Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

1969 Melbourne Transportation Plan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "1969 Melbourne Transportation Plan" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Congestion on theMonash Freeway

The1969 Melbourne Transportation Plan was aroad andrail transport plan forMelbourne, the state capital ofVictoria,Australia, instituted byHenry Bolte's state government. Most prominently, the plan recommended the provision of an extensivefreeway network, much of which has since been built.

Despite the majority of the printed material being devoted to non-car transport, 86 per cent of the projected budget was devoted to roads and parking, with only 14 per cent to other forms of transport.[1] The plan recommended 510 kilometres (320 mi) of freeways for metropolitan Melbourne, as well as a number of railways. Of the latter, only theCity Underground Loop was constructed. Proposed lines toDoncaster andMonash University (nowClayton Campus), and betweenDandenong andFrankston,[2] were never built.

The plan was described by J.M. Thompson inGreat Cities and their Traffic as "clearly ... a highway plan, not – as it is called – a comprehensive transport plan", and by historian Graeme Davison as "the most expansive and expensive freeway experiment in Australian history".[3]

In 1973, some freeway plans were pruned, especially those proposed for the inner city,[4] with State PremierRupert Hamer cancelling all the road reservations for the unbuilt urban freeways in 1976.[2]

Some significant outer suburban freeway projects, under new branding, were built by subsequent governments, includingCityLink (by theKennett government in the 1990s),EastLink (by theBracks government in the 2000s) andPeninsula Link (by theNapthine government in the 2010s).

Background

[edit]
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The plan consisted of three volumes:

  • Survey – completed for the Melbourne Transportation Committee byWilbur Smith & Associates and Len T Frazer & Associates
  • Parking – completed for the Melbourne Transportation Committee by Wilbur Smith & Associates and Len T. Frazer & Associates
  • The Transportation Plan – completed by the Melbourne Transportation Committee.

The scope of the plan specified surveys of vehicular and personal travel, transport facilities, goods movement by road and rail, and central city parking. It built on the previous major Melbourne Transport Plans:

  • 1929 Plan of General Development, Melbourne by the Metropolitan Town Planning Commission, and
  • 1954 Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Scheme by the Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works

and the minor

  • 1961 Metropolitan Street Service Study by Traffic Commission Victoria.

Goals

[edit]

The goals of the plan were to:

  • ensure safe, comfortable and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the design area
  • maintain a proper balance between public and private transport
  • make maximum use of the existing facilities and plans and the commitments already embodied in these plans
  • provide a transport service matched to the expectant demand throughout the design area
  • provide a system that could be adapted to meet changing conditions and be expanded beyond the design year
  • provide a transport network which could be implemented with as little interference to the commercial and community structure as possible

Funding

[edit]

The costs of the development of the plan were shared by the four participating authorities:

Minor contributions were provided byMelbourne City Council and the Transport Regulation Board.

Methodology

[edit]

The process adopted was:

  • Inventory of transport facilities, travel and developmental features of the study area
  • Forecast of 1985 travel requirements (estimated population of 3.7 million)
  • Evaluation of tentative 1985 plan
  • Periodic review

Organisation

[edit]

The organisation required to develop the plan included:

  • Metropolitan Transportation Committee – a statutory body established in 1963 to advise government on all transport factors (and produce the third volume of the plan)
  • Technical Committee – consisting of senior representatives of transportation and other authorities on the main committee, its job was to oversee all technical matters arising during surveys and preparation of the plan
  • Consultants – Wilbur Smith and Associates (fromNew Haven, Connecticut) and Len T Frazer and Associates (Melbourne)
  • Study Group – engineers who were assigned from participating authorities to be trained by the consultants and assist in data collection and analysis This group was expanded to include economists responsible for costing the final plan

Road

[edit]
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The plan proposed a budget of:

  • $1.675 billion for freeways
  • $64 million for divided arterial roads
  • $28 million on new arterial roads
  • $359 million on widening existing roads and bridges
  • $95 million for road/rail 80 grade separations

Major radial

[edit]

Minor radial

[edit]
  • F1 Collingwood Freeway (Originally to connect the F9 Freeway at Southbank to the F19 Freeway at Fitzroy, passing through East Melbourne and Collingwood) - Abandoned
  • F2 North Hume Freeway (Originally to connect the Dingley Freeway to the nowHume Freeway at Thomastown) - Northern section partly built connecting Hume Freeway & Metropolitan Ring Road. Southern section - Abandoned
  • F2 South Dingley Freeway - Partly built 1994–present, but not of freeway standard (Dandenong Bypass, South Road Extension andWestall Road Extension are part of theDingley Arterial Project)
  • F4 East Calder Freeway (Originally passing through thePascoe Vale Road Alignment to the F7 Freeway at Templestowe) - Abandoned
  • F5 East Greensborough Freeway - Partly built, but not of freeway standard (Greensborough Highway)
  • F5 West Metro Ring Road (Originally to pass through Essendon, Maribyrnong, East Sunshine and Footscray) - Partly built as theWestern Ring Road
  • F6 North Chandler Freeway (Originally to connect the F5 Ring Road at Lalor to the F9 Freeway at Glen Iris) - Abandoned
  • F6 South Nepean Freeway (Originally to connect the F9 Freeway at Glen Iris to the F35 Freeway at Frankston) – Partly built as theMornington Peninsula Freeway 1975–present
  • F9 EastHealesville Freeway - Not built
  • F12 Freeway (Originally through theBallarat Road Alignment) - Abandoned
  • F18 Freeway (Originally to connect the Northern Ring Road at Greensborough to the Eastern Freeway at Manningham) - Abandoned (SeeNorth East Link)
  • F35 SouthFrankston Freeway - Built 1962-1973

Inner city bypasses

[edit]
  • F9 Southern Bypass (Now known asCityLink), Built in 1997
  • F14 Western Bypass (Now known asCityLink), Built in 1997

Ring roads

[edit]

ANorth East Link between the eastern and northern ring roads was originally designed but construction has begun as of 2020 with major works to begin mid 2021.

Parking

[edit]

The plan included a proposed budget of $40 million for improvements in parking in the Melbourne central business district.

Buses

[edit]

The plan included a proposed budget $58 million for bus improvements:

  • $50 million for 2,540 new buses
  • $8 million for new bus depots

Rail

[edit]
Correct map
Diagram showing Melbourne's rail network, including former and planned lines

The forecast budget for railway projects was $242 million. Planned rail projects included:[5]

  • Melbourne Underground Rail Loop (estimated at $80 million and opened in stages from 1981)
  • Three new railway alignments and one extension (budgeted for $60 million):
  • $8 million for extension of suburban electric service along existing lines toWerribee (completed 1983),Rockbank (electrification toMelton to come),Sunbury (completed toSydenham in 2002, and Sunbury in 2012),Craigieburn (completed in 2007),Coldstream (line now closed),Hastings (not done) andMornington (line now closed)
  • $42 million forroute capacity improvements on existing lines (upgrades to automatic signalling, duplication of 19 miles (31 km) of single track and 33 miles (53 km) of new express tracks in existing rights of ways)
  • $2 million for new stations to be built on existing lines
  • $35 million on additional suburban trains
  • $15 million on modal interchanges (substantial increase in car and bus parking at suburban railway stations)

Trams

[edit]

The plan included a proposed budget $55 million for 910 new trams.

See also

[edit]

Adelaide:

Hobart:

References

[edit]
  1. ^Public Transport Users Association."Myth: They're not freeways, they're Integrated Transport Corridors". www.ptua.org.au. Retrieved18 July 2008.
  2. ^ab"Melbourne's Transport Task – an overview". www.melbourne.vic.gov.au. Archived fromthe original on 17 September 2006. Retrieved18 July 2008.
  3. ^Royce Millar (5 November 2005)."On the road to ... where?".The Age. Archived fromthe original on 23 August 2006. Retrieved18 July 2008. (via Google cache)
  4. ^"Issues and Trends: Transport"(PDF).Northern Central City Corridor Study. www.doi.vic.gov.au. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 30 July 2008. Retrieved18 July 2008.
  5. ^C L Fouvy."The Melbourne region's opportunity and need for rapid transit"(PDF). Railway Technical Society of Australasia. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 21 July 2008. Retrieved18 July 2008.

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1969_Melbourne_Transportation_Plan&oldid=1305289146"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp