 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 14North Carolina votes to theElectoral College | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County results Congressional district results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The1960 United States presidential election in North Carolina took place on November 8, 1960, as part of the1960 United States presidential election. North Carolina voters chose 14[2] representatives, or electors, to theElectoral College, who voted forpresident andvice president.
As a former Confederate state, North Carolina had a history ofJim Crow laws,disfranchisement of itsAfrican-American population and dominance of the Democratic Party in state politics. However, unlike the Deep South, the Republican Party always had sufficienthistoric Unionist white support fromthe mountains and northwestern Piedmont to gain minimally one-quarter and usually one-third of the statewide vote in general elections,[3] where turnout was higher than elsewhere in the former Confederacy due substantially to the state's early abolition ofthe poll tax in 1920.[4] LikeVirginia,Tennessee andOklahoma, the relative strength of Republican opposition meant that North Carolina never had statewidewhite primaries, although certain counties did use a white primary until it was banned bySmith v. Allwright.[5]
Following the banning of white primaries by the Supreme Court, North Carolina in 1948 offered less support to theDixiecrat bolt than any other former Confederate state, due to the economic liberalism of its Black Belt and solid Democratic party discipline due to consistent Republican opposition.[6] Although there was little satisfaction withHarry S. Truman during his second term,[7] the loyalty of the white voters of the state's Black Belt and the previously anti-Al SmithOuter Banks meant that unlike Texas, Florida and Virginia, urban middle-class Republican voting was inadequate to carry North Carolina forDwight D. Eisenhower in either 1952[8] or 1956. Aiding this failure was that the growing urban black electorate, which had increased from under ten percent of voting-age blacks in 1940 to about a quarter in 1956,[9] was much more favourable toAdlai Stevenson II than in other former Confederate states.[a] Inthe 1958 midterm elections, Republicans in the state legislature were reduced to their lowest ever representation of five seats, althoughCharles R. Jonasdid holdthe Tenth District.
North Carolina would largely escape the overt “Massive Resistance” seen in neighbouring Virginia,[11] and four of its congressmen did not sign theSouthern Manifesto.[12] Nonetheless, although the Greensboro school board voted 6–1 to desegregate within a day ofBrown,[13] no serious desegregation would occur until well into the 1960s, while two non-signers would be challenged and defeated in 1956 primaries.[b] With the likely nomination ofMassachusetts SenatorJohn F. Kennedy to counter Eisenhower's Catholic appeal inthe Northeast,[14] speculation emerged that the anti-Catholicism that turned North Carolina Republican in 1928 would again become a powerful force,[15] and many Baptist pastors in the state did raise the religious issue.[16]
During 1960, the state would be affected by theGreensboro sit-ins. Dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party on civil rights, as well as support for him amongst certain anti-Catholic groups, meant that incumbent vice-president and Republican nomineeRichard Nixon gained an enthusiastic reception when touring the state early in his fall campaign.[17] Polls in mid-October however favoured Kennedy,[18] and they continued to do so in the fourth week of the month.[19]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | John F. Kennedy | 713,136 | 52.11% | |
| Republican | Richard Nixon | 655,420 | 47.89% | |
| Total votes | 1,368,556 | 100% | ||
| County[20] | John F. Kennedy Democratic | Richard Nixon Republican | Margin | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Alamance | 13,599 | 47.86% | 14,818 | 52.14% | -1,219 | -4.28% | 28,417 |
| Alexander | 3,956 | 48.65% | 4,175 | 51.35% | -219 | -2.70% | 8,131 |
| Alleghany | 2,121 | 51.74% | 1,978 | 48.26% | 143 | 3.48% | 4,099 |
| Anson | 4,120 | 72.07% | 1,597 | 27.93% | 2,523 | 44.14% | 5,717 |
| Ashe | 4,477 | 48.14% | 4,823 | 51.86% | -346 | -3.72% | 9,300 |
| Avery | 1,047 | 20.05% | 4,176 | 79.95% | -3,129 | -59.90% | 5,223 |
| Beaufort | 6,039 | 69.15% | 2,694 | 30.85% | 3,345 | 38.30% | 8,733 |
| Bertie | 3,682 | 86.45% | 577 | 13.55% | 3,105 | 72.90% | 4,259 |
| Bladen | 4,353 | 70.13% | 1,854 | 29.87% | 2,499 | 40.26% | 6,207 |
| Brunswick | 4,305 | 59.63% | 2,915 | 40.37% | 1,390 | 19.26% | 7,220 |
| Buncombe | 23,303 | 45.39% | 28,040 | 54.61% | -4,737 | -9.22% | 51,343 |
| Burke | 10,015 | 43.66% | 12,925 | 56.34% | -2,910 | -12.68% | 22,940 |
| Cabarrus | 8,680 | 35.64% | 15,678 | 64.36% | -6,998 | -28.72% | 24,358 |
| Caldwell | 8,722 | 43.02% | 11,553 | 56.98% | -2,831 | -13.96% | 20,275 |
| Camden | 1,014 | 75.00% | 338 | 25.00% | 676 | 50.00% | 1,352 |
| Carteret | 5,264 | 53.95% | 4,493 | 46.05% | 771 | 7.90% | 9,757 |
| Caswell | 2,832 | 69.01% | 1,272 | 30.99% | 1,560 | 38.02% | 4,104 |
| Catawba | 13,491 | 41.35% | 19,135 | 58.65% | -5,644 | -17.30% | 32,626 |
| Chatham | 4,683 | 52.09% | 4,308 | 47.91% | 375 | 4.18% | 8,991 |
| Cherokee | 3,197 | 42.68% | 4,294 | 57.32% | -1,097 | -14.64% | 7,491 |
| Chowan | 1,920 | 78.27% | 533 | 21.73% | 1,387 | 56.54% | 2,453 |
| Clay | 1,264 | 43.27% | 1,657 | 56.73% | -393 | -13.46% | 2,921 |
| Cleveland | 10,545 | 56.08% | 8,257 | 43.92% | 2,288 | 12.16% | 18,802 |
| Columbus | 10,455 | 74.10% | 3,655 | 25.90% | 6,800 | 48.20% | 14,110 |
| Craven | 7,158 | 66.05% | 3,680 | 33.95% | 3,478 | 32.10% | 10,838 |
| Cumberland | 11,601 | 58.97% | 8,072 | 41.03% | 3,529 | 17.94% | 19,673 |
| Currituck | 1,651 | 78.06% | 464 | 21.94% | 1,187 | 56.12% | 2,115 |
| Dare | 1,247 | 54.10% | 1,058 | 45.90% | 189 | 8.20% | 2,305 |
| Davidson | 13,118 | 41.10% | 18,797 | 58.90% | -5,679 | -17.80% | 31,915 |
| Davie | 2,471 | 34.04% | 4,788 | 65.96% | -2,317 | -31.92% | 7,259 |
| Duplin | 7,269 | 71.11% | 2,953 | 28.89% | 4,316 | 42.22% | 10,222 |
| Durham | 19,298 | 57.40% | 14,322 | 42.60% | 4,976 | 14.80% | 33,620 |
| Edgecombe | 8,046 | 77.93% | 2,279 | 22.07% | 5,767 | 55.86% | 10,325 |
| Forsyth | 24,035 | 41.87% | 33,374 | 58.13% | -9,339 | -16.26% | 57,409 |
| Franklin | 5,081 | 82.10% | 1,108 | 17.90% | 3,973 | 64.20% | 6,189 |
| Gaston | 20,104 | 48.61% | 21,250 | 51.39% | -1,146 | -2.78% | 41,354 |
| Gates | 1,549 | 80.09% | 385 | 19.91% | 1,164 | 60.18% | 1,934 |
| Graham | 1,335 | 43.68% | 1,721 | 56.32% | -386 | -12.64% | 3,056 |
| Granville | 4,945 | 73.34% | 1,798 | 26.66% | 3,147 | 46.68% | 6,743 |
| Greene | 3,092 | 87.27% | 451 | 12.73% | 2,641 | 74.54% | 3,543 |
| Guilford | 30,486 | 42.43% | 41,357 | 57.57% | -10,871 | -15.14% | 71,843 |
| Halifax | 8,872 | 79.11% | 2,343 | 20.89% | 6,529 | 58.22% | 11,215 |
| Harnett | 7,892 | 59.82% | 5,301 | 40.18% | 2,591 | 19.64% | 13,193 |
| Haywood | 8,044 | 48.38% | 8,583 | 51.62% | -539 | -3.24% | 16,627 |
| Henderson | 4,611 | 29.85% | 10,835 | 70.15% | -6,224 | -40.30% | 15,446 |
| Hertford | 3,105 | 79.90% | 781 | 20.10% | 2,324 | 59.80% | 3,886 |
| Hoke | 2,106 | 77.94% | 596 | 22.06% | 1,510 | 55.88% | 2,702 |
| Hyde | 1,147 | 70.45% | 481 | 29.55% | 666 | 40.90% | 1,628 |
| Iredell | 8,973 | 42.61% | 12,085 | 57.39% | -3,112 | -14.78% | 21,058 |
| Jackson | 3,900 | 49.26% | 4,017 | 50.74% | -117 | -1.48% | 7,917 |
| Johnston | 9,914 | 59.82% | 6,660 | 40.18% | 3,254 | 19.64% | 16,574 |
| Jones | 1,920 | 76.65% | 585 | 23.35% | 1,335 | 53.30% | 2,505 |
| Lee | 4,673 | 64.58% | 2,563 | 35.42% | 2,110 | 29.16% | 7,236 |
| Lenoir | 8,126 | 68.96% | 3,658 | 31.04% | 4,468 | 37.92% | 11,784 |
| Lincoln | 6,728 | 49.68% | 6,816 | 50.32% | -88 | -0.64% | 13,544 |
| Macon | 3,098 | 45.34% | 3,735 | 54.66% | -637 | -9.32% | 6,833 |
| Madison | 4,546 | 50.69% | 4,422 | 49.31% | 124 | 1.38% | 8,968 |
| Martin | 5,826 | 88.77% | 737 | 11.23% | 5,089 | 77.54% | 6,563 |
| McDowell | 4,889 | 44.30% | 6,148 | 55.70% | -1,259 | -11.40% | 11,037 |
| Mecklenburg | 39,362 | 44.93% | 48,250 | 55.07% | -8,888 | -10.14% | 87,612 |
| Mitchell | 1,174 | 19.55% | 4,831 | 80.45% | -3,657 | -60.90% | 6,005 |
| Montgomery | 3,297 | 47.47% | 3,649 | 52.53% | -352 | -5.06% | 6,946 |
| Moore | 5,548 | 48.83% | 5,815 | 51.17% | -267 | -2.34% | 11,363 |
| Nash | 10,086 | 72.14% | 3,896 | 27.86% | 6,190 | 44.28% | 13,982 |
| New Hanover | 13,182 | 57.42% | 9,775 | 42.58% | 3,407 | 14.84% | 22,957 |
| Northampton | 4,756 | 87.52% | 678 | 12.48% | 4,078 | 75.04% | 5,434 |
| Onslow | 5,564 | 66.43% | 2,812 | 33.57% | 2,752 | 32.86% | 8,376 |
| Orange | 7,180 | 57.85% | 5,231 | 42.15% | 1,949 | 15.70% | 12,411 |
| Pamlico | 1,697 | 61.53% | 1,061 | 38.47% | 636 | 23.06% | 2,758 |
| Pasquotank | 4,530 | 71.26% | 1,827 | 28.74% | 2,703 | 42.52% | 6,357 |
| Pender | 2,744 | 68.29% | 1,274 | 31.71% | 1,470 | 36.58% | 4,018 |
| Perquimans | 1,460 | 69.62% | 637 | 30.38% | 823 | 39.24% | 2,097 |
| Person | 4,305 | 69.09% | 1,926 | 30.91% | 2,379 | 38.18% | 6,231 |
| Pitt | 12,526 | 78.37% | 3,458 | 21.63% | 9,068 | 56.74% | 15,984 |
| Polk | 2,762 | 49.16% | 2,856 | 50.84% | -94 | -1.68% | 5,618 |
| Randolph | 9,789 | 38.30% | 15,772 | 61.70% | -5,983 | -23.40% | 25,561 |
| Richmond | 8,293 | 71.63% | 3,285 | 28.37% | 5,008 | 43.26% | 11,578 |
| Robeson | 11,623 | 76.45% | 3,580 | 23.55% | 8,043 | 52.90% | 15,203 |
| Rockingham | 11,207 | 54.24% | 9,456 | 45.76% | 1,751 | 8.48% | 20,663 |
| Rowan | 12,919 | 42.16% | 17,726 | 57.84% | -4,807 | -15.68% | 30,645 |
| Rutherford | 8,554 | 48.75% | 8,993 | 51.25% | -439 | -2.50% | 17,547 |
| Sampson | 7,632 | 50.98% | 7,338 | 49.02% | 294 | 1.96% | 14,970 |
| Scotland | 3,643 | 74.01% | 1,279 | 25.99% | 2,364 | 48.02% | 4,922 |
| Stanly | 8,259 | 42.71% | 11,080 | 57.29% | -2,821 | -14.58% | 19,339 |
| Stokes | 4,487 | 47.94% | 4,872 | 52.06% | -385 | -4.12% | 9,359 |
| Surry | 8,185 | 44.92% | 10,035 | 55.08% | -1,850 | -10.16% | 18,220 |
| Swain | 2,171 | 50.69% | 2,112 | 49.31% | 59 | 1.38% | 4,283 |
| Transylvania | 3,388 | 44.53% | 4,221 | 55.47% | -833 | -10.94% | 7,609 |
| Tyrrell | 926 | 72.63% | 349 | 27.37% | 577 | 45.26% | 1,275 |
| Union | 7,393 | 64.72% | 4,030 | 35.28% | 3,363 | 29.44% | 11,423 |
| Vance | 5,694 | 73.89% | 2,012 | 26.11% | 3,682 | 47.78% | 7,706 |
| Wake | 26,050 | 58.56% | 18,436 | 41.44% | 7,614 | 17.12% | 44,486 |
| Warren | 2,997 | 80.69% | 717 | 19.31% | 2,280 | 61.38% | 3,714 |
| Washington | 2,415 | 70.16% | 1,027 | 29.84% | 1,388 | 40.32% | 3,442 |
| Watauga | 3,440 | 40.66% | 5,020 | 59.34% | -1,580 | -18.68% | 8,460 |
| Wayne | 7,856 | 58.93% | 5,474 | 41.07% | 2,382 | 17.86% | 13,330 |
| Wilkes | 7,986 | 38.02% | 13,016 | 61.98% | -5,030 | -23.96% | 21,002 |
| Wilson | 8,021 | 72.03% | 3,114 | 27.97% | 4,907 | 44.06% | 11,135 |
| Yadkin | 2,785 | 27.70% | 7,268 | 72.30% | -4,483 | -44.60% | 10,053 |
| Yancey | 3,310 | 50.20% | 3,284 | 49.80% | 26 | 0.40% | 6,594 |
| Totals | 713,136 | 52.11% | 655,420 | 47.89% | 57,716 | 4.22% | 1,368,556 |
North Carolina was won by Kennedy (D–Massachusetts), running with SenatorLyndon B. Johnson, with 52.11 percent of the popular vote against Nixon's 47.89 percent.[21][22]
Despite suspected hostility the state towards Kennedy's Catholicism, only in the traditionally Democratic parts ofAppalachia and the previously extremely solid eastern part of the state did Kennedy decline uponAdlai Stevenson II’s 1956 performance,[20] whilst Kennedy even gained in the Outer Banks where 1928 anti-Catholicism had been strongest. At the same time, the collapse of a long-standing political machine during the 1950s meant thatMadison County, previously one of the strongest Republican bastions in the state, voted Democratic for the first time since 1876,[23] whilst nearbyHaywood County andJackson County were the only counties to flip from Stevenson to Nixon.
Kennedy was helped crucially by the increasing black voter registration that was totalling almost a third of the voting-age black population at the time of the election: it is estimated he received about seven-eighths of black voters in the urban precincts where they were concentrated,[10] producing a substantial part of his sixty thousand vote statewide majority.
State and district results of the1960 United States presidential election | ||
|---|---|---|
|  | |
.jpg)
