Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

1935 college football rankings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1935 college football rankings
Season1935
Bowl season1935–36 bowl games
End of season championsMinnesota[a];SMU[b];Princeton[c];TCU[d];LSU[e]
college football rankings
← 1934
1936 →

The1935 college football rankings included(1) aUnited Press (UP) poll of sports writers,(2) a poll of sports editors conducted by the committee responsible for awarding theToledo Cup to the nation's top college football team, and the(3)Boand,(4)Dickinson, and(5)Houlgate Systems. TheMinnesota Golden Gophers (8–0), led by head coachBernie Bierman, were selected as national champions in the UP poll, the Toledo Cup voting, and the Boand System. TheSMU Mustangs (12–0 prior to losing the1936 Rose Bowl), led by consensus All-AmericansBob Wilson andJ. C. Wetsel, were selected as national champions by Dickinson and Houlgate.

Champions (by ranking)

[edit]

Major rankings (both contemporary and retroactive) have varied in who they identify as the season champion(s). Schools identified as 1935 season champions by at least one such ranking include: Minnesota, LSU, Princeton, SMU, and TCU as season champions:[1]

Note: Associated Press rankings, Boand System, Dickinson System, Dunkel System, Houlgate System, Litkenhous Ratings, Poling System, Toledo Cup, and Williamson System were given contemporarily. All other methods were given retroactively.

Associated Press rankings

[edit]

Weekly top ten rankings were published by the Associated Press news service throughout the season.[4] The rankings were made by Associated Press sports editorAlan Gould.[4][2]

Gould's final rankings on December 3, 1935, declared a three-way tie for first between SMU, Princeton, and Minnesota.[2] Controversy surrounding his selections lead Gould to instead poll the nation's sportswriters in subsequent years; thus theAP Poll would officially begin in1936.[4]

Rank[2]Team
1SMU
Princeton
Minnesota
4LSU
TCU
6Stanford
7Ohio State
8North Carolina
9California
10Fordham

United Press poll

[edit]

At the end of the regular season, theUnited Press (UP) polled 141 sports writers from all sections of the country. Each writer was asked to rank the top ten teams, and the UP then assigned points with ten points being awarded to a first-place vote, nine points for a second-place vote, etc.[5][6] The leaders in the poll were:

RankTeamPoints1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th
1Minnesota1,3669834100000000
2SMU1,24630683012000020
3Princeton1,0081220521416142602
4TCU790021236322620426
5Ohio State76401016222414281682
6Stanford720226163640141068
7LSU629058201824181684
8Notre Dame459016121281826248
9California29200020820282828
10Pittsburgh1380000324122214

The following teams were ranked below the top 10:

11.Fordham
12.North Carolina
13.Duke
14.Holy Cross
15.Auburn
16.Northwestern
17.Alabama
18. (tie)Army,Iowa,UCLA
21. (tie)Nebraska,Ohio
23. (tie)Marquette,Washington,Saint Mary's
26. (tie)Temple,Dartmouth,NYU

Toledo Cup

[edit]

TheToledo Cup was presented to the college football national champion. Overseen by a committee includingwestbrook Pegler,Avery Brundage,Gustavus Kirby,Lynn St. John,Wilbur C. Smith,Stewart Edward White, andTheodore Roosevelt Jr., the Toledo Cup award was based on input from a judge's committee of 250 sports editors of leading newspapers.

A preliminary vote was taken in December 1935 with the following results:

1. Minnesota - 840 points
2. Princeton - 379 points
3. SMU - 347 points
4. TCU - 71 points
5. Ohio State - 52 points
6. LSU - 24 points
7. Notre Dame - 23 points
8. Stanford - 22 points
9. California - 9 points
10. Pittsburgh - 2 points
11. (tie) Dartmouth, Alabama, Northwestern, and Saint Mary's - 1 point each[7]

The final vote of the committee was taken in January 1936 with the following results:

1. Minnesota - 168 votes
2. SMU - 46 votes
3. Princeton - 22 votes
[8]

It was Minnesota's second consecutive year winning the Toledo Cup.[9]

Boand System

[edit]

TheBoand System was a mathematical rating system, also known as the "Azzi Ratem" system, developed by W. F. Boand. The Boand ratings released in early December 1935 were as follows:

1. Minnesota - 170 points
2. SMU - 165 points
3. Princeton - 160 points
4. Ohio State - 159 points
5. LSU - 157 points
6. Notre Dame - 152 points
7. California - 151 points
8. TCU - 149 points
9. Pittsburgh - 147 points
10. Stanford - 144 points
11. Nebraska - 143 points
12. Auburn - 142 points

[10]

Dickinson System

[edit]

TheDickinson System was a mathematical rating system devised byUniversity of Illinois economics professor Frank G. Dickinson. In his 1935 rankings, Dickinson weighted each team's performance based on the strength of the conferences, reported as follows: Big Ten (+3.78), SWC (+3.31), East (0.00), Pacific Coast (-0.11), SEC (-0.12), Big Six (-1.95) and Southern (-6.15)[11] The final Dickinson System rankings for 1935 were released in December 1935, prior to SMU's loss to Stanford in the Rose Bowl. Dickinson ranked the top 11 teams as follows:[12]

1.SMU (12-0) - 28.01 points
2.Minnesota (8-0) - 27.35 points
3.Princeton (9-0) - 26.00 points
4.LSU (9-1-1) - 24.03 points
5. (tie)Stanford (7-1) - 23.11 points
5. (tie)California (9-1) - 23.11 points
7.Ohio State (7-1) - 22.21 points
8.TCU (10-1) - 22.01 points
9.Notre Dame (7-1-1) - 21.66 points
10.UCLA (8-2) - 21.25 points
11.Fordham (6-1-2) - 20.89 points

Northwestern, North Carolina, and Dartmouth followed.

Houlgate

[edit]

In early December 1935, Deke Houlgate released hisHoulgate System rankings as follows:

1. SMU
2. Princeton
3. LSU
4. California
5. Minnesota
6. TCU
7. Notre Dame
8. Tie:Holy Cross (9–0–1), Ohio State, Stanford
11. Pittsburgh
12. Tie:Fordham (6–1–2),Rice (8–3)
14. Tie: Duke, UCLA
16. North Carolina
17. Alabama
18.Auburn
19.Marquette (7–1)
20.Michigan State (6–2)
21.NYU (7–1)
22.Nebraska (6–2–1)
23. Tie:Catholic University (8–1),Furman (8–1)
25.Villanova (7–2)
26.Saint Mary's (5–2–2)
27. Tie:Army (6–2–1),Mississippi State (8–3)
29. Tie:Bucknell (6–3),Temple (7–3)
31. Tie:Oregon (6–3),Syracuse (6–1–1)
33.Vanderbilt (7–3–1)
34.Maryland (7–2–2)
35.Ole Miss (9–3)
36.Iowa (4–2–2)
37.Dartmouth (8–2)
38.Baylor (8–3)
39. Tie:Detroit (6–3),Yale (6–3)
41.Northwestern (4–3–1)
42.Clemson (6–3)
43.Georgia (6–4)
44. Tie:Colgate (7–3), Washington
46. Tie:NC State (6–4),Tulane (6–4)
48.Duquesne (6–3)
49.Boston College (6–3)
50. Tie:Indiana (4–3–1),Michigan (4–4),Navy (5–4),Penn State (4–4), Western Maryland

[13]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^perBoand System,Litkenhous Ratings,Poling System,Toledo Cup,Billingsley Report,College Football Researchers Association,Helms Athletic Foundation,National Championship Foundation; co champion (alongside Princeton and SMU) perAssociated Press ranking (byAlan Gould)
  2. ^perDickinson System,Houlgate System,Berryman QPRS,Sagarin Ratings Elo chess method, andSagarin Ratings Predictor method; co champion (alongside Minnesota and Princeton) perAssociated Press ranking (byAlan Gould)
  3. ^perDunkel System; co-champion (alongside Minnesota and SMU) perAssociated Press ranking (byAlan Gould)
  4. ^co-champion (alongside LSU) perWilliamson System
  5. ^co-champion (alongside TCU) perWilliamson System
  6. ^byAlan Gould

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Football Bowl Subdivision Records"(PDF).NCAA. 2017. p. 112. RetrievedJuly 29, 2025.
  2. ^abcdGould, Alan (December 3, 1935). Written at New York."Associated Press Rates Grid Teams — Mustangs, Tigers, Gophers Are Ranked as Equal All Unbeaten".The Duncan Eagle. Duncan, Oklahoma. Associated Press. RetrievedMay 16, 2023.
  3. ^Putnam, Herbert S. (December 23, 1935)."Athletic H-A-S-H".Fremont Tribune. Fremont, Nebraska. RetrievedSeptember 8, 2022.
  4. ^abcNissenson, Herschel (December 29, 1985)."Half a Century Later, Football Poll Still Causing Controversy".Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. RetrievedMay 16, 2023.
  5. ^George Kirksey (December 12, 1935)."Minnesota Is Voted Mythical National Grid Championship".Buffalo Evening News. United Press. p. 40 – viaNewspapers.com.
  6. ^George Kirksey (December 12, 1935)."Minnesota Voted No. 1 Football Eleven".The Anniston Star. p. 16 – viaNewspapers.com.
  7. ^"Minnesota, Princeton and Mustangs Lead for the Toledo Cup".St. Louis Post-Dispatch. December 22, 1935. p. 3D – viaNewspapers.com.
  8. ^"Trophy To Minnesota: Wins Toledo Cup Again, Symbolical of Gridiron Championship".The Emporia Daily Gazette. January 17, 1936. p. 10 – viaNewspapers.com.
  9. ^"Toledo Cup Goes To Gophers".The Minneapolis Tribune. January 18, 1936. p. 18 – viaNewspapers.com.
  10. ^"Gophers Rated Tops By Boand, Cards Are 10th".The Arizona Daily Star. December 6, 1935. p. 10 – viaNewspapers.com.
  11. ^"Dickinson System Rates Mustangs Champions of U.S.."Alton (Ill.) Evening Telegraph Dec. 10, 1935, p10
  12. ^"So. Methodist Rated No. 1 by Dickinson".The Chicago Daily Tribune. December 10, 1935. p. 21 – viaNewspapers.com.
  13. ^"Scoopin' Em Up".The Greenville NEws. December 10, 1935. p. 9 – viaNewspapers.com.
Pre-divisional
NCAA University Division
NCAA Division I
NCAA Division I-A/FBS
NCAA Division I-AA/FCS
Small college
NCAA Division II
NCAA Division III
Polls
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1935_college_football_rankings&oldid=1320180329"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp