 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The1928 United States presidential election in Florida was held on November 6, 1928, as part of the1928 United States presidential election held throughout all contemporary forty-eight states. Florida voters chose six electors, or representatives tothe Electoral College, who voted forpresident andvice president.
Ever sincethe disfranchisement of blacks at the beginning of the 1890s, Florida had been a one-party state ruled by the Democratic Party. The disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites bypoll taxes in 1889[1] had left the Republican Party – between 1872 and 1888 dependent upon black votes – virtually extinct. With the single exception ofWilliam Howard Taft's win inCalhoun County in 1908[2] the Democratic Party won every county in Florida in every presidential election from 1892[a] until 1916. Only twice – and never for more than one term – did any Republican serve in either house of the state legislature between 1896 and 1928. Despite this Democratic dominance and the restrictions on the franchise of the poorer classes due to the poll tax, significant socialist movements were to develop and persist inTampa[3] and to a lesser extent over other parts of the state, especially against the powerfulKu Klux Klan.[4] There was also a powerful Prohibitionist movement in olderNorth Florida, which saw theProhibition Party even win the governorship for one term under the notorious anti-Catholic ministerSidney J. Catts, who was later to be a major foe of Alfred Emmanuel Smith.[5]
The 1920 presidential election sawWarren Harding, aided substantially by isolationist sentiment in the region,[6] gain more support in the former Confederacy than any Republican since black disfranchisement, in the process winning three Florida counties.[2]Calvin Coolidge in 1924 was to do no more than maintain these gains, but did show that the presidential GOP vote from transplanted Northerners was equal to or greater than the traditionalUnionist GOP vote (which Florida entirely lacked) ofTexas,Arkansas,Alabama orGeorgia.[6]
During the months between the beginning of the campaign and the actual vote, a number of newspapers – including theOrlando Sentinel and theSt. Petersburg Times – utilized voting machines to take a sample ballot.[7] All these polls, in spite of the fact that the newspapers in question favored Smith, gave large majorities to Hoover, in the case of theTimes by over two-to-one. Despite these polls, Smith campaigners took a long time to realize the danger that he would not carry the traditional "Solid South".[8]
After a heated campaign in which he had played little part, Herbert Hoover won Florida against Al Smith by 42,404 votes or by a margin of 16.71 percentage points.[9] Vis-à-vis the 1924 election, swings of up to 100 percentage points occurred in the westernPanhandlepineywoods, where opposition to Smith's Catholic religion reached the fanatical,[10] and Hoover also gained from increased Republican voting by northern migrants inMiami,Tampa,Fort Lauderdale,Sarasota andJacksonville, along with the growth of an urban middle class in those cities.[10] This was the first time since 1876 that the state voted Republican. The1928 US presidential election would be the first time that Florida would become a crucial bellwether state in presidential elections: from 1928 and on, the winner of the presidential election has carried the state in every election except in1960, in1992, and in2020.[11]
In contrast, the counties of the central and eastern Panhandle remained loyal to Smith, who still carried ten counties in this region, all over thirty-five percent nonvotingAfrican-American, by three-to-one or larger majorities, because they saw party regularity as essential to preservingwhite supremacy against African Americans.[12] However, unlike Alabama and Georgia, Florida lacked the strength to counter anti-Catholic voting – which was indeed stronger than in most other parts of the white South – with the result that Hoover gained his largest margin among the five Confederate states he carried.
| Presidential candidate | Party | Home state | Popular vote | Electoral vote | Running mate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Percentage | Vice-presidential candidate | Home state | Electoral vote | ||||
| Herbert Hoover | Republican | California | 144,168[b] | 56.83% | 6 | Charles Curtis | Kansas | 6 |
| Al Smith | Democrat | New York | 101,764 | 40.12% | 0 | Joseph Taylor Robinson | Arkansas | 0 |
| Norman Thomas | Socialist | New York | 4,036[b] | 1.59% | 0 | James Maurer | Pennsylvania | 0 |
| William Z. Foster | Communist | Illinois | 3,704[b] | 1.46% | 0 | Benjamin Gitlow | New York | 0 |
| — | Write-ins | — | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Total | 253,674 | 100% | 6 | 6 | ||||
| Needed to win | 266 | 266 | ||||||
| County | Herbert Clark Hoover Republican | Alfred Emmanuel Smith Democratic | Various candidates Other parties | Margin | Total votes cast[13] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Alachua | 1,824 | 45.51% | 1,965 | 49.03% | 219 | 5.46% | -141 | -3.52% | 4,008 |
| Baker | 676 | 72.38% | 242 | 25.91% | 16 | 1.71% | 434 | 46.47% | 934 |
| Bay | 974 | 44.27% | 1,190 | 54.09% | 36 | 1.64% | -216 | -9.82% | 2,200 |
| Bradford | 534 | 43.73% | 679 | 55.61% | 8 | 0.66% | -145 | -11.88% | 1,221 |
| Brevard | 1,830 | 62.12% | 1,063 | 36.08% | 53 | 1.80% | 767 | 26.04% | 2,946 |
| Broward | 2,889 | 63.63% | 1,564 | 34.45% | 87 | 1.92% | 1,325 | 29.19% | 4,540 |
| Calhoun | 409 | 35.02% | 727 | 62.24% | 32 | 2.74% | -318 | -27.23% | 1,168 |
| Charlotte | 593 | 55.73% | 441 | 41.45% | 30 | 2.82% | 152 | 14.29% | 1,064 |
| Citrus | 505 | 37.77% | 816 | 61.03% | 16 | 1.20% | -311 | -23.26% | 1,337 |
| Clay | 1,088 | 72.05% | 394 | 26.09% | 28 | 1.85% | 694 | 45.96% | 1,510 |
| Collier | 151 | 37.01% | 256 | 62.75% | 1 | 0.25% | -105 | -25.74% | 408 |
| Columbia | 418 | 24.36% | 1,276 | 74.36% | 22 | 1.28% | -858 | -50.00% | 1,716 |
| Dade | 15,860 | 60.15% | 10,136 | 38.44% | 372 | 1.41% | 5,724 | 21.71% | 26,368 |
| De Soto | 1,382 | 64.04% | 748 | 34.66% | 28 | 1.30% | 634 | 29.38% | 2,158 |
| Dixie | 463 | 57.52% | 342 | 42.48% | 0 | 0.00% | 121 | 15.03% | 805 |
| Duval | 16,919 | 63.39% | 9,316 | 34.91% | 454 | 1.70% | 7,603 | 28.49% | 26,689 |
| Escambia | 4,443 | 53.32% | 3,772 | 45.27% | 118 | 1.42% | 671 | 8.05% | 8,333 |
| Flagler | 325 | 58.14% | 219 | 39.18% | 15 | 2.68% | 106 | 18.96% | 559 |
| Franklin | 334 | 44.30% | 417 | 55.31% | 3 | 0.40% | -83 | -11.01% | 754 |
| Gadsden | 346 | 22.31% | 1,184 | 76.34% | 21 | 1.35% | -838 | -54.03% | 1,551 |
| Gilchrist | 125 | 22.73% | 392 | 71.27% | 33 | 6.00% | -267 | -48.55% | 550 |
| Glades | 331 | 53.73% | 281 | 45.62% | 4 | 0.65% | 50 | 8.12% | 616 |
| Gulf | 156 | 34.98% | 275 | 61.66% | 15 | 3.36% | -119 | -26.68% | 446 |
| Hamilton | 167 | 16.83% | 741 | 74.70% | 84 | 8.47% | -574 | -57.86% | 992 |
| Hardee | 2,087 | 70.06% | 826 | 27.73% | 66 | 2.22% | 1,261 | 42.33% | 2,979 |
| Hendry | 337 | 54.18% | 266 | 42.77% | 19 | 3.05% | 71 | 11.41% | 622 |
| Hernando | 661 | 47.79% | 701 | 50.69% | 21 | 1.52% | -40 | -2.89% | 1,383 |
| Highlands | 1,393 | 66.52% | 669 | 31.95% | 32 | 1.53% | 724 | 34.57% | 2,094 |
| Hillsborough | 11,703 | 52.98% | 9,993 | 45.24% | 392 | 1.77% | 1,710 | 7.74% | 22,088 |
| Holmes | 2,260 | 74.44% | 735 | 24.21% | 41 | 1.35% | 1,525 | 50.23% | 3,036 |
| Indian River | 847 | 55.61% | 657 | 43.14% | 19 | 1.25% | 190 | 12.48% | 1,523 |
| Jackson | 1,398 | 35.43% | 2,516 | 63.76% | 32 | 0.81% | -1,118 | -28.33% | 3,946 |
| Jefferson | 235 | 20.22% | 919 | 79.09% | 8 | 0.69% | -684 | -58.86% | 1,162 |
| Lafayette | 135 | 23.48% | 435 | 75.65% | 5 | 0.87% | -300 | -52.17% | 575 |
| Lake | 3,383 | 68.08% | 1,474 | 29.66% | 112 | 2.25% | 1,909 | 38.42% | 4,969 |
| Lee | 2,058 | 63.17% | 1,154 | 35.42% | 46 | 1.41% | 904 | 27.75% | 3,258 |
| Leon | 630 | 24.72% | 1,888 | 74.07% | 31 | 1.22% | -1,258 | -49.35% | 2,549 |
| Levy | 711 | 46.23% | 797 | 51.82% | 30 | 1.95% | -86 | -5.59% | 1,538 |
| Liberty | 147 | 39.20% | 226 | 60.27% | 2 | 0.53% | -79 | -21.07% | 375 |
| Madison | 266 | 25.70% | 769 | 74.30% | 0 | 0.00% | -503 | -48.60% | 1,035 |
| Manatee | 2,705 | 63.87% | 1,472 | 34.76% | 58 | 1.37% | 1,233 | 29.11% | 4,235 |
| Marion | 1,927 | 49.75% | 1,863 | 48.10% | 83 | 2.14% | 64 | 1.65% | 3,873 |
| Martin | 703 | 58.05% | 474 | 39.14% | 34 | 2.81% | 229 | 18.91% | 1,211 |
| Monroe | 1,142 | 36.93% | 1,899 | 61.42% | 51 | 1.65% | -757 | -24.48% | 3,092 |
| Nassau | 863 | 65.13% | 445 | 33.58% | 17 | 1.28% | 418 | 31.55% | 1,325 |
| Okaloosa | 1,385 | 72.70% | 503 | 26.40% | 17 | 0.89% | 882 | 46.30% | 1,905 |
| Okeechobee | 657 | 68.87% | 287 | 30.08% | 10 | 1.05% | 370 | 38.78% | 954 |
| Orange | 6,524 | 70.04% | 2,616 | 28.08% | 175 | 1.88% | 3,908 | 41.95% | 9,315 |
| Osceola | 1,760 | 60.25% | 1,127 | 38.58% | 34 | 1.16% | 633 | 21.67% | 2,921 |
| Palm Beach | 5,298 | 64.23% | 2,652 | 32.15% | 298 | 3.61% | 2,646 | 32.08% | 8,248 |
| Pasco | 1,591 | 54.26% | 1,308 | 44.61% | 33 | 1.13% | 283 | 9.65% | 2,932 |
| Pinellas | 10,545 | 74.52% | 3,439 | 24.30% | 167 | 1.18% | 7,106 | 50.22% | 14,151 |
| Polk | 7,460 | 60.23% | 4,576 | 36.94% | 350 | 2.83% | 2,884 | 23.28% | 12,386 |
| Putnam | 2,105 | 63.01% | 1,156 | 34.60% | 80 | 2.39% | 949 | 28.40% | 3,341 |
| St. John's | 1,939 | 36.65% | 3,307 | 62.50% | 45 | 0.85% | -1,368 | -25.86% | 5,291 |
| St. Lucie | 983 | 55.88% | 741 | 42.13% | 35 | 1.99% | 242 | 13.76% | 1,759 |
| Santa Rosa | 1,628 | 73.97% | 541 | 24.58% | 32 | 1.45% | 1,087 | 49.39% | 2,201 |
| Sarasota | 1,603 | 56.46% | 1,181 | 41.60% | 55 | 1.94% | 422 | 14.86% | 2,839 |
| Seminole | 1,788 | 58.89% | 1,187 | 39.10% | 61 | 2.01% | 601 | 19.80% | 3,036 |
| Sumter | 1,152 | 55.60% | 909 | 43.87% | 11 | 0.53% | 243 | 11.73% | 2,072 |
| Suwannee | 606 | 31.68% | 1,286 | 67.22% | 21 | 1.10% | -680 | -35.55% | 1,913 |
| Taylor | 465 | 38.05% | 739 | 60.47% | 18 | 1.47% | -274 | -22.42% | 1,222 |
| Union | 177 | 25.69% | 503 | 73.00% | 9 | 1.31% | -326 | -47.31% | 689 |
| Volusia | 6,648 | 67.78% | 3,043 | 31.03% | 117 | 1.19% | 3,605 | 36.76% | 9,808 |
| Wakulla | 66 | 12.18% | 470 | 86.72% | 6 | 1.11% | -404 | -74.54% | 542 |
| Walton | 1,475 | 61.36% | 908 | 37.77% | 21 | 0.87% | 567 | 23.59% | 2,404 |
| Washington | 1,672 | 69.72% | 671 | 27.98% | 55 | 2.29% | 1,001 | 41.74% | 2,398 |
| Totals | 145,860 | 57.87% | 101,764 | 40.37% | 4,444 | 1.76% | 44,096 | 17.49% | 252,068 |
With all other prominent Democrats sitting the election out,[14] the party nominatedAlfred E. Smith, four-termGovernor of New York as its nominee for 1928, with little opposition. There was nonetheless almost no pro-Smith sympathy in Florida, which as part of the "Solid South" had been a major force in his1924 defeat.[15] This defeat was related to four characteristics of Smith that made him anything but an ideal candidate for Southern Democrats: he was a devout Catholic, opposed toProhibition, linked with New York City'sTammany Hall political machine, and the son of Irish and Italian immigrants. HisWall Street connections also had Smith viewed by poorer Southern whites as a "Gold Democrat".[16] Whilst it is generally thought that the South would have accepted a man possessingone of those characteristics,[17] the combination proved a bitter dose for many of Florida's loyal Democrats. Many Florida Protestants believed Smith's election would endanger religious liberty and lead tothe Pope controlling the White House.[15]
More critically, theSouthern Baptist Convention similarly said that
We enter into a sacred covenant and solemn pledge that we will support for the office of President, or any other office, only such men as stand for our present order of prohibition.[18]
Much of this anti-Smith political program was led by the Jacksonville Baptist Association, joined by the Indian River Missionary Baptist Association, Seminole Baptist Association, Peace River Baptist Association, Alachua Baptist Association, and the Florida Baptist Association in issuing similar resolutions at their 1928 annual meetings.[19] TheMethodist Episcopal Church took the same viewpoint,[20] and it was Bishop James Cannon who stood behind militant "drys" to organize the "Anti-Smith Democrats" inAsheville,North Carolina, pledging to keep the country dry against Smith's support of modifying theVolstead Act.
The leader of the defense of Smith wasSenatorDuncan Upshaw Fletcher who argued that Smith was a "throroughgoing Democrat" and that the Republican Party was the party who had, in typical "Solid South" style, denounced the Southern people as rebels and traitors.[21]
Echoing this, several Florida judges said it would be better to have a Catholic with some religion in the White House than a Republican with none.[15] Smith's strongest supporter, Chief Justice William H. Ellis, also argued that the GOP was hypocritical in its support for Prohibition,[22] and that because religious tests for elective office were forbidden by the Constitution, Smith would be unable to fill these offices with only Catholics. For Ellis, the election of Smith was the only way the Democratic Party could maintain itself. TheSuwanee Democrat indeed argued that Hoover'sQuaker faith meant he could not be elected President[23] because it believed that Hoover's religious would not permit him to fight for his country and commanded racial equality in a state whose electorate was all-white.[24]
State and district results of the1928 United States presidential election | ||
|---|---|---|
|  | |
