Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

1884 United States presidential election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For related races, see1884 United States elections.

1884 United States presidential election

← 1880
November 4, 1884
1888 →

401 members of theElectoral College
201 electoral votes needed to win
Turnout77.5%[1]Decrease 1.9pp
 
NomineeGrover ClevelandJames G. Blaine
PartyDemocraticRepublican
Home stateNew YorkMaine
Running mateThomas A. HendricksJohn A. Logan
Electoral vote219182
States carried2018
Popular vote4,914,4824,856,905
Percentage48.8%48.3%


President before election

Chester A. Arthur
Republican

Elected President

Grover Cleveland
Democratic

Presidential elections were held in theUnited States on November 4, 1884.Democratic GovernorGrover Cleveland ofNew York narrowly defeatedRepublicanJames G. Blaine ofMaine, ending a streak of six consecutive Republican victories.

Cleveland won the presidential nomination on the second ballot of the1884 Democratic National Convention. PresidentChester A. Arthur had acceded to the presidency in 1881 following theassassination of James A. Garfield, but he was unsuccessful in his bid for nomination to a full term. Blaine, who had served as Secretary of State under President Garfield, defeated Arthur and other candidates on the fourth ballot of the1884 Republican National Convention. A group of reformist Republicans known as "Mugwumps" abandoned Blaine's candidacy, viewing him as corrupt. The campaign was characterized bymudslinging and personal allegations that eclipsed substantive issues, such as civil administration change, and it was marred by exceptional political acrimony and personal invective. Blaine's reputation for public corruption and his inadvertent last minute alienation ofCatholic voters proved decisive, as well as voter exhaustion after a generation of Republican rule.

In the election, Cleveland won 48.8% of the nationwide popular vote and 219electoral votes, carrying theSolid South and several keyswing states. Blaine won 48.3% of the popular vote and 182 electoral votes. Cleveland won his home state by just 1,149 votes. Two third-party candidates,John St. John of theProhibition Party andBenjamin Butler of theGreenback Party and theAnti-Monopoly Party, each won less than 2% of the popular vote.

Marking an interruption in the era when Republicans largely controlled the presidency betweenReconstruction and theGreat Depression, Cleveland (who would be elected to another non-consecutive term in 1892) was the first Democrat elected president sinceJames Buchanan in1856, the first to hold office sinceAndrew Johnson left the White House in 1869, and the last to hold office untilWoodrow Wilson, who began his first term in 1913. Blaine became the only Republican nominee in the 52-year period from1860 to1912 never to win a presidential election, and he was the last former secretary of state to be nominated by a major political party until2016.

Nominations

[edit]

Democratic Party nomination

[edit]
Main article:1884 Democratic National Convention
Democratic Party (United States)
Democratic Party (United States)
1884 Democratic Party ticket
Grover ClevelandThomas A. Hendricks
for Presidentfor Vice President
28th
Governor of New York
(1883–1885)
16th
Governor of Indiana
(1873–1877)
Campaign

The Democrats convened in Chicago on July 8–11, 1884, with New York Governor Grover Cleveland as clear frontrunner, the candidate of northern reformers and sound-money men (as opposed to inflationists). AlthoughTammany Hall bitterly opposed his nomination, the machine represented a minority of the New York delegation. Its only chance to block Cleveland was to break the unit rule, which mandated that the votes of an entire delegation be cast for only one candidate, and this it failed to do.Daniel N. Lockwood from New York placed Cleveland's name in nomination. But this rather lackluster address was eclipsed by the seconding speech ofEdward S. Bragg from Wisconsin, who roused the delegates with a memorable slap at Tammany. "They love him, gentlemen," Bragg said of Cleveland, "and they respect him, not only for himself, for his character, for his integrity and judgment and iron will, but they love him most of all for the enemies he has made." As the convention rocked with cheers, Tammany bossJohn Kelly lunged at the platform, screaming that he welcomed the compliment.

On the first ballot, Cleveland led the field with 392 votes, more than 150 votes short of the nomination. Trailing him wereThomas F. Bayard from Delaware, 170;Allen G. Thurman from Ohio, 88;Samuel J. Randall from Pennsylvania, 78; andJoseph E. McDonald from Indiana, 56; with the rest scattered. Randall then withdrew in Cleveland's favor. This move, together with the Southern bloc scrambling aboard the Cleveland bandwagon, was enough to put him over the top of the second ballot, with 683 votes to 81.5 for Bayard and 45.5 forThomas A. Hendricks from Indiana. Hendricks was nominated unanimously for vice president on the first ballot afterJohn C. Black,William Rosecrans, andGeorge Washington Glick withdrew their names from consideration.[2]

Republican Party nomination

[edit]
Main article:1884 Republican National Convention
Republican Party (United States)
Republican Party (United States)
1884 Republican Party ticket
James G. BlaineJohn A. Logan
for Presidentfor Vice President
28th
U.S. Secretary of State
(1881)
U.S. Senator
fromIllinois
(1871–1877 & 1879–1886)
Chester A. Arthur, the incumbent president in 1884, whose term expired on March 4, 1885

The1884 Republican National Convention was held inChicago, Illinois, on June 3–6, with former Secretary of State James G. Blaine from Maine,President Arthur, and SenatorGeorge F. Edmunds from Vermont as the frontrunners. Though he was still popular, Arthur did not make a serious bid for a full-term nomination, knowing that his increasing health problems meant he would probably not survive a second term (he ultimately died in November 1886). Blaine led on the first ballot, with Arthur second, and Edmunds third. This order did not change on successive ballots as Blaine increased his lead, and he won a majority on the fourth ballot. After nominating Blaine, the convention chose SenatorJohn A. Logan from Illinois as the vice-presidential nominee. Blaine remains the only presidential nominee ever to come from Maine.[3]

FamedCivil War generalWilliam Tecumseh Sherman was considered a possible Republican candidate, but ruled himself out with what has become known as theSherman pledge: "If drafted, I will not run; if nominated, I will not accept; if elected, I will not serve."Robert Todd Lincoln,Secretary of War of the United States, and son of the past PresidentAbraham Lincoln, was also strongly courted by politicians and the media of the day to seek the presidential or vice-presidential nomination, but Lincoln was as averse to the nomination as Sherman.

Other parties and candidates

[edit]

Anti-Monopoly Party nomination

[edit]

Anti-Monopoly candidates:

TheAnti-Monopoly National Convention assembled in the Hershey Music Hall in Chicago, Illinois on May 14.[4] The party had been formed to express opposition to the business practices of the emerging nationwide companies. There were around 200 delegates from 16 states, but 61 of them were from Michigan and Illinois.

Alson Streeter was the temporary chairman and John F. Henry was the permanent chairman.

Benjamin Butler was nominated for president on the first ballot. Delegates from New York, Washington, D.C., and Maryland bolted the convention when it appeared that no discussion of other candidates would be allowed.Allen G. Thurman andJames B. Weaver were put forward as alternatives to Butler, but Weaver declined, not wishing to run another national campaign for political office, and Thurman generated little enthusiasm. Butler, while far from opposed to the nomination, hoped to be nominated by the Democratic or Republican party, or at least in the case of the former, to make its platform more favorable to greenbacks. Ultimately only theGreenback Party endorsed his candidacy.

The convention chose not to nominate a candidate for vice president, hoping that other conventions would endorse a similar platform and name a suitable vice-presidential nominee.[5]: 55  The committee ultimately nominatedAbsolom Madden West as their vice-presidential candidate.[6]: 56 

Presidential Ballot[6]: 56 
Ballot1st
Benjamin Butler124
Allen G. Thurman[a]2
Solon Chase1

Greenback Party nomination

[edit]
Main article:1884 Greenback National Convention

Greenback candidates:

The third Greenback National Convention assembled inEnglish's Opera House in Indianapolis, Indiana. Delegates from 28 states and theDistrict of Columbia were in attendance. The convention nominated formerMassachusettsGovernor Benjamin Butler for president over party chairman Jesse Harper on the first ballot.MississippiState SenatorAbsolom M. West was nominated unanimously for vice president. The ticket was subsequently adopted by the Anti-Monopoly Party.

Butler initially hoped to organizefusion tickets with the minority party in each state, a strategy designed to capitalize on the cross-partisan popularity of many elements of the candidate's program. The Greenbacks succeeded in negotiating fusion arrangements with the Democrats inIowa,Michigan, andNebraska and with the Republicans inMissouri andWest Virginia. The fusion electors agreed to divide their votes between Butler and Cleveland, or Butler and Blaine, in proportion to the statewide popular vote for each candidate; however, the fusion ticket was not elected in any state, and Butler received no votes in the Electoral College.[7][8]

Presidential Ballot[6]: 57 
Ballot1st
Benjamin Butler323
Jesse Harper98
Solon Chase2
Edward Phelps Allis1
David Davis0

American Prohibition Party nomination

[edit]

The American Prohibition Party held its national convention in the YMCA building in Chicago, Illinois. There were 150 delegates, including many non-voting delegates. The party sought to merge the reform movements ofanti-masonry,prohibition,anti-polygamy, and direct election of the president into a new party.Jonathan Blanchard was a major figure within the party. He traveled throughout northern states in the spring and gave an address entitled "The American Party – Its Principles and Its Claims."

During the convention, the party name was changed from the American Party to the American Prohibition Party. The party had been known as the Anti-Masonic Party in 1880. Many of the delegates at the convention were initially interested in nominatingJohn St. John, the former governor of Kansas, but it was feared that such a nomination might cost him that of the Prohibition Party, which he was actively seeking. Party leaders met withSamuel C. Pomeroy, a former senator from the same state who was the convention's runner-up for the nomination, and at Pomeroy's suggestion they agreed to withdraw the ticket from the race should St. John win the Prohibition Party nomination. Nominated alongside Pomeroy was John A. Conant from Connecticut.

St. John later unanimously won the Prohibition Party nomination, with Pomeroy and Conant withdrawing from the presidential contest and endorsing him. TheNew York Times speculated that the endorsement would "give him 40,000 votes".[9]

Prohibition Party nomination

[edit]
Main article:1884 Prohibition National Convention

The fourth Prohibition Party National Convention assembled in Lafayette Hall, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. There were 505 delegates from 31 states and territories at the convention. The national ticket was nominated unanimously: John St. John for president andWilliam Daniel for vice president. The straightforward single-issueProhibition Party platform advocated the criminalization ofalcoholic beverages.[6]: 58 

Presidential Ballot[5]: 56 
Ballot1st
John St. John505

Equal Rights Party nomination

[edit]

Dissatisfied with resistance by the men of the major parties to women's suffrage, a small group of women announced the formation in 1884 of theEqual Rights Party.

The Equal Rights Party held its national convention in San Francisco, California, on September 20. The convention nominatedBelva Ann Lockwood, an attorney inWashington, D.C., for president. ChairmanMarietta Stow, the first woman to preside over a national nominating convention, was nominated for vice president.[6]: 57 [5]: 56 

Lockwood agreed to be the party's presidential candidate even though most women in the United States did not yet have the right to vote. She said, "I cannot vote but I can be voted for." She was the first woman to run a full campaign for the office (Victoria Woodhull conducted a more limited campaign in1872). The Equal Rights Party had no treasury, but Lockwood gave lectures to pay for campaign travel. She received approximately 4,194 votes nationally.[10]

General election

[edit]

Campaign

[edit]
Campaign poster attacking Cleveland's morals

The issue of personal character was paramount in the 1884 campaign. Blaine had been prevented from getting the Republican presidential nomination during the previous two elections because of the stigma of the "Mulligan letters": in 1876, a Boston bookkeeper named James Mulligan had located some letters showing that Blaine had sold his influence in Congress to various businesses. One such letter ended with the phrase "burn this letter", from which a popular chant of the Democrats arose – "Burn, burn, burn this letter!" In just one deal, he had received $110,150 (over $1.5 million in 2010 dollars) from the Little Rock and Fort Smith Railroad for securing a federal land grant, among other things. Democrats and anti-Blaine Republicans made unrestrained attacks on his integrity as a result.Cleveland, on the other hand, was known as "Grover the Good" for his personal integrity; in the space of the three previous years he had become successively the mayor ofBuffalo, New York, and then the governor of the state of New York, cleaning up large amounts of Tammany Hall'sgraft.

This campaign poster purports to show the area of land grants to railroads

CommentatorJeff Jacoby notes that, "Not since George Washington had a candidate for president been so renowned for his rectitude."[11] In July the Republicans found a refutation buried in Cleveland's past. Aided by sermons from a minister named George H. Ball, they charged that Cleveland had fathered an illegitimate child while he was a lawyer in Buffalo. When confronted with the scandal, Cleveland immediately instructed his supporters to "Above all, tell the truth." Cleveland admitted to paying child support in 1874 to Maria Crofts Halpin, the woman who claimed he fathered her child, named Oscar Folsom Cleveland after Cleveland's friend and law partner, but asserted that the child's paternity was uncertain.[12] Shortly before election day, the Republican media published an affidavit from Halpin in which she stated that until she met Cleveland her "life was pure and spotless," and "there is not, and never was, a doubt as to the paternity of our child, and the attempt of Grover Cleveland, or his friends, to couple the name of Oscar Folsom, or any one else, with that boy, for that purpose is simply infamous and false."[13] In a supplemental affidavit, Halpin also implied Cleveland had raped her, hence the conception of their child.[13][14] Republican cartoonists across the land had a field day.[15][16][17][18][19][20]

Cleveland's campaign decided thatcandor was the best approach to this scandal: it admitted that Cleveland had formed an "illicit connection" with the mother and that a child had been born and given the Cleveland surname. They also noted that there was no proof that Cleveland was the father, and claimed that, by assuming responsibility and finding a home for the child, he was merely doing his duty. Finally, they showed that the mother had not been forced into an asylum; her whereabouts were unknown. Blaine's supporters condemned Cleveland in the strongest of terms, singing "Ma, Ma, Where's my Pa?"[21] (After Cleveland's victory, Cleveland supporters would respond to the taunt with: "Gone to the White House, Ha, Ha, Ha.") However, the Cleveland campaign's damage control worked well enough and the race remained a tossup through Election Day. The greatest threat to the Republicans came from reformers called "Mugwumps" who were angrier at Blaine's public corruption than at Cleveland's private affairs.[22]

Results by county explicitly indicating the percentage of the winning candidate in each county. Shades of blue are for Cleveland (Democratic), shades of red are for Blaine (Republican), shades of green are for Butler (Straight Greenback), and shades of yellow are for bolting electors (Whig Republican).

In the final week of the campaign, the Blaine campaign suffered a catastrophe. At a Republican meeting attended by Blaine, a group of New York preachers castigated the Mugwumps. Their spokesman,Reverend Dr. Samuel Burchard, said, "We are Republicans, and don't propose to leave our party and identify ourselves with the party whose antecedents have beenrum,Romanism, andrebellion." Blaine did not notice Burchard's anti-Catholic slur, nor did the assembled newspaper reporters, but a Democratic operative did, and Cleveland's campaign managers made sure it was widely publicized. The statement energized the Irish and Catholic vote in New York City heavily against Blaine, costing him New York state and the election by a narrow margin.

In addition to Burchard's statement, it is also believed that John St. John's campaign was responsible for winning Cleveland the election in New York. Since Prohibitionists tended to ally more with Republicans, the Republican Party attempted to convince St. John to drop out. When they failed, they resorted toslandering him. Because of this, he redoubled his efforts in upstate New York, where Blaine was vulnerable on his prohibition stance, and took votes away from the Republicans.[23]

Results

[edit]

35.6% of the voting age population and 78.3% of eligible voters participated in the election.[24]

While the results remained broadly the same as those from 1880, Cleveland narrowly won three states (New York,Indiana, andConnecticut) thatJames A. Garfield had won, while Blaine won two states (California andNevada) thatWinfield Hancock had won. But most of those states had relatively small numbers of electoral votes, and Cleveland's victory in New York was decisive. Cleveland won by a slightly larger margin than Garfield (0.57% compared to 0.11%) in the popular vote, but a slightly smaller margin in the Electoral College (29 votes to 59). Cleveland became the first Democrat to ever win without Pennsylvania, California, Nevada, and Illinois. Pennsylvania voted for the losing candidate for the first time since 1824, and the loser of the popular vote since 1800.

The result marked an electoral breakthrough for the Prohibition Party, who had been little more than a fringe party in the previous three elections. While they never seriously challenged for the presidency and had only limited success in congressional and state-level elections, they regularly earned at least a percentage point of the popular vote (and occasionally finished third in that vote) in presidential elections for the next three decades before declining back to fringe status after the passage of theEighteenth Amendment in 1919. By contrast, Butler earned less than half the popular vote share thatJames B. Weaver had won in 1880, accelerating the decline of the Greenback Party. This was the last presidential election the party contested; it collapsed after failing to nominate a ticket in 1888.

This election was one of only four U.S. presidential elections, held since the Democrats and Republicans became the two major parties in U.S. politics, in which the winner did not carry any of the threeRust Belt states ofMichigan,Pennsylvania, andWisconsin; the others were1916,2000, and2004.[25]

16.08% of Blaine's votes came from the eleven states of the former Confederacy, with him taking 40.15% of the vote in that region.[26]

InBurke County, Georgia, 895 votes were cast for bolting "Whig Republican" electors for president (they were not counted for Blaine).[27] The Republicans won in 20 of the 33 cities with populations over 50,000 outside the southern U.S.[28]

Electoral results
Presidential candidatePartyHome statePopular voteElectoral
vote
Running mate
CountPercentageVice-presidential candidateHome stateElectoral vote
Grover ClevelandDemocraticNew York4,914,48248.85%219Thomas A. HendricksIndiana219
James G. BlaineRepublicanMaine4,856,90348.28%182John A. LoganIllinois182
John St. JohnProhibitionKansas147,4821.50%0William DanielMaryland0
Benjamin ButlerGreenback/Anti-MonopolyMassachusetts134,2941.33%0Absolom M. WestMississippi0
Belva Ann LockwoodEqual RightsWashington, D.C.4,1940.04%0Marietta StowCalifornia0
Other3,5760.04%Other
Total10,060,145100%401401
Needed to win201201

Source (Popular Vote):Leip, David."1884 Presidential Election Results".Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. RetrievedJuly 27, 2005.

Source (Electoral Vote):"Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996".National Archives and Records Administration. RetrievedJuly 31, 2005.

Popular vote
Cleveland
48.85%
Blaine
48.28%
St. John
1.50%
Butler
1.33%
Others
0.09%
Electoral vote
Cleveland
54.61%
Blaine
45.39%

Geography of results

[edit]
  • Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote
    Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote

Cartographic gallery

[edit]
  • Map of presidential election results by county
    Map of presidential election results by county
  • Map of Democratic presidential election results by county
    Map of Democratic presidential election results by county
  • Map of Republican presidential election results by county
    Map of Republican presidential election results by county
  • Map of "other" presidential election results by county
    Map of "other" presidential election results by county

Results by state

[edit]

Source: Data fromWalter Dean Burnham,Presidential ballots, 1836–1892 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955) pp 247–57.[29]

States/districts won byCleveland/Hendricks
States/districts won byBlaine/Logan
Grover Cleveland
Democratic
James Blaine
Republican
John St. John
Prohibition
Benjamin Butler
Greenback
MarginState Total
Stateelectoral
votes
#%electoral
votes
#%electoral
votes
#%electoral
votes
#%electoral
votes
#%#
Alabama1092,73660.371059,44438.696100.407620.5033,29221.67153,624AL
Arkansas772,73457.83751,19840.701,8471.4721,53617.12125,779AR
California889,28845.33102,36951.9782,9651.512,0371.03−13,081−6.64196,988CA
Colorado327,72341.6836,08454.2537561.141,9562.94−8,361−12.5766,519CO
Connecticut667,18248.95665,89848.012,4931.821,6841.231,2840.94137,257CT
Delaware316,95756.55312,95343.20640.21100.034,00413.3529,984DE
Florida431,76952.96428,03146.73720.123,7386.2359,990FL
Georgia1294,66765.921248,60333.841950.141450.1046,06432.08143,610GA
Illinois22312,35146.43337,46950.172212,0741.7910,7761.60−25,118−3.73672,670IL
Indiana15245,00549.4615238,48948.153,0280.618,8101.786,5161.32495,332IN
Iowa13177,31647.01197,08952.25131,4990.40−19,773−5.24377,201IA
Kansas990,13233.90154,40658.0894,4951.6916,3466.15−64,274−24.18265,848KS
Kentucky13152,96155.3213118,69042.933,1391.141,6910.6134,27112.40276,481KY
Louisiana862,59457.22846,34742.373380.311200.1116,24714.85109,399LA
Maine652,15339.9772,21755.3462,1601.663,9553.03−20,064−15.38130,491ME
Maryland896,86652.07885,74846.102,8271.525780.3111,1185.98186,019MD
Massachusetts14122,35240.33146,72448.36149,9233.2724,3828.04−24,372−8.03303,383MA
Michigan13189,36147.20192,66948.021318,4034.597530.19−3,308−0.82401,186MI
Minnesota770,06536.87111,68558.7874,6842.473,5831.89−41,620−21.90190,017MN
Mississippi977,65364.34943,03535.6634,61828.68120,688MS
Missouri16236,02353.4916203,08146.022,1640.4932,9427.47441,268MO
Nebraska554,39140.5376,91257.3152,8992.16−22,521−16.78134,202NE
Nevada35,57843.597,19356.213260.20−1,615−12.6212,797NV
New Hampshire439,19846.3443,25451.1441,5801.875540.65−4,056−4.8084,586NH
New Jersey9127,79848.989123,44047.316,1592.363,4961.344,3581.67260,921NJ
New York36563,15448.2536562,00548.1525,0062.1417,0041.461,1490.101,167,169NY
North Carolina11142,90553.2511125,02146.594300.1617,8846.66268,356NC
Ohio23368,28046.94400,08250.992311,0691.415,1790.66−31,802−4.05784,610OH
Oregon324,60446.7026,86050.9934920.937261.38−2,256−4.2852,682OR
Pennsylvania30392,78543.46478,80452.973015,2831.6916,9921.88−86,019−9.52903,864PA
Rhode Island412,39137.8119,03058.0749282.834221.29−6,639−20.2632,771RI
South Carolina969,84575.25921,73023.4148,11551.8492,812SC
Tennessee12133,77051.4512124,10147.741,1500.449570.379,6693.72259,978TN
Texas13225,30969.261393,14128.633,5341.093,3211.02132,16840.63325,305TX
Vermont417,33129.1839,51466.5241,7532.957851.32−22,183−37.3459,401VT
Virginia12145,49151.0512139,35648.901300.056,1352.15284,977VA
West Virginia667,31150.94663,09647.759390.717990.604,2153.19132,145WV
Wisconsin11146,45345.79161,13550.38117,6492.394,5981.44−14,682−4.59319,835WI
TOTALS:4014,914,48248.852194,856,90348.28182150,8901.50134,2941.3357,5790.5710,060,145US

States that flipped from Democratic to Republican

[edit]

States that flipped from Republican to Democratic

[edit]

Close states

[edit]

Margin of victory less than 1% (55 electoral votes):

  1. New York, 0.10% (1,149 votes) (tipping point state)
  2. Michigan, 0.82% (3,308 votes)
  3. Connecticut, 0.94% (1,284 votes)

Margin of victory between 1% and 5% (117 electoral votes):

  1. Indiana, 1.32% (6,516 votes)
  2. New Jersey, 1.67% (4,358 votes)
  3. Virginia, 2.15% (6,135 votes)
  4. West Virginia, 3.19% (4,215 votes)
  5. Tennessee, 3.72% (9,669 votes)
  6. Illinois, 3.73% (25,118 votes)
  7. Ohio, 4.05% (31,802 votes)
  8. Oregon, 4.28% (2,256 votes)
  9. Wisconsin, 4.59% (14,682 votes)
  10. New Hampshire, 4.80% (4,056 votes)

Margin of victory between 5% and 10% (104 electoral votes):

  1. Iowa, 5.24% (19,773 votes)
  2. Maryland, 5.98% (11,118 votes)
  3. Florida, 6.23% (3,738 votes)
  4. California, 6.64% (13,081 votes)
  5. North Carolina, 6.66% (17,884 votes)
  6. Missouri, 7.47% (32,942 votes)
  7. Massachusetts, 8.03% (24,372 votes)
  8. Pennsylvania, 9.52% (86,019 votes)

See also

[edit]
Dance card cover depicting the candidates

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Published sources disagree on how many votes Thurman received on the ballot. Hinshaw claims he received 7 votes, but Havel finds only 2.

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections".The American Presidency Project.UC Santa Barbara.
  2. ^William DeGregorio,The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents, Gramercy 1997
  3. ^‘What States do Presidents Come From?’
  4. ^"Today in labor history:Anti-Monopoly Party founded". People's World. May 14, 2014. RetrievedFebruary 13, 2021.
  5. ^abcHinshaw, Seth (2000).Ohio Elects the President: Our State's Role in Presidential Elections 1804-1996. Mansfield: Book Masters, Inc.
  6. ^abcdeHavel, James T. (1996).U.S. Presidential Elections and the Candidates: A Biographical and Historical Guide. Vol. 2: The Elections,1789–1992. New York: Simon & Schuster.ISBN 0-02-864623-1.
  7. ^National Contest: Containing Portraits and Biographies of our National Favorites. Chicago. 1888. p. 127.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  8. ^Fuller, William D. (September 25, 1884)."Butler in Michigan".Iowa Plain Dealer.
  9. ^"Withdraws in Favor of St. John"(PDF).New York Times. August 28, 1884.Archived(PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. RetrievedJuly 9, 2014.
  10. ^Soden, Suzanne (February 1997)."Belva A. Lockwood Collection [1830–1917]". New York State Library.Archived from the original on October 9, 2023.
  11. ^Jeff Jacoby, "'Grover the good' — the most honest president of them all",Boston Globe, February 15. 2015.
  12. ^Henry F. Graff (2002).Grover Cleveland: The American Presidents Series: The 22nd and 24th President, 1885–1889 and 1893–1897. Henry Holt and Company. pp. 61–63.ISBN 9780805069235.
  13. ^abLachman, Charles (2014).A Secret Life. Skyhorse Publishing. pp. 285–288.
  14. ^Bushong, William; Chervinsky, Lindsay (2007)."The Life and Presidency of Grover Cleveland".White House History.
  15. ^Glen Jeansonne, "Caricature and Satire in the Presidential Campaign of 1884."Journal of American Culture (1980) 3#2 pp: 238–244.Online
  16. ^"Maria Halpin's Affidavit"(PDF).Democrat and Chronicle (Rochester, NY). October 31, 1884. p. 1.Archived(PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
  17. ^Daily Gazette (Fort Wayne, Indiana) Nov. 1, 1884. p. 5
  18. ^Topeka Daily Capital (Topeka, Kansas) Nov. 1, 1884. p. 4
  19. ^"That Scandal".Wichita Daily Eagle (Wichita, Kansas). November 2, 1884. p. 2. RetrievedJuly 30, 2014.
  20. ^Cedar Rapids Evening Gazette, (Cedar Rapids, Iowa). October 31, 1884. p. 3
  21. ^Tugwell, 90[full citation needed]
  22. ^Geoffrey T. Blodgett, "The Mind of the Boston Mugwump."Mississippi Valley Historical Review (1962): 614–634.in JSTOR
  23. ^"HarpWeek | Elections | 1884 Overview". Elections.harpweek.com. RetrievedJuly 9, 2014.
  24. ^Abramson, Aldrich & Rohde 1995, p. 99.
  25. ^Brownstein, Ronald (September 16, 2024)."Why these three states are the most consistent tipping point in American politics". CNN. RetrievedSeptember 16, 2024.
  26. ^Sherman 1973, p. 263.
  27. ^An American Almanac and Treasury of Facts, Statistical, Financial, and Political, for the year 1886., Ainsworth R. Spofford,https://books.google.com/books?id=1ZcYAAAAIAAJ (pg. 207)
  28. ^Murphy, Paul (1974).Political Parties In American History, Volume 3, 1890-present.G. P. Putnam's Sons.
  29. ^"1884 Presidential General Election Data – National". RetrievedMay 7, 2013.

Works cited

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Davies, Gareth; Zelizer, Julian E, eds. (2015).America at the Ballot Box.doi:10.9783/9780812291360.ISBN 9780812291360.
  • Hirsch, Mark. "Election of 1884", inHistory of Presidential Elections: Volume III 1848–1896, ed. Arthur Schlesinger and Fred Israel (1971), 3:1578.
  • Josephson, Matthew (1938).The Politicos: 1865–1896.
  • Keller, Morton (1977).Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America.doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674181885.ISBN 9780674181885.
  • Kleppner, Paul (1979).The Third Electoral System 1853–1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures.
  • Lynch, G. Patrick (2002). "U.S. Presidential Elections in the Nineteenth Century: Why Culture and the Economy Both Mattered".Polity.35:29–50.doi:10.1086/POLv35n1ms3235469.S2CID 157740436.
  • Norgren, Jill.Belva Lockwood: The Woman Who Would be President (2007).online version, focus on 1884
  • Morgan, H. Wayne (1969).From Hayes to McKinley: National Party Politics, 1877–1896.
  • James Ford Rhodes (1920).History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 to the Roosevelt-Taft Administration (8 vols.).
  • Summers, Mark Wahlgren.Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion: The Making of a President, 1884(2000) online versionArchived November 23, 2011, at theWayback Machine
  • "1884 Election Cleveland v. Blaine Overview",HarpWeek, July 26, 2008.
  • Roberts, North (2004).Encyclopedia of Presidential Campaigns, Slogans, Issues, and Platforms.
  • Thomas, Harrison Cook,The return of the Democratic Party to power in 1884 (1919)online

Primary sources

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toUnited States presidential election, 1884.
Life
Presidencies
Public image
Family
State and district results of the1884 United States presidential election
Electoral map, 1884 election
Democratic Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Republican Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Third party andindependent candidates
Greenback/
Anti-Monopoly
Prohibition Party
Equal Rights Party
Elections by year
18th century
19th century
20th century
21st century
Elections by state
Primaries and caucuses
Nominating conventions
Electoral College
and popular vote
Related
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1884_United_States_presidential_election&oldid=1336772056"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp