| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
County results Everett: 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% Morton: 50-60% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
The1835 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 9.
Acting Whig GovernorSamuel T. Armstrong ran for re-election to a full term in office, but was defeated for the Whig nomination byEdward Everett. In the general election, Armstrong ran without party support but finished a distant third behind Everett and DemocratMarcus Morton.
GovernorJohn Davis resigned in March after his election to the United States Senate, to succeed the retiringNathaniel Silsbee.[1]
The Whig convention nominatedEdward Everett.[2] Despite the suggestions of Everett, SenatorDaniel Webster, and Senator Davis, acting Governor Samuel T. Armstrong would not stand aside, and remained in the race.[1]
The Anti-Masonic convention nominated Everett as well, recalling his earlier "martyrdom" for the anti-Masonic cause.[2]
However, the party nominated the Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor, William Foster, over WhigGeorge Hull, ostensibly because Hull was a Mason. The party also endorsedMartin Van Buren for the presidency in 1836 overDaniel Webster, though some anti-Masons embraced Webster.[2]
Everett was somewhat distressed by the Anti-Masonic campaign in his name, which was conducted byBenjamin F. Hallett and suggested that Everett supportedMartin Van Buren over moderate DemocratHugh Lawson White for president in 1836. However, Everett resolved not to involve himself in Democratic politics on the advice ofCaleb Cushing. The Democratic press joined Hallett's campaign, likely to draw Anti-Masonic votes away from the Whigs and into the Democratic camp.[3]
A separate campaign was conducted byGeorge Bancroft to draw the Working Men's Party vote, which was largely rural and Western, to Marcus Morton. Morton's campaign was largely based on "radical" egalitarian opposition to aristocratic rule in the state.[4]
In total, the state was divided among the Everett Whigs, Armstrong Whigs, Everett Anti-Masons, Van Buren Anti-Masons, "integrant" Van Buren Democrats, agrarian Democrats, and finally a dissatisfied "Free Bridge" group drawing from all parties.[5]
Everett won easily, but Morton gained his largest support yet. Despite Everett's nominal endorsement, Morton succeeded in drawing away many anti-Masonic voters and consolidated nearly all of the Working Men's support, which had gone for Samuel Allen in the previous two elections. Morton's running mate, running with the explicit Anti-Masonic endorsement, outpolled him by another 5,000 votes.[6]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whig | Edward Everett | 37,555 | 57.86% | ||
| Democratic | Marcus Morton | 25,227 | 38.87% | ||
| Whig | Samuel T. Armstrong (incumbent) | 1,901 | 2.93% | N/A | |
| Write-in | 220 | 0.34% | |||
| Total votes | 64,903 | 100.00% | |||