Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

1769 English cricket season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cricket season review

Cricket tournament
1769 English cricket season
1768
1770

The1769 Englishcricket season was the last in which the originalLondon Cricket Club and theArtillery Ground feature prominently in the records. Details have of eleven matches are known.[note 1]

The increasing stature of theHambledon Club was encouraging a shift in focus from the Artillery Ground towardsBroadhalfpenny Down, which became a significant venue through the 1770s. The process may have been accelerated by Hambledon'sinnings victory overSurrey in September. The highlight of this match was one of the earliest knowncentury opening partnerships, betweenTom Sueter andGeorge Leer of Hambledon, described by a contemporary reporter as "remarkable". Elsewhere,John Minshull scored the first definitely recordedcentury in the sport's history.

Kent v London

[edit]

Kent andLondon played each other three times in August.[5] The first match was inBlackheath, and Kent won by 47 runs. According to theMiddlesex Journal: "Greenwich, Woolwich and Deptford beat the Artillery Club of London by 47 notches".[6] The other two matches took place on theArtillery Ground. In the first of these, London won by 56 runs,and a report said: "A great match at cricket was played in the Artillery Ground, for a very large sum of money (i.e., £20,000), and great bets depending, between eleven gentlemen of London and eleven of Kent : the match not being played out, they began again yesterday at two in the afternoon; when the Londoners beat by 56 notches".[7] The last match was played on Saturday, 26 August, and Kent won by 6 wickets.[6]

Hambledon v Caterham

[edit]

TheHambledon andCaterham clubs met 29 June onBroadhalfpenny Down, and 31 July to 1 August atGuildford Bason.[5] The result of the first is unknown, and Hambledon won the second by 4 wickets. A report of the game in theReading Mercury on Saturday, 5 August reads: "On Monday last began to be played at Guildford, in Surrey, the decisive grand match at cricket between the Hambledon and Caterham Clubs, which, after a long and vigorous contest, was determined on Tuesday evening in favour of the former. The utmost activity and skill in the game was displayed by each individual through the whole course of this match, but particularly the batting of MessrsSmall andBayton on the Hambledon team. There were near 20,000 spectators, and it is generally allowed by the best judges to have been the finest match that ever was played".[6]

The Hambledon team was: MrThomas Ridge,William Hogsflesh,Thomas Brett,Peter Stewart,Richard Nyren, John Small, John Bayton, Glazier,Thomas Sueter, Purdy, andWilliam Barber.[6]

The Caterham team was: MrHenry Rowett, Bellchambers,Lumpy Stevens,Page,Joseph Miller, Smailes,John Wood,Will Palmer, Shepherd,Thomas Quiddington, and Wessing.[6]

A report in theWhitehall Evening Post on Tuesday, 8 August states: "Guildford. The benefit arising to this town by the last great match at Cricket has set many projections on foot for more sport of that sort. They talk of a match soon for £1,000 a side between acertain Duke against All England". John Sackville had succeeded to his title on 6 January 1769.[6]

TheMiddlesex Journal dated Thurs 3 August states: "The afternoon of the first day was wet; the close of play scores were: Caterham, 104 ; Hambledon, 51 for 4". As this was the "decisive grand match", it leaves open the question of another one played between the "first match" on 29 June (see above) and this one.[6]

On 28 September, Hambledon playedSurrey on Broadhalfpenny Down.[8] Hambledon won by aninnings and 41 runs.[9] It is possible that Surrey was Caterham again, because a newspaper report said: "the second great match of cricket was played on Broad-halfpenny". The reporter went on to say: "What is very remarkable, the two first mates on the Hambledon team (Sueter and Leer) fetched 128 before they were parted". This is the sport's second knowncentury partnership, and the first in which thebatters' names are known:Tom Sueter andGeorge Leer.[9]

Berkshire v Surrey

[edit]

Berkshire played their first eleven-a-side match as an individual county team on 8 June, when they hostedSurrey onDatchet Common.[5] The match was reported by theSt James Chronicle on Tuesday, 13 June. Surrey won by 6 runs.[6]

Duke of Dorset's XI v Wrotham

[edit]

Although this was certainly a minor match, it has a place in cricket history becauseJohn Minshull, whose name was given as Minchin on the scoresheet, scored 107 for Dorset's XI in the secondinnings—the firstcentury in any class of cricket that has definitely been recorded.[10][11]

Other events

[edit]

Monday, 8 May. Coulsdon & Caterham v England atSmitham Bottom, Croydon. Result unknown. The exact venue was to be a field belonging to theRed Lion at Smitham Bottom, and it was aWhitsuntide event.[6]

Thursday, 6 July. TheMiddlesex Journal reported: "Yesterday a Mr. Carter, a very eminent butcher ofGrub Street, but of a corpulent body, was playing at Cricket in the Artillery Ground, making a stroke at the ball which he missed, he threw himself round with so great force that he broke his knee pan (knee cap). He was carried home, with little hope of ever recovering the use of his leg again".[6]

Thursday, 20 July. TheWhitehall Evening Post reported: "Nothing can exceed the vogue that Cricket has in some parts ofSurrey andHampshire: the people are so fond of it that it is common for them to ride 40 miles to be mere spectators at a Cricket match. A few days ago 22 expert players played a match not far fromGodalming when each team got the same number of notches at both innings, which was esteemed very extraordinary".[6]

Monday, 24 July. TheReading Mercury published a letter from "An old Cricket Player" concerning: "A Reading v. Sonning match on Bulmarsh Heath on Fri., 21 July, complaining of the latter’s unfair tactics. Sonning batted first and made 86: Reading then made 187, sacrificing their last five wickets: Sonning then made 125 which put them 24 ahead. There had been a bet between a player on each team on their total individual scores. The Sonning player made 9 the first innings, and between 60 & 70 the second : the Reading player having made 41 the first innings could not exceed the other's total as only 25 runs were wanted to win the match. There was a dispute over that, but finally the Reading player agreed to go in for the game. Sonning at first refused to play or to pay the money, although there was nearly an hour to go; they finally went into the held, and 'by throwing the ball about, out of the way' so delayed the game that it could not be played out".[6]

Tuesday, 1 August. TheWhitehall Evening Post reported: "We are informed that the great match at Cricket, which has been so long in agitation, will be decided one day next week on the downs atCalais. On this match near £5,000 is depending : the players are to be all English men".[6]

Saturday, 26 August.Middlesex v London inStanmore.[5] TheBath Chronicle reported this on Thursday, 31 August, and said: "London beat Middlesex for 50 guineas".[6]

Friday, 22 September.West Kent v Surrey onSevenoaks Vine[5] was announced the previous day in theSt James Chronicle, but no report of the matchhas been found. West Kent was then the Duke of Dorset's team.[6]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Some eleven-a-side matches played from 1772 to 1863 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources.[1] However, the term only came into common use around 1864, whenoverarm bowling was legalised. It was formally defined as a standard by a meeting atLord's, in May 1894, ofMarylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and thecounty clubs which were then competing in theCounty Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have noofficial definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective.[2] Matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have anunofficial first-class status.[3] Pre-1864 matches which are included inthe ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as important or, at least, historically significant.[4] For further information, seeFirst-class cricket.

References

[edit]
  1. ^"FC Matches in England in 1772". CricketArchive. Retrieved29 November 2025.
  2. ^Wisden (1948).Preston, Hubert (ed.).Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (85th ed.). London: Sporting Handbooks Ltd. p. 813.OCLC 851705816.
  3. ^ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
  4. ^ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
  5. ^abcdeACS 1981, p. 23.
  6. ^abcdefghijklmnoBuckley 1935, pp. 50–52.
  7. ^Waghorn 1899, p. 69.
  8. ^ACS 1981, p. 24.
  9. ^abWaghorn 2005, p. 33.
  10. ^Bowen 1970, p. 56.
  11. ^"Duke of Dorset's XI v Wrotham". CricketArchive. Retrieved12 December 2025.

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
English cricket teams in the 18th century
English cricket venues (1726–1770)
English cricket seasons
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1769_English_cricket_season&oldid=1331109462"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp