Requesting a block?Wikinews:Blocking policy states that administrators may block users who "excessively and consistently break site policy. Admins should only do this as a last resort - efforts to educate must be made first, followed by warnings." Admins can not and will not block unless this policy is followed. Please do not raise an alert here unless efforts to educate the user have been made, and warnings have been given. If you have an ongoing problem with another user, you should considerWikinews:Dispute resolution. When reporting a user that needs to be blocked, please use the {{user}} template. This makes it easier for the administrator to view the user's contributions without needing to copy/paste the name of the user into a search box. Thank you.

Shortcut: WN:AAA Archives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13

05:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

User:Some exit sign sneaks up to pages

Vandalism accountBigKrow (talk)23:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Some exit sign sneaks up to pages (talk ·contribs ·page moves ·block user ·block log) Account already globally locked.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer)13:23, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism only account @Michael.C.WrightBigKrow (talk)19:20, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

152.22.74.22 (talk ·contribs ·page moves ·block user ·block log) already blocked byTernera (thank you).Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer)00:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.BigKrow (talk)00:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism only accountBigKrow (talk)21:05, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Michael.C.Wright, thanks.BigKrow (talk)00:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

SkibidiVondalSigmaToilet (talk ·contribs ·page moves ·block user ·block log) already globally blocked.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer)00:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Michael! Sorry for being a pest. @Michael.C.WrightBigKrow (talk)00:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not at all. I was just noting the work had been done in case others came along and thought it was an open request.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer)00:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

• BigKrow (talk ·contribs)

This user keeps on reverting my valid and helpful edits on a talk page:[1][2].
I consider such behavior as an intentional vandalism: if made once, it could've been "made occasionally", but here's twice! —2A00:1370:8186:BB3:A30C:5EA3:D6AA:40E6 (talk)21:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm a good user so you won't get anywhere making users feel bad thank you @BddpauxBigKrow (talk)21:59, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

There not helpful calling a admin/user names. You don't seem to care. @BigKrow (talk)22:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

If you really not gettin' it, then you are a useless administrator; sorry, nothing personal.)

You told @BddpauxBigKrow (talk)22:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@2A00:1370:8186:BB3:A30C:5EA3:D6AA:40E6BigKrow (talk)22:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This appears to have been a communication breakdown.

There has been ongoing vandalism atWN:VD. The “skibidi” and related LTA accounts responsible for it now appear to be globally blocked. I applied minimal protection (autoconfirmed users) to the redirect. This was not intended to overrideBddpaux’s work; I simply saw the request and the dispute and acted on it.

@BigKrow, user pages are generally left to their owners unless there is clear vandalism or other serious abuse. The IP editor’s suggestion to protect the page was reasonable, though their delivery could have been more constructive.

@2A00:1370:8186:BB3:A30C:5EA3:D6AA:40E6, thank you for reporting the issue; the page has been protected. A few notes: if you create an account, your IP address will no longer be publicly visible, and your requests may receive more positive responses. Also, please be aware that we do not have a policy to “assume good faith.” Comments such as “If you really not gettin' it, then you are auseless administrator” are taken at face value and can come across as hostile. Not exactly a recipe for success when asking someone for assistance.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer)22:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Apologies @Michael.C.WrightBigKrow (talk)23:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Adding not news articles.BigKrow (talk)19:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

77.100.251.218 (talk ·contribs ·page moves ·block user ·block log)

Warned user and deleted encyclopedic pages.Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer)13:18, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank youBigKrow (talk)16:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Michael.C.Wright, they've continued on creating non-news articles; please nuke and block them. Thanks.Codename Noreste (talk)18:26, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

• Bot directives