Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Assessment

中華/中华Welcome to WikiProject China
(changes)
Chinese article statistics

This list is automatically updated every night around 3 AM (UTC)

Article assessments are specified using the{{WikiProject China}} project banner, and can be seen in the sub-categories ofCategory:China-related articles by quality andCategory:China-related articles by importance. Summaries are inWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/China-related articles by quality statistics.

To add an article to WikiProject China, add{{WikiProject China}} to the talk page. Any member of WikiProject China is free to add or update the rating of an article. If you are in doubt or disagree about a rating please bring it up for discussion onour talk page.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/China-related articles by quality log is a full log of rating changes over the past thirty days. For an overview see thestatistics.

Instructions

edit

Quality assessment

edit

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the|class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the{{WikiProject China}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (seeWikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA(forfeatured articlesonly; adds them to theFA-Class China-related articles category)  FA
FL(forfeatured listsonly; adds them to theFL-Class China-related articles category)  FL
A(for articles that passed a formalpeer reviewonly; adds them to theA-Class China-related articles category)  A
GA(forgood articlesonly; adds them to theGA-Class China-related articles category)  GA
B(for articles that satisfy all of theB-Class criteria; adds them to theB-Class China-related articles category)B
C(for substantial articles; adds them to theC-Class China-related articles category)C
Start(for developing articles; adds them to theStart-Class China-related articles category)Start
Stub(for basic articles; adds them to theStub-Class China-related articles category)Stub
List(forstand-alone lists; adds them to theList-Class China-related articles category)List
NA(for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to theNA-Class China-related pages category)NA
???(articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in theUnassessed China-related articles category)???

For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:

Category(forcategories; adds them to theCategory-Class China-related pages category)Category
Draft(fordrafts; adds them to theDraft-Class China-related pages category)Draft
File(forfiles andtimed text; adds them to theFile-Class China-related pages category)File
Portal(forportal pages; adds them to thePortal-Class China-related pages category)Portal
Project(forproject pages; adds them to theProject-Class China-related pages category)Project
Template(fortemplates andmodules; adds them to theTemplate-Class China-related pages category)Template

The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:

Disambig(fordisambiguation pages; adds them to theDisambig-Class China-related pages category)Disambig
Redirect(forredirect pages; adds them to theRedirect-Class China-related pages category)Redirect

Quality scale

edit
WikiProject content quality grading scheme
ClassCriteriaReader's experienceEditing suggestionsExample
  FAThe article has attainedfeatured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers fromWP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets thefeatured article criteria:

Afeatured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting thepolicies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims areverifiable against high-qualityreliable sources and are supported by inline citationswhere appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents viewsfairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoingedit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant withWikipedia's copyright policy and free ofplagiarism ortoo-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows thestyle guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a conciselead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchicalsection headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—seeciting sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It hasimages and other media, where appropriate, with succinctcaptions andacceptable copyright status. Images follow theimage use policy.Non-free images or media must satisfy thecriteria for inclusion of non-free content andbe labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and usessummary style where appropriate.
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.Battle of Red Cliffs
  FLThe article has attainedfeatured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers fromWP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets thefeatured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaginglead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,section headings andtable sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with theManual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoingedit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.List of Chinese inventions
  AThe article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets theA-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described inWikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as afeatured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g.WikiProject Military history).
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.WP:Peer review may help.First Battle of Maryang San
  GAThe article meetsall of thegood article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers fromWP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
Agood article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, andunderstandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with theManual of Style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation.
  2. Verifiable withno original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources arecited inline. All content thatcould reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it containsno original research; and
    4. it contains nocopyright violations orplagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses themain aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, bymedia such asimages,video, oraudio:
    1. media aretagged with theircopyright statuses, andvalid non-free use rationales are provided fornon-free content; and
    2. media arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions.
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existingfeatured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.Shanghai
BThe article meetsall of theB-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reachgood article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article issuitably referenced, withinline citations. It hasreliable sources, and any important or controversial material which islikely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of<ref> tags andcitation templates such as{{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for anA-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including alead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to beof the standard of featured articles. TheManual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, aninfobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in anappropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background andtechnical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with theManual of Style and relatedstyle guidelines.Gan Ning
CThe article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantialcleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solvecleanup problems.People's Liberation Army
StartAn article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.Providing references toreliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon.Luo Guanzhong
StubA very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.Liu Ding, Prince of Shanyang
ListMeets the criteria of astand-alone list orset index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.Historical capitals of China
CategoryAnycategory falls under this class.Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area.Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized.Category:China
DisambigAnydisambiguation page falls under this class.The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title.Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title.China (disambiguation)
FileAny page in thefile namespace falls under this class.The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content.Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited.File:Greatwall large.jpg
PortalAny page in theportal namespace falls under this class.Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics.Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date.Portal:China
RedirectAnyredirect falls under this class.The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location.Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles.Chinese Zodiac
TemplateAnytemplate falls under this class. The most common types of templates includeinfoboxes andnavboxes.Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles.Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information.Template:China topics
NAAny non-article page that fits no other classification.The page contains no article content.Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Requested articles

Importance assessment

edit

An article's importance assessment is generated from theimportance parameter in the{{WikiProject China}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject China|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for theimportance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (seeWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles toCategory:Top-importance China-related articles) Top 
High (adds articles toCategory:High-importance China-related articles) High 
Mid (adds articles toCategory:Mid-importance China-related articles) Mid 
Low (adds articles toCategory:Low-importance China-related articles) Low 
NA (adds articles toCategory:NA-importance China-related articles) NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed inCategory:Unknown-importance China-related articles) ??? 

Importance scale

edit
WikiProject article importance scheme
ImportanceCriteriaExample
 Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. High probability that non-Chinese would look this up. When giving this rating to an article, try to check with other members of WikiProject China onour talk page.China
 High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge to the encyclopedia.Guzheng
 Mid Subject fills in more minor details, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of another topic.Chinese Rites controversy
 Low Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial.2008 Summer Paralympics
 NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc.Category:China
 ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed.???

Participants

edit

Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

  1. Alexjookim (talk ·contribs)
  2. AQu01rius (talk ·contribs)
  3. Azpineapple (talk ·contribs)
  4. Blootix (talk ·contribs)
  5. Bobbychan193 (talk ·contribs)
  6. Chen19711 (talk ·contribs)
  7. Chongkian (talk ·contribs)
  8. CWH (talk ·contribs)
  9. Danaman5 (talk ·contribs)
  10. Durzatwink (talk ·contribs)
  11. E8xE8 (talk ·contribs)
  12. Ethansmith (talk ·contribs)
  13. F1anders (talk ·contribs) history & culture
  14. FeralOink (talk ·contribs) business
  15. GWST11 (talk ·contribs)
  16. Hiàn (talk ·contribs)
  17. Homunculus (talk ·contribs) - Chinese history, politics, law, religion
  18. Ideogram (talk ·contribs)
  19. Jaguar (talk ·contribs)
  20. Joey Aldo (talk ·contribs)
  21. Ksyrie (talk ·contribs)
  22. Kyle.Mullaney (talk ·contribs)
  23. LittleCuteSuit (talk ·contribs)
  24. LLTimes (talk ·contribs)
  25. Mopswade (talk ·contribs)
  26. Redcloud822 (talk ·contribs)
  27. Rincewind42 (talk ·contribs)
  28. Sarcelles (talk ·contribs)
  29. Sɛvɪnti faɪv (talk ·contribs)
  30. Shadowy Sorcerer (talk ·contribs) Chinese History and Philosophy, especially the more contentious modern political issues.
  31. Shellwood (talk ·contribs)
  32. Shenhemu (talk ·contribs)
  33. simplyla (talk ·contribs) Yunnan, ethnic minorities, linguistics (dialects & minority language), travel
  34. StrikoWriter1234 (talk ·contribs)
  35. Studious Human (talk ·contribs) Chinese History
  36. STSC (talk ·contribs)
  37. Takamaxa (talk ·contribs) - help out classification of existing articles.
  38. Tavatar (talk ·contribs)
  39. TheAsianGURU (talk ·contribs) MainlyWP:China,WP:Hong Kong & other WP Projects.
  40. Vancancy (talk ·contribs)
  41. Warren Leywon (talk ·contribs)
  42. Whsun808 (talk ·contribs)
  43. Windmemories (talk ·contribs)
  44. Zhaofeng Li (talk ·contribs)
  45. Huaxiazidi (talk ·contribs)
  46. Someone who likes maps (talk ·contribs)

Example assessments

edit

To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

Quality

  • {{WPCHINA|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=C}} - to rate an article at C-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=Start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=Stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
  • {{WPCHINA}} - to leave the article un-assessed.

Importance

  • {{WPCHINA|importance=Top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
  • {{WPCHINA|importance=High}} - to rate an article at High importance
  • {{WPCHINA|importance=Mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
  • {{WPCHINA|importance=Low}} - to rate an article at Low importance

Statistics

edit
China-related articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
 FA913172564
 FL124916
 A123
 GA9421161604331
B1372766179372122,179
C2075061,4173,2461,3406,716
Start96544,13713,0004,96922,769
Stub2193,96519,52911,20334,916
List25802661,46793722,219
Category24,61724,617
Disambig1,2391,239
File1,0131,013
Portal185185
Project8686
Redirect1472571,1532,8964,354
Template2,9232,923
NA11
Other12150162
Assessed3981,83910,79739,54033,11918,100103,793
Unassessed153,4703,485
Total3981,83910,79739,55533,11921,570107,278
WikiWork factors (?)ω =357,407Ω = 5.34


By workgroup

edit
Chinese history articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
 FA6104222
 FL112
 A11
 GA12524555
B233757874208
C277314612717390
Start10141229158862
Stub51157169134511
List3981383161
Category406406
Disambig1515
File77
Portal11
Project55
Redirect1109116495
Template2525
Assessed613168198315232162,766
Unassessed33
Total613168198315232192,769
WikiWork factors (?)ω =9,671Ω = 4.72
Chinese politics articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
 GA123
B4987230
C41120753113
Start5391859238
Stub101363149
List11810
Category620620
Disambig11
Project11
Redirect246
Template66
Assessed82678408632251,177
Total82678408632251,177
WikiWork factors (?)ω =2,632Ω = 4.94
Chinese cities articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
 GA22
B5218
C26111543
Start453311098
Stub2474546140
List66
Category128128
File22
Project22
Redirect44
Template11
Assessed3391129113356434
Total3391129113356434
WikiWork factors (?)ω =1,530Ω = 5.26
Chinese provinces articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
 GA112
B117119
C1411319
Start2248
Stub11314
List112
Category9090
Project11
Redirect44
Template22
Assessed263429972161
Total263429972161
WikiWork factors (?)ω =261Ω = 4.21
Chinese cinema articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNAOther???Total
 FA134
 FL22
 GA11516
B1121822
C114381388190
Start224281,365541,869
Stub67161,101911,914
List29333175384
Category283165448
Disambig11
File11314
Redirect452231
Template1792109
Assessed22621,2223073,2511585,004
Unassessed11
Total22621,2223073,2511595,005
WikiWork factors (?)ω =21,699Ω = 5.40

Non-article pages

edit
China-related
non-article pages		Type
Class
DisambiguationRedirectTemplateCategoryImagePortalOtherTotal
Total00000000

Assessment log

edit

July 15, 2025

edit

Renamed

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

Removed

edit

July 11, 2025

edit

Renamed

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

Removed

edit

July 10, 2025

edit

Renamed

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

Removed

edit

July 9, 2025

edit

Renamed

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp