Vratislaus II (orWratislaus II) (Czech:Vratislav II.) (c. 1032 – 14 January 1092), the son ofBretislaus I[1] andJudith of Schweinfurt,[2] was the firstKing of Bohemia as of 15 June 1085,[1] his royal title granted as a lifetime honorific from Holy Roman EmperorHenry IV that did not establish a hereditary monarchy.[3] Before his elevation to the royal dignity, Vratislaus had ruled Bohemia as duke since 1061.
Vratislaus II | |
---|---|
Duke of Bohemia | |
Reign | January 1061 – June 1085 |
Predecessor | Spytihněv II of Bohemia |
Successor | himself as king |
King of Bohemia | |
Reign | June 1085 – 14 January 1092 |
Coronation | 15 June 1085,Prague |
Predecessor | himself as duke |
Successor | Conrad I of Bohemia |
Born | c. 1032 Bohemia |
Died | 14 January 1092 (aged c. 59–60) Bohemia |
Burial | |
Spouse | Maria Adelaide of Hungary Świętosława of Poland |
Issue | |
Dynasty | Přemyslid |
Father | Bretislaus I of Bohemia |
Mother | Judith of Schweinfurt |
On his father's death in 1055, Vratislaus became duke ofOlomouc, whereas his older brother became Duke of Bohemia as Spytihněv II. He fell out with his brother and was exiled toHungary. Vratislaus regained the ducal throne of Olomouc with Hungarian assistance and eventually reconciled with his brother, then succeeded him as duke of Bohemia when he died in 1061.
Campaigns of Henry IV
editBothPope Alexander II andPope Gregory VII confirmed Vratislaus in the privilege of wearing the mitre and tunic which his predecessors had.[4] Despite this, Vratislaus supported Henry in both theInvestiture Controversy against thePopes and the rebellions inSaxony that dominated his long reign. These actions would negate the significance of the mitre.[4]
Vratislaus was often at odds with his brotherJaromír, Bishop of Prague. Jaromír, for his part, ignored the creation of a new Moravian diocese in Olomouc by Vratislaus in 1063.[5] Jaromir even went so far as to retake, by arms, the relics removed from Prague and taken to Moravia. Despite the pope's support for Vratislaus' new see, the Bohemian duke was unswayed in his loyalty to the emperor.
The Saxons revolted under DukeMagnus of Saxony andOtto of Nordheim,Duke of Bavaria, in 1070 and Boleslaus of Poland attacked Bohemia in 1071. In August 1073, Henry responded with an invasion of Poland, but a newSaxon revolt drew him back in 1075. Vratislaus joined him, and they defeated the rebels on 9 June at theFirst Battle of Langensalza. The Bohemian troops showed conspicuous bravery. Henry then took Jaromír to Germany to be his chancellor under the name of Gebhard and Vratislaus was greatly relieved.
Vratislaus also took part in thewars against the anti-kings who opposed Henry's rule and were elected by a faction of the nobility to replace him. At theBattle of Flarchheim, only through the aid of Vratislaus' contingent was the imperial army capable of overcoming the rebels of the papally-approved claimantRudolf of Rheinfelden,Duke of Swabia.[6] Vratislaus even succeeded in seizing Rudolf's golden lance.[6] The golden lance was then carried in front of Vratislaus on state occasions.
Vratislaus would defeat the rebels again at Mailberg in 1082, and it would be in thanks for this victory that Henry granted Vratislaus the title of king in 1085.[7]
Relations with the papacy
editVratislaus requested permission to utilize Slavonic liturgy to the Roman Curia in 1080; the request was denied.[8] This petition may have been made in an effort to save a "Slavonic" Benedictine monastery still in operation that was founded in Sazava, close to Prague, in 1032.[8]
Vratislaus raised an army to serve in Henry's Italian campaign of 1081. In 1083, Vratislaus and his Bohemians were with Henry when they enteredRome itself.
Expansionism
editVratislaus coveted the largely Slavic marches ofMeissen andLusatia, but, in spite of Henry's promises and Bohemian successes against the rebellious margraves, he never received them. He held Lower Lusatia between 1075 and 1086, but in 1088, with the insurrection ofEgbert II of Meissen, Henry granted the region toHenry of Ostmark. Vratislaus was thereafter cool to Henry's military adventures. He never wavered in his loyalty, but he abstained from giving the emperor martial aid.
Internal affairs
editIt was aPřemyslid tradition that Moravia would be entrusted to the younger brothers of the ruling prince. In Vratislaus' case, his two younger brothersConrad andOtto inheritedBrno and Olomouc and the youngest, Jaromír, entered the church. However, enmity grew between the brothers. It was then that Vratislaus founded the diocese of Olmütz (diocese of Olomouc), under theArchbishopric of Mainz, to counter Otto's authority within his province. Both pope and emperor took a hand in mediating the conflict, which was partially fixed with Henry's appointment of Jaromír as chancellor in 1077. In April 1085, areichstag convened inMainz suppressed the Moravian see, but Vratislaus later re-founded see. Jaromír protested inRome toPope Urban II, but died in 1090 before a pope ruled on the matter.
Sadly for Vratislaus, his last years were occupied by dynastic quarrelling. When his brother Otto died in 1086, he gave Olomouc to his son Boleslaus, which was seen to be an act against the interests of Conrad. Vratislaus raised an army against Conrad and sent it out under his other sonBretislaus. This son turned on him. Vratislaus, in keeping with Bohemian custom, designated an heir: Conrad. Thus reconciled, the two attacked Bretislaus, who fled to Hungary.
Vratislaus died of a hunting wound on 14 January 1092 after a reign of thirty years. He was buried in St. Peter and Paul's Church,Vyšehrad.[9]
Legacy
editVratislaus frequently found himself in conflict withBishop Jaromír of Prague and sought means to diminish the importance of the Bishop of Prague in domestic Bohemian politics. Among the actions he took were the re-establishment of theBishopric of Olomouc in 1063 and the creation of theVyšehrad Chapter in 1070. The latter was richly endowed independently of the Prague bishop, subject instead to theHoly See directly. His success in curbing the power of the Prague bishop helped to strengthen the Bohemian crown and enable later rulers to govern a more unified state. His policy towards theHoly Roman Empire set an example that would be followed in the twelfth century and would ultimately lead to the permanent elevation of Bohemia to the status of a kingdom at the beginning of the thirteenth century. The marriage alliances he was able to conclude with notable foreign princesses reflected the rising position of the Přemyslids among European dynasties. In contrast, Vratislaus's fatherBretislaus in 1019 had to abduct his wife, the minor noblewomanJudith of Schweinfurt, to secure any suitable consort at all. His successor continued to cultivate dynastic bonds with notable courts in central and eastern Europe.
Family
editVratislaus was married three times. His first wife Maria died during prematurechildbirth. He married the second time in 1057 toAdelaide, daughter ofAndrew I of Hungary, who died in 1061.[10] They had:
- Vratislaus (-1061)
- Judith (1056/58-1086), married toLadislaus I Herman,[11] son ofCasimir I of Poland
- Ludmila (-after 1100)
- Bretislaus II of Bohemia (c. 1060–December 22, 1100),Duke of Bohemia
In 1062, Vratislaus married a third time toSwatawa of Poland, a daughter ofCasimir I of Poland.[12] They had five children:
- Boleslaus (-1091)[12]
- Bořivoj II of Bohemia (c. 1064-February 2, 1124), Duke of Bohemia[12]
- Vladislaus I of Bohemia (-April 12, 1125), Duke of Bohemia[12]
- Soběslav I of Bohemia (-February 14, 1140), Duke of Bohemia[12]
- Judith (c. 1066-9 December 1108), married toWiprecht II of Groitzsch
Notes
edit- ^abKrofta 1957, p. 426-427.
- ^Lawler 2001, p. 173.
- ^Krofta 1957, p. 426–427.
- ^abBerend, Urbanczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 384.
- ^Berend, Urbanczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 375.
- ^abThompson 1926, p. 621.
- ^Wilson, Peter H. (2016).The Holy Roman Empire - A Thousand Years of Europe's History. p. 207.
- ^abBerend, Urbanczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 316.
- ^František Palacký: Dějiny národa českého v Čechách i v Moravě, book III
- ^Ketrzynski 1950, p. 39.
- ^Grudziński 1985, p. 201-202.
- ^abcdeKnoll & Schaer 2003, p. 82.
References
edit- Berend, Nora; Urbanczyk, Przemyslaw; Wiszewski, Przemyslaw (2013).Central Europe in the High Middle Ages: Bohemia, Hungary and Poland, c.900-c.1300. Cambridge University Press.
- Grudziński, Tadeusz (1985).Boleslaus the Bold, Called Also the Bountiful, and Bishop Stanislaus: The Story of a Conflict. Interpress Publishers.
- Ketrzynski, S. (1950). "The Introduction of Christianity and the Early Kings of Poland". In Reddaway, W.F.; Penson, J.H.; Halecki, O.; Dyboski, R. (eds.).The Cambridge History of Poland: From the Origins to Sobieski (to 1696). Cambridge University Press.
- Krofta, Kamil (1957). "Bohemia to the Extinction of the Premyslids". In Tanner, J.R.; Previte-Orton, C.W.; Brooke, Z.N. (eds.).Cambridge Medieval History: Victory of the Papacy. Vol. VI. Cambridge University Press.
- Knoll, Paul W.; Schaer, Frank, eds. (2003).Gesta principum Polonorum: The Deeds of the Princes of the Poles. Central European University Press.
- Lawler, Jennifer (2001). "Bohemia (chart 1)".Encyclopedia of Women in the Middle Ages. McFarland & Company Inc.
- Thompson, James Westfall (March 1926). "Medieval German Expansion in Bohemia".The Slavonic Review.4 (12).
Literature
edit- Vratislav Vaníček:Vratislav II. (I.). První český král. Vyšehrad 2004,ISBN 80-7021-655-7
- Hans Patze:DiePegauer Annalen, die Königserhebung Wratislaws v. Böhmen und die Anfänge der Stadt Pegau. JGMODtl 12, 1963, 1–62
- Percy Ernst Schramm:Böhmen und das Regnum: Die Verleihung der Königswürde an die Herzöge von Böhmen (1085/86,1158,1198/1203) (Adel und Kirche. G. Tellenbach z. 65. Geb. Hrsg.J. Fleckenstein-K. Schmid, 1968), 346–364.
External links
editRegnal titles | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded by | Duke of Bohemia 1061–1085 | Vacant Title next held by Conrad I |
New title | King of Bohemia 1085–1092 | Vacant Title next held by Vladislaus II |