Tomruen
| This isTomruen'stalk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Please leave anew message. |
 Archives |
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heptagonal tiling honeycomb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AquitaneHungerForce (talk)03:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleOrder-7 cubic honeycomb, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order-7 cubic honeycomb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:01, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleOrder-6 cubic honeycomb, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order-6 cubic honeycomb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:01, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRhombic hectotriadiohedron, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhombic hectotriadiohedron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:02, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Would you please{{db-u1}}User:Tomruen/List of D5 polytopes? Saves me a trip to MfD. ;)Paradoctor (talk)18:48, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- P.S.: Please includeUser:Tomruen/List of A5 polytopes andUser:Tomruen/List of B5 polytopes in my request.Paradoctor (talk)18:52, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
What does this mean???Tom Ruen (talk)21:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Sorry. These three pages areWP:COPIES of their respective mainspace articles, and therefore
should be deleted
. If you place a{{db-u1}} template on a page in your userspace, you request deletion of that page. It's an unbureaucratic alternative to me putting these pages up for deletion atWP:MfD.Paradoctor (talk)23:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I think I choose to keep my user page copy. They are harmless.Tom Ruen (talk)18:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I assume you have readWP:COPIES?Paradoctor (talk)19:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I think I choose to keep my user page copy. They are harmless.Tom Ruen (talk)18:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I saw the word "should" which suggests it is not mandatory. I added links to their top to the article space to remind me.Tom Ruen (talk)19:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Ok then, we'll see how it goes at MfD.Paradoctor (talk)19:40, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
User:Tomruen/List of D5 polytopes, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tomruen/List of D5 polytopes and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofUser:Tomruen/List of D5 polytopes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Paradoctor (talk)19:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Template:Cubic tessellations small has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)13:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Do you have any public repository for the code used to generate your geometric illustrations? I'd love a link to it if you do, am interested in using particularly the Goldberg polyhedra (specifically (6, 2)) to make some 3d models. Thanks,BagLuke (talk)01:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I work with a few codes, likeStella (software), and my own experimental viewer as JS webapp, exampleG(2,0), but it doesn't generate polyhedral parametrically, just has a library of premade objects.Tom Ruen (talk)00:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply