The user 78.186.89.42 should be blocked.Burzuchius (talk)12:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Favonian: Please block78.186.89.42 and78.183.9.252: edit warring in several articles.Burzuchius (talk)14:16, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please extend the protection time, as that vandal has been active for a long time.Thyj (talk)08:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello Favonian, Thanks for looking at the page protection onChrist Myth Theory page yesterday. I wanted to just mention that one of the edit warring IP hoppers in the Christ Myth Theory article[1] also edit warred in theHistoricity of Jesus page recently[2].

On the Historicity of Jesus page editors have had to request page protection multiple times in the past few years due to IP edit warring and it seems that IP hopping is occurring. I think that a more permanent page protection solution is better than having to constantly go to page protection due to the periodical edit warring. Here are some recent examples of page protection requests within the past few years that I found[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8].Part of the reason for this frequency of requests is that the topic invokes strong feelings in editors and IPs and so the edit wars can be intense, including IP hopping. I think the page protection of at least a year, like it was done on Christ Myth Theory, yesterday would benefit everyone. What do you think? Ramos1990 (talk)16:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The other IP that edit warred in Christ Myth Theory yesterday[9] is likely IP hopping with IP I mentioned above. This one is opening up numerous noticeboards, talk pages, and seemingly not stopping until they get what they want. They already jumped on to the Historicity of Jesus article talk page with the same arguments and goals[10] despite being told otherwise in RS noticeboard[11],[12]. I see more edit warring coming onto the Historicity of Jesus since they can still edit it. Ramos1990 (talk)16:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply