| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to thePolitics of India template. |
|
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
{{editprotected}}
The current presidentDr. A P J Abdul Kalam has just recently been replace byPratibha Patil. Please correct this on the side note panel of content page.
The template is being used not only in pages of Indian national institutions and the Constitution of India, but also in articles on individual Indian political parties like theDMK. I'm highly uncomfortable about having the Indian flag prominently in such articles. Either we should modify this template or should remove the template from those pages. --Sundar\talk \contribs 04:15, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll go ahead and remove the template from the pages that I know of. --Sundar\talk \contribs 05:43, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Hi,
WhileVice President of India is also a part of legislative, he is nevertheless an executive. This is not contradictory, as an MP can be a minister as well and has both legislative and executive functions. Similarly, the Vice President has a legislative or more precisely an administrative overseeing function as the Chairman of theRajya Sabha.
While theDeputy Prime Minister of India is not a regular position, it is, nevertheless, an implicit "second among equals" after the Prime Minister.
Also, the respective links to these 2 pages show them to be ceremonial or namesake positions, hence their addition to the template gives a complete picture without inflating the importance of these two positions.
---Gurubrahma06:13, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Similar to having two seperate articles for the post and the person, (eg. President & Abdul Kalam, Prime Minister & Manmohan Singh), I think we should separate between the union minstries and the ministers. Today, the pageThe Union Ministries of India redirects toIndian Cabinet Ministers, which only lists the current union ministers. Any objections...? Since I've not done changes to templates before, I just want to be sure than to 'screw-up'!! --Natrajdr08:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any particular reason the President is listed under the "legislative" section of this template? I'm tempted to just go ahead and move it up to the Executive section, but wanted to double-check in case there's some quirk of Indian politics I'm missing. --Jfruh (talk)17:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see thatUser:Sumanch has changed the template. In the new template the names of the various leaders are missing (Pratibha Patil, Manmohan Singh etc.) Can somebody add that? --Natrajdr (talk)15:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hamare desh ke bharast netao se sirf itni vinti hai sukoon se khaker air condition me so jane aur subeh se sam tak majduri karke pet chalane me kitna fark hai ye aap logon ko batane ki sayad jarurat nahi hai zara ac se bahar nikalker aam janta ke dard ko samajiye to aap logon ko bhi apne kartvayo ka ahsas hoga saugandh khate woqt bade hi nistha aur imandari se desh chalane ki bat karte hai aap log aur bad me utne hi sahazta se aam logon ke zazbaton ki dhazziya uda dete hai aap log jo dard hamare dilo me nas—Precedingunsigned comment added by110.224.202.187 (talk)10:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
this line should be updated as "United Progressive Alliance" the title of the article, as this is individual political party, it does not constitute the Republic of India (the nation), so need to be excluded. similarly this also need to be removed
as emblem of India can be used only for administrative or judiciary authorities, it can not be connected with the identities of Political parties.
if this is the template for all the Political parties of India, then it need to be corrected for all the concerned pages.
59.164.116.156 (talk)04:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While editing the Politics of India page, I had stumbled upon this template. At first glance, the template looked too messy and when compared to other politics templates, it was sub-par. Some of the names in the template were also outdated, and I felt the responsibility to change these. Most of my changes are lessening the content, perWP:NAV. Templates like this aren't an index of one topic, but it is a mere guide to the larger web of articles on the wiki. I also changed some formatting to conform withTemplate:Politics of the United States,Template:Politics of the United Kingdom, andTemplate:Politics of Japan, like adding a portal at the bottom, lessening size of image, etc. Should you have questions please reply to this discussion.Jeremy (Message)20:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
A. Under the "Elections" section, please insertElection Commission of India andElectoral reforms (piped and shortened fromElectoral reform in India).
B. Under the "Political parties" section, please insertPolitical families (piped and shortened fromPolitical families of India) andPolitical scams (piped and shortened fromList of scandals in India).
Rationale: Existing template hasSupreme Court of India under "Judiciary" section, this suggestion to include the "Election Commission" is similar.
Thank you.58.182.176.169 (talk)17:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{edit semi-protected}} template. -FlightTime(open channel)17:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please change name of chairman of Rajya Sabha i,e, Venkaiah Naidu (BJP) to Jagdeep Dhankhar.Jagdeep Dhankhar is serving as the 14th and current vice president of India and chairman of Rajya Sabha since 11 August 2022.NehalPatel9898 (talk)08:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PK2: I removed an unplausible link that you have added in revision1240040450. --ZandDev17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]