Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Wikipedia

Talk:Telepathy

Latest comment:1 year ago by Rui Gabriel Correia in topic"Tapping into oneness" listed at Redirects for discussion
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theTelepathy article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2,3
This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconParanormalMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls under the scope ofWikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to theparanormal andrelated topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help withcurrent tasks, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconParapsychology (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology
WikiProject iconSkepticismHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofscience,pseudoscience,pseudohistory andskepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconScience FictionMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofscience fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article wascopy edited byOtheus, a member of theGuild of Copy Editors, on 19 April 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related topseudoscience andfringe science, which has beendesignated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience

In December of 2006 theArbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience inWikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:

  • Neutral point of view as applied to science:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed topseudoscience.
  • Serious encyclopedias: Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
  • Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such asTime Cube, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more justification.
  • Generally considered pseudoscience: Theories which have a following, such asastrology, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
  • Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such aspsychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
  • Alternative theoretical formulations: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.
The subject of this article iscontroversial and content may be indispute. When updating the article,be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.Content must be written from aneutral point of view. Includecitations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers.

This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:

  • [[Brain–computer interface#Synthetic telepathy/silent communication|Synthetic telepathy]] The anchor (Synthetic telepathy/silent communication)has been deleted.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error

"Tapping into oneness" listed atRedirects for discussion

edit
Latest comment:1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

 The redirectTapping into oneness has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Tapping into oneness until a consensus is reached.Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk)09:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp