Seems like a little too much detail about the hospital for this article, but WikiPedia could certainly use an article dedicated to mission hospitals in Nepal that the Tansen article could link to. Plus other Christian missionary work in the country.

Now that Nepal is a republic and no longer a Hindu kingdom where proselytizing was made illegal, perhaps the full story can be told!LADave (talk)20:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I propose thatTansen, Nepal be merged withTansing. The other article has some important historical context but is an orphan and titled with a non-standard transcrption from nepali. The page Tansing could then be deleted.173.46.104.35 (talk)19:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support Clearly the same place, support merging of both articles.Richard3120 (talk)03:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support the idea of a merge, but there is no referenced material at all on the page, despite being tagged for several years. Therefore, redirected.Klbrain (talk)15:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onTansen, Nepal. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110324221935/http://www.tansenmun.org.np/eng_introduction.htm tohttp://www.tansenmun.org.np/eng_introduction.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply