| This article is ratedList-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please update the CAS section, MATLAB also has the Symbolic Math Toolbox which is a general purpose Computer Algebra System. Note, I am a MathWorker (Spalfrey (talk)19:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Why are Mozart and Lingo listed under Computer Algebra Systems?Their description reads they are just programming languages.Gesslein22:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just link to "List of computer algebra systems" under Computer Algebra Systems?Gesslein16:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Other sections might be:optimization software, CFD, FEA, theorem provers, morphological image processing, number theory software. I am sure there are others.Greenmatter (talk)10:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onMathematical software. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Recently,this article's lead section was re-written, but it still seems confusing in some places.
For example:
Specially, It may be sure common sense that to the attention that there is a such as next case in mathematical software using:
- That is no security to solving neccesaly. [sic]
Does this lead section need to be re-written again?Jarble (talk)22:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.Eric Rowland (talk)15:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]