| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theMOS Technology 6502 article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| This article is based on material taken from6502 at theFree On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of theGFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived byClueBot III. |
"Peddle suggested that anyone that actually required this style of access could implement it with a single 74158." I don't see how that would work with just one, the 74158 is a quad 2-input mux, the bus is 16 bit. Thesource doesn't say "single" either, just "a". Someone with better knowledge of the topic, please fixAecho6Ee (talk)08:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that the Reset Pin in the pin configuration picture is wrong. It should be inverted. That means a Dash should be drawn over it, similar to the NMI and IRQ pin.WhyLee (talk)09:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the Furby article, in the technology section the original model's use of the 6502 is mentioned. Could that be brought into this article?Anamyd (talk)16:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What is this suggestion that the history of 6502 somehow goes back to 1960? The whole paragraph is too farfetched, and does not really have anything to do with 6502. Some of it related to the personal history with Peddle, but that is about Peddle and not about 6502. The section needs to be rewritten or removed.~2026-81565-2 (talk)04:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]