The following discussion is an archived discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:no consensus to move.Favonian (talk)22:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Djibouti (city) →Djibouti City — In December 2006, the two articlesDjibouti City andDjibouti (city) were merged by cutting and pasting with "Djibouti (city)" as the article location on the grounds that the editor rarely saw "Djibouti City" being used. Whilst this is probably true, I think we need to bear in mind that this is a country where French is more likely to be used than English and as such "Djibouti Ville" and "Ville de Djibouti" are likely to be common. I have found these terms used in a range of websites such asthis presidential decree,this property company website,this tourism page,this news report on waste disposal,this election-related pamphlet, andthis UNHCR document. Therefore I think this article would be better located at "Djibouti City".Green Giant (talk)22:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Sincepolling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into accountWikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose. It seems that the citations given to support the nomination are all French and not English as is needed perWP:UE. The (few) sources for the article use simply "Djibouti". — AjaxSmack 01:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:Moved. Consensus is clear.(non-admin closure)  Paine  ^u/c23:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Djibouti (city) →Djibouti City – This has been proposed before, with not much discussion previously. From what I can tell, it is common for the city to be called either "Djibouti" or "Djibouti City" in English. (We currently use "(city)" to disambiguate the article name from the country, which shares the same name and is atDjibouti.) It is difficult to conduct searches to determinewhich is more common, since the majority of the hits that result from "Djibouti" alone are going to be for the country. But I get 330,000+ for a Wikipedia-less search of"Djibouti City", with around 3000 in google books, 800 in google news, and 300 in google scholar – so the proposed form is not uncommon. I think using "Djibouti City" would be a more natural form and in line with articles in similar situations, such asLuxembourg City.Good Ol’factory^(talk) 04:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)--Relisting.No such user (talk) 09:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. — AjaxSmack 19:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

• Support - The capitalized and non-parenthetical form is indeed more standard and natural.Soupforone (talk)17:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

• Oppose the proposal but am open to convincing. A Google search of"the capital of Djibouti is" -wikipedia (books) gives a variety renditions with "Djibouti City" not all that common. What aboutDjibouti city (lowercasec) which is at least as common as the proposal or the official name ofCity of Djibouti? — AjaxSmack 22:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • I would prefer the current parenthetical version overDjibouti city. The uncapitalized version is basically the same form of adding a non-proper noun disambiguation word in parentheses, and the usual way on WP of doing that seems to me to be adding a word in parentheses, not just tacking on an extra common noun word without parentheses.Good Ol’factory^(talk)09:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

• Oppose. TheWP:COMMONNAME seems to be plain "Djibouti". CIA and others agree. (Also, the Luxembourg RM only had two respondents - I don't know strong the consensus for that one is.)Dohn joe (talk)18:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
• Support - seeMexico City,Panama City, etc. I'm not sure what else you'd be looking for here.RedSlash20:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
• Support perWP:NATURALDAB.Armbrust^{TheHomunculus}16:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
• Support. This is common senseWP:NATURAL disambiguation solution. --Tavix^(talk)17:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:not moved perWP:SNOW. It is clear the article is not going to be moved to the proposed title. --Tavix^(talk)17:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Djibouti City →Djibouti (capital) – Djibouti is the capital of the country of Djibouti. The BBC, CIA, and Britannica all have the capital listed as Djibouti, not Djibouti City. I think it is more reasonable that the title of the article of the city of Djibouti be called Djibouti without the city.2601:183:101:58D0:F83B:5C3:19D2:CF2 (talk)12:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

• Oppose. The usual worldwide naming convention is, if the name of a city matches the name of the region it is located in, the common name for the city is usually "XX City".ToThAc (talk)17:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose move as bad disambiguation. I'd be fine with overturning the last RM and moving it back toDjibouti (city). ONR  (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose per the above.Lugnuts^{Fire Walk with Me}09:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose and snow/speedy closeIn ictu oculi (talk)15:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose. It's not at all clear that the current title is actually problematic — we title things on Wikipedia with theircommon name, not necessarily their official one, and nominator hasn't provided any evidence that "Djibouti City" isn't a normal and common way of disambiguating the city from the country. But even if this were to get moved, the correct parenthetical disambiguator would be "(city)", not "(capital)". So I'd be willing to consider a substantive nomination to move this to the "(city)" form, but "(capital)" isn't the appropriate choice.Bearcat (talk)16:56, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:page moved toDjibouti (city).Mahveotm (talk)19:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Djibouti City → ? – I previously suggested moving the current page title fromDjibouti City toDjibouti (capital), but everyone opposed the move. A few of you suggested moving the page toDjibouti (city), so I want to know if anyone is interested in moving the page toDjibouti (city) or possiblyDjibouti, Djibouti2601:183:101:58D0:9159:407:BB05:205B (talk)22:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

• SupportDjibouti (city), but opposeDjibouti, Djibouti per my statements in the previous RM. "Djibouti, Djibouti" is redundant enough that parenthetical disambiguaton is the better option. ONR  (talk) 05:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

• SupportDjibouti (city). The current title (with capsC "City") is largely a Wikipedia creation. A Google search of"the capital of Djibouti is" -wikipedia gives a variety renditions with "Djibouti City" not all that common. OpposeDjibouti, Djibouti as an even worse Wikipedia creation. — AjaxSmack 02:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was:moved.(closed by non-admin page mover) —Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,mellohi! (投稿)17:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Djibouti (city) →Djibouti City – In most cases on Wikipedia, an entity whose capital city is the same name as the entity itself results in the page for the capital city being labeled as 'Place'+"City". Notable examples areLuxembourg City, whose official name is just Luxembourg, but the suffix of 'City' was tacked on to disambiguate, andQuebec City, whose name is officially just Quebec, but the article name has been changed to differentiate. The same should be done for this article perWikipedia:TITLECON consistency. There was also ayes consensus for the same move in 2016 athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Djibouti_(city)#Requested_move_30_September_2016BhamBoi (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Moved from contested RM/TRUtherSRG(talk)16:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@BhamBoi andExtraordinary Writ: - pinging originator and contester. -UtherSRG(talk)16:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note: There are at least 4 previous RMs, not just the 2 listed at the top of the talk page. -UtherSRG(talk)16:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note:WikiProject Africa andWikiProject Cities have been notified of this discussion.UtherSRG(talk)16:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

• Support perWP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION. I am finding English-language sources that refer to it as such:The Washington Post,U.S. Military,International Monetary Fund,Aljazeera,Business Wire,Business Insider,Global Times,The Guardian,BBC,France24,The New Yorker,U.S. Department of Defense,DW,FIFA,The Telegraph.Rreagan007 (talk)23:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
• Support - seems reasonable per Rreagan007, and for consistency with similar cases.eviolite(talk)00:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
• Support - seems reasonable enough, like New York, New York isNew York City.Ebbedlila (talk)23:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
• Support--this is also how Mexican city articles are named (Chihuahua City)RedSlash17:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply