I have removed the section "Nobody takes his reviews seriously, because everyone knows how stupid he is". That is very much out-of-line. Kehr may very well be a bad reviewer, but to call him stupid in an allegedly objective encyclopedia article is insulting and potentially libelous.AlbertSM (talk)16:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Any reader of this article who isn't familiar with Kehr's reviews would think, that he is an honest film critic. It definitely has to be mentioned, that he intentionally disagrees with the majority of all other film critics in numerous cases. Go look it up yourself on Rotten Tomatoes. If there's a movie with a 95%+ approval rate, you can be quite certain that Kehr is one of the critics who gave it a negative review - in many cases the only one.—Precedingunsigned comment added byTeamheads2 (talk •contribs)21:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Indented line@Teamheads2 Yeah, he is a pretty terrible critic. --PCGuy566 (talk)00:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I realize these comments are very old but I just wanted to say I think the real culprit here is the Rotten Tomatoes and how it enables people to make snap judgements and fosters completely undeserved reputations.Kehr has a phenomenal reputation as a classic Andrew Sarris-style auteurist critic. He advises on the National Film Registry, got hired at the New York Times, and now is a curator at the Museum of Modern Art.But he didn't like Alien.

A good critic is not someone who aligns with the Tomatometer or even popular taste. Does that really need to be stated? Read what he wrote if you're going to make up your mind.

Why is this person a Wikipedia entry? Important? No . Seems to be some kind of vanity entry for an average professional?!?— Precedingunsigned comment added by98.240.240.106 (talk)02:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Danwroy (talk)11:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links onDave Kehr. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added{{dead link}} tag tohttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/apocalypse_now/comments.php?reviewid=249559
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20100328192214/http://www.rottentomatoes.com:80/m/empire_strikes_back/comments.php?reviewid=1635662 tohttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/empire_strikes_back/comments.php?reviewid=1635662
• Added{{dead link}} tag tohttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dog_day_afternoon/comments.php?reviewid=1816299
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20111118041059/http://www.rottentomatoes.com:80/m/alien/comments.php?reviewid=1636989 tohttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/alien/comments.php?reviewid=1636989

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)12:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links onDave Kehr. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20101225111226/http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/01/15/kehr.html tohttp://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/01/15/kehr.html
• Corrected formatting/usage forhttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/empire_strikes_back/comments.php?reviewid=1635662
• Corrected formatting/usage forhttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/alien/comments.php?reviewid=1636989

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply