Synod of Chelsea

There were a number ofSynods of Chelsea held in Anglo-Saxon England. They were held at Cealchythe,^{[Notes 1]} inKent, generally identified with modernChelsea, London.

Offa's councils

edit

787

edit

KingOffa of Mercia presided over a church council held at Chelsea in the 787. Although it has often been claimed that the council was attended bypapal legates, this stems from a conflation of the visit by papal legates to Offa's court and Northumbria in 786. The two legates did attend a council held at Offa's court, but this was not necessarily held at Chelsea.^[1]

Two different versions of theAnglo-Saxon Chronicle record the proceedings of the council. ThePeterborough Manuscript (Version E) of theChronicle records the council under the year 785, although the events took place in 787, and states that "here there was a contentious synod at Chelsea and ArchbishopJænberht relinquished some part of his bishopric, andHygeberht was chosen by King Offa, and Ecgfrith consecrated as king."^[2] TheCanterbury Manuscript (Version F) has the council under 785 also, and describes the council as "a full synod sat at Chelsey" but otherwise relates much the same events.^[3] The historianNicholas Brooks sees the coupling of the elevation of Lichfield with the consecration of Ecgfrith, who was Offa's son, as significant. He argues that Offa desired to have Ecgfrith consecrated as his successor during Offa's lifetime, but was unable to get Jænberht to agree, and this was another factor in the creation of Lichfield as an archbishopric.^[4] Hygeberht consecrated Ecgfrith after Hygeberht's elevation to archiepiscopal status.^[5]

Offa vowed at the council to donate 365mancuses each year to the papacy, to provide for poor people in Rome and to provide lights forSt. Peter's Basilica, stated to be a thanks-offering for his victories. C. J. Godfrey has argued that the donation was really in return for the papal approval of Offa's scheme to elevate the diocese of Lichfield to an archdiocese. Whatever Offa's motivation, historians have generally seen the gift as the beginning ofPeter's Pence, an annual "tax" paid to Rome by the English Church.^[6]

Although it appears that the 787 council approved Lichfield's elevation to an archdiocese, Hygeberht, who was present, remained a bishop at its conclusion; he signed the council's report still as a bishop. There is no indication that he played any significant part in the council nor in the actions that led to him becoming an archbishop.^[6]

789

edit

Another council was held at Chelsea in 789, and a surviving charter records some of the attending bishops. These included both the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Archbishop of Lichfield, as well as the Bishops of Dunwich, Leicester, Lindsey, and Winchester.^[7]

793

edit

Although a charter exists claiming that there was a council at Chelsea in 793, the charter itself (Sawyer 136) is a forgery, and likely put together from a list of bishops alive at that date.^[7]

801

edit

A council appears to have been held at Chelsea in 801, as an extant charter (Sawyer 158) records a confirmation of a land grant byCoenwulf, the king of Mercia that was part of the council's proceedings.^[8]

816

edit

There was a further synod in Chelsea in 816. Called byCoenwulf of Mercia, it limited the power of ArchbishopWulfred. It also ruled onbaptism,^[9]relics.^{[Notes 2]} and church property.^[11]

The canons of this council are still extant, as British Library manuscriptCotton Vespasian A xiv.^[12]

Notes

edit

^Also called Celchyth, Calchut, Celicyth.
^"When relics of the saints could not be procured, consecrated Hosts and fragments of the Gospels were sometimes used; concerning the use of the former for this purpose the English Synod of Calchut (Celicyth, Chelsea, 816) made a regulation (can. 22)."^[10]

Citations

edit

^CubittAnglo-Saxon Church Councils p. 270
^Swanton (trans. and ed.)Anglo-Saxon Chronicle pp. 53, 55
^Swanton (trans. and ed.)Anglo-Saxon Chronicle p. 52
^BrooksEarly History of the Church of Canterbury pp. 118–119
^WilliamsKingship and Government p. 28
^^a ^bGodfrey "Archbishopric"Studies in Church History p. 147
^^a ^bCubittAnglo-Saxon Church Councils pp. 273-274
^CubittAnglo-Saxon Church Councils p. 279
^"Baptism, an Examination of the Lutheran view of Baptism". Archived fromthe original on 7 June 2000.
^Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913)."History of the Christian Altar" .Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
^"The Early History of the Annuity"(PDF). Retrieved3 January 2011. p.235.
^CubittAnglo-Saxon Church Councils p. 285

References

edit

Curtin, D.P. (2022).Synod of Chelsea: 787 AD. Dalcassian.ISBN 979-8-348-55970-0.
Brooks, Nicholas (1984).The Early History of the Church of Canterbury: Christ Church from 597 to 1066. London: Leicester University Press.ISBN 0-7185-0041-5.
Cubitt, Catherine (1995).Anglo-Saxon Church Councils c.650–c.850. London: Leicester University Press.ISBN 0-7185-1436-X.
Swanton, Michael James (trans. and editor) (1998).The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. New York: Routledge.ISBN 0-415-92129-5.{{cite book}}:|author= has generic name (help)
Williams, Ann (1999).Kingship and Government in Pre-Conquest England c. 500–1066. London: MacMillan Press.ISBN 0-333-56797-8.