This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "State" functional analysis – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In the mathematical field offunctional analysis, astate of anoperator system is apositive linear functional ofnorm 1. States in functional analysisgeneralize the notion ofdensity matrices in quantum mechanics, which representquantum states, bothmixed states andpure states. Density matrices in turn generalizestate vectors, which only represent pure states. ForM an operator system in aC*-algebraA with identity, the set of all states ofM, sometimes denoted by S(M), is convex, weak-* closed in the Banach dual spaceM*. Thus the set of all states ofM with the weak-* topology forms a compact Hausdorff space, known as thestate space ofM.In the C*-algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics, states in this previous sense correspond to physical states, i.e. mappings from physical observables (self-adjoint elements of the C*-algebra) to their expected measurement outcome (real number).
States can be viewed as noncommutative generalizations ofprobability measures. ByGelfand representation, every commutative C*-algebraA is of the formC0(X) for some locally compact HausdorffX. In this case,S(A) consists of positiveRadon measures onX, and thepure states are the evaluation functionals onX.
More generally, theGNS construction shows that every state is, after choosing a suitable representation, avector state.
A bounded linear functional on a C*-algebraA is said to beself-adjoint if it is real-valued on the self-adjoint elements ofA. Self-adjoint functionals are noncommutative analogues ofsigned measures.
TheJordan decomposition in measure theory says that every signed measure can be expressed as the difference of two positive measures supported on disjoint sets. This can be extended to the noncommutative setting.
Theorem—Every self-adjoint in can be written as where and are positive functionals and.
A proof can be sketched as follows: Let be the weak*-compact set of positive linear functionals on with norm ≤ 1, and be the continuous functions on.
can be viewed as a closed linear subspace of (this isKadison's function representation). By Hahn–Banach, extends to a in with.
Using results from measure theory quoted above, one has:
where, by the self-adjointness of, can be taken to be a signed measure. Write:
a difference of positive measures. The restrictions of the functionals and to has the required properties of and. This proves the theorem.
It follows from the above decomposition thatA* is the linear span of states.
By theKrein-Milman theorem, the state space ofM hasextreme points. The extreme points of the state space are termedpure states and other states are known asmixed states.
For a Hilbert spaceH and a vectorx inH, the formula ωx(T) := ⟨Tx,x⟩ (forT inB(H)) defines a positive linear functional onB(H). Since ωx(1)=||x||2, ωx is a state if ||x||=1. IfA is a C*-subalgebra ofB(H) andM anoperator system inA, then the restriction of ωx toM defines a positive linear functional onM. The states ofM that arise in this manner, from unit vectors inH, are termedvector states ofM.
A state isfaithful, if implies.
A state is callednormal, iff for every monotone, increasingnet of operators with least upper bound, converges to.
Atracial state is a state such that
For any separable C*-algebra, the set of tracial states is aChoquet simplex.
Afactorial state of a C*-algebraA is a state such that the commutant of the corresponding GNS representation ofA is afactor.