TheRoman calendar was thecalendar used by theRoman Kingdom andRoman Republic. Although the term is primarily used for Rome's pre-Julian calendars, it is often used inclusively of theJulian calendar established byJulius Caesar in 46 BC.^[a]

According to most Roman accounts,their original calendar was established by theirlegendaryfirst kingRomulus. It consisted of tenmonths, beginning in spring with March and leaving winter as an unassigned span of days before the next year. These months each had 30 or 31days and ran for 38nundinal cycles, each forming a kind of eight-dayweek—nine dayscounted inclusively in the Roman manner—and ending with religious rituals and apublic market. This fixed calendar bore traces of its origin as anobservationallunar one. In particular, the most important days of each month—itskalends,nones, andides—seem to have derived from thenew moon, thefirst-quarter moon, and thefull moon respectively. To a late date, theCollege of Pontiffs formally proclaimed each of these days on theCapitoline Hill and Roman dating counted down inclusively towards the next such day in any month. (For example, the year-end festival ofTerminalia on 23 February was calledVII.Kal.Mart., the 6th day before the March kalends.)

Romulus's successorNuma Pompilius was then usually credited with arevised calendar that divided winter between the two months ofJanuary andFebruary, shortened most other months accordingly, and brought everything into rough alignment with thesolar year by some system ofintercalation. This is a typical element oflunisolar calendars and was necessary to keep theRoman religiousfestivals and other activities in their properseasons.

Modern historians dispute various points of this account. It is possible the original calendar was agriculturally based, observational of the seasons and stars rather than of the moon, with ten months of varying length filling the entire year. If this ever existed, it would have changed to the lunisolar system later credited to Numa during the kingdom orearly Republic under the influence of theEtruscans and ofPythagoreanSouthern Italian Greeks. After theestablishment of the Republic,yearsbegan to be dated byconsulships but the calendar and its rituals were otherwise very conservatively maintained until theLate Republic. Even when the nundinal cycles had completely departed from correlation with the moon's phases, apontiff was obliged to meet thesacred king, to claim that he had observed the new moon, and to offer a sacrifice toJuno to solemnize each kalends.

It is clear that, for a variety of reasons, the intercalation necessary for the system's accuracy was not always observed. Astronomical events recorded inLivy show the civil calendar had varied from the solar year by an entire season in190 BC and was still two months off in168 BC. By the191 BCLex Acilia or before, control of intercalation was given to thepontifex maximus but—as these were oftenactive political leaders likeCaesar—political considerations continued to interfere with its regular application.

Victorious in civil war, Caesarreformed the calendar in 46 BC, coincidentally making the year of his third consulship last for 446 days. This new Julian calendar was an entirelysolar one, influenced by theEgyptian calendar. In order to avoid interfering with Rome's religious ceremonies, the reform distributed the unassigned days among the months (towards their ends) and did not adjust any nones or ides, even in months which came to have 31 days. The Julian calendar was designed to have a singleleap day every fourth year by repeating February 24^[b] (a doubledVI. Kal. Mart. orante diem bis sextum Kalendas Martias) but, followingCaesar's assassination, the priests mistakenly added thebissextile (bis sextum) leap day every three years due to their inclusive counting. In order to bring the calendar back to its proper place, Augustus was obliged to suspend intercalation for one or two decades.

At 365.25 days, the Julian calendar remained slightly longer than the solar year (365.24 days). By the 16th century, thedate of Easter had shifted so far away from thevernal equinox thatPope Gregory XIII ordered a further correction to the calendar method, resulting in the establishment of the modernGregorian calendar.

The original Romancalendar is usually believed to have been anobservationallunar calendar^[2] whose months ended and began from thenew moon.^[3][4] Because alunar cycle is about 29.5 days long, such months would have varied between29 and 30 days.^[5] Twelve such months would have fallen10 or 11 days short of thesolar year and, without adjustment, such a year would have quickly rotated out of alignment with the seasons^[5] in the manner of theIslamic calendar. Given the seasonal aspects of the calendar and its associatedreligiousfestivals, this was presumably avoided through some form of arbitrary curtailment or intercalation^[5] or through the suspension of the calendar during winter.Against this,Michels has argued that the early calendars used by Rome and its neighbors were more probably observational of seasonal markers in nature (theleafing of trees), animal behavior (themigration of birds), and theagricultural cycle (the ripening ofgrain) combined with observation ofstars in thenight sky.^[6] She considers that this more sensibly accounts for later legends ofRomulus'sdecimal year and the great irregularity in Italian month lengths recorded inCensorinus.^[6][7] Roman works on agriculture including those ofCato,^[8]Varro,^[9]Vergil,^[10]Columella,^[11] andPliny^[12] invariably date their practices based on suitable conditions or upon therising of stars, with only occasional supplementary mention of thecivil calendar of their times^[6] until the 4th or 5th century authorPalladius.^[13]Augury, formal Romanornithomancy, continued to be the focus of aprestigious dedicated priesthood until at least the end of the 4th century.^[14] Although most Roman festivals in the historical record were closely tied to thenundinal cycle of thelater calendar,^[15] there remained severalmoveable feasts (feriae conceptivae, "proclaimed festivals") like theSementivae that were dependent on local conditions.^[16] Michels suggests this was the original state of all ancient festivals, marking divisions between the seasons and occasions within them.^[16]

The Romans themselves usually described their first organized year as one with ten fixed months,^[17][18] a decimal division fitting general Roman practice.^[19] There were four months of "31" days^[17]—March, May, Quintilis, and October—called "full months" (pleni menses) and six months of "30" days^[17]—April, June, Sextilis, September, November, and December—called "hollow months" (cavi menses).^[20][5] These "304" days made up exactly 38 nundinal cycles. The months were kept in alignment with the moon, however, by counting thenew moon as the last day of the first month and simultaneously the first day of the next month.^[4] The system is usually said to have left the remaining two to three months of the year as an unorganized "winter", since they were irrelevant to the farming cycle.^[4]Macrobius claims the 10-month calendar was fixed and allowed to shift until the summer months were completely misplaced, at which time additional days belonging to no month were simply inserted into the calendar until it seemed things were restored to their proper place.^[21][22]Licinius Macer's lost history apparently similarly stated that even the earliest Roman calendar employed intercalation.^[23][24][25]

Later Roman writers usually credited this calendar toRomulus,^[26][27] theirlegendaryfirst king andculture hero, although this was common with other practices and traditions whose origin had been lost to them.Censorinus considered him to have borrowed the system fromAlba Longa,^[23] his supposed birthplace. Some scholars doubt the existence of this calendar at all, as it is only attested in late Republican and Imperial sources and supported only by the misplaced names of the months from September to December.^[28]Rüpke also finds the coincidence of the length of the supposed "Romulan" year with the length of the first ten months of the Julian calendar to indicate that it is ana priori interpretation by late Republican writers.^[28]

Other traditions existed alongside this one, however.Plutarch'sParallel Lives recounts thatRomulus's calendar had been solar but adhered to the general principle that the year should last for 360 days. Months were employed secondarily and haphazardly, with some counted as 20 days and others as 35 or more.^[32][33] Plutarch records that while one tradition is thatNuma added two new months to a ten-month calendar, another version is that January and February were originally the last two months of the year and Numa just moved them to the start of the year, so that January (named after a peaceful ruler calledJanus) would come before March (which was named for Mars, the god of war).^[34]

Rome's 8-day week, thenundinal cycle, was shared with theEtruscans, who used it as the schedule of royal audiences. It was presumably a part of the early calendar and was credited inRoman legend variously toRomulus andServius Tullius.

The attested calendar of theRoman Republic was quite different. It had twelve months, already includingJanuary andFebruary during the winter.

According to Livy, it was Numa Pompilius, the second king of Rome(715–673 BC), who divided the year into twelve lunar months (History of Rome, I.19). Fifty days, says Censorinus, were added to the calendar and a day taken from each month of thirty days to provide for the two winter months: Januarius (January) and Februarius (February), both of which had 28 days (The Natal Day, XX). This was a lunar year of 354 days but, because of the Roman superstition about even numbers, an additional day was added to January to make the calendar 355 days long. Auspiciously, each month now had an odd number of days: Martius (March), Maius (May), Quinctilis (July), and October continued to have 31; the other months, 29, except for February, which had 28 days. Considered unlucky, it was devoted to rites of purification (februa) and expiation appropriate to the last month of the year. (Although these legendary beginnings attest to the venerability of the lunar calendar of the Roman Republic, its historical origin probably was the publication of a revised calendar by the Decemviri in450 BC as part of theTwelve Tables, Rome's first code of law.)^[4]

The inequality between the lunar year of 355 days and thetropical year of 365.25 days led to a shortfall over four years of (10.25 × 4) = 41 days.^[5] Theoretically, 22 days were interpolated into the calendar in the second year of the four-year cycle and 23 days in the fourth.^[5] This produced an excess of four days over the four years in line with the normal one day excess over one year. The method of correction was to truncate February by five days and follow it with the intercalary month which thus commenced (normally) on the day after February 23 and had either 27 or 28 days. February 23 was theTerminalia and in a normal year it wasa.d. VII Kal. Mart. Thus the dates of the festivals of the last five days of February were preserved^[35] on account of them being actually named and counted inclusively in days before thekalends of March; they were traditionally part of the celebration for the new year. There was occasionally a delay of one day (adies intercalaris being inserted between February 23 and the start of themensis intercalaris) for the purpose of avoiding a clash between a particular festival and a particular day of the week (seeHebrew calendar § Rosh Hashanah postponement rules for another example). The Roman superstitions concerning the numbering and order of the months seem to have arisen fromPythagorean superstitions concerning the luckiness ofodd numbers.^[36]

These Pythagorean-based changes to the Roman calendar were generally credited by the Romans toNuma Pompilius,^[4]Romulus's successor and the second ofRome's seven kings, as were the two new months of the calendar.^[37][38][c] Most sources thought he had established intercalation with the rest of his calendar.^{[citation needed]} AlthoughLivy's Numa instituted a lunar calendar, the author claimed the king had instituted a 19-year system of intercalation equivalent to theMetonic cycle^[39] centuries before its development byBabylonian andGreek astronomers.^[d]Plutarch's account claims he ended the former chaos of the calendar by employing 12 months totalling 354 days—the length of thelunar andGreek years—and a biennial intercalary month of 22 days calledMercedonius.^[32][33]

According to Livy'sPeriochae, the beginning of the consular year changed from March to 1 January in 153 BC to respond to a rebellion in Hispania.^[41] Plutarch believed Numa was responsible for placing January and February first in the calendar;^[32][33]Ovid states January began as the first month and February the last, with its present order owing to theDecemvirs.^[42][43]W. Warde Fowler believed theRoman priests continued to treat January and February as the last months of the calendar throughout the Republican period.^[44]

According to the later writers Censorinus and Macrobius, to correct the mismatch of the correspondence between months and seasons due to the excess of one day of the Roman average year over the tropical year, the insertion of the intercalary month was modified according to the scheme: common year (355 days), leap year with 23-day February followed by 27-day Mercedonius (377 days), common year, leap year with 23-day February followed by 28-day Mercedonius (378 days), and so on for the first 16 years of a 24-year cycle. In the last 8 years, the intercalation took place with the month of Mercedonius only 27 days, except the last intercalation which did not happen. Hence, there would be a typical common year followed by a leap year of 377 days for the next 6 years and the remaining 2 years would sequentially be common years. The result of this twenty-four-year pattern was of great precision for the time: 365.25 days, as shown by the following calculation:

${\displaystyle \frac{355\times 13+377\times 7+378\times 4}{24}=\frac{8,766}{24}=365\frac{1}{4}}$ 

The consuls' terms of office were not always a modern calendar year, but ordinary consuls were elected or appointed annually. The traditionallist of Roman consuls used by the Romans to date their years began in 509 BC.^[47]

Gnaeus Flavius, a secretary (scriba) to censorApp. Claudius Caecus, introduced a series of reforms in 304 BC.^[48] Their exact nature is uncertain, although he is thought to have begun the custom of publishing the calendar in advance of the month, depriving the priests of some of their power but allowing for a more consistent calendar for official business.^[49]

Julius Caesar, following hisvictory inhis civil war and in his role aspontifex maximus, ordered areformation of the calendar in 46 BC. This was undertaken by a group of scholars apparently including theAlexandrianSosigenes^[50] and the Roman M. Flavius.^[51][46] Its main lines involved the insertion of ten additional days throughout the calendar and regular intercalation of a singleleap day every fourth year to bring the Roman calendar into close agreement with the solar year. The year 46 BC was the last of the old system and included three intercalary months, the first inserted in February and two more—Intercalaris Prior andPosterior—before the kalends of December.

AfterCaesar's assassination,Mark Antony had Caesar's birth month Quintilis renamedJuly (Iulius) in his honor. After Antony'sdefeat at Actium,Augustus assumed control of Rome and, finding the priests had (owing to their inclusive counting) been intercalating every third year instead of every fourth, suspended the addition of leap days to the calendar for one or two decades until its proper position had been restored. SeeJulian calendar: Leap year error. In 8 BC, theplebisciteLex Pacuvia de Mense Augusto renamed SextilisAugust (Augustus) in his honor.^{[52][53][46][e]}

In large part, this calendar continued unchanged under theRoman Empire. (Egyptians used the relatedAlexandrian calendar, which Augustus had adapted fromtheir wandering ancient calendar to maintain its alignment with Rome's.) A few emperors altered the names of the months after themselves or their family, but such changes were abandoned by their successors.Diocletian began the 15-yearindiction cycles beginning from the AD 297 census;^[47] these became the required format for official dating underJustinian.Constantine formally established the 7-dayweek by makingSunday an official holiday in 321.^{[citation needed]} Consular dating became obsolete following the abandonment of appointing nonimperial consuls in AD 541.^[47] The Roman method of numbering the days of the month never became widespread in the Hellenized eastern provinces and was eventually abandoned by theByzantine Empire inits calendar.

Roman dates werecounted inclusively forward to the next one of three principal days within each month:^[54]

• Kalends (Kalendae orKal.), the first day of each month^[54]
• Nones (Nonae orNon.), the seventh day of "full months"^[55][f] and fifth day of hollow ones,^[54] 8 days before the Ides in every month
• Ides (Idus, variouslyEid. orId.), the 15th day of "full months"^[55][f] and the 13th day of hollow ones,^[54] one day earlier than the middle of each month.

These are thought to reflect a prehistoric lunar calendar, with the kalends proclaimed after the sighting of the first sliver of the new crescent moon a day or two after thenew moon, the nones occurring on the day of thefirst-quarter moon, and the ides on the day of thefull moon. The kalends of each month were sacred toJuno and the ides toJupiter.^[56][57] The day before each was known as its eve (pridie); the day after each (postridie) was considered particularly unlucky.

The days of the month were expressed in early Latin using theablative of time, denoting points in time, in the contracted form "the 6th December Kalends" (VI Kalendis Decembribus).^[55] In classical Latin, this use continued for the three principal days of the month^[58] but other days were idiomatically expressed in theaccusative case, which usuallyexpressed a duration of time, and took the form "6th day before the December Kalends" (ante diem VI Kalendas Decembres). This anomaly may have followed the treatment of days inGreek,^[59] reflecting the increasing use of such date phrases as an absolute phrase able to function as the object of another preposition,^[55] or simply originated in a mistaken agreement ofdies with the prepositionante once it moved to the beginning of the expression.^[55] Inlate Latin, this idiom was sometimes abandoned in favor of again using the ablative of time.

The kalends were the day for payment of debts and the account books (kalendaria) kept for them gave English its wordcalendar. The public Roman calendars were thefasti, which designated the religious and legal character of each month's days. The Romans marked each day of such calendars with the letters:^[60]

• F (fastus, "permissible") on days when it was legal to initiate action in the courts of civil law (dies fasti, "allowed days")
• C (comitialis) onfasti days during which the Roman people could holdassemblies (dies comitiales)
• N (nefastus) on days when political and judicial activities were prohibited (dies nefasti)
• NP (uncertain)^[g] on public holidays (feriae)
• QRCF (uncertain)^[h] on days when the "king" (rex sacrorum) could convene an assembly
• EN (endotercissus, anarchaic form ofintercissus, "halved") on days when most political and religious activities were prohibited in the morning and evening due tosacrifices being prepared or offered but were acceptable for a period in the middle of the day

Each day was also marked by a letter from A to H to indicate its place within thenundinal cycle of market days.

Thenundinae were the market days which formed a kind ofweekend inRome,Italy, and some other parts of Roman territory. By Romaninclusive counting, they were reckoned as "ninth days" although they actually occurred every eighth day. Because the republican and Julian years were not evenly divisible into eight-day periods,Roman calendars included a column giving every day of the year anundinal letter from A to H marking its place in the cycle of market days. Each year, the letter used for the markets would shift2–5 letters along the cycle. As a day when the city swelled with ruralplebeians, they were overseen by theaediles and took on an important role in Roman legislation, which was supposed to be announced for three nundinal weeks (between17 and 24 days) in advance of its coming to a vote. Thepatricians and theirclients sometimes exploited this fact as a kind offilibuster, since thetribunes of the plebs were required to wait another three-week period if their proposals could not receive a vote before dusk on the day they were introduced. Superstitions arose concerning the bad luck that followed a nundinae on the nones of a month or, later, on thefirst day ofJanuary. Intercalation was supposedly used to avoid such coincidences, even after the Julian reform of the calendar.

The7-day week began to be observed inItaly in the early imperial period,^[62] as practitioners and converts to eastern religions introducedHellenistic and Babylonian astrology, theJewishSaturdaysabbath, and theChristianLord's Day. The system was originally used for private worship and astrology but had replaced the nundinal week by the timeConstantine madeSunday (dies Solis) an official day of rest in AD 321. The hebdomadal week was also reckoned as a cycle of letters from A to G; these were adapted for Christian use as thedominical letters.

The names of Roman months originally functioned as adjectives (e.g., the January kalends occur in the January month) before being treated as substantive nouns in their own right (e.g., the kalends of January occur in January). Some of their etymologies are well-established: January and March honor the godsJanus^[63] andMars;^[64] July and August honorJulius Caesar^[65] and his successor, theemperorAugustus;^[66] and the months Quintilis,^[67] Sextilis,^[68] September,^[69] October,^[70] November,^[71] and December^[72] are archaic adjectives formed from theordinal numbers from5 to 10, their position in the calendar when it began around the spring equinox in March.^[69] Others are uncertain. February may derive from theFebrua festival or its eponymousfebrua ("purifications, expiatory offerings"), whose name may be eitherSabine or preserve an archaic word forsulphuric.^[73] April may relate to theEtruscan goddess Apru or the verbaperire ("to open").^{[citation needed]} May and June may honorMaia^[74] andJuno^[75] or derive from archaic terms for "senior" and "junior". A fewemperors attempted to add themselves to the calendar after Augustus, but without enduring success.

In classical Latin, the days of each month were usually reckoned as:^[58]

Dates after the ides count forward to the kalends of the next month and are expressed as such. For example, March 19 was expressed as "the 14th day before the April Kalends" (a.d. XIV Kal. Apr.), without a mention of March itself. The day after a kalends, nones, or ides was also often expressed as the "day after" (postridie) owing to their special status as particularly unlucky "black days".

The anomalous status of the new 31-day months under the Julian calendar was an effect of Caesar's desire to avoid affecting thefestivals tied to the nones and ides of various months. However, because the dates at the ends of the month all counted forward to the next kalends, they were all shifted by one or two days by the change. This created confusion with regard to certain anniversaries. For instance,Augustus's birthday on the 23rd day of September wasa.d. VIII Kal. Oct. in the old calendar buta.d. IX Kal. Oct. under the new system. The ambiguity caused honorary festivals to be held on either or both dates.

The Republican calendar only had 355 days, which meant that it would quickly unsynchronize from the solar year, causing, for example, agricultural festivals to occur out of season. The Roman solution to this problem was to periodically lengthen the calendar by adding extra dayswithin February. February was broken into two parts, each with an odd number of days. The first part ended with the Terminalia on the 23rd (a.d. VII Kal. Mart.), which was considered the end of the religious year; the five remaining days beginning with theRegifugium on the 24th (a.d. VI Kal. Mart.) formed the second part; and the intercalary monthMercedonius was inserted between them. In such years, the days between the ides and the Regifugium were counted down to either the Intercalary Kalends or to the Terminalia. The intercalary month counted down to nones and ides on its 5th and 13th day in the manner of the other short months. The remaining days of the month counted down towards the March Kalends, so that the end of Mercedonius and the second part of February were indistinguishable to the Romans, one ending ona.d. VII Kal. Mart. and the other picking up ata.d. VI Kal. Mart. and bearing the normal festivals of such dates.

Apparently because of the confusion of these changes or uncertainty as to whether an intercalary month would be ordered, dates after the February ides are attested as sometimes counting down towards theQuirinalia (February 17), theFeralia (February 21), or the Terminalia (February 23)^[76] rather than the intercalary or March kalends.

The third-century writer Censorinus says:

When it was thought necessary to add (every two years) an intercalary month of22 or 23 days, so that the civil year should correspond to the natural (solar) year, this intercalation was in preference made in February, between the Terminalia [23rd] and Regifugium [24th].^[77]

The fifth-century writerMacrobius says that the Romans intercalated22 and 23 days in alternate years;^[78] the intercalation was placed after February 23 and the remaining five days of February followed.^[79] To avoid the nones falling on a nundine, where necessary an intercalary day was inserted "in the middle of the Terminalia, where they placed the intercalary month".^[80] This appears to have been generally correct. In 170 BC,Intercalaris began on the second day after February 23^[81] and, in 167 BC, it began on the day after February 23.^[82]

Varro, writing in the first century BC, says "the twelfth month was February, and when intercalations take place the five last days of this month are removed."^[83] Since all the days after the Ides of Intercalaris were counted down to the beginning of March, the month had either 27 days (making 377 for the year) or 28 (making 378 for the year).

There is another theory which says that in intercalary years February had23 or 24 days and Intercalaris had 27. No date is offered for the Regifugium in 378-day years.^[84] Macrobius describes a further refinement whereby, in one 8-year period within a 24-year cycle, there were only three intercalary years, each of 377 days. This refinement brings the calendar back in line with the seasons and averages the length of the year to 365.25 days over 24 years.

The Pontifex Maximus determined when an intercalary month was to be inserted. On average, this happened in alternate years. The system of aligning the year through intercalary months broke down at least twice: the first time was during and after theSecond Punic War. It led to the reform of the 191 BCAcilian Law on Intercalation, the details of which are unclear, but it appears to have successfully regulated intercalation for over a century. The second breakdown was in the middle of the first century BC and may have been related to the increasingly chaotic and adversarial nature of Roman politics at the time. The position of Pontifex Maximus was not a full-time job; it was held by a member of the Roman elite, who would almost invariably be involved in the machinations of Roman politics. Because the term of office of electedRoman magistrates was defined in terms of a Roman calendar year, a Pontifex Maximus had an incentive to lengthen a year in which he or his allies were in power or shorten a year in which his political opponents held office.

Although there are many stories to interpret the intercalation, a period of22 or 23 days is always1⁄4 synodic month short. Obviously, the month beginning shifts forward (from the new moon, to the third quarter, to the full moon, to the first quarter, back the new moon) after intercalation.

As mentioned above, Rome's legendary 10-month calendar notionally lasted for 304 days but was usually thought to make up the rest of thesolar year during an unorganized winter period. The unattested but almost certain lunar year and the pre-Julian civil year were354 or 355 days long, with the difference from the solar year more or less corrected by an irregular intercalary month. TheJulian year was 365 days long, with aleap day doubled in length every fourth year, almost equivalent to the presentGregorian system.

Thecalendar era before and under theRoman kings is uncertain but dating byregnal years was common in antiquity. Under theRoman Republic, from 509 BC, years were most commonly described in terms of their reigningordinary consuls.^[47] (Temporary and honorary consuls were sometimes elected or appointed but were not used in dating.)^[47]Consular lists were displayed on thepublic calendars. After the institution of theRoman Empire, regnal dates based on the emperors' terms in office became more common. Some historians of the later republic and early imperial eras dated from the legendary founding of the city of Rome (ab urbe condita orAVC).^[47]Varro's date for this was 753 BC but other writers used different dates, varying by several decades.^{[citation needed]} Such dating was, however, never widespread. After the consuls waned in importance, most Roman dating was regnal^[86] or followedDiocletian's 15-yearIndiction tax cycle.^[47] These cycles were not distinguished, however, so that "year 2 of the indiction" may refer to any of 298, 313, 328, &c.^[47] TheOrthodox subjects of theByzantine Empire used various Christian eras, includingthose based on Diocletian's persecutions,Christ's incarnation, andthe supposed age of the world.

The Romans did not have records of their early calendars but, like modern historians, assumed the year originally began in March on the basis of the names of the months following June. The consulM. Fulvius Nobilior (r. 189 BC) wrote a commentary on the calendar at hisTemple of Hercules Musarum that claimed January had been named forJanus because the god faced both ways,^[83][where?] suggesting it had been instituted as a first month.^{[citation needed]} It was, however, usually said to have been instituted along with February, whose nature and festivals suggest it had originally been considered the last month of the year. The consuls' term of office—and thus the order of the years under the republic—seems to have changed several times. Their inaugurations were finally moved to January 1(Kal. Ian.) in 153 BC to allowQ. Fulvius Nobilior to attackSegeda inSpain during theCeltiberian Wars, before which they had occurred on March 15 (Eid. Mart.).^[87] There is reason to believe the inauguration date had been May 1 during the3rd century BC until 222 BC^{[citation needed]} andLivy mentions earlier inaugurations on May 15 (Eid. Mai.), July 1 (Kal. Qui.), August 1 (Kal. Sex.), October 1(Kal. Oct.), and December 15 (Eid. Dec.).^[88] Under the Julian calendar, the year began on January 1 but years of theIndiction cycle began on September 1.

In addition toEgypt's separate calendar, some provinces maintained their records using a local era.^[47]Africa dated its records sequentially from 39 BC;^[86]Spain from AD 38.^{[citation needed]} This dating system continued as theSpanish era used inmedieval Spain.^{[citation needed]}

The continuity of names from the Roman to theGregorian calendar can lead to the mistaken belief that Roman dates correspond to Julian or Gregorian ones. In fact, the essentially completelist of Roman consuls allows general certainty of years back tothe establishment of theRoman Republic but the uncertainty as to the end of lunar dating and the irregularity of Roman intercalation means that dates which can be independently verified are invariably weeks to months outside of their "proper" place. Two astronomical events dated byLivy show the calendar four months out of alignment with the Julian date in 190 BC and two months out of alignment in 168 BC. Thus, "the year of the consulship ofPublius Cornelius Scipio Africanus andPublius Licinius Crassus" (usually given as "205 BC") actually began on March 15, 205 BC, and ended on March 14, 204 BC, according to the Roman calendar but may have begun as early as November or December 206 BC owing to its misalignment. Even following the establishment of theJulian calendar, the leap years were not applied correctly by the Roman priests, meaning dates are a few days out of their "proper" place until a few decades into Augustus's reign.

Given the paucity of records regarding the state of the calendar and its intercalation, historians have reconstructed the correspondence of Roman dates to their Julian and Gregorian equivalents from disparate sources. There are detailed accounts of the decades leading up to the Julian reform, particularly the speeches and letters ofCicero, which permit an established chronology back to about 58 BC. Thenundinal cycle and a few known synchronisms—e.g., a Roman date in terms of theAttic calendar andOlympiad—are used to generate contested chronologies back to the start of theFirst Punic War in 264 BC. Beyond that, dates are roughly known based on clues such as the dates ofharvests and seasonalreligious festivals.

• List of calendars
• Julian,Alexandrian,Byzantine, &Gregorian calendars
• Fasti,menologia rustica, and theCalendar of 354
• List of Roman consuls andab urbe condita dating
• General Roman Calendar of the Catholic Church
• Roman festivals
• Undecimber

• Chris Bennett's reconstruction of early Roman dates in terms of the Julian calendar
• Early Roman Calendar – History
• Roman Date Calculator The North American Institute of Living Latin Studies
• "Theological commentary on the daily Gospel Reading".Apostolic Movement (Roman Catholic Church) (in English, French, and Spanish).