An example with is thecircle: we can takeV1 to be the unit tangent vector field, say pointing in the anti-clockwise direction. Thetorus of dimension is also parallelizable, as can be seen by expressing it as acartesian product of circles. For example, take and construct a torus from a square ofgraph paper with opposite edges glued together, to get an idea of the two tangent directions at each point. More generally, everyLie groupG is parallelizable, since a basis for the tangent space at theidentity element can be moved around by the action of the translation group ofG onG (every translation is a diffeomorphism and therefore these translations induce linear isomorphisms between tangent spaces of points inG).
A classical problem was to determine which of thespheresSn are parallelizable. The zero-dimensional caseS0 is trivially parallelizable. The caseS1 is the circle, which is parallelizable as has already been explained. Thehairy ball theorem shows thatS2 is not parallelizable. HoweverS3 is parallelizable, since it is the Lie groupSU(2). The only other parallelizable sphere isS7; this was proved in 1958, byFriedrich Hirzebruch,Michel Kervaire, and byRaoul Bott andJohn Milnor, in independent work. The parallelizable spheres correspond precisely to elements of unit norm in thenormed division algebras of the real numbers, complex numbers,quaternions, andoctonions, which allows one to construct a parallelism for each. Proving that other spheres are not parallelizable is more difficult, and requiresalgebraic topology.
The product of parallelizablemanifolds is parallelizable.
The termframed manifold (occasionallyrigged manifold) is most usually applied to an embedded manifold with a given trivialisation of thenormal bundle, and also for an abstract (that is, non-embedded) manifold with a given stable trivialisation of thetangent bundle.
A related notion is the concept of aπ-manifold.[4] A smooth manifold is called aπ-manifold if, when embedded in a high dimensional euclidean space, its normal bundle is trivial. In particular, every parallelizable manifold is a π-manifold.
^Bishop, Richard L.; Goldberg, Samuel I. (1968),Tensor Analysis on Manifolds, New York: Macmillan, p. 160
^Milnor, John W.; Stasheff, James D. (1974),Characteristic Classes, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 76, Princeton University Press, p. 15,ISBN0-691-08122-0