Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Administrative divisions of the Ottoman Empire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromOttoman provinces)

Vilayets and Sanjaks of the Ottoman Empire in 1875

Theadministrative divisions of the Ottoman Empire wereadministrative divisions of thestate organisation of the Ottoman Empire. Outside this system were various types ofvassal and tributary states.

The Ottoman Empire was first subdivided into provinces, in the sense of fixed territorial units with governors appointed by the sultan, in the late 14th century.[1] Thebeylerbey, or governor, of each province was appointed by the central government.[2]Sanjaks (banners) were governed bysanjak-beys, selected from the high military ranks by the central government.[2][3] Beylerbeyis had authority over all the sancakbeyis in a region.[2]Kaza was a subdivision of sancak and referred to the basic administrative district, governed by akadi.[2]

It is considered extremely difficult to define the number and exact borders of Ottoman provinces and domains, as their borders were changed constantly.[4] Until theTanzimat period from 1839 to 1876, the borders of administrative units fluctuated, reflecting the changing strategies of the Ottomans, the emergence of new threats in the region, and the rise of powerfulayans.[5] All the subdivisions were very unequal in regard of area and population, and the presence of numerousnomadic tribes contributed to the extreme variability of the population figures.[6]

List of types

[edit]

In English, Ottoman subdivisions are seldom known by myriad Turkish terms (vilayet, eyalet, beylerbeylik, sancak, nahiye, kaza, etc.) which are often eschewed in favour of the English-language denomination (e.g. "province", "county", or "district") that is perceived to be the closest to the Turkish original.[7] These translations are rarely consistent between the works of different scholars, however.

TurkishEnglishEtymologyHeadNotes
vilayetprovince, department[8]from ArabicwilāyahWali (administrative title)Established: 21 January 1867, replaced the eyalets
eyaletprovincereplaced the beylerbeylik, starting 1590
beylerbeylikbeylerbey
sancak (liva)sanjak, banner, district, arrondissement[8]sanjakbey/mutesarrifsmostly subdivision of eyalet or vilayet, but also independent sanjaks
kazajurisdiction, subdistrict, cantonkadi (until 1839)/kaymakambelow sanjak or mutasarrifate
nahiyesubdistrict, commune, parishfrom Arabicnāḥiyahkaymakambelow kaza
belediyemunicipalityfrom Arabicbaladiyyahbelow kaza
mutasarriflıkmutasarrifatemutasarrıfdirect controlled
ağalıkagalukaga
kadılıkkadilukkadisometimes equivalent of kaza

Sanjaks were further divided intotimars (fiefs held bytimariots),kadiluks (the area of responsibility of a judge, orKadi)[9] andzeamets (alsoziam; largertimars).

Initial organization (pre-1362)

[edit]
State organisation of
the Ottoman Empire
Coat of arms of the Ottoman Empire (1882–1922)
Classic period
Constitutional period

The initial organization dates back to the Ottoman beginnings as aSeljuk vassal state (Uç Beyligi) in centralAnatolia. The Ottoman Empire over the years became an amalgamation of pre-existingpolities, theAnatolian beyliks, brought under the sway of the rulingHouse of Osman.

This extension was based on an already established administrative structure of theSeljuk system in which the hereditary rulers of these territories were known asbeys. These beys (local leadership), which were not eliminated, continued to rule under thesuzerainty of the Ottomansultans. The term bey came to be applied not only to these former rulers but also to new governors appointed where the local leadership had been eliminated.

The Ottoman Empire was, at first, subdivided into the sovereign'ssanjak and other sanjaks entrusted to theOttomansultan's sons. Sanjaks were governed bysanjakbeys, military governors who received a flag or standard – a "sanjak" (the literal meaning) – from the sultan.

As the Empire expanded intoEurope, the need for an intermediate level of administration arose and, under the rule ofMurad I (r. 1359-1389), abeylerbey ("bey of beys") or governor-general was appointed to overseeRumelia, the European part of the empire. At the end of the 14th century, abeylerbeylik was also established forAnatolia, with his capital atKütahya.[10] He was always considered inferior in rank to thebeylerbey of Rumelia, since large areas nominally under his control were given to the ruler's sons.[10]

Following the establishment ofbeylerbeyliks,sanjaks became second-order administrative divisions, although they continued to be of the first order in certain circumstances such as newly conquered areas that had yet to be assigned abeylerbey. In addition to their duties as governors-general,beylerbeys were the commanders of all troops in their province.

Following the conquests between 1362 and 1400 ofMurad I and his sonBayezid I, a need arose for the formal organisation of Ottoman territory.

Administrative hierarchy

[edit]

First-level divisions

[edit]

There were two main eras of administrative organisation. The first was the initial organisation that evolved with the rise of the Empire and the second was the organisation after extensive administrative reforms of 1864.

Eyalets (1362–1864)

[edit]
Main article:Eyalet
Eyalets in 1609
Eyalets in 1795

Aneyalet (alsopashalik orbeylerbeylik) was the territory of office of abeylerbey, and was further subdivided insanjaks.[11] Toward the end of the 16th century, thebeylerbeyliks began to be known aseyalets.[12] Thebeylerbeyliks where thetimar system was not applied, such as Habesh, Algers, Egypt, Baghdad, Basra andLahsa, were more autonomous than the others. Instead of collecting provincial revenues through thetimariotsipahis, thebeylerbey transferred fixed annual sums to Istanbul, known as thesalyane.[12]

Vilayets (1864–1922)

[edit]
Main article:Vilayet
Vilayets in 1905
Table of Ottoman Administrative Divisions in 1905 (table published in 1908)

The Vilayets were introduced with the promulgation of the "Vilayet Law" (Turkish:Teskil-i Vilayet Nizamnamesi)[13] in 1864, as part of the administrative reforms of theTanzimat period that were being enacted throughout the empire.[14][15]

Unlike the previouseyalet system, the 1864 law established a hierarchy of administrative units: the vilayet,liva/sanjak (cf.Liwa (Arabic)),kaza andvillage council, to which the 1871 Vilayet Law added thenahiye.[16] The 1864 law also specified the responsibilities of the governor (wali) of the vilayet and their councils.[16] At the same time, the law left to the governors vast scope for independent action as well as responsibility, as part of a system intended to achieve a large degree of efficiency in ruling the provinces.[14]

The new provincial system could not be introduced in provinces at the same time, due to both insufficient funds and a lack of experience in administering the new law. Therefore, the newDanube Vilayet, composed of the former eyalets ofSilistria,Vidin, andNis, was selected to be the pilot project.[17]Midhat Pasha andCevdet Pasha were particularly successful in applying the new law in the Vilayets of Danube andAleppo, respectively.[17]

By 1865 the four vilayets of Danube, Aleppo,Erzurum andBosnia were fully organized and in operation.Damascus,Tripolitania, andEdirne followed the next year.[17] In 1867, 13 new vilayets were organized, includingBursa,Izmir,Trabzon,Salonica, Prizren, andIskodra, with an autonomousCrete being organized as a vilayet byAli Pasha in 1871.[17] By the end of 1876 the new provincial system was in operation all over the empire, with the sole exception of the Arabian Peninsula and autonomous provinces like Egypt.[17]

Mahmud Nedim Pasha reduced the size of some of the larger provinces, thus takingSofia from the Danube Vilayet,Sebinkarahisar from Trabzon, andMaras from Adana and making them into separate provinces, and also taking Herzegovina from Bosnia and joining it with Novipazar in a new province.[18]

Second-level divisions (sanjaks)

[edit]
Main article:Sanjak

The provinces (eyalets, later vilayets) were divided intosanjaks (also calledlivas) governed bysanjakbeys (also calledMutesarrifs) and were further subdivided intotimars (fiefs held bytimariots),kadiluks (the area of responsibility of a judge, orKadi)[9] andzeamets (alsoziam; larger timars).

Third-level divisions

[edit]
Main article:Kaza

Sanjaks were divided into kazas, along with other divisions. The position of kazas in the administrative hierarchy was clarified after 1839.

Governors

[edit]

Beylerbey

[edit]
Main article:Beylerbey
A detailed map showing the Ottoman Empire and its dependencies, including its administrative divisions (vilayets, sanjaks, kazas), in 1899.

The Turkish word for governor-general isBeylerbey, meaning 'lord of lords'. In times of war, they would assemble under his standard and fight as a unit in the sultan's army. However, as a territorial governor, the Beylerbey now had wider responsibilities. He played the major role in allocating fiefs in his eyalet, and had a responsibility for maintaining order and dispensing justice. His household, like the sultan's in the capital, was the political centre of the eyalet.[1] By the mid-16th century, apart from the principalities north of the Danube, all eyalets came under the direct rule of the sultan. The Beylerbeys were all his appointees, and he could remove or transfer them at will. Their term of office was limited: governorships were not hereditary, and no one could serve for life.[1]

The office of Beylerbey was the most prestigious and the most profitable in the provincial government, and it was from among the Beylerbeys that the sultan almost always chose his viziers. There was also, it appears, a hierarchy among the governors themselves. The senior was the Beylerbey of Rumelia who, from 1536, had the right to sit on the Imperial Council. Precedence among the remainder, according to Ayn Ali in 1609, followed the order in which the eyalets were conquered, although he does not make it clear whether this ranking had anything other than a ceremonial significance. However, before 1650, there was another development. During this period, the practice began of appointing some Beylerbeys with the rank of vizier. A vizieral governor, according to the chancellor Abdurrahman Pasha in 1676, had command over the governors of adjoining eyalets who 'should have recourse to him and obey his command'. Furthermore, 'when Beylerbeys with Vizierates are dismissed from their eyalet, they listen to lawsuits and continue to exercise Vizieral command until they reach Istanbul'.[1]

Sanjak-bey

[edit]
Main article:Sanjak-bey
Major R Huber's 1899 map of the Ottoman Empire, showing detailed subdivisions (vilayets, sanjaks and kazas)

The office ofSanjak-bey resembled that of Beylerbey on a more modest scale. Like the Beylerbey, the Sanjak-bey drew his income from a prebend, which consisted usually of revenues from the towns, quays and ports within the boundary of his sanjak.[1]

Like the Beylerbey, the Sanjak-bey was also a military commander. The term sanjak means 'flag' or 'standard' and, in times of war, the cavalrymen holding fiefs in his sanjak, gathered under his banner. The troops of each sanjak, under the command of their governor, would then assemble as an army and fight under the banner of the Beylerbey of the eyalet. In this way, the structure of command on the battlefield resembled the hierarchy of provincial government. Within his own sanjak, a governor was responsible above all for maintaining order and, with the cooperation of the fief holders, arresting and punishing wrongdoers. For this, he usually received half of the fines imposed on miscreants, with the fief holder on whose lands the misdeed took place, receiving the other half. Sanjak governors also had other duties, for example, the pursuit of bandits, the investigation of heretics, the provision of supplies for the army, or the despatch of materials for shipbuilding, as the sultan commanded.[1]

Sanjak governors also served as military commanders of all of the timariot andzeamet-holdingcavalrymen in their sanjak.[citation needed] Some provinces such asEgypt,Baghdad,Abyssinia, andAl-Hasa (thesalyane provinces) were not subdivided into sanjaks and timars. The area governed by anAga was often known as anAgaluk.[9] The termArpalik (Turkish:Arpalik), or Arpaluk, refers to large estate (i.e.sanjak) entrusted to some holder of senior position, or to somemargrave, as temporary arrangement before they were appointed to some appropriate position.[19] Thebarleycorn was known asarpa inTurkish, and the feudal system inOttoman Empire employed the term Arpalik, or "barley-money", to refer to a second allowance made to officials to offset the costs of fodder for their horses (for covering the expenses of keeping a small unit ofcavalry).[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefImber, Colin (2002)."The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power"(PDF). pp. 177–200. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on July 26, 2014.
  2. ^abcdAğır, Seven (November 2010)."Sacred Obligations, Precious Interests: Ottoman Grain Administration in Comparative Perspective"(PDF).Department of Economics - Yale University. p. 12. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on March 25, 2012.
  3. ^E. Streusand, Douglas (2011). "3: The Ottoman Empire".Islamic Gunpowder Empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. Central Avenue, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. p. 98.ISBN 978-0-8133-1359-7.
  4. ^Peter F. Sugar (1977).Southeastern Europe Under Ottoman Rule: 1354 - 1804. University of Washington Press. p. 41.ISBN 978-0-295-80363-0. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  5. ^Gábor Ágoston; Bruce Alan Masters (2009-01-01).Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. Infobase Publishing. p. 100.ISBN 978-1-4381-1025-7. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  6. ^System of universal geography founded on the works of Malte-Brun and Balbi
  7. ^Gábor Ágoston; Bruce Alan Masters (2009-01-01).Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. Infobase Publishing. p. 36.ISBN 978-1-4381-1025-7. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  8. ^ab"Australian Light Horse Studies Centre".
  9. ^abcMalcolm, Noel (1994).Bosnia: A Short History. Macmillan. p. 50.ISBN 0-330-41244-2.
  10. ^abStanford J. Shaw (29 October 1976).History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey: Volume 1, Empire of the Gazis: The Rise and Decline of the Ottoman Empire 1280-1808. Cambridge University Press. p. 121.ISBN 978-0-521-29163-7. Retrieved1 June 2013.
  11. ^Raymond Detrez; Barbara Segaert (2008-01-01).Europe and the historical legacies in the Balkans. Peter Lang. p. 167.ISBN 978-90-5201-374-9. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  12. ^abSelcuk Aksin Somel (2010-03-23).The A to Z of the Ottoman Empire. Scarecrow Press. p. 41.ISBN 978-1-4617-3176-4. Retrieved2013-06-02.
  13. ^Naim Kapucu; Hamit Palabiyik (2008).Turkish Public Administration: From Tradition to the Modern Age. USAK Books. p. 164.ISBN 978-605-4030-01-9. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  14. ^abMa?mud Yazbak (1998).Haifa in the Late Ottoman Period 1864-1914: A Muslim Town in Transition. BRILL. p. 28.ISBN 978-90-04-11051-9. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  15. ^The Arabs of the Ottoman Empire, 1516-1918: A Social and Cultural History, p. 177. Bruce Masters, Cambridge University Press, 2013.ISBN 9781107033634
  16. ^abMartha Mundy; Richard Saumarez Smith (2007-03-15).Governing Property, Making the Modern State: Law, Administration and Production in Ottoman Syria. I.B.Tauris. p. 50.ISBN 978-1-84511-291-2. Retrieved2013-06-01.
  17. ^abcdeStanford Jay Shaw; Ezel Kural Shaw (1977).History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press. p. 90.ISBN 978-0-521-29166-8. Retrieved2013-06-04.
  18. ^Stanford Jay Shaw; Ezel Kural Shaw (1977).History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge University Press. p. 154.ISBN 978-0-521-29166-8. Retrieved2013-06-04.
  19. ^Ze'evi, Dror (1996),An Ottoman century : the district of Jerusalem in the 1600s, Albany: State University of New York Press, p. 121,ISBN 978-0-585-04345-6,OCLC 42854785, retrieved29 December 2011
  20. ^Houtsma M Th; Arnold TW; Wensinck AJ (1993).E.J. Brill's First Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1913-1936. Brill. p. 460.ISBN 90-04-09796-1.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Imber, Colin (2002).The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Inalcik, Halil (1973).The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300-1600. Translated by Itzkowitz, Norman; Imber, Colin. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  • Magocsi, Paul Robert (2002).Historical Atlas of Central Europe (2nd ed.). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  • Nouveau Larousse illustré (in French).[full citation needed] undated (early 20th century), passim (in French)
  • Pitcher, Donald Edgar (1972).An Historical Geography of the Ottoman Empire. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  • Westermann Großer Atlas zur Weltgeschichte (in German).[full citation needed]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toSubdivisions of the Ottoman Empire.
Africa
Anatolia
Europe
Levant
Arabia
Mesopotamia
1867–1922 (vilayets andmutasarrıfates)
Africa
Anatolia
Europe
Levant
Arabia
Mesopotamia
Vassals and autonomies
Vassals
Autonomies
Central system
House of Osman
Government
Imperial Council (Porte)
(classical period)
Cabinet
(reform period)
Imperial government
(reform period)
General Assembly
(constitutional period)
Ottoman "Arma" symbol
Millets
Provincial
Ottomanhistory of themodern world
Identities
1566
1900
Northern regions
Arab
world
Foreigners
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Administrative_divisions_of_the_Ottoman_Empire&oldid=1317045050"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp