Theopisthokonts (fromAncient Greekὀπίσθιος (opísthios) 'rear, posterior' andκοντός (kontós) 'pole, i.e.flagellum') are a broad group ofeukaryotes, including both theanimal andfunguskingdoms.[5] The opisthokonts, previously called the "Fungi/Metazoa group",[6] are generally recognized as aclade. Opisthokonts together withApusomonadida andBreviata comprise the larger cladeObazoa.[7][8][9][10][11]
Opisthokont Temporal range:1010–0 Ma[1] | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Clockwise, from top left:Abeoforma whisleri (Mesomycetozoea);Amanita muscaria (Fungi);Desmarella moniliformis (Choanoflagellatea);bonnet macaque (Metazoa);Nuclearia thermophila (Nucleariida);Ministeria vibrans (Filasterea) | |
Scientific classification![]() | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Clade: | Amorphea |
Clade: | Obazoa |
Clade: | Opisthokonta Copeland 1956,[2]emend.Cavalier-Smith 1987,[3]emend. Adlet al., 2005[4] |
Subgroups | |
Flagella and other characteristics
editA common characteristic of opisthokonts is thatflagellate cells, such as thesperm of most animals and thespores of thechytridfungi, propel themselves with a singleposterior flagellum. It is this feature that gives the group its name. In contrast, flagellate cells in other eukaryote groups propel themselves withone or moreanterior flagella. Flagellate cells however have been secondarily lost in some opisthokont groups, including most of the fungi.[7]
Opisthokont characteristics include synthesis of extracellularchitin in exoskeleton, cyst/spore wall, or cell wall of filamentous growth and hyphae; the extracellular digestion of substrates with osmotrophic absorption of nutrients; and other cell biosynthetic and metabolic pathways. Genera at the base of each clade are amoeboid andphagotrophic.[12]
History
editThe close relationship between animals and fungi was suggested byThomas Cavalier-Smith in 1987,[3] who used the informal name opisthokonta (the formal name has been used for thechytrids byCopeland in 1956), and was supported by later genetic studies.[13]
Early phylogenies placed fungi near theplants and other groups that havemitochondria with flatcristae, but this character varies. More recently, it has been said that holozoa (animals) and holomycota (fungi) are much more closely related to each other than either is to plants, because opisthokonts have a triple fusion ofcarbamoyl phosphate synthetase,dihydroorotase, andaspartate carbamoyltransferase that is not present in plants, and plants have a fusion ofthymidylate synthase anddihydrofolate reductase not present in the opisthokonts. Animals and fungi are also more closely related to amoebas than to plants, and plants are more closely related to theSAR supergroup of protists than to animals or fungi.[citation needed] Animals and fungi are bothheterotrophs, unlike plants, and while most fungi aresessile like plants, there are also sessile animals.
Cavalier-Smith and Stechmann argue that the uniciliate eukaryotes such as opisthokonts andAmoebozoa, collectively calledunikonts, split off from the otherbiciliate eukaryotes, calledbikonts, shortly after theyevolved.[14]
Taxonomy
editOpisthokonts are divided intoHolomycota or Nucletmycea (fungi and all organisms more closely related to fungi than to animals) andHolozoa (animals and all organisms more closely related to animals than to fungi); no opisthokonts basal to the Holomycota/Holozoa split have yet been identified.[citation needed] The Opisthokonts was largely resolved by Torriella et al.[15] Holomycota and Holozoa are composed of the following groups.[citation needed]
- Holomycota (Fungus-like)
- Fungi
- Includes:
- chytrids (flagellated,zoosporic fungi)
- Fonticula[16] (more recent work considers this to be part ofCristidiscoidea, a sister group to the fungi)
- Hyaloraphidium (previously thought to be agreen alga, now considered a fungus)
- microsporidia (previously thought to beapicomplexia)
- Nucleariida (more recent work considers this to be part ofCristidiscoidea, a sister group to the fungi)
- Excludes:
- labyrinthulomycetes (slime nets) (now included in theSAR supergroup)
- myxomycetes (now included inamoebozoans)
- oomycetes (water molds) (now included in theSAR supergroup)
- Includes:
- Rozellida (placement uncertain)
- Fungi
- Holozoa (Animal-like)
- Corallochytrium (formerly considered aHeterokont)
- Filozoa
- Animalia (includingmyxozoa)
- Choanoflagellata (flagellates formerly included in protozoa)
- Filasterea
- Mesomycetozoea
- Amoebidiales (formerly considered trichomycetes)
- Dermocystida (formerly considered parasitic fungi or sporozoans)
- Eccrinales (formerly considered fungi)
- Ichthyophonida (formerly considered parasitic fungiincertae sedis)
Phylogeny
editThe followingphylogenetic tree indicates the evolutionary relationships between the different opisthokont lineages, and the time divergence of the clades in millions of years ago (Mya).[17][18][19]
Gallery
edit- Microsporidian spore (Microsporidia)
- Chytrid (flagellated fungus)
- Sphaeroforma sp. (Mesomycetozoea)
- Ministeria sp. (Filasterea)
- Capsaspora sp. (Filasterea)
- Desmarella sp. colony (Choanoflagellatea)
References
edit- ^Loron, Corentin C.; François, Camille; Rainbird, Robert H.; Turner, Elizabeth C.; Borensztajn, Stephan; Javaux, Emmanuelle J. (June 2019). "Early fungi from the Proterozoic era in Arctic Canada".Nature.570 (7760):232–235.Bibcode:2019Natur.570..232L.doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1217-0.PMID 31118507.S2CID 162180486.
- ^The Classification of Lower Organisms. Palo Alto: Pacific Books. 1956.OCLC 477890.
- ^abRayner, Alan D. M., ed. (1987). "The origin of fungi and pseudofungi".Evolutionary biology of Fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 339–353.ISBN 0-521-33050-5.OL 2936766W.
- ^Adl, Sina M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Farmer, Mark A.; Andersen, Robert A.; Anderson, O. Roger; Barta, John R.; et al. (September–October 2005)."The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists".The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.52 (5):399–451.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x.PMID 16248873.
- ^Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Minge MA, Espelund M, Orr R, Ruden T, Jakobsen KS, Cavalier-Smith T (May 2008). Aramayo R (ed.)."Multigene phylogeny of choanozoa and the origin of animals".PLOS ONE.3 (5): e2098.Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2098S.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002098.PMC 2346548.PMID 18461162.
- ^"Fungi/Metazoa group".UniProt. Archived fromthe original on 17 February 2009. Retrieved2009-03-08.
- ^abSteenkamp ET, Wright J, Baldauf SL (January 2006)."The protistan origins of animals and fungi".Molecular Biology and Evolution.23 (1):93–106.doi:10.1093/molbev/msj011.PMID 16151185.
- ^Huang, Jinling; Xu, Ying; Gogarten, Johann Peter (November 2005)."The presence of a haloarchaeal type tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase marks the opisthokonts as monophyletic".Molecular Biology and Evolution.22 (11):2142–2146.doi:10.1093/molbev/msi221.PMID 16049196.
- ^Parfrey LW, Barbero E, Lasser E, Dunthorn M, Bhattacharya D, Patterson DJ, Katz LA (December 2006)."Evaluating support for the current classification of eukaryotic diversity".PLOS Genetics.2 (12): e220.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220.PMC 1713255.PMID 17194223.
- ^Torruella, G.; Derelle, R.; Paps, J.; Lang, B. F.; Roger, A. J.; Shalchian-Tabrizi, K.; Ruiz-Trillo, I. (February 2012)."Phylogenetic relationships within the Opisthokonta based on phylogenomic analyses of conserved single-copy protein domains".Molecular Biology and Evolution.29 (2):531–544.doi:10.1093/molbev/msr185.PMC 3350318.PMID 21771718.
- ^Eme, L.; Sharpe, S. C.; Brown, M. W.; Roger, A. J. (August 2014)."On the age of eukaryotes: evaluating evidence from fossils and molecular clocks".Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology.6 (8): a016139.doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016139.PMC 4107988.PMID 25085908.
- ^Adl, Sina M.; Bass, David; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Schoch, Conrad L.; Smirnov, Alexey; et al. (January 2019)."Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes".The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.66 (1):4–119.doi:10.1111/jeu.12691.PMC 6492006.PMID 30257078.
- ^Wainright PO, Hinkle G, Sogin ML, Stickel SK (April 1993)."Monophyletic origins of the metazoa: an evolutionary link with fungi"(PDF).Science.260 (5106):340–342.Bibcode:1993Sci...260..340W.doi:10.1126/science.8469985.PMID 8469985.S2CID 27373608.
- ^Stechmann, Alexandra;Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (July 2002). "Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion".Science.297 (5578):89–91.Bibcode:2002Sci...297...89S.doi:10.1126/science.1071196.PMID 12098695.S2CID 21064445.
- ^Torruella, Guifré; De Mendoza, Alex; Grau-Bové, Xavier; Antó, Meritxell; Chaplin, Mark A.; Del Campo, Javier; et al. (September 2015)."Phylogenomics Reveals Convergent Evolution of Lifestyles in Close Relatives of Animals and Fungi".Current Biology.25 (18):2404–2410.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.053.PMID 26365255.
- ^Brown, M. W.; Spiegel, F. W.; Silberman, J. D. (December 2009)."Phylogeny of the "forgotten" cellular slime mold, Fonticula alba, reveals a key evolutionary branch within Opisthokonta".Molecular Biology and Evolution.26 (12):2699–2709.doi:10.1093/molbev/msp185.PMID 19692665.
- ^Tedersoo, Leho; Sánchez-Ramírez, Santiago; Kõljalg, Urmas; Bahram, Mohammad; Döring, Markus; Schigel, Dmitry; et al. (2018)."High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses".Fungal Diversity.90 (1):135–159.doi:10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0.ISSN 1560-2745.
- ^Galindo, Luis Javier; Torruella, Guifré; López-García, Purificación; Ciobanu, Maria; Gutiérrez-Preciado, Ana; Karpov, Sergey A.; Moreira, David (June 2023)."Phylogenomics Supports the Monophyly of Aphelids and Fungi and Identifies New Molecular Synapomorphies"(PDF).Systematic Biology.72 (3):505–515.doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac054.PMID 35900180.
- ^Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; Mikhailov, Kirill V.; Hehenberger, Elisabeth; Karpov, Sergei A.; Prokina, Kristina I.; Esaulov, Anton S.; et al. (November 2020)."New Lineage of Microbial Predators Adds Complexity to Reconstructing the Evolutionary Origin of Animals".Current Biology.30 (22): 4500–4509.e5.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.061.PMID 32976804.