Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Wikipedia

Lithium iron phosphate battery

Thelithium iron phosphate battery (LiFePO
4
battery
) orLFP battery (lithium ferrophosphate) is a type oflithium-ion battery usinglithium iron phosphate (LiFePO
4
) as thecathode material, and agraphiticcarbon electrode with a metallic backing as theanode. Because of their low cost, high safety, low toxicity, long cycle life and other factors, LFP batteries are finding a number of roles invehicle use, utility-scale stationary applications, andbackup power.[7] LFP batteries are cobalt-free.[8] As of September 2022, LFP type battery market share forEVs reached 31%, and of that, 68% were from EV makersTesla andBYD alone.[9]Chinese manufacturers currently hold a near-monopoly of LFP battery type production.[10] With patents having started to expire in 2022 and the increased demand for cheaper EV batteries,[11] LFP type production is expected to rise further and surpasslithium nickel manganese cobalt oxides (NMC) type batteries.[12] By 2024, the LFP world market was estimated at $11-17 billion.[13][14]

Lithium iron phosphate battery
LiFePO4_AA
A Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) 14500 battery (right) shown next to a battery placeholder (left)
Specific energy90–160 Wh/kg (320–580 J/g or kJ/kg)[1]
Next gen: 180–205 Wh/kg[2]
Energy density325 Wh/L (1200 kJ/L)[1]
Specific poweraround 200 W/kg[3]
Energy/consumer-price1-4 Wh/US$[4][5]
Time durability> 10 years
Cycle durability2,500–9,000[6] cycles
Nominal cell voltage3.2 V

Thespecific energy of LFP batteries is lower than that of other common lithium-ion battery types such asnickel manganese cobalt (NMC) andnickel cobalt aluminum (NCA). As of 2024, the specific energy ofCATL's LFP battery is claimed to be 205watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg) on the cell level.[15]BYD's LFP battery specific energy is 150 Wh/kg. The best NMC batteries exhibit specific energy values of over 300 Wh/kg. Notably, the specific energy of Panasonic’s “2170” NCA batteries used inTesla’s 2020 Model 3 mid-size sedan is around 260 Wh/kg, which is 70% of its "pure chemicals" value. LFP batteries also exhibit a lower operatingvoltage than other lithium-ion battery types.

History

edit

LiFePO
4
is a natural mineral known astriphylite.Arumugam Manthiram andJohn B. Goodenough first identified the polyanion class of cathode materials forlithium ion batteries.[16][17][18]LiFePO
4
was then identified as a cathode material belonging to the polyanion class for use in batteries in 1996 by Padhiet al.[19][20] Reversible extraction of lithium fromLiFePO
4
and insertion of lithium intoFePO
4
was demonstrated. Because of its low cost, non-toxicity, the natural abundance ofiron, its excellent thermal stability, safety characteristics, electrochemical performance, and specific capacity (170 mA·h/g, or 610 C/g) it has gained considerable market acceptance.[21][22]

The chief barrier to commercialization was its intrinsically lowelectrical conductivity. This problem was overcome by reducing the particle size, coating theLiFePO
4
particles with conductive materials such ascarbon nanotubes,[23][24] or both. This approach was developed byMichel Armand and his coworkers atHydro-Québec and theUniversité de Montréal in 2015.[25][26][27] Another approach byYet Ming Chiang's group atMIT consisted ofdoping[21] LFP withcations of materials such asaluminium,niobium, andzirconium.

Negative electrodes (anode, on discharge) made ofpetroleum coke were used in early lithium-ion batteries; later types used natural or synthetic graphite.[28]

Specifications

edit
 
Multiple lithium iron phosphate modules are wired inseries and parallel to create a 2800 Ah 52 V battery module. Total battery capacity is 145.6 kWh. Note the large, solidtinned copperbusbar connecting the modules together. This busbar is rated for 700 amps DC to accommodate the high currents generated in this 48 volt DC system.
 
Lithium iron phosphate modules, each 700 Ah, 3.25 V. Two modules are wired in parallel to create a single 3.25 V 1400 Ah battery pack with a capacity of 4.55 kWh.
  • Cell voltage
    • Minimum discharge voltage = 2.0-2.8 V[29][30][31]
    • Working voltage =3.0 ~ 3.3 V
    • Max Viable voltage =2.5 ~ 3.47 V
    • Maximum charge voltage = 3.60-3.65 V[32][30]
  • Volumetricenergy density = 220 Wh/L (790 kJ/L)
  • Gravimetric energy density > 90 Wh/kg[33] (> 320 J/g). Up to 160 Wh/kg[1] (580 J/g). Latest version announced in end of 2023, early 2024 made significant improvements in energy density from 180 up to 205 Wh/kg[34] without increasing production costs.
  • Cycle life from 2,500 to more than 9,000 cycles depending on conditions.[6] Next gen high energy density versions have increased charging lifecycles probably around 15000 max cycles.[citation needed]

Comparison with other battery types

edit

The LFP battery uses a lithium-ion-derived chemistry and shares many advantages and disadvantages with other lithium-ion battery chemistries. However, there are significant differences.

Resource availability

edit

Iron and phosphates are verycommon in the Earth's crust. LFP contains neithernickel[35] norcobalt, both of which are supply-constrained and expensive. As with lithium, human rights[36] and environmental[37] concerns have been raised concerning the use of cobalt. Environmental concerns have also been raised regarding the extraction of nickel.[38]

Cost

edit

A 2020 report published by theDepartment of Energy compared the costs of large scale energy storage systems built with LFP vs NMC. It found that the cost per kWh of LFP batteries was about 6% less than NMC, and it projected that the LFP cells would last about 67% longer (more cycles). Because of differences between the cell's characteristics, the cost of some other components of the storage system would be somewhat higher for LFP, but in balance it still remains less costly per kWh than NMC.[39]

In 2020, the lowest reported LFP cell prices were $80/kWh (12.5 Wh/$) with an average price of $137/kWh,[40] while in 2023 the average price had dropped to $100/kWh.[41]By early 2024,VDA-sized LFP cells were available for less thanRMB 0.5/Wh ($70/kWh), while Chinese automakerLeapmotor stated it buys LFP cells at RMB 0.4/Wh ($56/kWh) and believe they could drop to RMB 0.32/Wh ($44/kWh).[42] By mid 2024, assembled LFP batteries were available to consumers in the US for around $115/kWh.[43]

Better aging and cycle-life characteristics

edit

LFP chemistry offers a considerably longercycle life than other lithium-ion chemistries. Under most conditions it supports more than 3,000 cycles, and under optimal conditions it supports more than 10,000 cycles. NMC batteries support about 1,000 to 2,300 cycles, depending on conditions.[6]

LFP cells experience a slower rate ofcapacity loss (a.k.a. greatercalendar-life) than lithium-ion battery chemistries such as cobalt (LiCoO
2
), manganese spinel (LiMn
2
O
4
),lithium-ion polymer batteries (LiPo battery) orlithium-ion batteries.[44]

Viable alternative to lead-acid batteries

edit

Because of the nominal 3.2 V output, four cells can be placed in series for a nominal voltage of 12.8 V. This comes close to the nominal voltage of six-celllead-acid batteries. Along with the good safety characteristics of LFP batteries, this makes LFP a good potential replacement for lead-acid batteries in applications such as automotive and solar applications, provided the charging systems are adapted not to damage the LFP cells through excessive charging voltages (beyond 3.6 volts DC per cell while under charge), temperature-based voltage compensation, equalisation attempts or continuoustrickle charging. The LFP cells must be at least balanced initially before the pack is assembled and a protection system also needs to be implemented to ensure no cell can be discharged below a voltage of 2.5 V or severe damage will occur in most instances, due to irreversible deintercalation of LiFePO4 into FePO4.[45]

Safety

edit

One important advantage over other lithium-ion chemistries is thermal and chemical stability, which improves battery safety.[46][37][better source needed]LiFePO
4
is an intrinsically safer cathode material thanLiCoO
2
andmanganese dioxidespinels through omission of thecobalt, whose negativetemperature coefficient ofresistance can encouragethermal runaway. ThePO bond in the(PO
4
)3−
ion is stronger than theCoO bond in the(CoO
2
)
ion, so that when abused (short-circuited,overheated, etc.), the oxygen atoms are released more slowly. This stabilization of the redox energies also promotes faster ion migration.[47][better source needed]

As lithium migrates out of the cathode in aLiCoO
2
cell, theCoO
2
undergoesnon-linear expansion that affects the structural integrity of the cell. The fully lithiated and unlithiated states ofLiFePO
4
are structurally similar which means thatLiFePO
4
cells are more structurally stable thanLiCoO
2
cells.[citation needed]

No lithium remains in the cathode of a fully charged LFP cell. In aLiCoO
2
cell, approximately 50% remains.LiFePO
4
is highly resilient during oxygen loss, which typically results in an exothermic reaction in other lithium cells.[22] As a result,LiFePO
4
cells are harder to ignite in the event of mishandling (especially during charge). TheLiFePO
4
battery does notdecompose at high temperatures.[37]

Lower energy density

edit

Theenergy density (energy/volume) of a new LFP battery as of 2008 was some 14% lower than that of a newLiCoO
2
battery.[48] Since discharge rate is a percentage of battery capacity, a higher rate can be achieved by using a larger battery (moreampere hours) if low-current batteries must be used.

Uses

edit
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Lithium iron phosphate battery" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Home energy storage

edit

Enphase pioneered LFP along with SunFusion Energy Systems LiFePO4 Ultra-Safe ECHO 2.0 and Guardian E2.0 home or business energy storage batteries for reasons of cost and fire safety, although the market remains split among competing chemistries.[49] Though lower energy density compared to other lithium chemistries adds mass and volume, both may be more tolerable in a static application. In 2021, there were several suppliers to the home end user market, including SonnenBatterie andEnphase.Tesla Motors continued to useNMC batteries in its home energy storage products until the release of the Power Wall 3 in 2023. Tesla utility-scale batteries switched to using LFP in 2021.[50] According to EnergySage the most frequently quoted home energy storage battery brand in the U.S. is Enphase, which in 2021 surpassedTesla Motors andLG.[51]

Vehicles

edit

Higher discharge rates needed for acceleration, lower weight and longer life makes this battery type ideal for forklifts, bicycles and electric cars. Twelve-volt LiFePO4 batteries are also gaining popularity as a second (house) battery for a caravan, motor-home or boat.[52]

Tesla Motors uses LFP batteries in all standard-rangeModels 3 andY made after October 2021[53] except for standard-range vehicles made with 4680 cells starting in 2022, which use anNMC chemistry.[54]

As of September 2022, LFP batteries had increased its market share of the entire EV battery market to 31%. Of those, 68% were deployed by two companies, Tesla and BYD.[55]

Lithium iron phosphate batteries officially surpassed ternary batteries in 2021 with 52% of installed capacity. Analysts estimate that its market share will exceed 60% in 2024.[56]

In February 2023, Ford announced that it will be investing $3.5 billion to build a factory in Michigan that will produce low-cost batteries for some of its electric vehicles. The project will be fully owned by a Ford subsidiary, but will use technology licensed from Chinese battery company Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL).[57]

Solar-powered lighting systems

edit

Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO₄) batteries, known for their stable operating voltage (approximately 3.2V) and high safety, have been widely used insolar lighting systems. Compared to traditional nickel-cadmium (NiCd) or nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) batteries, LiFePO₄ batteries offer a longer cycle life and superior thermal stability, making them well-suited for solar applications that require frequent charging and discharging.[58][59]

In addition, LiFePO₄ batteries exhibit a high tolerance toovercharging during the charging process, allowing them to be connected directly tosolar panels without the need for complex charge control circuitry. This makes them an ideal energy source for solar garden lights,streetlights, and other outdoor lighting systems.[60]

By 2013, better solar-chargedpassive infrared motion detector security lamps emerged.[61] As AA-sized LFP cells have a capacity of only 600 mAh (while the lamp's bright LED may draw 60 mA), the units shine for at most 10 hours. However, if triggering is only occasional, such units may be satisfactory even charging in low sunlight, as lamp electronics ensure after-dark "idle" currents of under 1 mA.[62]

Other uses

edit

Someelectronic cigarettes use these types of batteries. Other applications include marine electrical systems[63] and propulsion, flashlights,radio-controlled models, portable motor-driven equipment, amateur radio equipment, industrial sensor systems[64] andemergency lighting.[65]

Recent developments

edit
  • LFP batteries can be improved by using a more stable material as the separator.[66] Disassembly of overheated LFP cells found a brick-red compound. This suggested that the separator suffered molecular breakdown, in which side-reactions consumed lithium ions so they could not be shuttled.
  • Three-electrode batteries have emerged that let external devices detect that internal shorts have formed.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^abc"Great Power Group, Square lithium-ion cell". Archived fromthe original on 2020-08-03. Retrieved2019-12-31.
  2. ^"CATL announcement". 2024-05-10.
  3. ^"12,8 Volt Lithium-Iron-Phosphate Batteries"(PDF).VictronEnergy.nl. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2016-09-21. Retrieved2016-04-20.
  4. ^"Zooms 12V 100Ah LiFePO4 Deep Cycle Battery, Rechargeable Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery".Amazon.com.Archived from the original on 2022-01-25. Retrieved2022-01-25.
  5. ^"ZEUS Battery Products - 12.8 V Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Rechargeable (Secondary) 20Ah".DigiKey.com.Archived from the original on 2022-01-25. Retrieved2022-01-25.
  6. ^abcPreger, Yuliya; Barkholtz, Heather M.; Fresquez, Armando; Campbell, Daniel L.; Juba, Benjamin W.; Romàn-Kustas, Jessica; Ferreira, Summer R.; Chalamala, Babu (2020)."Degradation of Commercial Lithium-Ion Cells as a Function of Chemistry and Cycling Conditions".Journal of the Electrochemical Society.167 (12). Institute of Physics: 120532.Bibcode:2020JElS..167l0532P.doi:10.1149/1945-7111/abae37.S2CID 225506214.
  7. ^Learn about lithium batteries ethospower.org
  8. ^Li, Wangda; Lee, Steven; Manthiram, Arumugam (2020). "High-Nickel NMA: A Cobalt-Free Alternative to NMC and NCA Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries".Advanced Materials.32 (33): e2002718.Bibcode:2020AdM....3202718L.doi:10.1002/adma.202002718.OSTI 1972436.PMID 32627875.
  9. ^"Tesla, BYD accounted for 68% of LFP batteries deployed from Q1-Q3 2022". 15 December 2022.
  10. ^"Japan battery material producers lose spark as China races ahead". 4 April 2022. Retrieved12 August 2024.
  11. ^"A Handful of Lithium Battery Patents Are Set to Expire Before the End of the Year, Hopefully Bringing EV Prices Down With Them | GetJerry.com".getjerry.com. Retrieved2023-04-12.
  12. ^"Global lithium-ion battery capacity to rise five-fold by 2030". 22 March 2022.
  13. ^"Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Market Size, Growth | Report [2025-2033]".www.globalgrowthinsights.com. 2024.
  14. ^"Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Market: Size, Share & Trends, 2034".Polaris. 2024.
  15. ^Willuhn, Marian (2024-04-29)."CATL presents EV battery with 1,000 km range".pv magazine International. Retrieved2024-09-24.
  16. ^Masquelier, Christian; Croguennec, Laurence (2013). "Polyanionic (Phosphates, Silicates, Sulfates) Frameworks as Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Li (or Na) Batteries".Chemical Reviews.113 (8):6552–6591.doi:10.1021/cr3001862.PMID 23742145.
  17. ^Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. (1989). "Lithium insertion into Fe2(SO4)3 frameworks".Journal of Power Sources.26 (3–4):403–408.Bibcode:1989JPS....26..403M.doi:10.1016/0378-7753(89)80153-3.
  18. ^Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. (1987)."Lithium insertion into Fe2(MO4)3 frameworks: Comparison of M = W with M = Mo".Journal of Solid State Chemistry.71 (2):349–360.Bibcode:1987JSSCh..71..349M.doi:10.1016/0022-4596(87)90242-8.
  19. ^"LiFePO
    4
    : A Novel Cathode Material for Rechargeable Batteries", A.K. Padhi, K.S. Nanjundaswamy, J.B. Goodenough, Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts,96-1, May, 1996, pp 73
  20. ^"Phospho-olivines as Positive-Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries" A. K. Padhi, K. S. Nanjundaswamy, and J. B. Goodenough, J. Electrochem. Soc., Volume 144, Issue 4, pp. 1188-1194 (April 1997)
  21. ^abGorman, Jessica (September 28, 2002)."Bigger, Cheaper, Safer Batteries: New material charges up lithium-ion battery work".Science News. Vol. 162, no. 13. p. 196. Archived fromthe original on 2008-04-13.
  22. ^abJohn (12 March 2022)."Factors Need To Pay Attention Before Install Your Lithium LFP Battery". Happysun Media Solar-Europe.
  23. ^Susantyoko, Rahmat Agung; Karam, Zainab; Alkhoori, Sara; Mustafa, Ibrahim; Wu, Chieh-Han; Almheiri, Saif (2017). "A surface-engineered tape-casting fabrication technique toward the commercialisation of freestanding carbon nanotube sheets".Journal of Materials Chemistry A.5 (36):19255–19266.doi:10.1039/c7ta04999d.ISSN 2050-7488.
  24. ^Susantyoko, Rahmat Agung; Alkindi, Tawaddod Saif; Kanagaraj, Amarsingh Bhabu; An, Boohyun; Alshibli, Hamda; Choi, Daniel; AlDahmani, Sultan; Fadaq, Hamed; Almheiri, Saif (2018)."Performance optimization of freestanding MWCNT-LiFePO4 sheets as cathodes for improved specific capacity of lithium-ion batteries".RSC Advances.8 (30):16566–16573.Bibcode:2018RSCAd...816566S.doi:10.1039/c8ra01461b.ISSN 2046-2069.PMC 9081850.PMID 35540508.
  25. ^US 20150132660A1, Ravet, N.; Simoneau, M. & Armand, M. et al., "Electrode materials with high surface conductivity", published 2015/05/14, assigned to Hydro-Québec 
  26. ^Armand, Michel; Goodenough, John B.; Padhi, Akshaya K.; Nanjundaswam, Kirakodu S.; Masquelier, Christian (Feb 4, 2003),Cathode materials for secondary (rechargeable) lithium batteries,archived from the original on 2016-04-02, retrieved2016-02-25
  27. ^Long Hard Road: The Lithium-Ion Battery and the Electric Car. 2022. C.J. Murray.ISBN 978-1-61249-762-4
  28. ^David Linden (ed.),Handbook of Batteries 3rd Edition,McGraw Hill 2002,ISBN 0-07-135978-8, pages 35-16 and 35-17
  29. ^"Cell — CA Series".CALB.cn. Archived fromthe original on 2014-10-09.
  30. ^ab"A123 Systems ANR26650". 2022-07-30.
  31. ^"LiFePO4 Battery". 2022-07-30.
  32. ^"LiFePO4 Battery".www.evlithium.com. Retrieved2020-09-24.
  33. ^"Large-Format, Lithium Iron Phosphate".JCWinnie.biz. 2008-02-23. Archived fromthe original on 2008-11-18. Retrieved2012-04-24.
  34. ^"CATL announcement". 2024-05-10.
  35. ^"Nickel battery infographic"(PDF).
  36. ^"Transition Minerals Tracker"(PDF).humanrights.org.
  37. ^abc"Rechargeable Lithium Batteries".Electropaedia — Battery and Energy Technologies.Archived from the original on 2011-07-14.
  38. ^"'We are afraid': Erin Brockovich pollutant linked to global electric car boom".the Guardian. 2022-02-19. Retrieved2022-02-19.
  39. ^Mongird, Kendall; Viswanatha, Vilayanur (December 2020).2020 Grid Energy Storage Technology Cost and Performance Assessment(pdf) (Technical report). U.S. Department of Energy. DOE/PA-0204.
  40. ^"Battery Pack Prices Cited Below $100/kWh for the First Time in 2020, While Market Average Sits at $137/kWh".BloombergNEF. December 16, 2020.
  41. ^Colthorpe, Andy (27 November 2023)."LFP cell average falls below US$100/kWh as battery pack prices drop to record low in 2023".Energy-Storage.News.
  42. ^Phate Zhang (Jan 17, 2024)."Battery price war: CATL, BYD pushing battery costs down further".CnEVPost.
  43. ^"LiFePO4 Prices". Retrieved2024-07-30. Prices are lower for LFP cells.
  44. ^"ANR26650M1".A123Systems. 2006. Archived fromthe original on 2012-03-01.Current test projecting excellent calendar life: 17%impedance growth and 23% capacity loss in 15 years at 100%SOC, 60°C.
  45. ^Inoue, Katsuya; Fujieda, Shun; Shinoda, Kozo; Suzuki, Shigeru; Waseda, Yoshio (2010)."Chemical State of Iron of LiFePO4 during Charge-Discharge Cycles Studied by In-Situ X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy".Materials Transactions.51 (12):2220–2224.doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2010229.ISSN 1345-9678.
  46. ^Evro, Solomon; Ajumobi, Abdurahman; Mayon, Darrell; Tomomewo, Olusegun Stanley (2024-12-01)."Navigating battery choices: A comparative study of lithium iron phosphate and nickel manganese cobalt battery technologies".Future Batteries.4: 100007.doi:10.1016/j.fub.2024.100007.ISSN 2950-2640.
  47. ^"Lithium Ion batteries | Lithium Polymer | Lithium Iron Phosphate".Harding Energy.Archived from the original on 2016-03-29. Retrieved2016-04-06.
  48. ^Guo, Yu-Guo; Hu, Jin-Song; Wan, Li-Jun (2008)."Nanostructured Materials for Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Devices".Advanced Materials.20 (15):2878–2887.Bibcode:2008AdM....20.2878G.doi:10.1002/adma.200800627.
  49. ^"Enphase Energy Enters into Energy Storage Business with AC Battery | Enphase Energy".newsroom.enphase.com.
  50. ^"Tesla's Shift to LFP Batteries: What to Know | EnergySage". August 12, 2021. Archived fromthe original on March 15, 2022. RetrievedJanuary 1, 2022.
  51. ^"Latest EnergySage marketplace report shows quoted battery prices are rising".Solar Power World. August 16, 2021.
  52. ^"Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery".Lithium Storage.
  53. ^Gitlin, Jonathan M. (October 21, 2021)."Tesla made $1.6 billion in Q3, is switching to LFP batteries globally".Ars Technica.
  54. ^Tesla 4680 Teardown: Specs Revealed! (Part 2), retrieved2023-05-15
  55. ^"EV Battery Market: LFP Chemistry Reached 31% Share In September".MSN. Retrieved2023-04-12.
  56. ^"EV Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Battles Back".energytrend.com. 2022-05-25.
  57. ^"Ford to build $3.5 billion electric vehicle battery plant in Michigan".CBS News. February 13, 2023.Archived from the original on February 14, 2023.
  58. ^"Energy Storage Technology and Cost Characterization Report"(PDF).U.S. Department of Energy. July 2019. RetrievedMay 26, 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  59. ^"Lithium iron phosphate battery". 2025-03-26. Retrieved2025-05-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  60. ^"Grid Energy Storage – Cost and Performance Characterization Report"(PDF).National Renewable Energy Laboratory. January 2020. RetrievedMay 26, 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  61. ^"instructables.com". Archived fromthe original on 2014-04-16. Retrieved2014-04-16.
  62. ^Tsai, Chih-Hsiung (2011)."PIR-sensor-based Lighting Device with Ultra-low Standby Power Consumption".Academia.edu. RetrievedMay 26, 2025.The proposed lighting device has an ultra-low standby power consumption of only 0.007 W.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  63. ^"Why Fisherman Are Switching to Lithium Batteries".Astro Lithium. 28 November 2022. Retrieved2023-03-29.
  64. ^"IECEx System".iecex.iec.ch. Archived fromthe original on 2018-08-27. Retrieved2018-08-26.
  65. ^"EM ready2apply BASIC 1 – 2 W". Tridonic. Retrieved23 October 2018.
  66. ^Liu, Zhifang; Jiang, Yingjun; Hu, Qiaomei; Guo, Songtao; Yu, Le; Li, Qi; Liu, Qing; Hu, Xianluo (2021)."Safer Lithium-Ion Batteries from the Separator Aspect: Development and Future Perspectives".Energy & Environmental Materials.4 (3):336–362.Bibcode:2021EEMat...4..336L.doi:10.1002/eem2.12129.S2CID 225241307.

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp