Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Instructional manipulation check

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Blue-dot task, a check designed to detect participants who fail to read the instructions. After Oppenheimeret al.[1]

Aninstructionalmanipulation check, often abbreviatedIMC, is a special kind of question inserted in aquestionnaire among the regular questions, designed to check whether respondents are paying attention to the instructions.[2] Discarding responses by participants who fail to read the instructions increases thesignal-to-noise ratio and can thereby increase thestatistical power of an experiment. The tool was developed by Oppenheimeret al.[1]

Eliminating random responses this way before performingstatistical hypothesis testing may be considered a legitimate form ofdata manipulation, but should be duly mentioned in publications reporting on the outcome of the experiment in question.[3]

Blue-dot task

[edit]

Among several forms an IMC can take, a popular one is the so-calledblue-dot task,[3] suitable foron-line questionnaires. A number of larger blue circles are arranged according to aLikert scale from (say) "very rarely" to "very frequently". Participants who ignore the instructions and merely want to finish the task will just click any one of these circles. The instructions, however, ask the participants to ignore the larger circles and instead click a little blue dot at the bottom of the screen. Oppenheimeret al. report that in a large sample ofundergraduate participants, approximately 7% failed this task.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcDaniel M. Oppenheimer; Tom Meyvis; Nicolas Davidenko (July 2009). "Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power".Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.45 (4):867–872.doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009.
  2. ^Bernard E. Whitley, Jr.; Mary E. Kite (2012).Principles of Research in Behavioral Science (Third Edition). Routledge. pp. 248–249.ISBN 978-1-136-19658-4.
  3. ^abWolfgang Stroebe; Tom Postmes; Russell Spears (2012)."Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-correction in Science".Perspectives on Psychological Science.7 (6). Note 2.doi:10.1177/1745691612460687.PMID 26168129.


Stub icon

This science article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instructional_manipulation_check&oldid=1196167865"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp