Gynocentrism is a dominant or exclusive focus on women in theory or practice.[1] Anything can be gynocentric when it is considered exclusively with a female or feminist point of view in mind.[2] The opposite practice, placing themasculine point of view at the centre, isandrocentrism.
Etymology
editThe termgynocentrism is derived fromancient Greek, γυνή and κέντρον. Γυνή can be translated aswoman orfemale, but also aswife.[3][4] In ancient Greek compounds with γυνή, the stem γυναικ- is normally used.[4] This stem can be spotted in the genitive case γυναικός,[3] and in the older form of the nominative case γύναιξ.[3] In ancient Greek, no compounds are known to exist with γυνή that start with γυνο- or γυνω-.[4]
The ancient Greek word κέντρον can be translated assharp point,[4]sting (of bees and wasps),[4]point of a spear[4] andstationary point of a pair of compasses,[4] with the meaningcentre of a circle related to the latter.[4] The meaningcentre/middle point (of a circle) is preserved in the Latin wordcentrum,[5][6] aloanword from ancient Greek.[5][6] The English wordcentre is derived from the Latincentrum.[7] The word κέντρον is derived from the verb κεντεῖν,[4][6] meaningto sting (of bees),[4]to prick,[4]to goad,[4] andto spur.[4] When trying to explain etymologically the termgynocentrism, it is important to consider the ancient Greek κέντρον, with the significationmiddle point/centre, and not the more obvious ancient Greek word κεντρισμός (mirroring-centrism).
History
editThe term gynocentrism has been in use since at least 1897 when it appeared in The Open Court stating that Continental Europeans view Americans "as suffering rather from gynocentrism than anthropocentrism."[8] In 1914, authorGeorge A. Birmingham found American social life to be "gynocentric"; it was "arranged with a view to the convenience and delight of women."[9]
Beginning withsecond-wave feminism in the 1970s, the term gynocentrism has been used to describedifference feminism, which displayed a shift towards understanding and accepting gender differences, in contrast toequality feminism.[10]
In contemporary society
editTheMen Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) community describes themselves as a backlash against the "misandry of gynocentrism".[11][12] According to University of Massachusetts philosopher Christa Hodapp, in modern men's movements gynocentrism is described as a continuation of thecourtly love conventions of medieval times, wherein women were valued as a quasi-aristocratic class, and males were seen as a lower serving class. This viewpoint describesfeminism as the perpetuation of oppressive medieval conventions such asdevotional chivalry andromanticized relationships, rather than as a movement towards liberation.[13]
J. Lasky has characterized gynocentrism as a potential response to androcentrism,[14] and that gynocentrism has been used as an argument by anti-feminists, who believe that gynocentrism is anti-male.[14]
In a 2019 study of Trinidad society published in theJustice Policy Journal, researchers concluded that "gynocentrism pervades all aspects of the criminal justice system."[15][16]
Criticism
editChristina Hoff Sommers has argued that gynocentrism is anti-intellectual and holds an antagonistic view of traditional scientific and creative disciplines, dismissing many important discoveries and artistic works as masculine. Sommers also writes that the presumption of objectivity ascribed to many gynocentrist theories has stifled feminist discourse and interpretation.[17]
Feminist writerLynda Burns alleges that gynocentrism is a manification of celebration of women's positive differences—of women's history, myths, arts and music—as opposed to an assimilationist model privileging similarity to men.[18]
However observed in practice, the preeminence of women associated with gynocentric narratives is often seen as absolute: interpersonally, culturally, historically, politically, or in broader social contexts such as popular entertainment. As such, it can shade into whatRosalind Coward called "womanism... a sort of popularized version of feminism which acclaims everything women do and disparages men".[19]
In the 2006 bookLegalizing Misandry religious studies professors Paul Nathanson andKatherine K. Young claim that feminist calls for equality or equity are a subterfuge for gynocentrism.[20] Nathanson and Young state that ideologically, the overriding focus of gynocentrism is to prioritize women hierarchically, and as a result may be interpreted asmisandry (hatred of and prejudice towards men).[20] They claim that gynocentrism as a worldview has become de rigueur in law courts and government bureaucracies, resulting in systemic discrimination against men.[20] They define gynocentrism as a form ofessentialism as it focuses on the innate virtues of women and the innate vices of men.[20]
According to Margrit Eichler gynocentrism can be seen as sexist bias in social science research.[21]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^Staff writer (2009), "Gynocentrism", inOED (ed.).Oxford English Dictionary - Vers.4.0. Oxford University Press.ISBN 9780199563838.
- ^Staff writer (2010), "Gynocentric", inOED, ed. (2006).Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press.ISBN 9780198614241.
- ^abcKraus, Ludwig A. (1844).Kritisch-etymologisches medicinisches Lexikon (Dritte Auflage). Göttingen, Germany: Deuerlich & Dieterich.OCLC 491993305.
- ^abcdefghijklmLiddell, Henry G.;Scott, Robert (1940).A Greek-English lexicon / a new edition revised and augmented throughout / by Sir Henry Stuart Jones; with the assistance of Roderick McKenzie and with the co-operation of many scholars. Oxford: Clarendon Press.OCLC 630078019.
- ^abLewis, Charlton T.; Short, Charles (1879).A Latin dictionary founded on Andrews' edition of Freund's Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.OCLC 223667500.
- ^abcSaalfeld, Günther Alexander Ernst Adolf (1884).Tensaurus Italograecus : ausführliches historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der Griechischen Lehn- und Fremdwörter im Lateinischen. Wien: Druck und Verlag von Carl Gerold's Sohn, Buchhändler der Kaiserl. Akademie der Wissenschaften.OCLC 46301119.
- ^Klein, Ernest (1971).A comprehensive etymological dictionary of the English language: Dealing with the origin of words and their sense development thus illustration the history of civilization and culture. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.OCLC 802030047.
- ^The Open Court, Volume 11 (Open Court Publishing Company, 1897)
- ^George A. Birmingham,From Dublin to Chicago: Some Notes on a Tour in America (George H. Doran Company, 1914)
- ^Nicholson, Linda J. (1997), "Gynocentrism: women's oppression, women's identity, and women's standpoint", inNicholson, Linda J., ed. (1997).The second wave: a reader in feminist theory (Volume 1). New York: Routledge. pp. 147–151.ISBN 9780415917612.
- ^Daubney, Martin (November 24, 2015)."George Lawlor's story shows how universities have become hostile towards men".The Daily Telegraph. Archived fromthe original on April 15, 2016. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2016.
- ^Smith, C. Brian (September 28, 2016)."The straight men who want nothing to do with women".MEL Magazine. Archived fromthe original on February 14, 2017.
- ^Christa Hodapp,Men's Rights, Gender, and Social Media, Lexington Books (September 5, 2017)ISBN 1498526160
- ^abLasky, J. (2023). Gynocentrism.Salem Press Encyclopedia.
- ^Wallace, W. C., Gibson, C., Gordon, N. A., Lakhan, R., Mahabir, J., & Seetahal, C.Domestic Violence: Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Non-Reporting to the Police in Trinidad and Tobago. (2019)
- ^Joseph-Edwards, Avis; Wallace, Wendell C. (2020-09-13)."Suffering in Silence, Shame, Seclusion, and Invisibility: Men as Victims of Female Perpetrated Domestic Violence in Trinidad and Tobago".Journal of Family Issues.42 (8):1805–1830.doi:10.1177/0192513x20957047.ISSN 0192-513X.
- ^Hoff Sommers, Christina (1995), "Transforming the academy", inHoff Sommers, Christina, ed. (May 1995).Who stole feminism?: How women have betrayed women. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 64–73.ISBN 9780684801568.
- ^La Caze, Marguerite (2006), "Splitting the difference: between Young and Fraser on identity politics", inBurns, Lynda, ed. (2006).Feminist alliances. Amsterdam New York: Rodopi. p. 153.ISBN 9789042017283.
- ^Coward, Rosalind (2000), "Introduction", inCoward, Rosalind, ed. (2000).Sacred cows: is feminism relevant to the new millennium. London: HarperCollins. p. 11.ISBN 9780006548201.
- ^abcdNathanson, Paul;Young, Katherine K. (2006).Legalizing misandry: from public shame to systemic discrimination against men. Montreal Ithaca: McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 58, 116, 209.ISBN 9780773559998.
- ^Eichler, Margrit (1988).Non-sexist research methods. A practical guide.Allen and Unwin. p. 107.
External links
edit- Peter Wright, 'Gynocentrism As A Narcissistic Pathology'
- Peter Wright, 'Gynocentrism As A Narcissistic Pathology' (Part 2)
- Iris M. Young, 'Humanism, Gynocentrism and Feminist Politics'
- Gynocentrism and its Cultural Origins
- Gynocentric Eco-Logics
- International Academy HAGIA: MatriarchyArchived 2015-10-03 at theWayback Machine