Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Geoengineering

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deliberate and large-scale intervention in Earth's climate system
This articlehas an unclearcitation style. The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style ofcitation andfootnoting.(November 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Not to be confused withWeather modification.For other uses, seeGeoengineering (disambiguation).

Examples of geoengineering methods:Solar radiation modification technologies,reforestation in the Seychelles, clouds created by ship exhausts (marine cloud brightening), experimentalspace mirror.

Geoengineering (also known asclimate engineering orclimate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-causedclimate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scalecarbon dioxide removal (CDR) andsolar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to removecarbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form ofclimate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion ofsunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including theUS National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] theRoyal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and theWorld Climate Research Programme.[1]

Methods

[edit]

Carbon dioxide removal

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromCarbon dioxide removal.[edit]
Planting trees is anature-based way to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere; however, the effect may only be temporary in some cases.[9][10]

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is a process in whichcarbon dioxide (CO2) is removed fromEarth's atmosphere by deliberatehuman activities and durably stored in geological, terrestrial, or marine reservoirs, or in products.[11]: 2221  This process is also known as carbon removal, greenhouse gas removal or negative emissions. CDR is more and more often integrated intoclimate policy, as an element ofclimate change mitigation strategies.[12][13] Achievingnet zero emissions will require first and foremost deep and sustained cuts in emissions, and then—in addition—the use of CDR ("CDR is what puts thenet intonet zero emissions"[14]). In the future, CDR may be able to counterbalance emissions that are technically difficult to eliminate, such as some agricultural and industrial emissions.[15]: 114 

CDR includes methods that are implemented on land or in aquatic systems. Land-based methods includeafforestation,reforestation, agricultural practices that sequester carbon in soils (carbon farming),bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), anddirect air capture combined with storage.[15][16] There are also CDR methods that use oceans and other water bodies. Those are calledocean fertilization,ocean alkalinity enhancement,[17]wetland restoration andblue carbon approaches.[15] A detailed analysis needs to be performed to assess how much negative emissions a particular process achieves. This analysis includeslife cycle analysis and "monitoring, reporting, and verification" (MRV) of the entire process.[18]Carbon capture and storage (CCS) are not regarded as CDR because CCS does not reduce the amount ofcarbon dioxide already in the atmosphere.

Solar radiation modification

[edit]
refer to caption and image description
Proposed solar radiation modification using a tethered balloon to inject sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere
This section is an excerpt fromSolar radiation modification.[edit]

Solar radiation modification (SRM), also called solar geoengineering, is a group of large-scale approaches to reduceglobal warming by increasing the amount ofsunlight that is reflected away fromEarth and back toouter space. It is not intended to replaceefforts to reducegreenhouse gas emissions,[19] but rather to complement them as a potential way to limit global warming.[20]: 1489  SRM is a form of geoengineering.

The most-researched SRM method isstratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), in which small reflective particles would be introduced into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight.[21]: 350  Other approaches includemarine cloud brightening (MCB), which would increase the reflectivity of clouds over the oceans, or constructing aspace sunshade or aspace mirror, to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching earth.[22][23]

Glacial geoengineering

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromGlacial geoengineering.[edit]
Arctic sea ice coverage as of 2007 compared to 2005 and also compared to 1979-2000 average

Glacial geoengineering is a set of proposed geoengineering approaches that focus on slowing the loss ofglaciers,ice sheets, andsea ice inpolar regions and, in some cases, alpine areas. Proposals are motivated by concerns that feedback loops—such as ice-albedo loss, accelerated glacier flow, and permafrost methane release—could amplifyclimate change and triggerclimate tipping points.[24][25]

Proposed glacial geoengineering methods include regional or localsolar radiation management, thinningcirrus clouds to allow more heat to escape, and deploying mechanical or engineering structures to stabilize ice. Specific strategies under investigation arestratospheric aerosol injection focused on polar regions,[24]marine cloud brightening,[26] surfacealbedo modification with reflective materials,[27] basal interventions such as draining subglacial water or promoting basal freezing,[25] andice shelf protection measures including seabed curtains.[28]

Glacial geoengineering is in the early research stage and many proposals face major technical, environmental, and governance challenges.[26] Supporters argue that targeted interventions could help stabilize ice sheets, slow sea-level rise, and reduce the risk of passing irreversible thresholds in theclimate system. At the same time, experts caution that the effectiveness of these methods remains highly uncertain and that interventions could produce unintended side effects.[25] Glacial geoengineering is generally considered a possible complement to, not a replacement for, efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.[24][26]

Governance

[edit]

Most governance issues relating to geoengineering are specific to the category or the specific method. Nevertheless, a couple of international governance instruments have addressed geoengineering collectively.

The Conference of Parties to theConvention on Biological Diversity have made several decisions regarding "climate related geoengineering." That of 2010 established "a comprehensive non-binding normative framework"[29]: 106  for "climate-related geoengineering activities that may affect biodiversity," requesting that such activities be justified by the need to gather specific scientific data, undergo prior environmental assessment, be subject to effective regulatory oversight.[30]: 96–97 [31]: 161–162  The Parties' 2016 decision called for "more transdisciplinary research and sharing of knowledge... in order to better understand the impacts of climate-related geoengineering."[31]: 161–162 [32]

The parties to theLondon Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter and its associated London Protocol have addressed "marine geoengineering." In 2013, the parties to the London Protocol adopted an amendment to establish a legally binding framework for regulating marine geoengineering, initially limited to ocean fertilization and requiring assessment and permitting before any activity proceeds. This amendment has not yet entered into force due to insufficient ratifications. In 2022, the parties to both agreements acknowledged growing interest in marine geoengineering, identified four techniques for priority review, and encouraged careful assessment of proposed projects under existing guidelines while considering options for further regulation. In 2023, they cautioned that these techniques could pose serious environmental risks, highlighted scientific uncertainty about their effects, urged strict application of assessment frameworks, and called for broader international cooperation.[33] Their work is supported by the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection of theInternational Maritime Organization.[citation needed]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abWorld Climate Research Programme."Research on Climate Intervention".www.wcrp-climate.org.
  2. ^IPCC (2022)Chapter 1: Introduction and Framing inClimate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
  3. ^IPCC, 2021:Annex VII: Glossary [Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C.  Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. InClimate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256,doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022.
  4. ^Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 1 January 1992.Bibcode:1992nap..book.1605I.doi:10.17226/1605.ISBN 978-0-309-04386-1.
  5. ^Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 17 June 2015.Bibcode:2015nap..book18805N.doi:10.17226/18805.ISBN 978-0-309-30529-7.
  6. ^Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 23 June 2015.Bibcode:2015nap..book18988N.doi:10.17226/18988.ISBN 978-0-309-31482-4.
  7. ^Royal Society of London, ed. (2009).Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London.ISBN 978-0-85403-773-5.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  8. ^UNESCO World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (2023)."Report of the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) on the ethics of climate engineering". Retrieved9 March 2024.
  9. ^Buis, Alan (7 November 2019)."Examining the Viability of Planting Trees to Help Mitigate Climate Change".Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved13 April 2023.
  10. ^Marshall, Michael (26 May 2020)."Planting trees doesn't always help with climate change".BBC. Retrieved13 April 2023.
  11. ^IPCC, 2021: "Annex VII: Glossary". Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.). In "Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256,doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022
  12. ^Schenuit, Felix; Colvin, Rebecca; Fridahl, Mathias; McMullin, Barry; Reisinger, Andy; Sanchez, Daniel L.; Smith, Stephen M.; Torvanger, Asbjørn;Wreford, Anita; Geden, Oliver (4 March 2021)."Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases".Frontiers in Climate.3 638805.Bibcode:2021FrCli...3.8805S.doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.638805.hdl:1885/270309.ISSN 2624-9553.
  13. ^Geden, Oliver (May 2016)."An actionable climate target".Nature Geoscience.9 (5):340–342.Bibcode:2016NatGe...9..340G.doi:10.1038/ngeo2699.ISSN 1752-0908.Archived from the original on 25 May 2021. Retrieved7 March 2021.
  14. ^Ho, David T. (4 April 2023)."Carbon dioxide removal is not a current climate solution — we need to change the narrative".Nature.616 (7955): 9.Bibcode:2023Natur.616....9H.doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00953-x.ISSN 0028-0836.PMID 37016122.S2CID 257915220.
  15. ^abcM. Pathak, R. Slade, P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Pichs-Madruga, D. Ürge-Vorsatz,2022:Technical Summary. In:Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.002.
  16. ^Rackley, Steve; Andrews, Graham; Clery, Diarmaid; De Richter, Renaud; Dowson, George; Knops, Pol; Li, We; Mccord, Stephen; Ming, Tingzhen; Sewel, Adrienne; Styring, Peter; Tyka, Michael (2023).Negative Emissions Technologies for Climate Change Mitigation.Elsevier.ISBN 978-0-12-819663-2.
  17. ^Lebling, Katie; Northrop, Eliza; McCormick, Colin; Bridgwater, Liz (15 November 2022),"Toward Responsible and Informed Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: Research and Governance Priorities"(PDF),World Resources Institute: 11,doi:10.46830/wrirpt.21.00090,S2CID 253561039
  18. ^Schenuit, Felix; Gidden, Matthew J.; Boettcher, Miranda; Brutschin, Elina; Fyson, Claire; Gasser, Thomas; Geden, Oliver; Lamb, William F.; Mace, M. J.; Minx, Jan; Riahi, Keywan (3 October 2023)."Secure robust carbon dioxide removal policy through credible certification".Communications Earth & Environment.4 (1): 349.Bibcode:2023ComEE...4..349S.doi:10.1038/s43247-023-01014-x.ISSN 2662-4435.
  19. ^Helwegen, Koen G.; Wieners, Claudia E.; Frank, Jason E.; Dijkstra, Henk A. (15 July 2019)."Complementing CO2 emission reduction by solar radiation management might strongly enhance future welfare".Earth System Dynamics.10 (3):453–472.Bibcode:2019ESD....10..453H.doi:10.5194/esd-10-453-2019.ISSN 2190-4979.even if successful, SRM can not replace but only complement CO2 abatement.
  20. ^Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021).Climate Change 2021: Mitigation of Climate Change – Working Group III Contribution.
  21. ^Ipcc (9 June 2022).Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/9781009157940.006.ISBN 978-1-009-15794-0.
  22. ^Feingold, Graham; Ghate, Virendra P.; Russell, Lynn M.; Blossey, Peter; Cantrell, Will; Christensen, Matthew W.; Diamond, Michael S.; Gettelman, Andrew; Glassmeier, Franziska; Gryspeerdt, Edward; Haywood, James; Hoffmann, Fabian; Kaul, Colleen M.; Lebsock, Matthew; McComiskey, Allison C.; McCoy, Daniel T.; Ming, Yi; Mülmenstädt, Johannes; Possner, Anna; Prabhakaran, Prasanth; Quinn, Patricia K.; Schmidt, K. Sebastian; Shaw, Raymond A.; Singer, Clare E.; Sorooshian, Armin; Toll, Velle; Wan, Jessica S.; Wood, Robert; Yang, Fan; Zhang, Jianhao; Zheng, Xue (22 March 2024)."Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening".Science Advances.10 (12) eadi8594.Bibcode:2024SciA...10I8594F.doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi8594.PMC 10954212.PMID 38507486.
  23. ^Feinberg, Alec (12 February 2024)."Annual Solar Geoengineering: Mitigating Yearly Global Warming Increases".Climate.12 (2): 26.Bibcode:2024Clim...12...26F.doi:10.3390/cli12020026.
  24. ^abcDuffey, Alistair; Irvine, Peter; Tsamados, Michel; Stroeve, Julienne (31 May 2023)."Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review".Earth's Future.11 (6).Bibcode:2023EaFut..1103679D.doi:10.1029/2023EF003679.ISSN 2328-4277.
  25. ^abcMinunno, R.; Andersson, N.; Morrison, G.M. (18 April 2023)."A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise".Earth-Science Reviews.241 104431.Bibcode:2023ESRv..24104431M.doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431.
  26. ^abcWang, Feiteng; Xie, Yida; Wang, Lin; Liu, Shuangshuang; Jin, Xiang (15 January 2025)."Mitigating ice sheets and mountain glaciers melt with geoengineering".Science of the Total Environment.963 178450.Bibcode:2025ScTEn.96378450W.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178450.PMID 39818158.
  27. ^Lockley, Andrew; Wolovick, Michael; Keefer, Bowie; Gladstone, Rupert; Zhao, Li-Yun; Moore, John C. (5 December 2020)."Glacier geoengineering to address sea-level rise: A geotechnical approach".Advances in Climate Change Research.11 (4):401–414.Bibcode:2020ACCR...11..401L.doi:10.1016/j.accre.2020.11.008.
  28. ^Gertner, Jon (6 January 2024)."Can $500 Million Save This Glacier?".The New York Times.ISSN 0362-4331. Archived fromthe original on 9 January 2024. Retrieved27 April 2025.
  29. ^Geoengineering in relation to the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD technical series. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2012.ISBN 978-92-9225-429-2.
  30. ^National Academies of Sciences, Engineering (25 March 2021).Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance.Bibcode:2021nap..book25762N.doi:10.17226/25762.ISBN 978-0-309-67605-2.Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved17 April 2021.
  31. ^abScientific Advice Mechanism to the European Commission (9 December 2024).Solar radiation modification: evidence review report (Report). SAPEA.doi:10.5281/zenodo.14283096.
  32. ^Convention on Biological Diversity, Conference of the Parties to the (8 December 2016).Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, XIII/14. Climate-related Geoengineering(PDF).
  33. ^International Maritime Organization."Marine geoengineering".
Overview
Overview
Sources
History
Physical
Flora and fauna
Social and economic
By country and region
Economics and finance
Energy
Preserving and enhancing
carbon sinks
Other
Society andadaptation
Society
Adaptation
Communication
International agreements
Background and theory
Measurements
Theory
Research and modelling
General
Causes
Effects
Mitigation
Specialties
and
interdisciplinarity
Civil
Mechanical
Electrical
Chemical
Materials
Computer
Engineering education
Related topics
Glossaries
Other
Major topics
Society and
population
Publications
Lists
Events and
organizations
Related topics
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geoengineering&oldid=1334603882"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp