FactCheck.org is a nonprofit^[1] website that aims to reduce the level ofdeception and confusion inU.S. politics by providing original research onmisinformation andhoaxes.^[2] It is a project of theAnnenberg Public Policy Center of theAnnenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by theAnnenberg Foundation.^[2]

FactCheck.org

Available in	English
Owner	Annenberg Public Policy Center
URL	factcheck.org
Commercial	No
Launched	December 2003; 21 years ago (2003-12)

Kathleen Hall Jamieson's 1993 bookDirty Politics, in which she criticized the presidential campaigns ofGeorge H. W. Bush andMichael Dukakis in 1988, provided the idea for FactCheck.org.^[3]

Most of its content consists of rebuttals to inaccurate,misleading, or false claims made by politicians. FactCheck.org has also targetedmisinformation from variouspolitical action committees. Other features include:

• Ask FactCheck:^[4] users can ask questions that are usually based on an online rumor.
• Viral Spiral:^[5] a page dedicated to the most popular online myths that the site has debunked. It clarifies the answer as well as links readers to a full article on the subject.
• Party Lines:^[6] talking points that have been repeatedly used by multiple members of a political party.
• Mailbag:^[7] page for readers' sent letters and praise or disapproval of something said on the site.

FactCheck.org was launched in December 2003 by Brooks Jackson, a formerAssociated Press,Wall Street Journal, andCNN reporter who had covered Washington and national politics since 1970.^[8] As a special assignment correspondent at CNN during the 1992 political campaign season, Jackson became well known for his "Ad Police" reports, which monitored candidates' advertising and financing strategies throughout the campaign.^[9] In 2003,Kathleen Hall Jamieson of the Annenberg Public Policy Center approached Jackson about forming FactCheck.org,^[10] and the site was online in December of that year.

In 2007,UnSpun was published. This book was co-written by Brooks Jackson, the director emeritus of Factcheck.org and by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, the director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center. It teaches readers how to be aware of the deceptions, or "spin", that is commonly used in media and by politicians.^[11]

In January 2013, Jackson stepped down as director of FactCheck.org. He now holds the title of director emeritus. Eugene Kiely, a former reporter and editor atThe Record (ofHackensack, New Jersey),The Philadelphia Inquirer andUSA Today, is now the site's director. FactCheck.org employs a staff of four full-time journalists, and offers yearly fellowships to undergraduate students at the University of Pennsylvania.^[12]

In 2019, Factcheck.org celebrated its 15th anniversary.^[3]

FactCheck.org became a focus of political commentary following the2004 vice-presidential debate betweenDick Cheney andJohn Edwards. Cheney cited the website, claiming that the independent site defended his actions while CEO ofHalliburton. Cheney's claim was disputed by FactCheck.org as wrong, saying that "Edwards was mostly right" when talking about "Cheney's responsibility for earlier Halliburton troubles".^[13]

Cheney's reference created some controversy because he incorrectly cited the web site's address as "FactCheck.com." At the time of the debate, factcheck.com was controlled byFrank Schilling's company Name Administration Inc., who quickly redirected the address to point to an anti-Bush website owned by Bush criticGeorge Soros.^[14]

FactCheck.org also became a focus of national attention in the summer of 2012, during the presidential race between incumbent DemocratBarack Obama and GOP challengerMitt Romney. The Obama campaign ran a TV ad accusing Romney of involvement in the outsourcing of American jobs overseas byBain Capital, the venture capital firm that he had founded in 1984.^[15] FactCheck.org ruled this ad to be false, claiming that the acts of outsourcing occurred after Romney had left the company to head the2002 Winter Olympics inSalt Lake City.^[16] In response, the Obama campaign contested FactCheck.org's ruling in a six-page letter that was distributed to major news corporations, holding that Romney still retained responsibility for the company's actions.^[17]

Since November 2014, FactCheck.org has published twenty-eight pages of articles checking the facts on the many2016 presidential candidates.^[18] As of April 2016, the five remaining candidates had dedicated archives to their fact-checked claims.

In 2016, FactCheck.org became a fact-checking partner ofFacebook.^[3][19]

The findings of thefact checking process can be seen publicly and have been broken down.^[20]

The site has gained recognition and won numerous awards for its contributions to political journalism. In 2004,Time magazine named FactCheck.org as one of the "50 best websites 2004".^[21] In 2006,Time magazine named FactCheck.org one of the "25 Sites We Can't Live Without."^[22] In 2008,PC Magazine called it one of the "20 Best Political Websites."^[23] In 2009, theAssociation for Women in Communications awarded FactCheck.org the Clarion Awards.^[3] In 2010, FactCheck.org won the Delta-Chi-Price of theSociety of Professional Journalists.^[3]

Between 2008 and 2012, the site won fourWebby Awards in the Politics category, in 2008, 2010, 2011, and 2012; as well as four People's Voice Awards in Politics, in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012.^[24] FactCheck.org also won a 2010Sigma Delta Chi Award from theSociety of Professional Journalists for reporting on deceptive claims made about the federal health care legislation.^[25]

• List of common misconceptions
• Fact-checking – Process of verifying information in non-fictional text
• Snopes – Fact-checking website
• PolitiFact – American nonprofit fact-checking website
• The Skeptic's Dictionary – 2003 essay collection by Robert Todd Carroll
• The Straight Dope – Column published in the Chicago Reader
• Full Fact – British fact-checking organisation - UK equivalent

• Official website