Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Electrical length

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Parameter characterizing an AC conductor
Not to be confused withAntenna effective length.
Part ofa series on
Antennas

Inelectrical engineering,electrical length is a dimensionless parameter equal to the physical length of anelectrical conductor such as a cable or wire, divided by thewavelength ofalternating current at a givenfrequency traveling through the conductor.[1][2][3] In other words, it is the length of the conductor measured in wavelengths. It can alternately be expressed as anangle, inradians ordegrees, equal to thephase shift the alternating current experiences traveling through the conductor.[1][3]

Electrical length is defined for a conductor operating at a specific frequency or narrow band of frequencies. It varies according to the construction of the cable, so different cables of the same length operating at the same frequency can have different electrical lengths. A conductor is calledelectrically long if it has an electrical length much greater than one (i.e. it is much longer than the wavelength of the alternating current passing through it), andelectrically short if it is much shorter than a wavelength.Electrical lengthening andelectrical shortening mean addingreactance (capacitance orinductance) to an antenna or conductor to increase or decrease its electrical length,[1] usually for the purpose of making itresonant at a differentresonant frequency.

This concept is used throughoutelectronics, and particularly inradio frequency circuit design,transmission line andantenna theory and design. Electrical length determines when wave effects (phase shift along conductors) become important in a circuit. Ordinary lumped elementelectric circuits only work well for alternating currents at frequencies for which the circuit is electrically small (electrical length much less than one). For frequencies high enough that the wavelength approaches the size of the circuit (the electrical length approaches one) thelumped element model on which circuit theory is based becomes inaccurate, andtransmission line techniques must be used.[4]: p.12–14 

Definition

[edit]

Electrical length is defined for conductors carryingalternating current (AC) at a single frequency or narrow band of frequencies. An alternatingelectric current of a single frequencyf{\displaystyle f} is an oscillatingsine wave which repeats with aperiod ofT=1/f{\displaystyle T=1/f}.[5] This current flows through a given conductor such as a wire or cable at a particularphase velocityvp{\displaystyle v_{p}}. It takes time for later portions of the wave to reach a given point on the conductor so the spatial distribution of current and voltage along the conductor at any time is a movingsine wave. After a time equal to the periodT{\displaystyle T} a complete cycle of the wave has passed a given point and the wave repeats; during this time a point of constantphase on the wave has traveled a distance of

λ=vpT=vp/f{\displaystyle \lambda =v_{p}T=v_{p}/f}

soλ{\displaystyle \lambda } (Greeklambda) is thewavelength of the wave along the conductor, the distance between successive crests of the wave.

Theelectrical lengthG{\displaystyle G} of a conductor with a physical length ofl{\displaystyle l} at a given frequencyf{\displaystyle f} is the number of wavelengths or fractions of a wavelength of the wave along the conductor; in other words the conductor's length measured in wavelengths[6][1][2]

Electrical lengthG=lfvp=lλ=Physical lengthWavelength{\displaystyle \quad {\text{Electrical length}}\,G={lf \over v_{p}}={l \over \lambda }={{\text{Physical length}} \over {\text{Wavelength}}}\quad }

Thephase velocityvp{\displaystyle v_{p}} at which electrical signals travel along a transmission line or other cable depends on the construction of the line. Therefore, the wavelengthλ{\displaystyle \lambda } corresponding to a given frequency varies in different types of lines, thus at a given frequency different conductors of the same physical length can have different electrical lengths.

Phase shift definition

[edit]

Inradio frequency applications, when a delay is introduced due to a conductor, it is often thephase shiftϕ{\displaystyle \phi }, the difference inphase of the sinusoidal wave between the two ends of the conductor, that is of importance.[5] The length of asinusoidal wave is commonly expressed as an angle, in units ofdegrees (with 360° in a wavelength) orradians (with 2π radians in a wavelength). So alternately the electrical length can be expressed as anangle which is thephase shift of the wave between the ends of the conductor[1][3][5]

ϕ=360lλdegrees{\displaystyle \phi =360^{\circ }{l \over \lambda }\,{\text{degrees}}}
=2πlλradians{\displaystyle \quad =2\pi {l \over \lambda }\,{\text{radians}}}

Significance

[edit]

The electrical length of a conductor determines when wave effects (phase shift along the conductor) are important.[4]: p.12–14  If the electrical lengthG{\displaystyle G} is much less than one, that is the physical length of a conductor is much shorter than the wavelength, say less than one tenth of the wavelength (l<λ/10{\displaystyle l<\lambda /10}) it is calledelectrically short. In this case the voltage and current are approximately constant along the conductor, so it acts as a simple connector which transfers alternating current with negligible phase shift. Incircuit theory the connecting wires between components are usually assumed to be electrically short, so thelumped elementcircuit model is only valid for alternating current when the circuit iselectrically small, much smaller than a wavelength.[4]: p.12–14 [5] When the electrical length approaches or is greater than one, a conductor will have significantreactance,inductance orcapacitance, depending on its length. So simple circuit theory is inadequate andtransmission line techniques (thedistributed-element model) must be used.

Velocity factor

[edit]

In a vacuum anelectromagnetic wave (radio wave) travels at thespeed of lightvp=c={\displaystyle v_{p}=c=} 2.9979×108 meters per second, and very close to this speed in air, so thefree space wavelength of the wave isλ0=c/f{\displaystyle \lambda _{\text{0}}=c/f}.[5] (in this article free space variables are distinguished by a subscript 0) Thus a physical lengthl{\displaystyle l} of a radio wave in space or air has an electrical length of

G0=lλ0=lfc{\displaystyle G_{\text{0}}={l \over \lambda _{\text{0}}}={lf \over c}} wavelengths.

In theSI system of units, empty space has apermittivity ofϵ0={\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{0}}=} 8.854×10−12 F/m (farads per metre) and amagnetic permeability ofμ0={\displaystyle \mu _{\text{0}}=} 1.257×10−6 H/m (henries per meter). These universal constants determine the speed of light[5][7]

c=1ϵ0μ0{\displaystyle c={1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon _{\text{0}}\mu _{\text{0}}}}}}
Equivalent circuit of a lossless transmission line.L{\displaystyle L} andC{\displaystyle C} represent theinductance andcapacitance per unit length of a small section of line

In most transmission lines, the seriesresistance of the wires and shuntconductance of the insulation is low enough that the line can be approximated as lossless (see diagram). This means the inductance and capacitance per unit length of the line determine the phase velocity.

In an electrical cable, for a cycle of the alternating current to move a given distance along the line, it takes time to charge thecapacitance between the conductors, and the rate of change of the current is slowed by the seriesinductance of the wires. This determines the phase velocityvp{\displaystyle v_{p}} at which the wave moves along the line. In cables and transmission lines an electrical signal travels at a rate determined by the effective shuntcapacitanceC{\displaystyle C} and seriesinductanceL{\displaystyle L} per unit length of the transmission line

vp=1LC{\displaystyle v_{p}={1 \over {\sqrt {LC}}}}

Some transmission lines consist only of bare metal conductors, if they are far away from other high permittivity materials their signals propagate at very close to the speed of light,c{\displaystyle c}. In most transmission lines the material construction of the line slows the velocity of the signal so it travels at a reducedphase velocity[5] This property of the line is specified by a dimensionless number between 0 and 1 called thevelocity factorVF{\displaystyle {\mathit {VF}}}:

VF=vpc{\displaystyle {\mathit {VF}}={v_{p} \over c}}

characteristic of the type of line, equal to the ratio of signal velocity in the line to the speed of light.[8][9][6]

Most transmission lines contain adielectric material (insulator) filling some or all of the space in between the conductors. Thepermittivityϵ{\displaystyle \epsilon } ordielectric constant of that material increases the distributed capacitanceC{\displaystyle C} in the cable, which reduces the velocity factor below unity. If there is a material with highmagnetic permeability (μ{\displaystyle \mu }) in the line such as steel orferrite which increases the distributed inductanceL{\displaystyle L}, it can also reduceVF{\displaystyle {\mathit {VF}}}, but this is almost never the case. If all the space around the transmission line conductors containing the near fields was filled with a material of permittivityϵ{\displaystyle \epsilon } and permeabilityμ{\displaystyle \mu }, the phase velocity on the line would be[5]

vp=1ϵμ{\displaystyle \;\;v_{p}={1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon \mu }}}\;}  

The effective permittivityϵ{\displaystyle \epsilon } and permeabilityμ{\displaystyle \mu } per unit length of the line are frequently given as dimensionless constants;relative permittivity:ϵr{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{r}}} andrelative permeability:μr{\displaystyle \mu _{\text{r}}} equal to the ratio of these parameters compared to the universal constantsϵ0{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{0}}} andμ0{\displaystyle \mu _{\text{0}}}

ϵr=ϵϵ0μr=μμ0{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{r}}={\epsilon \over \epsilon _{\text{0}}}\qquad \mu _{\text{r}}={\mu \over \mu _{\text{0}}}}

so the phase velocity is

vp=1ϵμ=1ϵ0ϵrμ0μr=c1ϵrμr{\displaystyle v_{\text{p}}={1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon \mu }}}={1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon _{\text{0}}\epsilon _{\text{r}}\mu _{\text{0}}\mu _{\text{r}}}}}=c{1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon _{\text{r}}\mu _{\text{r}}}}}}

So the velocity factor of the line is

VF=vpc=1ϵrμr{\displaystyle {\mathit {VF}}={v_{p} \over c}={1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon _{\text{r}}\mu _{\text{r}}}}}}

In many lines, for exampletwin lead, only a fraction of the space surrounding the line containing the fields is occupied by a solid dielectric. With only part of the electromagnetic field effected by the dielectric, there is less reduction of the wave velocity. In this case aneffective permittivityϵeff{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{eff}}} can be calculated which if it filled all the space around the line would give the same phase velocity. This is computed as a weighted average of the relative permittivity of free space, unity, and that of the dielectric:ϵeff=(1F)+Fϵr{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{eff}}=(1-F)+F\epsilon _{\text{r}}}where thefill factorF expresses the effective proportion of space around the line occupied by dielectric.

In most transmission lines there are no materials with high magnetic permeability, soμ=μ0{\displaystyle \mu =\mu _{\text{0}}} andμr=1{\displaystyle \mu _{\text{r}}=1} and so

VF=1ϵeff{\displaystyle \;\;{\mathit {VF}}={1 \over {\sqrt {\epsilon _{\text{eff}}}}}\;} (no magnetic materials)    

Since the electromagnetic waves travel slower in the line than in free space, the wavelength of the wave in the transmission lineλ{\displaystyle \lambda } is shorter than the free space wavelength by the factor VF:λ=vp/f=VF(c/f)=λ0VF{\displaystyle \lambda =v_{\text{p}}/f={\mathit {VF}}(c/f)=\lambda _{\text{0}}{\mathit {VF}}}. Therefore, more wavelengths fit in a transmission line of a given lengthl{\displaystyle l} than in the same length of wave in free space, so the electrical length of a transmission line is longer than the electrical length of a wave of the same frequency in free space[5]

G=lλ=lλ0VF=lfcVF{\displaystyle \;G={l \over \lambda }={l \over \lambda _{\text{0}}{\mathit {VF}}}={lf \over c{\mathit {VF}}}\;}

Transmission lines

[edit]
Type of lineVelocity
factorVF{\displaystyle {\mathit {VF}}}[10]
Velocity of signal
in cm per ns
Parallel line,
air dielectric
.9529
Parallel line,
polyethylene dielectric (Twin lead)
.8528
Coaxial cable,
polyethylene dielectric
.6620
Twisted pair, CAT-5.6419
Stripline.5015
Microstrip.5015

Ordinary electrical cable suffices to carry alternating current when the cable iselectrically short; the electrical length of the cable is small compared to one, that is when the physical length of the cable is small compared to a wavelength, sayl<λ/10{\displaystyle l<\lambda /10}.[11]

As frequency gets high enough that the length of the cable becomes a significant fraction of a wavelength,l>λ/10{\displaystyle l>\lambda /10}, ordinary wires and cables become poor conductors of AC.[4]: p.12–14  Impedance discontinuities at the source, load, connectors and switches begin to reflect the electromagnetic current waves back toward the source, creating bottlenecks so not all the power reaches the load. Ordinary wires act as antennas, radiating the power into space as radio waves, and in radio receivers can also pick upradio frequency interference (RFI).

To mitigate these problems, at these frequenciestransmission line is used instead. A transmission line is a specialized cable designed for carrying electric current ofradio frequency. The distinguishing feature of a transmission line is that it is constructed to have a constantcharacteristic impedance along its length and through connectors and switches, to prevent reflections. This also means AC current travels at a constant phase velocity along its length, while in ordinary cable phase velocity may vary. The velocity factorVF{\displaystyle {\mathit {VF}}} depends on the details of construction, and is different for each type of transmission line. However the approximate velocity factor for the major types of transmission lines is given in the table.

Electrical length is widely used with a graphical aid called theSmith chart to solve transmission line calculations. A Smith chart has a scale around the circumference of the circular chart graduated in wavelengths and degrees, which represents the electrical length of the transmission line from the point of measurement to the source or load.

The equation for the voltage as a function of time along a transmission line with amatched load, so there is no reflected power, is

v(x,t)=Vpcos(ωtβx){\displaystyle v(x,t)=V_{\text{p}}\cos(\omega t-\beta x)}

where

Vp{\displaystyle V_{\text{p}}} is the peak voltage along the line
ω=2πf=2π/T{\displaystyle \omega =2\pi f=2\pi /T} is theangular frequency of the alternating current in radians per second
β=2π/λ{\displaystyle \beta =2\pi /\lambda } is thewavenumber, equal to the number of radians of the wave in one meter
x{\displaystyle x} is the distance along the line
t{\displaystyle t} is time

In a matched transmission line, the current is in phase with the voltage, and their ratio is thecharacteristic impedanceZ0{\displaystyle Z_{\text{0}}} of the line

i(x,t)=v(x,t)Z0=VpZ0cos(ωtβx)=VpZ0cosω(tx/VFc){\displaystyle i(x,t)={v(x,t) \over Z_{\text{0}}}={V_{\text{p}} \over Z_{\text{0}}}\cos(\omega t-\beta x)={V_{\text{p}} \over Z_{\text{0}}}\cos \omega (t-x/{\mathit {VF}}c)}

Antennas

[edit]
A half-wavedipole antenna showing the standing waves of voltage(red) and current(blue) on the antenna. The antenna is resonant at the frequency at which the electrical length is approximately equal toλ/2=c/2f{\displaystyle \lambda /2=c/2f}

An important class of radioantenna is thethin element antenna in which the radiating elements are conductive wires or rods. These includemonopole antennas anddipole antennas, as well as antennas based on them such as thewhip antenna,T antenna,mast radiator,Yagi,log periodic, andturnstile antennas. These areresonant antennas, in which the radio frequency electric currents travel back and forth in the antenna conductors, reflecting from the ends.

If the antenna rods are not too thick (have a large enough length to diameter ratio), the current along them is close to a sine wave, so the concept of electrical length also applies to these.[3] The current is in the form of two oppositely directed sinusoidal traveling waves which reflect from the ends, which interfere to formstanding waves. The electrical length of an antenna, like a transmission line, is its length in wavelengths of the current on the antenna at the operating frequency.[1][12][13][4]: p.91–104  An antenna'sresonant frequency,radiation pattern, and driving pointimpedance depend not on its physical length but on its electrical length.[14] A thin antenna element is resonant at frequencies at which the standing current wave has a node (zero) at the ends (and in monopoles anantinode (maximum) at the ground plane). Adipole antenna is resonant at frequencies at which its electrical length is a half wavelength (λ/2,ϕ=180orπradians{\displaystyle \lambda /2,\phi =180^{\circ }\;{\text{or}}\;\pi \;{\text{radians}}})[12] or a multiple of it. Amonopole antenna is resonant at frequencies at which its electrical length is a quarter wavelength (λ/4,ϕ=90orπ/2radians{\displaystyle \lambda /4,\phi =90^{\circ }\;{\text{or}}\;\pi /2\;{\text{radians}}}) or a multiple of it.

Resonant frequency is important because at frequencies at which the antenna isresonant the inputimpedance it presents to its feedline is purelyresistive. If the resistance of the antenna is matched to thecharacteristic resistance of the feedline, it absorbs all the power supplied to it, while at other frequencies it hasreactance and reflects some power back down the line toward the transmitter, causingstanding waves (highSWR) on the feedline. Since only a portion of the power is radiated this causes inefficiency, and can possibly overheat the line or transmitter. Therefore, transmitting antennas are usually designed to be resonant at the transmitting frequency; and if they cannot be made the right length they areelectrically lengthened orshortened to be resonant (see below).

End effects

[edit]
Reduction factor of physical length of a resonant dipole from a half-wavelength electrical length as a function of element thickness

A thin-element antenna can be thought of as a transmission line with the conductors separated,[15] so the near-field electric and magnetic fields extend further into space than in a transmission line, in which the fields are mainly confined to the vicinity of the conductors. Near the ends of the antenna elements the electric field is not perpendicular to the conductor axis as in a transmission line but spreads out in a fan shape (fringing field).[16] As a result, the end sections of the antenna have increased capacitance, storing more charge, so the current waveform departs from a sine wave there, decreasing faster toward the ends.[17] When approximated as a sine wave, the current does not quite go to zero at the ends; thenodes of the current standing wave, instead of being at the ends of the element, occur somewhat beyond the ends.[18] Thus the electrical length of the antenna is longer than its physical length.

The electrical length of an antenna element also depends on the length-to-diameter ratio of the conductor.[19][15][20][21] As the ratio of the diameter to wavelength increases, the capacitance increases, so the node occurs farther beyond the end, and the electrical length of the element increases.[19][20] When the elements get too thick, the current waveform becomes significantly different from a sine wave, so the entire concept of electrical length is no longer applicable, and the behavior of the antenna must be calculated byelectromagnetic simulation computer programs likeNEC.

As with a transmission line, an antenna's electrical length is increased by anything that adds shunt capacitance or series inductance to it, such as the presence of high permittivity dielectric material around it. Inmicrostrip antennas which are fabricated as metal strips onprinted circuit boards, thedielectric constant of the substrate board increases the electrical length of the antenna. Proximity to the Earth or aground plane, a dielectric coating on the conductor, nearby grounded towers, metal structural members,guy lines and the capacitance of insulators supporting the antenna also increase the electrical length.[20]

These factors, called "end effects", cause the electrical length of an antenna element to be somewhat longer than the length of the same wave in free space. In other words, the physical length of the antenna at resonance will be somewhat shorter than the resonant length in free space (one-half wavelength for a dipole, one-quarter wavelength for a monopole).[19][20] As a rough generalization, for a typicaldipole antenna, the physical resonant length is about 5% shorter than the free space resonant length.[19][20]

Electrical lengthening and shortening

[edit]

In many circumstances for practical reasons it is inconvenient or impossible to use an antenna of resonant length. An antenna of nonresonant length at the operating frequency can be made resonant by adding areactance, acapacitance orinductance, either in the antenna itself or in amatching network between the antenna and itsfeedline.[20] A nonresonant antenna appears at its feedpoint electrically equivalent to aresistance in series with a reactance. Adding an equal but opposite type of reactance in series with the feedline will cancel the antenna's reactance; the combination of the antenna and reactance will act as a seriesresonant circuit, so at its operating frequency its input impedance will be purely resistive, allowing it to be fed power efficiently at a lowSWR without reflections.

In a common application, an antenna which iselectrically short, shorter than its fundamental resonant length, a monopole antenna with an electrical length shorter than a quarter-wavelength (λ/4{\displaystyle \lambda /4}), or a dipole antenna shorter than a half-wavelength (λ/2{\displaystyle \lambda /2}) will havecapacitive reactance. Adding aninductor (coil of wire), called aloading coil, at the feedpoint in series with the antenna, withinductive reactance equal to the antenna's capacitive reactance at the operating frequency, will cancel the capacitance of the antenna, so the combination of the antenna and coil will be resonant at the operating frequency. Since adding inductance is equivalent to increasing the electrical length, this technique is calledelectrically lengthening the antenna. This is the usual technique for matching an electrically short transmitting antenna to its feedline, so it can be fed power efficiently. However, an electrically short antenna that has been loaded in this way still has the sameradiation pattern; it does not radiate as much power, and therefore has lowergain than a full-sized antenna.

Conversely, an antenna longer than resonant length at its operating frequency, such as a monopole longer than a quarter wavelength but shorter than a half wavelength, will haveinductive reactance. This can be cancelled by adding acapacitor of equal but opposite reactance at the feed point to make the antenna resonant. This is calledelectrically shortening the antenna.

Scaling properties of antennas

[edit]

Two antennas that aresimilar (scaled copies of each other), fed with different frequencies, will have the sameradiation resistance andradiation pattern and fed with equal power will radiate the same power density in any direction if they have the same electrical length at the operating frequency; that is, if their lengths are in the same proportion as the wavelengths.[22][4]: p.12–14 

l1l2=λ1λ2=f2f1{\displaystyle {l_{\text{1}} \over l_{\text{2}}}={\lambda _{\text{1}} \over \lambda _{\text{2}}}={f_{\text{2}} \over f_{\text{1}}}}

This means the length of antenna required for a givenantenna gain scales with the wavelength (inversely with the frequency), or equivalently theaperture scales with the square of the wavelength.

Electrically short antennas

[edit]

An electrically short conductor, much shorter than one wavelength, makes an inefficient radiator ofelectromagnetic waves. As the length of an antenna is made shorter than its fundamental resonant length (a half-wavelength for a dipole antenna and a quarter-wavelength for a monopole), theradiation resistance the antenna presents to the feedline decreases with the square of the electrical length, that is the ratio of physical length to wavelength,(l/λ)2{\displaystyle (l/\lambda )^{2}}. As a result, other resistances in the antenna, the ohmic resistance of metal antenna elements, the ground system if present, and the loading coil, dissipate an increasing fraction of transmitter power as heat. A monopole antenna with an electrical length below .05λ{\displaystyle \lambda } or 18° has a radiation resistance of less than one ohm, making it very hard to drive.

A second disadvantage is that since the capacitive reactance of the antenna and inductive reactance of the required loading coil do not decrease, theQ factor of the antenna increases; it acts electrically like a high Qtuned circuit. As a result, thebandwidth of the antenna decreases with the square of electrical length, reducing thedata rate that can be transmitted. AtVLF frequencies even the huge toploaded wire antennas that must be used have bandwidths of only ~10 hertz, limiting thedata rate that can be transmitted.

Regimes of electromagnetics

[edit]

The field ofelectromagnetics is the study ofelectric fields,magnetic fields,electric charge,electric currents andelectromagnetic waves. Classic electromagnetism is based on the solution ofMaxwell's equations. These equations are mathematically difficult to solve in all generality, so approximate methods have been developed that apply to situations in which the electrical length of the apparatus is very short (G1{\displaystyle G\ll 1}) or very long (G1{\displaystyle G\gg 1}). Electromagnetics is divided into three regimes orfields of study depending on the electrical length of the apparatus, that is the physical lengthl{\displaystyle l} of the apparatus compared to the wavelengthλ=c/f{\displaystyle \lambda =c/f} of the waves:[4]: p.21 [23][24][25] Completely different apparatus is used to conduct and process electromagnetic waves in these different wavelength ranges

Historically, electric circuit theory and optics developed as separate branches of physics until at the end of the 19th centuryJames Clerk Maxwell's electromagnetic theory andHeinrich Hertz's discovery that light was electromagnetic waves unified these fields as branches of electromagnetism.

Definition of variables

[edit]
SymbolUnitDefinition
β{\displaystyle \beta }meter−1Wavenumber of wave in conductor=2π/λ{\displaystyle =2\pi /\lambda }
ϵ{\displaystyle \epsilon }farads / meterPermittivity per meter of the dielectric in cable
ϵ0{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{0}}}farads / meterPermittivity of free space, a fundamental constant
ϵeff{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{eff}}}farads / meterEffective relativepermittivity per meter of cable
ϵr{\displaystyle \epsilon _{\text{r}}}noneRelative permittivity of the dielectric in cable
κ{\displaystyle \kappa }noneVelocity factor of current in conductor=vp/c{\displaystyle =v_{p}/c}
λ{\displaystyle \lambda }meterWavelength of radio waves in conductor
λ0{\displaystyle \lambda _{\text{0}}}meterWavelength of radio waves in free space
μ{\displaystyle \mu }henries / meterEffectivemagnetic permeability per meter of cable
μ0{\displaystyle \mu _{\text{0}}}henries / meterPermeability of free space, a fundamental constant
μr{\displaystyle \mu _{\text{r}}}noneRelative permeability of dielectric in cable
ν{\displaystyle \nu }noneIndex of refraction of dielectric material
π{\displaystyle \pi }noneConstant = 3.14159
ϕ{\displaystyle \phi }radians ordegreesPhase shift of current between the ends of the conductor
ω{\displaystyle \omega }radians / secondAngular frequency of alternating current=2π/f{\displaystyle =2\pi /f}
c{\displaystyle c}meters / secondSpeed of light in vacuum
C{\displaystyle C}farads / meterShuntcapacitance per unit length of the conductor
f{\displaystyle f}hertzFrequency of radio waves
F{\displaystyle F}noneFill factor of a transmission line, the fraction of space filled with dielectric
G{\displaystyle G}noneElectrical length of conductor
G0{\displaystyle G_{\text{0}}}noneElectrical length of electromagnetic wave of length l in free space
l{\displaystyle l}meterLength of the conductor
L{\displaystyle L}henries / meterInductance per unit length of the conductor
T{\displaystyle T}secondPeriod of radio waves
t{\displaystyle t}secondtime
vp{\displaystyle v_{p}}meters / secondphase velocity of current in conductor
x{\displaystyle x}meterdistance along conductor

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdef"Electrical length".ATIS Telecom Glossary. Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions website. 2019. Retrieved24 December 2022. ANSI (American National Standards Institute) accredited definition
  2. ^abKaiser, Kenneth L. (2004).Electromagnetic Compatibility Handbook. CRC Press. pp. 3.1 –3.2.ISBN 9780849320873.
  3. ^abcdWeik, Martin (2012).Communications Standard Dictionary. Springer. p. 283.ISBN 9781461304296.
  4. ^abcdefgSchmitt, Ron (2002).Electromagnetics Explained: A Handbook for Wireless RF, EMC, and High-Speed Electronics. Newnes.ISBN 9780750674034.
  5. ^abcdefghiPaul, Clayton R. (2011).Transmission Lines in Digital and Analog Electronic Systems. Wiley. pp. 6–11.ISBN 9781118058244.
  6. ^abDrollinger, Francis J. (1980).Ground Radio Communications Specialist: Vol. 7 - Auxiliary circuits and systems. US Air Force Technical Training School. pp. 16–18.
  7. ^Rao, R. S. (2012).Electromagnetic Waves and Transmission Lines. PHI Learning. p. 445.ISBN 9788120345157.
  8. ^Carr, Joseph J. (1997).Microwave & Wireless Communications Technology. Newnes. p. 51.ISBN 0750697075.
  9. ^Amlaner, Charles J. Jr. (March 1979)."The design of antennas for use in radio telemetry".A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking: Proceedings of an International Conference on Telemetry and Radio Tracking in Biology and Medicine, Oxford, 20–22 March 1979. Elsevier. p. 260. Retrieved23 November 2013.
  10. ^Keller, Reto B. (2022).Design for Electromagnetic Compatibility-In a Nutshell. Springer International. p. 39.ISBN 9783031141867.
  11. ^Keller, Reto (2018)."Chapter 5: Transmission lines".Electromagnetic compatibility knowledge base. Academy of EMC website. Retrieved24 December 2022.
  12. ^abRadioman 3 & 2, US Navy Training Course NAVPERS 10228-E. Bureau of Naval Personnel, US Navy. 1967. p. 131.
  13. ^Singh, Yaduvir (2011).Electro Magnetic Field Theory. Dorling Kindersley. p. 451.ISBN 9788131760611.
  14. ^Griffith, B. Whitfield (2000).Radio-electronic Transmission Fundamentals. Noble Publishing. pp. 335–337.ISBN 9781884932137.
  15. ^abUS Air Force Manual 52-19: Antenna Systems. US Air Force. 1953. pp. 104–105.
  16. ^Schelkunoff, Sergei A.; Friis, Harold T. (1952).Antennas: Theory and Practice. John Wiley and Sons. p. 245.
  17. ^Rudge, Alan W.; Milne, K. (1982).The Handbook of Antenna Design, Vol. 2. IET. p. 564.ISBN 9780906048870.
  18. ^The effect of this on the antenna is equivalent to the current wave moving along the antenna at a phase velocityvp{\displaystyle v_{\text{p}}} lower than the speed of lightc{\displaystyle c}, as in a transmission line. Some sources explain it this way:Carr, Joseph; Hippisley, George (2012).Practical Antenna Handbook, 5th Ed(PDF). McGraw-Hill. p. 105.ISBN 9780071639590. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2023-01-28. Retrieved2023-11-29. andRudge, Alan W.; Milne, K. (1982).The Handbook of Antenna Design, Vol. 2. IET. p. 564.ISBN 9780906048870. However, this is a physically misleading description; the phase velocity is not constant along the element.
  19. ^abcdLewis, Geoff (2013).Newnes Communications Technology Handbook. Elsevier. p. 46.ISBN 9781483101026.
  20. ^abcdefThe A.R.R.L. Antenna Book, 5th Ed. American Radio Relay League. 1949. pp. 27–28.
  21. ^Carr, Joseph (2001).Antenna Toolkit, 2nd Ed. Elsevier. pp. 52–54.ISBN 9780080493886.
  22. ^Levin, Boris (2019).Wide-Range Antennas. CRC Press. p. 26.ISBN 9781351043229.
  23. ^Azadeh, Mohammad (2009).Fiber Optics Engineering. Springer Science and Business Media. p. 11.ISBN 9781441903044.
  24. ^Pozar, David M. (2011).Microwave Engineering, 4th Ed. Wiley Global Education. pp. 1–2.ISBN 9781118213636.
  25. ^Karmel, Paul R.; Colef, Gabriel D.; Camisa, Raymond L. (1998).Introduction to Electromagnetic and Microwave Engineering. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 1–2.ISBN 9780471177814.
  26. ^Clark, Alan Robert; Fourie, Andre P. C. (2001).Antennas in Practice(PDF). Poynting Innovations. p. 3.ISBN 0620276193. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2023-01-02. Retrieved2023-01-02.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electrical_length&oldid=1320194766"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp