| Космическая программа «Энергия» — «Буран» Kosmicheskaya Programma Energia — Buran | |
 TheAntonov An-225 Mriya carrying aBuran orbiter in 1989. | |
| Program overview | |
|---|---|
| Country | Soviet Union / Russia |
| Organisation | Roscosmos (1991–1993) |
| Purpose | crewed orbital flight and reentry |
| Status | Cancelled |
| Programme history | |
| Duration | 1971–1993 |
| First flight | OK-GLI Flight 1 (10 November 1985) |
| Last flight | OK-1K1 (15 November 1988) |
| Successes | 1 |
| Failures | 0 |
| Launch site | Baikonur pad 110/37 |
| Vehicle information | |
| Crewed vehicle | Buran-class orbiter |
| Crew capacity | 10 cosmonauts |
| Launch vehicle | Energia |
TheBuran programme (Russian:Буран,IPA:[bʊˈran], "Snowstorm", "Blizzard"), also known as the "VKK Space Orbiter programme" (Russian:ВКК «Воздушно-Космический Корабль»,lit. 'Air and Space Ship'),[1] was aSoviet and later Russian reusablespacecraft project that began in 1974 at theCentral Aerohydrodynamic Institute inMoscow and was formally suspended in 1993.[2] In addition to being the designation for the whole Soviet/Russian reusable spacecraft project,Buran was also the name given toorbiter 1K, which completed one uncrewed spaceflight in 1988 and was the only Soviet reusable spacecraft to be launched into space. The Buran-class orbiters used the expendableEnergia rocket as alaunch vehicle.
TheBuran programme was started by theSoviet Union as a response to the United StatesSpace Shuttle program.[3] The latter's unclassified nature was a boon for the Soviets and resulted in many superficial and functional similarities between American and Soviet shuttle designs.[4] Although the Buran class was similar in appearance toNASA'sSpace Shuttle orbiter, and could similarly operate as are-entryspaceplane, its final internal and functional design was different. For example, the main engines during launch were on the Energia rocket and were not taken into orbit by the spacecraft. Smaller rocket engines on the craft's body provided propulsion in orbit and de-orbital burns, similar to the Space Shuttle'sOMS pods. Unlike the Space Shuttle whosefirst orbital spaceflight was accomplished in April 1981, Buran, whosefirst and only spaceflight occurred in November 1988, had a capability of flying uncrewed missions, as well as performing fully automated landings.[5] The project was the largest and the most expensive in the history of Sovietspace exploration.[2]
The Soviet reusable spacecraft programme has its roots in the late 1950s, at the very beginning of the space age. The idea of Soviet reusable space flight is very old, though it was neither continuous nor consistently organized. Before Buran, no project of the programme reached operational status.
The first step toward a reusable Soviet spacecraft was the 1954Burya, a high-altitude prototype jet aircraft/cruise missile. Several test flights were made before it was cancelled by order of theCentral Committee. TheBurya had the goal of delivering a nuclear payload, presumably to the United States, and then returning to base. The Burya programme was cancelled by the USSR in favor of a decision to developICBMs instead. The next iteration of a reusable spacecraft was theZvezda design, which also reached a prototype stage. Decades later,another project with the same name would be used as a service module for theInternational Space Station. After Zvezda, there was a hiatus in reusable projects until Buran.
The Buran orbital vehicle programme was developed in response to the U.S. Space Shuttle program, which raised considerable concerns among the Soviet military and especially Defense MinisterDmitry Ustinov. An authoritative chronicler of the Soviet and later Russian space programme, the academicBoris Chertok, recounts how the programme came into being.[6] According to Chertok, after the U.S. developed its Space Shuttle program, the Soviet military became suspicious that it could be used for military purposes, due to its enormous payload, several times that of previous U.S. launch vehicles. Officially, the Buran orbital vehicle was designed for the delivery to orbit and return to Earth of spacecraft, cosmonauts, and supplies. Both Chertok andGleb Lozino-Lozinskiy (General Designer and General Director ofNPO Molniya) suggest that from the beginning, the programme was military in nature; however, the exact military capabilities, or intended capabilities, of the Buran programme remain classified.
Like its American counterpart, the Buran orbital vehicle, when in transit from its landing sites back to the launch complex, was transported on the back of a large jet aeroplane – theAntonov An-225 Mriya transport aircraft, which was designed in part for this task and was the largest aircraft in the world to fly multiple times.[7] Before theMriya was ready (after the Buran had flown), theMyasishchev VM-TAtlant, a variant on the SovietMyasishchev M-4Molot (Hammer) bomber (NATO code: Bison), fulfilled the same role.
The development of the Buran began in the early 1970s as a response to the U.S. Space Shuttle program. Soviet officials were concerned about a perceived military threat posed by the U.S. Space Shuttle. In their opinion, the Shuttle's 30-ton payload-to-orbit capacity and, more significantly, its 15-ton payload return capacity, were a clear indication that one of its main objectives would be to place massive experimental laser weapons into orbit that could destroy enemy missiles from a distance of several thousands of kilometres. Their reasoning was that such weapons could only be effectively tested in actual space conditions and that to cut their development time and save costs it would be necessary to regularly bring them back to Earth for modifications and fine-tuning.[8] Soviet officials were also concerned that the U.S. Space Shuttle could make a sudden dive into the atmosphere to drop nuclear bombs on Moscow.[9][10]
In 1974,Valentin Glushko's design bureau,OKB-1 (later NPO Energiya), proposed a new family of heavy-lift rockets called RLA (Russian:РЛА, «Ракетные Летательные Аппараты»,romanized: Raketnyye Letatel'niye Apparaty,lit. 'Rocket Flying Apparatus'). The RLA concept included the use of kerosene and liquid hydrogen as fuel, and liquid oxygen as oxidizer (both new technologies in the Soviet space programme), with the shuttle orbiter being one possible payload.[11] WhileNPO Molniya conducted development under the lead ofGleb Lozino-Lozinskiy, the Soviet Union's Military-Industrial Commission, or VPK, was tasked with collecting all data it could on the U.S. Space Shuttle. Under the auspices of the KGB, the VPK was able to amass documentation on the American shuttle's airframe designs, design analysis software, materials, flight computer systems and propulsion systems. The KGB targeted many university research project documents and databases, including Caltech, MIT, Princeton, Stanford and others. The thoroughness of the acquisition of data was made much easier as the U.S. shuttle development was unclassified.[12]
By 1975, NPO Energiya had come up with two competing designs for the orbiter vehicle: the MTKVP (Russian:МТКВП, «Многоразовый Транспортный Корабль Вертикальной Посадки»,romanized: Mnogorazoviy Transportniy Korabl' Vertikal'noy Posadki,lit. 'Reusable Vertical Landing Transport Ship'), a 34-meter-longlifting body spaceplane launched on top of a stack of kerosene-fueled strap on boosters;[13] and the OS-120 (Russian:ОС-120, «Орбитальный Самолет»,romanized: Orbital'niy Samolet,lit. 'Orbital Spaceplane–120 tons'), a close copy of the US Space Shuttle based on US Space Shuttle documentation and designs obtained through the VPK and KGB.[12] The OS-120 was a delta-winged spaceplane based heavily on the US Space Shuttle design, equipped with three liquid hydrogen engines, strapped to a detachable external tank and four liquid fuel boosters (NPO Energiya even considered the use ofsolid propellant rocket boosters, further imitating the US Shuttle's configuration).[14]
A compromise between these two proposals was achieved by NPO Energiya in January 1976 with the OK-92 (Russian:ОК-92, «Орбитальный Корабль»,romanized: Orbital'niy Korabl',lit. 'Orbital Ship–92 tons'), a delta-winged orbiter equipped with twoSoloviev D-30 turbofan jet engines for autonomous atmospheric flight, launched to space from a rocket stack made of a core stage with three cryogenic engines, and four kerosene-fueled boosters, each with four engines.[15] By 1978, the OK-92 design was further refined, with its final configuration completed in June 1979.[16]
Sovietengineers were initially reluctant to implement a spacecraft design with so many similarities to the US Space Shuttle. Although it has been commented thatwind tunnel testing showed that NASA's design was already ideal,[17] the shape requirements were mandated by its potential military capabilities to transport large payloads to low Earth orbit, themselves a counterpart to thePentagon's initially projected missions for the Shuttle.[18] Even though the Molniya Scientific Production Association proposed itsSpiral programme design[19] (halted 13 years earlier), it was rejected as being altogether dissimilar from the American shuttle design.
The construction of the shuttles began in 1980, and by 1984 the first full-scale Buran was rolled out. The firstsuborbital test flight of a scale-model (BOR-5) took place as early as July 1983. As the project progressed, five additional scale-model flights were performed. A test vehicle was constructed with four jet engines mounted at the rear; this vehicle is usually referred to asOK-GLI, or as the "Buran aerodynamic analogue". The jets were used to take off from a normal landing strip, and once it reached a designated point, the engines were cut and OK-GLI glided back to land. This provided invaluable information about the handling characteristics of the Buran design, and significantly differed from the carrier plane/air drop method used by the United States and the Enterprise test craft. Twenty-four test flights of OK-GLI were performed by theGromov Flight Research Institutetest pilots and researchers after which the shuttle was "worn out". The developers considered using a couple ofMil Mi-26helicopters to "bundle" lift the Buran, but test flights with amock-up showed how risky and impractical that was.[20] TheVM-T ferried components[21] and theAntonov An-225 Mriya (the heaviest airplane ever) was designed and used to ferry the shuttle.[22][23]
The flight and ground-testing software also required research. In 1983 the Buran developers estimated that the software development would require several thousand programmers if done with their existing methodology (in assembly language), and they appealed toKeldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics for assistance. It was decided to develop a new high-level "problem-oriented" programming language. Researchers at Keldysh developed two languages: PROL2 (used for real-time programming of onboard systems) and DIPOL (used for the ground-based test systems), as well as the development and debugging environment SAPO PROLOGUE.[24] There was also an operating system known as Prolog Manager.[25] Work on these languages continued beyond the end of the Buran programme, with PROL2 being extended into SIPROL,[26] and eventually all three languages developed intoDRAKON[citation needed] which is still in use in the Russian space industry. A declassified May 1990 CIA report citingopen-source intelligence material states that the software for the Buran spacecraft was written in "the French-developed programming language known asProlog",[27] possibly due to confusion with the name PROLOGUE.
Until the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, sevencosmonauts were allocated to the Buran programme and trained on theOK-GLI ("Buran aerodynamic analogue") test vehicle. All had experience as test pilots. They were:Ivan Ivanovich Bachurin,Alexei Sergeyevich Borodai,Anatoli Semyonovich Levchenko,Aleksandr Vladimirovich Shchukin,Rimantas Antanas Stankevičius,Igor Petrovich Volk, andViktor Vasiliyevich Zabolotsky.
A rule, set in place for cosmonauts after the failedSoyuz 25 mission of 1977, stipulated that all Soviet space missions must contain at least one crew member who has been to space before. In 1982, it was decided that all Buran commanders and their back-ups would occupy the third seat on a Soyuz mission, prior to their Buran spaceflight. Several people had been selected to potentially be in the first Buran crew. By 1985, it was decided that at least one of the two crew members would be atest pilot trained at theGromov Flight Research Institute (known as "LII"), and potential crew lists were drawn up. Only two potential Buran crew members reached space:Igor Volk, who flew inSoyuz T-12 to the space stationSalyut 7, andAnatoli Levchenko who visitedMir, launching withSoyuz TM-4 and landing withSoyuz TM-3. Both of these spaceflights lasted about a week.[8]
Levchenko died of a brain tumour the year after his orbital flight, Bachurin left the cosmonaut corps because of medical reasons, Shchukin was assigned to the back-up crew of Soyuz TM-4 and later died in a plane crash, Stankevičius was also killed in a plane crash, while Borodai and Zabolotsky remained unassigned to a Soyuz flight until the Buran programme ended.
Igor Volk was planned to be the commander of the first crewed Buran flight. There were two purposes of the Soyuz T-12 mission, one of which was to give Volk spaceflight experience. The other purpose, seen as the more important factor, was to beat the United States and have the firstspacewalk by a woman.[8] At the time of the Soyuz T-12 mission the Buran programme was still astate secret. The appearance of Volk as a crew member caused some, including theBritish Interplanetary Society magazineSpaceflight, to ask why a test pilot was occupying a Soyuz seat usually reserved for researchers or foreign cosmonauts.[28]
Anatoli Levchenko was planned to be the back-up commander of the first crewed Buran flight, and in March 1987 he began extensive training for his Soyuz spaceflight.[8] In December 1987, he occupied the third seat aboardSoyuz TM-4 to Mir, and returned to Earth about a week later onSoyuz TM-3. His mission is sometimes calledMir LII-1, after theGromov Flight Research Institute shorthand.[29] When Levchenko died the following year, it left the back-up crew of the first Buran mission again without spaceflight experience. A Soyuz spaceflight for another potential back-up commander was sought by the Gromov Flight Research Institute, but never occurred.[8]
Maintenance, launches and landings of the Buran-class orbiters were to take place at theBaikonur Cosmodrome in theKazakh SSR. Several facilities at Baikonur were adapted or newly built for these purposes:
An aerodynamic testbed,OK-GLI, was constructed in 1984 to test the in-flight properties of the Buran design. Unlike the American prototypeSpace Shuttle Enterprise, OK-GLI had fourAL-31turbofan engines fitted, meaning it was able to fly under its own power.
Following a series of atmospheric test flights using the jet-poweredOK-GLI prototype, the first operational spacecraft (Buran, orbiter 1K) flew one uncrewed test mission.[35]
At 03:00 UTC on 15 November 1988,Buran and the Energia carrier rocket lifted off frompad 110/37 in Baikonur.[35] The life support system was not installed for the flight and no data was displayed on theCRT displays in the Command Compartment.[36]
| No | Launch Date | Mission | Shuttle | Crew | Duration | Landing Site | Notes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 November 1988 03:00:02 UTC 06:00:02 MSK | 1K1 | Buran | 0 | 3h 25m 22s | Baikonur |
| [37][38][39][40] |
The shuttle orbited theEarth twice, travelling 83,707 kilometres (52,013 mi) in 3 hours and 25 minutes (0.14 flight days).[41] On its return, it performed an automated landing on the shuttle runway (Site 251) atBaikonur Cosmodrome.[42]
The planned flights for the shuttles in 1989, before the downsizing of the project and eventual cancellation, were:[43]
The planned uncrewed second flight of orbiter 2K was changed in 1991 to the following:
After the first flight of a Buran shuttle, the project was suspended due to lack of funds and the political situation in the Soviet Union. The two subsequent orbiters, which were due in 1990 (Orbiter 2K) and 1992 (Orbiter 3K) were never completed with other articles being scrapped (see next section).
The project was officially terminated on 30 June 1993, by PresidentBoris Yeltsin. At the time of its cancellation, 20 billionroubles had been spent on the Buran programme.[44] Commenting on the discontinuation of the programme in his interview toNew Scientist, RussiancosmonautOleg Kotov described the project's end:
"We had no civilian tasks forBuran and the military ones were no longer needed."[45]
The programme was designed to boost national pride, carry out research, and meet technological objectives similar to those of the U.S. Space Shuttle program, including resupply of theMir space station, which was launched in 1986 and remained in service until 2001. When Mir wasfinally visited by a spaceplane, the visitor was aSpace Shuttle orbiter, not a Buran-class orbiter.
The Buran SO, a docking module that was to be used for rendezvous with the Mir space station, was refitted for use with the U.S. Space Shuttles during theShuttle–Mir missions.[46]
The cost of a Buran launch carrying a 20-ton payload was estimated at 270 million roubles, vs 5.5 million roubles on the Proton rocket.[47]
On 12 May 2002, ahangar roof at theBaikonur Cosmodrome inKazakhstan collapsed because of astructural failure due to poor maintenance. The collapse killed eight workers and destroyed one of the Buran-class orbiters (Buran, orbiter 1K), which flew the test flight in 1988, as well as amock-up of an Energia booster rocket. It was not clear to outsiders at the time which orbiter was destroyed and the BBC reported that it was just "a model" of the orbiter.[48] It occurred at theMIK RN/MIK 112 building at Site 112 of theBaikonur Cosmodrome, 14 years after theonly Buran flight. Work on the roof had begun for a maintenance project, whose equipment is thought to have contributed to the collapse, together with heavy rainfall in the days preceding the collapse.[8][49]
Five orbiters were planned to be built (designated 1K-5K, K stands forКорабль,'craft, flying article'), with hull numbering starting with 1 or 2 (e.g. 1.01), two originally ordered in 1970s and three ("second series") additionally ordered in 1983.[citation needed]
For research and testing purposes, several test articles were produced, designated 1M-8M (M stands forМакет,'mock-up'), with hull numbering starting with 0 (e.g. 0.02). The programme prefix OK stands forОрбитальный Корабль,'Orbital Vehicle' and carries theGRAU index number 11F35.
By 1991 two operational vehicles were delivered to Baikonur, three others were under construction at the Tushino Machine-Building Plant (TMZ) near Moscow.
Most of the geo-locations below show the orbiter bodies on the ground; in some casesGoogle Earth's History facility is required to see the orbiter within the dates specified.[50][51]
| Name | Function | Location | Image | Geo-location | Approximate dates | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight orbiters | ||||||
| Buran 1K 1.01 | First flight article, first spaceplane series | Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 110/37 (L) atBaikonur | [1] 1988 1989 | 45°57′53″N63°18′18″E / 45.96486°N 63.30496°E /45.96486; 63.30496 (Buran 1K 1.01 (15 November 1988)) Spaceplane not visible; no available satellite photos | 15 November 1988 | Built in 1986, only flightworthy orbiter. Launched on an uncrewed, remote controlled flight; two orbits and landing (with heavy crosswinds and a self-initiated approach direction change) at Yubileiniy (Jubilee) Airport, Baikonur. |
| MIK building, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan | [2] 2002 | 45°55′39″N63°17′51″E / 45.92750°N 63.29761°E /45.92750; 63.29761 (Buran 1K 1.01 (1988 to 2002)) Spaceplane not visible; shadows | 1988 to 2002 | Housed in MIK building in area 112, Baikonur with an Energia booster mockup and other Energia hardware, destroyed in a roof collapse on 12 May 2002, which killed eight workers. | ||
| 2K Ptichka | Second flight article, first series, 95–97% complete | MIK building, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan | [3] | 45°55′42″N63°17′53″E / 45.92836°N 63.29809°E /45.92836; 63.29809 (Ptichka 2K 1.02 (1988 to 1995)) Shuttle not visible, in building | 1988 to 1995 | Built in 1988, housed adjacent toBuran. |
| MZK building 80, area 112a, Baikonur | [4] 2015 2020 | 45°56′26″N63°19′06″E / 45.94046°N 63.31841°E /45.94046; 63.31841 (Ptichka 2K 1.02 (1995 to present)) Spaceplane not visible; in building | 1995 to present | Often erroneously referred to as "Ptichka" or "Burya".[52] Moved to the MZK in August 1995.[53] Reportedly property of Russian-Kazakh companyAelita since 2005.[54] | ||
| 3K Baikal | First flight article, second series, 30–50% complete | Inside Tushino Plant, Moscow, Russia | 1991 to 2006 | Built 1991 | ||
| Car park on Kimki Reservoir, near plant | [5] 2007–2011 | 55°50′29″N37°27′59″E / 55.84136°N 37.46625°E /55.84136; 37.46625 (3K 2.01 (2006 to 2011)); use history | 2006 to 2011 | Moved outdoors | ||
| Zhukovsky Airport, near Moscow, Russia |  2011 | on 15 August 201155°34′17″N38°08′35″E / 55.57125°N 38.143°E /55.57125; 38.143 (3K 2.01 (2011 to present)); use history | 2011 to present | An exhibit in the MAKS-2011 and later air shows.Zhukovsky International Airport is the site of theGromov Flight Research Institute, and has become a large outdoor flight museum. Other sightings: on 15 March 2012:55°33′56″N38°08′42″E / 55.56565°N 38.14491°E /55.56565; 38.14491, on 31 July 2012 and 8 May 201355°33′47″N38°08′50″E / 55.56309°N 38.14714°E /55.56309; 38.14714, on 4 June and 29 July 201455°33′06″N38°08′41″E / 55.55179°N 38.14463°E /55.55179; 38.14463, on 11 September 2016 through 202055°34′17″N38°08′35″E / 55.57125°N 38.143°E /55.57125; 38.143. As of December, 2021, it has been reportedly bought by Vadim Zadorozhny, in order to be restored and displayed inUMMC Museum Complex.[55] | ||
| 4K 2.02 | Second flight article, second series, 10–20% complete | Tushino plant, Moscow, Russia | [6] | 1988 to present | Build started 1988, Only forward fuselage with crew cabin was completed by the time its construction was cancelled. The right wing with landing gear produced for this orbiter was later used forOK-TVA.[56] Some pieces of 2.02, likeheat tiles, have found their way onto eBay.[57] | |
| 5K 2.03 | Third flight article, second series, very small amount assembled | Scattered | 1988 to present | Disassembled by 1995. All parts have been scattered and are unidentifiable. | ||
| Test articles | ||||||
| OK-M OK-ML-1 BTS-001 1M 0.01 | Airframe and shake test bed article | Outdoor pad, area 112, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan | [7] | 45°55′11″N63°18′36″E / 45.91963°N 63.30996°E /45.91963; 63.30996 (OK-M (1988 to January 2007)); use history | 1988 to January 2007 | Built in 1982, deteriorated considerably outdoors on pad |
| Gagarin Museum, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan |  2007 | 45°54′35″N63°19′04″E / 45.90963°N 63.31789°E /45.90963; 63.31789 (OK-M (January 2007 to present)) | January 2007 to present | Refurbished in 2007, now on outdoor display | ||
| OK-GLI OK-ML-2 BTS-002 2M 0.02 | Atmospheric test article, two extra jet engines in rear to facilitate take-off | Ramenskoye Airport, Moscow | 55°33′47″N38°08′50″E / 55.5631°N 38.14716°E /55.5631; 38.14716 (OK-GLI (1999)); no history available this far back | 1999 | Built in 1984, used in 25 test flights. On display at MAKS-1999, Russia's most prestigious airshow. | |
| Darling Island, Sydney harbour, Australia | [8] 2000.jpg) 2002 | 33°51′50″S151°11′48″E / 33.86392°S 151.19662°E /-33.86392; 151.19662 (OK-GLI (2000-2002)); use history to see shelter, shuttle not visible | February 2000 to September 2000; afterwards stored on the site until about Oct 2002 | Sold and sent in February 2000 to the Sydney, Australia 2000 Olympic Games. Displayed inside a light structure, stored outdoors there afterwards. | ||
| Manama harbor, Bahrain | 26°11′54″N50°36′09″E / 26.19826°N 50.60243°E /26.19826; 50.60243 (OK-GLI (July 2004 to 2007)); use history | July 2004 to 2007 | Stored outdoors inBahrain while the ownership of the spaceplane was legally contested. | |||
| Technik Museum, Speyer, Germany[58] |  2008 | 49°18′43″N8°26′47″E / 49.31185°N 8.44628°E /49.31185; 8.44628 (OK-GLI (2008 to present)); shuttle not visible, in building | 2008 to present | Purchased from Roscosmos State Corporation when it won the legal battle, displayed indoors. | ||
| OK-KS 3M 0.03 | Electrical test article | Checkout and Test Building (KIS), RKK Energia Plant, Korolev, Russia | [9] | 55°55′17″N37°47′57″E / 55.92132°N 37.79929°E /55.92132; 37.79929 (OK-KS (2006 to 15 October 2012)); not visible, in building. This location shows a half-scale memorial of Energia and the Buran, perhaps meant to be replaced. | 2006 to 15 October 2012 | Built in 1982, stored inside |
| Grounds of the RKK Energia plant | 55°55′01″N37°47′58″E / 55.91685°N 37.79937°E /55.91685; 37.79937 (OK-KS (15 October 2012 to June 2017)) | 15 October 2012 to June 2017 | Stored outside by 15 October 2012, intended to be placed on permanent display.[59] | |||
| Sirius Science Center, Sochi, Krasnodar Krai, Russia |  2018 | 43°24′52″N39°56′57″E / 43.414442°N 39.949115°E /43.414442; 39.949115 (OK-KS (June 2017 to current)) | June 2017 to current | On permanent outdoor display at the Sirius Science Center in Sochi, Russia.[60][61] | ||
| OK-MT 4M 0.04 | Engineering mockup | MZK building, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan | [10] 2014 2020 | 45°56′26″N63°19′06″E / 45.94046°N 63.31841°E /45.94046; 63.31841 (OK-MT); vehicle not visible, in building | 1988 to present | Built in 1983. Moved to the MZK in August 1995.[53] |
| 5M 0.05 | Environmental test parts from forward fuselage | Unknown | 1988 to present | Destroyed, parts used forOK-TVA.[56] | ||
| OK-TVI 6M 0.06 | Environmental test article | NIIKhimMash rocket test area, near Moscow, Russia | [11] | 1988 to present | ||
| OK-TVA 7M 0.15 | Structural test article | Gorky Park, Moscow, Russia |  2010 | 55°43′44″N37°35′49″E / 55.72876°N 37.59688°E /55.72876; 37.59688 (OK-TVA (1995 to July 2014)); use history | 1995 to July 2014 | Served as an attraction, a small restaurant, and bicycle storage, as part of the now-defunct amusement park at that site. |
| Outside Pavilion 20 about 250 meters south of theVostok rocket,VDNKh/VVT (All-Russia Exhibition Center) |  2014 | 55°49′56″N37°37′22″E / 55.83219°N 37.62291°E /55.83219; 37.62291 (OK-TVA (July 2014 to present)); use history | July 2014 to present | Moved to VDNKh on 5 July 2014, assembled by 21 July.[62][63] The shuttle acquisition is part of the VDNKh refurbishment. | ||
| 8M 0.08 | Components used for static thermal and vacuum tests | Outdoor display at Clinical Hospital No. 83 FMBA on Orekhovy Boulevard in Moscow |  2012 | 55°37′05″N37°45′52″E / 55.618°N 37.76448°E /55.618; 37.76448 (8M (from 24 April 2011 to present)) | from 24 April 2011 to present | |
| Unnamed | Wooden wind tunnel model, 1/3 scale | Ramenskoye Airport, near Moscow, Russia, photographed in 2013 | .jpg) 2013[64] | up to 2013 | Has been destroyed in or after 2013. Photographed atZhukovsky International Airport by Aleksander Makin. | |
| Name | Function | Image | Construction date | Current status[65] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOR-4 | Sub-scale model of theSpiral space plane |  | 1982–1984 | 1:2 scale model of Spiral space plane. 5 launches. NPO Molniya, Moscow. |
| BOR-5 ("Kosmos") | Suborbital test of 1/8 scale model of Buran | .jpg) | 1983–1988 | 5 launches, none were reflown but at least 4 were recovered. NPO Molniya, Moscow. |
| Wind tunnel models | Scales from 1:3 to 1:550 | 85 models built; see unnamed test article in table above. | ||
| Gas dynamics models | Scales from 1:15 to 1:2700 |
Over time, several scientists looked into trying to revive the Buran programme, especially after theSpace ShuttleColumbia disaster.[66]
The 2003 grounding of the U.S.Space Shuttles caused many to wonder whether theEnergia launcher or Buran shuttle could be brought back into service.[67] By then, however, all of the equipment for both (including the vehicles themselves) had fallen into disrepair or been repurposed after falling into disuse with the collapse of theSoviet Union.
In 2010 the director of Moscow's Central Machine Building Institute said the Buran programme would be reviewed in the hope of restarting a similar crewed spacecraft design, with rocket test launches as soon as 2015.[68] Russia also continues work on thePPTS but has abandoned theKliper program, due to differences in vision with its European partners.[69]
Due to the2011 retirement of the American Space Shuttle and the need for STS-type craft in the meantime to complete the International Space Station, some American and Russian scientists had been mulling over plans to possibly revive the already-existing Buran shuttles in the Buran programme rather than spend money on an entirely new craft and wait for it to be fully developed[66][67] but the plans did not come to fruition.
On the 25th anniversary of the Buran flight in November 2013,Oleg Ostapenko, the new head ofRoscosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency, proposed that a newheavy-lift launch vehicle be built for the Russian space programme. The rocket would be intended to place a payload of 100 tonnes (220,000 lb) in a baselinelow Earth orbit and is projected to be based on theAngara launch vehicle technology.[70]
Energia (Russian:Энергия,romanized: Energiya,lit. 'Energy';GRAU 11K25) was a 1980ssuper-heavy lift launch vehicle. It was designed byNPO Energia of theSoviet Union as part of the Buran program for a variety of payloads including theBuran spacecraft. Control system main developer enterprise was theKhartron NPO "Electropribor".[71][72] The Energia used fourstrap-on boosters each powered by a four-chamberRD-170 engine burningkerosene/LOX, and a central core stage with four single-chamberRD-0120 (11D122) engines fueled byliquid hydrogen/LOX.[73]
The launch vehicle had two functionally different operational variants: Energia-Polyus, the initial test configuration, in which thePolyus system was used as a final stage intended to put the payload into orbit, and Energia-Buran,[74] in which theBuran orbiter was the payload and the source of the orbit insertion impulse.
The launch vehicle had the capacity to place about 100tonnes inLow Earth orbit, up to 20 tonnes togeostationary orbit and up to 32 tonnes by translunar trajectory intolunar orbit.[75]
The launch vehicle made just two flights before being discontinued.[76][74] Since 2016, there have been attempts to revive the launch vehicle, reusing anupdated version of its booster engine in theSoyuz-5 rocket.
_1200dpi.jpg)
Buran (Russian:Буран,IPA:[bʊˈran],lit. 'blizzard';GRAU indexserial number: 11F35 1K, construction number: 1.01) was the firstspaceplane to be produced as part of the Soviet/Russian Buran program. The Buran orbiters were similar in design to the U.S.Space Shuttle.[77] Buran completed one uncrewed spaceflight in 1988, and was destroyed in 2002 when the roof of its storage hangar collapsed atBaikonur Cosmodrome.[78] The Buran-class orbiters used theexpendableEnergia rocket, a class ofsuper heavy-lift launch vehicle. Besides describing the first operational Soviet/Russian shuttle orbiter, "Buran" was also the designation for the entire Soviet/Russian spaceplane project and its flight articles, which were known as "Buran-class orbiters".
.jpg)
TheAntonov An-225 Mriya (Ukrainian: Антонов Ан-225 Мрія meaningdream;NATO reporting name: Cossack) was a largestrategic airliftcargo aircraft designed and produced by theAntonov Design Bureau in theSoviet Union.
It was originally developed during the 1980s as an enlarged derivative of theAntonov An-124 airlifter for transportingBuran spacecraft. On 21 December 1988, the An-225 performed itsmaiden flight; only one aircraft was ever completed, although a second airframe with a slightly different configuration was partially built. After a brief period of use in the Soviet space program, the aircraft wasmothballed during the early 1990s. Towards the turn of the century, it was decided to refurbish the An-225 and reintroduce it for commercial operations, carrying oversized payloads for the operatorAntonov Airlines. Multiple announcements were made regarding the potential completion of the second airframe, though its construction largely remained on hold due to a lack of funding. By 2009, it had reportedly been brought up to 60–70% completion.
With a maximum takeoff weight of 640 tonnes (705 short tons), the An-225 held several records, includingheaviest aircraft ever built and largestwingspan of any operational aircraft. It was commonly used to transport objects once thought impossible to move by air, such as 130-ton generators,wind turbine blades, anddiesel locomotives. Additionally, both Chinese and Russian officials had announced separate plans to adapt the An-225 for use in their respective space programmes. The Mriya routinely attracted a high degree of public interest, attaining a global following due to its size and its uniqueness.
The only completed An-225 was destroyed in theBattle of Antonov Airport in 2022 during theRussian invasion of Ukraine. In 2022, Ukrainian presidentVolodymyr Zelenskyy announced plans to complete the second An-225 to replace the destroyed aircraft.
Zenit (Ukrainian:Зеніт,Russian:Зени́т; meaningZenith) was a family of spacelaunch vehicles designed by theYuzhnoye Design Bureau inDnipro,Ukraine, which was then part of theSoviet Union. Zenit was originally built in the 1980s for two purposes: as aliquid rocket booster for theEnergia rocket and, equipped with a second stage, as a stand-alone middle-weight launcher with a payload greater than the 7 tonnes of theSoyuz but smaller than the 20 tonnes payload of theProton. The last rocket family developed in the USSR, the Zenit was intended as an eventual replacement for the dated Soyuz and Proton families, and it would employ propellants which were safer and less toxic than the Proton's nitrogen tetroxide/UDMH mix. Zenit was planned to take over crewed spaceship launches from Soyuz, but these plans were abandoned after thedissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Many of components of the Zenit rockets were produced in Russia. The Ukrainian space industry was highly integrated with that of Russia due to its Soviet heritage, but that cooperation was interrupted by theRusso-Ukrainian War beginning in 2014, which has effectively led to a hiatus in the Zenit program.[79] The subsequentRussian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 saw damage to its manufacturing facilities due to Russian missile strikes, and what survived those strikes pivoted to producing military weapons.[80]
Zenit-3SL was launched by theSea Launch consortium's floating launch platform in thePacific Ocean and Zenit-2 was launched fromBaikonur Cosmodrome inKazakhstan.RD-171M engines of the Zenit's first and second stages as well as the upper stage of the Zenit-3SL rocket were supplied by Russia. An improved Zenit-3SLB rocket was used for commercial launches from Baikonur Cosmodrome beginning in April 2008, marketed asLand Launch.[81]
Zenit-3SL was launched 36 times with 32 successes, one partial success, and three failures. The first failure, the launch of aHughes-built communications satellite owned byICO Global Communications, occurred during the second commercial launch on March 12, 2000, and was blamed on a software error that failed to close a valve in the second stage of the rocket. The second failure occurred on January 30, 2007, when the rocket exploded on theOdyssey launch platform, seconds after engine ignition. TheNSS-8 communication satellite on board was destroyed.[82]
On September 24, 2011Zenit-3SL launched successfully from theOdyssey launch platform under a renewedSea Launch project withRSC Energia as the majority stakeholder. The rocket delivered the European communication satellite Atlantic Bird 7 to its planned orbit. On February 1, 2013, another Zenit-3SL failed while launching theIntelsat 27 satellite.[83]
_2.jpg)
Because Buran's debut followed that ofSpace Shuttle Columbia's, and because there were striking visual similarities between the two shuttle systems—a state of affairs which recalled the similarity between theTupolev Tu-144 andConcorde supersonic airliners—many speculated thatCold War espionage played a role in the development of the Soviet shuttle. Despite remarkable external similarities, many key differences existed, which suggests that, had espionage been a factor in Buran's development, it would likely have been in the form of external photography or early airframe designs. NASA AdministratorJames C. Fletcher stated that Buran was based on a rejected NASA design.[84] See the§ Program development section above.
Space Shuttle andBuran-class orbiters | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|  | |||||
![[1]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.thelivingmoon.com%2f41pegasus%2f04images%2fRussian%2fShuttle%2fBuran_Launchpad_12.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.buran.ru%2fimages%2fjpg%2fbbur90.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aerospaceweb.org%2fquestion%2fspacecraft%2fburan%2fptichka2.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.thelivingmoon.com%2f41pegasus%2f04images%2fRussian%2fBuran_2_01%2fBuran2_01_01.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aerospaceweb.org%2fquestion%2fspacecraft%2fburan%2f2.02-2.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fi0.wp.com%2fsometimes-interesting.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2014%2f05%2fabandoned-buran.jpg){kind=link}
![[9]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fweb.archive.org%2fweb%2f20110517055026%2fhttp%3a%2f%2fwww.k26.com%2fburan%2fassets%2fimages%2faok-ks1.jpg){kind=link}
![[10]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fimg-fotki.yandex.ru%2fget%2f16117%2f46616872.dc%2f0_cbbff_6c5b945d_orig.jpg){kind=link}
![[11]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.buran.fr%2fbourane-buran%2fimg%2fok-tvi1-petit.jpg){kind=link}