Boris I (alsoBogoris), venerated asSaint Boris I (Mihail) the Baptizer (Church Slavonic:Борисъ / Борисъ-Михаилъ,Bulgarian:Борис I / Борис-Михаил; died 2 May 907), was the ruler (knyaz) of theFirst Bulgarian Empire from 852 to 889. Despite a number of military setbacks, the reign of Boris I was marked with significant events that shapedBulgarian and European history. With theChristianization of Bulgaria in 864, paganism was abolished. A skillful diplomat, Boris I successfully exploited the conflict between thePatriarchate of Constantinople and thePapacy to secure anautocephalous Bulgarian Church, thus dealing with the nobility's concerns about Byzantine interference in Bulgaria's internal affairs.
When in 885 the disciples ofSaints Cyril and Methodius were banished fromGreat Moravia, Boris I gave them refuge and assistance, which saved theGlagolitic script and later promoted the development of theCyrillic script and of Slavic literature. After he abdicated in 889, his eldest son and successor tried to restore the old pagan religion but was deposed by Boris I. During the subsequentCouncil of Preslav, Byzantine clergymen were replaced by native Bulgarians, and the Greek language was replaced with what is now known asOld Church Slavonic as the church language.
He is regarded as a saint in theOrthodox Church, as the Prince and baptizer of Bulgaria, and asEqual-to-the-Apostles, with his feast day observed onMay 2 and in Synaxis of all venerable and holy Fathers of Bulgaria (movable holiday on the 2nd Sunday of Pentecost).[1][2]
The most common theory is that thename Boris is ofBulgar origin.[3][4][5] After his official act of conversion toChristianity, Boris adopted the Christian nameMichael. He is sometimes called Boris-Michael in historical research.
The only direct evidence of Boris's title are his seals andthe inscription found near the town ofBallsh, modernAlbania, and atVarna. There he is called by the Byzantine title "Archon of Bulgaria", which is usually translated as "ruler", and in the 10-11th centuries also as "Knyaz" (Кнѧзъ, Bulg.).[6] In the Bulgarian sources from that period, Boris I is called "Knyaz" and during theSecond Bulgarian Empire, "Tsar".[7]
In modern historiography Boris is called by different titles. Most historians accept that he changed his title after his conversion to Christianity. According to them, before the baptism he had the titleKhan[8] orKanasubigi,[9][10] and after thatKnyaz.[11]
As early as 781, theEmpressIrene began to seek a closer relationship with theCarolingian dynasty and thePapacy. She negotiated a marriage between her son,Constantine, andRotrude, a daughter ofCharlemagne by his third wifeHildegard. Irene went as far as to send an official to instruct the Frankish princess in Greek; however, Irene herself broke off the engagement in 787, against her son's wishes. When theSecond Council of Nicaea of 787 reintroduced theveneration of icons under Empress Irene, the result was not recognized by Charlemagne since no Frankish emissaries had been invited even though Charlemagne was by then ruling more than three provinces of the old Roman empire. While this improved relations with the Papacy, it did not prevent the outbreak of a war with the Franks, who took overIstria andBenevento in 788.
When Charlemagne was proclaimed Emperor of theHoly Roman Empire byLeo III, the Pope was effectively nullifying the legitimacy of Irene. He certainly desired to increase the influence of the papacy and to honour his protector Charlemagne. Irene, like many of her predecessors sinceJustinian I, was too weak to protect Rome and its much reduced citizenry and the city was not being ruled by any emperor. Thus, Charlemagne's assumption of the imperial title was not seen as an usurpation in the eyes of the Franks or Italians. It was, however, seen as such in Byzantium, but protests by Irene and her successorNicephorus I had no great effect.
Mojmír I managed to unite some Slavic princes and establishedGreat Moravia in 833. His successor,Rastislav, also fought against the Germans.[12] Both states tried to maintain good relations with Bulgaria on account of its considerable military power.
Boris I was the son and successor ofPresian I of Bulgaria. In 852 he sent emissaries toEastern Francia to confirm the peace treaty of 845.[13][14] At the time of his accession he threatened the Byzantines with an invasion, but his armies did not attack,[15] and he received a small area inStrandzha to the southeast.[16] The peace treaty was not signed, however, although both states exchanged temporary delegations.[17] In 854 the Moravian Prince Rastislav persuaded Boris I to help him against East Francia. According to some sources, some Franks bribed the Bulgarian monarch to attackLouis the German.[18] The Bulgarian-Slav campaign was a disaster, and Louis scored a great victory and invaded Bulgaria.[19] At the same time theCroats wageda war against the Bulgarians. Both peoples had coexisted peacefully up to that time, suggesting that the Croats were paid by Louis to attack Bulgaria and distract Boris' attention from his alliance with Great Moravia.[20]Kanasubigi Boris could not achieve any success, and both sides exchanged gifts and settled for peace.[21] As a result of the military actions in 855, the peace between Bulgaria and Eastern Francia was restored, and Rastislav was forced to fight against Louis alone. In the meantime, a conflict between the Byzantines and Bulgarians had started in 855–856, and Boris, distracted by his conflict with Louis, lost Philippopolis (Plovdiv), the region ofZagora, and the ports around theGulf of Burgas on theBlack Sea to theByzantine army led byMichael III and thecaesarBardas.[22][23]
After the death of KnezVlastimir of Serbia circa 850, his state was divided between his sons. Vlastimir and Boris' father had fought against each other in theBulgarian-Serbian War of 839–842, which resulted in a Serbian victory, and Boris sought to avenge that defeat. In 853 or 854, the Bulgarian army led byVladimir-Rasate, the son of Boris I, invaded Serbia, with the aim of replacing the Byzantine overlordship over the Serbs. The Serbian army was led byMutimir and his two brothers; they defeated the Bulgarians, capturing Vladimir and 12boyars.[24] Boris I and Mutimir agreed to peace (and perhaps an alliance[24]), and Mutimir sent his sonsPribislav andStefan to the border to escort the prisoners, where they exchanged items as a sign of peace. Boris himself gave them "rich gifts", while he was given "twoslaves, twofalcons, twodogs, and 80furs".[25][26][27] An internal conflict among the Serbian brothers resulted in Mutimir banishing the two younger brothers to the Bulgarian court.[24][28] Mutimir, however, kept a nephew,Petar, at his court for political reasons.[29] The reason for the feud is not known, though it is postulated that it was a result of treachery.[29] Petar would later defeatPribislav, Mutimir's son, and take the Serbian throne.
Motivations for baptism and conversion to Christianity
There are a number of versions as to why Boris converted to Christianity. Some historians attribute it to the intervention ofhis sister who had already converted while being at Constantinople.[30] Another story mentions a Greek slave in the ruler's court.[30] A more mythological version is the one in which Boris is astonished and frightened by an icon ofJudgement day and thus decides to adopt Christianity.[30] Richard B. Spence sees the decision as deliberate, practical, and politic.[31]
For a variety of diplomatic reasons, Boris became interested in converting to Christianity. In order to both extend his control over the Slavic world and gain an ally against one of the most powerful foes of theBulgars, the Byzantine Empire, Boris sought to establish an alliance withLouis the German against Ratislav of Moravia.[32] Through this alliance, Louis promised to supply Boris with missionaries, which would have effectively brought the Bulgars under the Roman Church.[33] However, late in 863, theByzantine Empire under Emperor Michael III declared war on Boris and the Bulgars during a period of famine and natural disasters. Taken by surprise, Boris was forced to make peace with the Byzantines, promising to convert to Christianity according to the eastern rites, in exchange for peace and territorial concessions inThrace (he regained the region of Zagora recently recovered by the Byzantines).[34] At the beginning of 864, Boris was secretly baptized atPliska by an embassy of Byzantine clergymen, together with his family and select members of the Bulgarian nobility.[35] With EmperorMichael III as his godfather, Boris also adopted the Christian name Michael.[30]
Separate from diplomatic concerns, Boris was interested in converting himself and the Bulgarians to Christianity to resolve the disunity within the Bulgarian society. When he ascended to the throne, the Bulgars and Slavs were separate elements within Boris' kingdom, the minority Bulgars constituting a military aristocracy. Richard Spence compares it to the relationship between the Normans and Saxons in England.[31] Religious plurality further contributed to divisions within the society. The Slavs had their ownpolytheistic belief system while the Bulgar elite believed inTangra, the Sky God, or God of Heaven.The arrival of Methodius and his followers introduced the Cyrillic alphabet, freeing the Bulgarians from dependence on Greek as a written and liturgical language. A SlavicChristian culture developed that helped unify the realm.[31]
Baptism of the Bulgarians and the establishment of the Bulgarian Church
Depiction in the Manases Chronicle of Boris I' baptism.
After his baptism, the first major task that Boris undertook was the baptism of his subjects and for this task he appealed to Byzantine priests between 864 and 866.[36] At the same time Boris sought further instruction on how to lead a Christian lifestyle and society and how to set up anautocephalous church from the Byzantine PatriarchPhotios. Photios' answer proved less than satisfactory, and Boris sought to gain a more favorable settlement from thePapacy.[37] Boris dispatched emissaries led by thekavhanPeter with a long list of questions toPope Nicholas I at Rome in August 866, and obtained 106 detailed answers, detailing the essence ofreligion,law,politics,customs and personalfaith. Stemming from his concerns with the baptism of the Bulgarians, Boris also complained to Nicholas about the abuses perpetrated by the Byzantine priests responsible for baptizing the Bulgarians and how he could go about correcting the consequences resulting from these abuses. The pope temporarily glossed over the controversial question of the autocephalous status desired by Boris for his church and sent a large group of missionaries to continue the conversion of Bulgaria in accordance with the western rite.[38][39] Bulgaria's shift towards the Papacy infuriated Patriarch Photios, who wrote an encyclical to the eastern clergy in 867 in which he denounced the practices associated with the western rite and Rome's ecclesiastical intervention in Bulgaria.[39] This occasioned thePhotian Schism, which was a major step in the rift between the eastern and western churches.
To deliver his response to Boris’ questions, Pope Nicholas I sent two bishops to Bulgaria: Paul of Populonia and Formosus of Porto. The Pope expected that these priests would execute their episcopal responsibilities to address Boris’ concerns, but did not intend for them to be elevated to the positions that they assumed in the Bulgar hierarchy. In Bulgaria, the activities of Bishop Formosus (laterPope Formosus) met with success, until the pope rejected Boris' request to nominate Formosus as archbishop of Bulgaria. Nicholas justified the rejection of the request by arguing that it was “uncanonical to transfer an already established bishop from one see to another”. The newPope Adrian II refused Boris' request for a similar nomination of either Formosus or Deacon Marinus (laterPope Marinus I), after which Bulgaria began to shift towards Constantinople once again. At theFourth Council of Constantinople in 870 the position of the Bulgarian church was reopened by Bulgarian envoys, and the eastern patriarchs adjudicated in favor of Constantinople. This determined the future of theBulgarian Orthodox Church, which was granted the status of an autocephalous archbishopric by thePatriarchate of Constantinople and an archbishop of its own. Later in the 870s, the Patriarch of Constantinople surrendered Bulgaria to the Papacy, but this concession was purely nominal, as it did not affect the actual position of Bulgaria's autocephalous church.[40]
The Christianization of the Bulgarians as a result of Boris’ actions had profound effects not only on the religious belief system of the Bulgarians but also the structure of the Bulgarian government. Upon embracing Christianity, Boris took on the title of Knyaz and joined the community of nations that embraced Christ, to the great delight of the Eastern Roman Empire.[38]
Toward the end of his reign, Boris began to increase the number of native Bulgarian clergy. Consequently, Boris began to send Bulgarians to Constantinople to obtain a monastic education and some of these Bulgarians returned to their homeland to serve as clergymen.[41] In 885, Boris was presented with a new opportunity to establish a native clergy when Slavic-speaking disciples of St. Cyril and St. Methodius were forced to flee from Moravia after a German-inspired reaction to the death of the apostle.[citation needed]
Changes to Bulgarian culture brought on by Clement and Naum
Knyaz Boris I meeting the disciples of Saints Cyril and Methodius
In 886 Boris' governor ofBelgrade welcomed the disciples ofSaint Cyril and Saint Methodius, who were exiled fromGreat Moravia into Bulgaria and sent them on to Boris inPliska. Boris happily greeted two of these disciples,Clement of Ohrid andNaum of Preslav, who were of noble Bulgarian Slavic origin. To utilize the disciple's talents, Boris commissioned Clement to be a “teacher” in the province ofKutmichevitsa.
Both Clement and Naum were instrumental in furthering the cultural, linguistic and spiritual works of Cyril and Methodius.[42] They set up educational centers inPliska and inOhrid to further the development of Slavonic letters andliturgy. Clement later trained thousands of Slavonic-speaking priests who replaced the Greek-speaking clergy from Constantinople still present in Bulgaria. The script that was originally developed by Cyril and Methodius is known as theGlagolitic alphabet.
InBulgaria,Clement of Ohrid andNaum of Preslav created (or rather compiled) the new Bulgarian script, later calledCyrillic that was declared the official alphabet in 893.Old Bulgarian was declared as the official language in the same year. In the following centuries this script was adopted by otherSlavic peoples and states. The introduction of Slavic liturgy paralleled Boris' continued development of churches and monasteries throughout his realm.
Conversion to Christianity met great opposition among the Bulgarian elite. Some refused to become Christians while others apostatized after baptism and started a rebellion against Boris for forcing them to be baptized. Some people did not object necessarily to the Christian religion but to the fact that it was brought by foreign priests, which, as a result, established external foreign policy. By breaking the power of the old cults, Boris reduced the influence of the boyars, who resisted the khan's authority.[31] In the summer of 865 a group of Bulgar aristocrats (boyars) started an open revolt.[30] Boris ruthlessly suppressed it and executed 52 boyars together with their entire families.[43] Thus the Christianization continued.
In 889 Boris abdicated the throne and became a monk. His son and successorVladimir attempted a pagan reaction, which brought Boris out of retirement in 893. Vladimir was defeated and Boris had him blinded, his wife shaved and sent to a monastery. Boris gathered theCouncil of Preslav placing his third son, TsarSimeon I of Bulgaria, on the throne, threatening him with the same fate if he too apostatized. Boris returned to his monastery, emerging once again in c. 895 to help Simeon fight theMagyars, who hadinvaded Bulgaria in alliance with the Byzantines. After the passing of this crisis, Boris resumed monastic life and died in 907. The location of his retreat, where perhaps he was interred, is not certain; it may be near Preslav, or Pliska, or in aRavna Monastery nearVarna.
^Peter B. Golden, Turks and Khazars: Origins, Institutions, and Interactions in Pre-Mongol Eurasia, Volume 952 of Collected studies, Ashgate/Variorum, 2010,ISBN1409400034, p. 4.
^Бакалов, Георги. Средновековният български владетел. (Титулатура и инсигнии), София 1995, с. 144, 146, Бобчев, С. С. Княз или цар Борис? (към историята на старобългарското право). Титлите на българските владетели, Българска сбирка, XIV, 5, 1907, с. 311
^Бакалов, Георги. Средновековният български владетел..., с. 144–146
^Златарски, Васил [1927] (1994). „История на Българската държава през Средните векове, т.1, ч.2“, Второ фототипно издание, София: Академично издателство „Марин Дринов“, стр. 29.ISBN954-430-299-9.
^Златарски, Васил [1927] (1994). „История на Българската държава през Средните векове, т.1, ч.2“, Второ фототипно издание, София: Академично издателство „Марин Дринов“.ISBN954-430-299-9.
^К. Грот, Моравия и Мадяры, Петроград, 1881, стр. 108 и сл.
^Sullivan, Richard E. (1994). "Khan Boris and the Conversion of Bulgaria: A case Study of the Impact of Christianity on a Barbarian Society".Christian Missionary Activity in the Early Middle Ages. Variorum:55–139.ISBN0-86078-402-9.
^Simeonova, Liliana (1998).Diplomacy of the Letter and the Cross. Photios, Bulgaria and the Papacy, 860s–880s. A.M. Hakkert, Amsterdam. p. 434.ISBN90-256-0638-5.
^McGuckin, John Anthony (February 3, 2014).The Concise Encyclopedia of Orthodox Christianity. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 68.ISBN978-1118759332.
Yordan Andreev, Ivan Lazarov, Plamen Pavlov,Koy koy e v srednovekovna Balgariya, Sofia 1999.
Bulgarian historical review (2005), United Center for Research and Training in History, Published by Pub. House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, v. 33: no. 1–4.
Gjuzelev, V., (1988) Medieval Bulgaria, Byzantine Empire, Black Sea, Venice, Genoa (Centre culturel du monde byzantin). Published by Verlag Baier.