Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Wikipedia

Banach space

Normed vector space that is complete

Inmathematics, more specifically infunctional analysis, aBanach space (/ˈbɑː.nʌx/,Polish pronunciation:[ˈba.nax]) is acompletenormed vector space. Thus, a Banach space is a vector space with ametric that allows the computation ofvector length and distance between vectors and is complete in the sense that aCauchy sequence of vectors always converges to a well-definedlimit that is within the space.

Banach spaces are named after the Polish mathematicianStefan Banach, who introduced this concept and studied it systematically in 1920–1922 along withHans Hahn andEduard Helly.[1]Maurice René Fréchet was the first to use the term "Banach space" and Banach in turn then coined the term "Fréchet space".[2]Banach spaces originally grew out of the study offunction spaces byHilbert,Fréchet, andRiesz earlier in the century. Banach spaces play a central role in functional analysis. In other areas ofanalysis, the spaces under study are often Banach spaces.

Contents

Definition

edit

ABanach space is acompletenormed space(X,).{\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|).} A normed space is a pair[note 1](X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} consisting of avector spaceX{\displaystyle X} over a scalar fieldK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} } (whereK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} } is commonlyR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } orC{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }) together with a distinguished[note 2]norm:XR.{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|:X\to \mathbb {R} .} Like all norms, this norm induces atranslation invariant[note 3]distance function, called thecanonical or(norm) induced metric, defined for all vectorsx,yX{\displaystyle x,y\in X} by[note 4]d(x,y):=yx=xy.{\displaystyle d(x,y):=\|y-x\|=\|x-y\|.}This makesX{\displaystyle X} into ametric space(X,d).{\displaystyle (X,d).} A sequencex1,x2,{\displaystyle x_{1},x_{2},\ldots } is calledCauchy in(X,d){\displaystyle (X,d)} ord{\displaystyle d}-Cauchy or{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|}-Cauchy if for every realr>0,{\displaystyle r>0,} there exists some indexN{\displaystyle N} such thatd(xn,xm)=xnxm<r{\displaystyle d(x_{n},x_{m})=\|x_{n}-x_{m}\|<r}wheneverm{\displaystyle m} andn{\displaystyle n} are greater thanN.{\displaystyle N.} The normed space(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is called aBanach space and the canonical metricd{\displaystyle d} is called acomplete metric if(X,d){\displaystyle (X,d)} is acomplete metric space, which by definition means for everyCauchy sequencex1,x2,{\displaystyle x_{1},x_{2},\ldots } in(X,d),{\displaystyle (X,d),} there exists somexX{\displaystyle x\in X} such thatlimnxn=x in (X,d),{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }x_{n}=x\;{\text{ in }}(X,d),}where becausexnx=d(xn,x),{\displaystyle \|x_{n}-x\|=d(x_{n},x),} this sequence's convergence tox{\displaystyle x} can equivalently be expressed aslimnxnx=0 in R.{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }\|x_{n}-x\|=0\;{\text{ in }}\mathbb {R} .}

The norm{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|} of a normed space(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is called acomplete norm if(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is a Banach space.

L-semi-inner product

edit

For any normed space(X,),{\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|),} there exists anL-semi-inner product,{\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle } onX{\displaystyle X} such thatx=x,x{\textstyle \|x\|={\sqrt {\langle x,x\rangle }}} for allxX.{\displaystyle x\in X.} In general, there may be infinitely many L-semi-inner products that satisfy this condition. L-semi-inner products are a generalization ofinner products, which are what fundamentally distinguishHilbert spaces from all other Banach spaces. This shows that all normed spaces (and hence all Banach spaces) can be considered as being generalizations of (pre-)Hilbert spaces.

Characterization in terms of series

edit

The vector space structure allows one to relate the behavior of Cauchy sequences to that of convergingseries of vectors. A normed spaceX{\displaystyle X} is a Banach space if and only if eachabsolutely convergent series inX{\displaystyle X} converges to a value that lies withinX,{\displaystyle X,}[3] symbolicallyn=1vn<n=1vn converges in X.{\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\|v_{n}\|<\infty \implies \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }v_{n}{\text{ converges in }}X.}

Topology

edit

The canonical metricd{\displaystyle d} of a normed space(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} induces the usualmetric topologyτd{\displaystyle \tau _{d}} onX,{\displaystyle X,} which is referred to as thecanonical ornorm inducedtopology. Every normed space is automatically assumed to carry thisHausdorff topology, unless indicated otherwise. With this topology, every Banach space is aBaire space, although there exist normed spaces that are Baire but not Banach.[4] The norm:XR{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|:X\to \mathbb {R} } is always acontinuous function with respect to the topology that it induces.

The open and closed balls of radiusr>0{\displaystyle r>0} centered at a pointxX{\displaystyle x\in X} are, respectively, the setsBr(x):={zXzx<r} and Cr(x):={zXzxr}.{\displaystyle B_{r}(x):=\{z\in X\mid \|z-x\|<r\}\qquad {\text{ and }}\qquad C_{r}(x):=\{z\in X\mid \|z-x\|\leq r\}.} Any such ball is aconvex andbounded subset ofX,{\displaystyle X,} but acompact ball/neighborhood exists if and only ifX{\displaystyle X} isfinite-dimensional.In particular, no infinite–dimensional normed space can belocally compact or have theHeine–Borel property. Ifx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is a vector ands0{\displaystyle s\neq 0} is a scalar, thenx0+sBr(x)=B|s|r(x0+sx) and x0+sCr(x)=C|s|r(x0+sx).{\displaystyle x_{0}+s\,B_{r}(x)=B_{|s|r}(x_{0}+sx)\qquad {\text{ and }}\qquad x_{0}+s\,C_{r}(x)=C_{|s|r}(x_{0}+sx).} Usings=1{\displaystyle s=1} shows that the norm-induced topology istranslation invariant, which means that for anyxX{\displaystyle x\in X} andSX,{\displaystyle S\subseteq X,} the subsetS{\displaystyle S} isopen (respectively,closed) inX{\displaystyle X} if and only if its translationx+S:={x+ssS}{\displaystyle x+S:=\{x+s\mid s\in S\}} is open (respectively, closed).Consequently, the norm induced topology is completely determined by anyneighbourhood basis at the origin. Some common neighborhood bases at the origin include{Br(0)r>0},{Cr(0)r>0},{Brn(0)nN}, and {Crn(0)nN},{\displaystyle \{B_{r}(0)\mid r>0\},\qquad \{C_{r}(0)\mid r>0\},\qquad \{B_{r_{n}}(0)\mid n\in \mathbb {N} \},\qquad {\text{ and }}\qquad \{C_{r_{n}}(0)\mid n\in \mathbb {N} \},}wherer1,r2,{\displaystyle r_{1},r_{2},\ldots } can be any sequence of positive real numbers that converges to0{\displaystyle 0} inR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } (common choices arern:=1n{\displaystyle r_{n}:={\tfrac {1}{n}}} orrn:=1/2n{\displaystyle r_{n}:=1/2^{n}}). So, for example, any open subsetU{\displaystyle U} ofX{\displaystyle X} can be written as a unionU=xIBrx(x)=xIx+Brx(0)=xIx+rxB1(0){\displaystyle U=\bigcup _{x\in I}B_{r_{x}}(x)=\bigcup _{x\in I}x+B_{r_{x}}(0)=\bigcup _{x\in I}x+r_{x}\,B_{1}(0)}indexed by some subsetIU,{\displaystyle I\subseteq U,} where eachrx{\displaystyle r_{x}} may be chosen from the aforementioned sequencer1,r2,.{\displaystyle r_{1},r_{2},\ldots .} (The open balls can also be replaced with closed balls, although the indexing setI{\displaystyle I} and radiirx{\displaystyle r_{x}} may then also need to be replaced). Additionally,I{\displaystyle I} can always be chosen to becountable ifX{\displaystyle X} is aseparable space, which by definition means thatX{\displaystyle X} contains some countabledense subset.

Homeomorphism classes of separable Banach spaces

edit

All finite–dimensional normed spaces are separable Banach spaces and any two Banach spaces of the same finite dimension are linearly homeomorphic. Every separable infinite–dimensionalHilbert space is linearly isometrically isomorphic to the separable Hilbertsequence space2(N){\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} )} with its usual norm2.{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|_{2}.}

TheAnderson–Kadec theorem states that every infinite–dimensional separableFréchet space ishomeomorphic to theproduct spaceiNR{\textstyle \prod _{i\in \mathbb {N} }\mathbb {R} } of countably many copies ofR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } (this homeomorphism need not be alinear map).[5][6] Thus all infinite–dimensional separable Fréchet spaces are homeomorphic to each other (or said differently, their topology is uniqueup to a homeomorphism). Since every Banach space is a Fréchet space, this is also true of all infinite–dimensional separable Banach spaces, including2(N).{\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} ).} In fact,2(N){\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} )} is evenhomeomorphic to its ownunitsphere{x2(N)x2=1},{\displaystyle \{x\in \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} )\mid \|x\|_{2}=1\},} which stands in sharp contrast to finite–dimensional spaces (theEuclidean planeR2{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}} is not homeomorphic to theunit circle, for instance).

This pattern inhomeomorphism classes extends to generalizations ofmetrizable (locally Euclidean)topological manifolds known asmetricBanach manifolds, which aremetric spaces that are around every point,locally homeomorphic to some open subset of a given Banach space (metricHilbert manifolds and metricFréchet manifolds are defined similarly).[6] For example, every open subsetU{\displaystyle U} of a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is canonically a metric Banach manifold modeled onX{\displaystyle X} since theinclusion mapUX{\displaystyle U\to X} is anopenlocal homeomorphism. Using Hilbert spacemicrobundles, David Henderson showed[7] in 1969 that every metric manifold modeled on a separable infinite–dimensional Banach (orFréchet) space can betopologically embedded as anopen subset of2(N){\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} )} and, consequently, also admits a uniquesmooth structure making it into aC{\displaystyle C^{\infty }}Hilbert manifold.

Compact and convex subsets

edit

There is a compact subsetS{\displaystyle S} of2(N){\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} )} whoseconvex hullco(S){\displaystyle \operatorname {co} (S)} isnot closed and thus alsonot compact.[note 5][8] However, like in all Banach spaces, theclosed convex hullco¯S{\displaystyle {\overline {\operatorname {co} }}S} of this (and every other) compact subset will be compact.[9] In a normed space that is not complete then it is in generalnot guaranteed thatco¯S{\displaystyle {\overline {\operatorname {co} }}S} will be compact wheneverS{\displaystyle S} is; an example[note 5] can even be found in a (non-complete)pre-Hilbert vector subspace of2(N).{\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} ).}

As a topological vector space

edit

This norm-induced topology also makes(X,τd){\displaystyle (X,\tau _{d})} into what is known as atopological vector space (TVS), which by definition is a vector space endowed with a topology making the operations of addition and scalar multiplication continuous. It is emphasized that the TVS(X,τd){\displaystyle (X,\tau _{d})} isonly a vector space together with a certain type of topology; that is to say, when considered as a TVS, it isnot associated withany particular norm or metric (both of which are "forgotten"). This Hausdorff TVS(X,τd){\displaystyle (X,\tau _{d})} is evenlocally convex because the set of all open balls centered at the origin forms aneighbourhood basis at the origin consisting of convexbalanced open sets. This TVS is alsonormable, which by definition refers to any TVS whose topology is induced by some (possibly unknown)norm. Normable TVSsare characterized by being Hausdorff and having aboundedconvex neighborhood of the origin. All Banach spaces arebarrelled spaces, which means that everybarrel is neighborhood of the origin (all closed balls centered at the origin are barrels, for example) and guarantees that theBanach–Steinhaus theorem holds.

Comparison of complete metrizable vector topologies

edit

Theopen mapping theorem implies that whenτ1{\displaystyle \tau _{1}} andτ2{\displaystyle \tau _{2}} are topologies onX{\displaystyle X} that make both(X,τ1){\displaystyle (X,\tau _{1})} and(X,τ2){\displaystyle (X,\tau _{2})} intocomplete metrizable TVSes (for example, Banach orFréchet spaces), if one topology isfiner or coarser than the other, then they must be equal (that is, ifτ1τ2{\displaystyle \tau _{1}\subseteq \tau _{2}} orτ2τ1{\displaystyle \tau _{2}\subseteq \tau _{1}} thenτ1=τ2{\displaystyle \tau _{1}=\tau _{2}}).[10]So, for example, if(X,p){\displaystyle (X,p)} and(X,q){\displaystyle (X,q)} are Banach spaces with topologiesτp{\displaystyle \tau _{p}} andτq,{\displaystyle \tau _{q},} and if one of these spaces has some open ball that is also an open subset of the other space (or, equivalently, if one ofp:(X,τq)R{\displaystyle p:(X,\tau _{q})\to \mathbb {R} } orq:(X,τp)R{\displaystyle q:(X,\tau _{p})\to \mathbb {R} } is continuous), then their topologies are identical and the normsp{\displaystyle p} andq{\displaystyle q} areequivalent.

Completeness

edit

Complete norms and equivalent norms

edit

Two norms,p{\displaystyle p} andq,{\displaystyle q,} on a vector spaceX{\displaystyle X} are said to beequivalent if they induce the same topology;[11] this happens if and only if there exist real numbersc,C>0{\displaystyle c,C>0} such thatcq(x)p(x)Cq(x){\textstyle c\,q(x)\leq p(x)\leq C\,q(x)} for allxX.{\displaystyle x\in X.} Ifp{\displaystyle p} andq{\displaystyle q} are two equivalent norms on a vector spaceX{\displaystyle X} then(X,p){\displaystyle (X,p)} is a Banach space if and only if(X,q){\displaystyle (X,q)} is a Banach space.See this footnote for an example of a continuous norm on a Banach space that isnot equivalent to that Banach space's given norm.[note 6][11] All norms on a finite-dimensional vector space are equivalent and every finite-dimensional normed space is a Banach space.[12]

Complete norms vs complete metrics

edit

A metricD{\displaystyle D} on a vector spaceX{\displaystyle X} is induced by a norm onX{\displaystyle X} if and only ifD{\displaystyle D} istranslation invariant[note 3] andabsolutely homogeneous, which means thatD(sx,sy)=|s|D(x,y){\displaystyle D(sx,sy)=|s|D(x,y)} for all scalarss{\displaystyle s} and allx,yX,{\displaystyle x,y\in X,} in which case the functionx:=D(x,0){\displaystyle \|x\|:=D(x,0)} defines a norm onX{\displaystyle X} and the canonical metric induced by{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|} is equal toD.{\displaystyle D.}

Suppose that(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is a normed space and thatτ{\displaystyle \tau } is the norm topology induced onX.{\displaystyle X.} Suppose thatD{\displaystyle D} isanymetric onX{\displaystyle X} such that the topology thatD{\displaystyle D} induces onX{\displaystyle X} is equal toτ.{\displaystyle \tau .} IfD{\displaystyle D} istranslation invariant[note 3] then(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is a Banach space if and only if(X,D){\displaystyle (X,D)} is a complete metric space.[13] IfD{\displaystyle D} isnot translation invariant, then it may be possible for(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} to be a Banach space but for(X,D){\displaystyle (X,D)} tonot be a complete metric space[14] (see this footnote[note 7] for an example). In contrast, a theorem of Klee,[15][16][note 8] which also applies to allmetrizable topological vector spaces, implies that if there existsany[note 9] complete metricD{\displaystyle D} onX{\displaystyle X} that induces the norm topologyτ{\displaystyle \tau } onX,{\displaystyle X,} then(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is a Banach space.

AFréchet space is alocally convex topological vector space whose topology is induced by some translation-invariant complete metric. Every Banach space is a Fréchet space but not conversely; indeed, there even exist Fréchet spaces on which no norm is a continuous function (such as thespace of real sequencesRN=iNR{\textstyle \mathbb {R} ^{\mathbb {N} }=\prod _{i\in \mathbb {N} }\mathbb {R} } with theproduct topology). However, the topology of every Fréchet space is induced by somecountable family of real-valued (necessarily continuous) maps calledseminorms, which are generalizations ofnorms. It is even possible for a Fréchet space to have a topology that is induced by a countable family ofnorms (such norms would necessarily be continuous)[note 10][17] but to not be a Banach/normable space because its topology can not be defined by anysingle norm. An example of such a space is theFréchet spaceC(K),{\displaystyle C^{\infty }(K),} whose definition can be found in the article onspaces of test functions and distributions.

Complete norms vs complete topological vector spaces

edit

There is another notion of completeness besides metric completeness and that is the notion of acomplete topological vector space (TVS) or TVS-completeness, which uses the theory ofuniform spaces. Specifically, the notion of TVS-completeness uses a unique translation-invariantuniformity, called thecanonical uniformity, that dependsonly on vector subtraction and the topologyτ{\displaystyle \tau } that the vector space is endowed with, and so in particular, this notion of TVS completeness is independent of whatever norm induced the topologyτ{\displaystyle \tau } (and even applies to TVSs that arenot even metrizable). Every Banach space is a complete TVS. Moreover, a normed space is a Banach space (that is, its norm-induced metric is complete) if and only if it is complete as a topological vector space. If(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} is ametrizable topological vector space (such as any norm induced topology, for example), then(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} is a complete TVS if and only if it is asequentially complete TVS, meaning that it is enough to check that every Cauchysequence in(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} converges in(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} to some point ofX{\displaystyle X} (that is, there is no need to consider the more general notion of arbitrary Cauchynets).

If(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} is a topological vector space whose topology is induced bysome (possibly unknown) norm (such spaces are callednormable), then(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} is a complete topological vector space if and only ifX{\displaystyle X} may be assigned anorm{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|} that induces onX{\displaystyle X} the topologyτ{\displaystyle \tau } and also makes(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} into a Banach space. AHausdorfflocally convex topological vector spaceX{\displaystyle X} isnormable if and only if itsstrong dual spaceXb{\displaystyle X'_{b}} is normable,[18] in which caseXb{\displaystyle X'_{b}} is a Banach space (Xb{\displaystyle X'_{b}} denotes thestrong dual space ofX,{\displaystyle X,} whose topology is a generalization of thedual norm-induced topology on thecontinuous dual spaceX{\displaystyle X'}; see this footnote[note 11] for more details). IfX{\displaystyle X} is ametrizable locally convex TVS, thenX{\displaystyle X} is normable if and only ifXb{\displaystyle X'_{b}} is aFréchet–Urysohn space.[19] This shows that in the category oflocally convex TVSs, Banach spaces are exactly those complete spaces that are bothmetrizable and have metrizablestrong dual spaces.

Completions

edit

Every normed space can beisometrically embedded onto a dense vector subspace of a Banach space, where this Banach space is called acompletion of the normed space. This Hausdorff completion is unique up toisometric isomorphism.

More precisely, for every normed spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} there exists a Banach spaceY{\displaystyle Y} and a mappingT:XY{\displaystyle T:X\to Y} such thatT{\displaystyle T} is anisometric mapping andT(X){\displaystyle T(X)} is dense inY.{\displaystyle Y.} IfZ{\displaystyle Z} is another Banach space such that there is an isometric isomorphism fromX{\displaystyle X} onto a dense subset ofZ,{\displaystyle Z,} thenZ{\displaystyle Z} is isometrically isomorphic toY.{\displaystyle Y.}The Banach spaceY{\displaystyle Y} is the Hausdorffcompletion of the normed spaceX.{\displaystyle X.} The underlying metric space forY{\displaystyle Y} is the same as the metric completion ofX,{\displaystyle X,} with the vector space operations extended fromX{\displaystyle X} toY.{\displaystyle Y.} The completion ofX{\displaystyle X} is sometimes denoted byX^.{\displaystyle {\widehat {X}}.}

General theory

edit

Linear operators, isomorphisms

edit
Main article:Bounded operator

IfX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} are normed spaces over the sameground fieldK,{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} ,} the set of allcontinuousK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }-linear mapsT:XY{\displaystyle T:X\to Y} is denoted byB(X,Y).{\displaystyle B(X,Y).} In infinite-dimensional spaces, not all linear maps are continuous. A linear mapping from a normed spaceX{\displaystyle X} to another normed space is continuous if and only if it isbounded on the closedunit ball ofX.{\displaystyle X.} Thus, the vector spaceB(X,Y){\displaystyle B(X,Y)} can be given theoperator normT=sup{TxYxX, xX1}.{\displaystyle \|T\|=\sup\{\|Tx\|_{Y}\mid x\in X,\ \|x\|_{X}\leq 1\}.}

ForY{\displaystyle Y} a Banach space, the spaceB(X,Y){\displaystyle B(X,Y)} is a Banach space with respect to this norm. In categorical contexts, it is sometimes convenient to restrict thefunction space between two Banach spaces to only theshort maps; in that case the spaceB(X,Y){\displaystyle B(X,Y)} reappears as a naturalbifunctor.[20]

IfX{\displaystyle X} is a Banach space, the spaceB(X)=B(X,X){\displaystyle B(X)=B(X,X)} forms a unitalBanach algebra; the multiplication operation is given by the composition of linear maps.

IfX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} are normed spaces, they areisomorphic normed spaces if there exists a linear bijectionT:XY{\displaystyle T:X\to Y} such thatT{\displaystyle T} and its inverseT1{\displaystyle T^{-1}} are continuous. If one of the two spacesX{\displaystyle X} orY{\displaystyle Y} is complete (orreflexive,separable, etc.) then so is the other space. Two normed spacesX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} areisometrically isomorphic if in addition,T{\displaystyle T} is anisometry, that is,T(x)=x{\displaystyle \|T(x)\|=\|x\|} for everyx{\displaystyle x} inX.{\displaystyle X.} TheBanach–Mazur distanced(X,Y){\displaystyle d(X,Y)} between two isomorphic but not isometric spacesX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} gives a measure of how much the two spacesX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} differ.

Continuous and bounded linear functions and seminorms

edit

Everycontinuous linear operator is abounded linear operator and if dealing only with normed spaces then the converse is also true. That is, alinear operator between two normed spaces isbounded if and only if it is acontinuous function. So in particular, because the scalar field (which isR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } orC{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }) is a normed space, alinear functional on a normed space is abounded linear functional if and only if it is acontinuous linear functional. This allows for continuity-related results (like those below) to be applied to Banach spaces. Although boundedness is the same as continuity for linear maps between normed spaces, the term "bounded" is more commonly used when dealing primarily with Banach spaces.

Iff:XR{\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {R} } is asubadditive function (such as a norm, asublinear function, or real linear functional), then[21]f{\displaystyle f} iscontinuous at the origin if and only iff{\displaystyle f} isuniformly continuous on all ofX{\displaystyle X}; and if in additionf(0)=0{\displaystyle f(0)=0} thenf{\displaystyle f} is continuous if and only if itsabsolute value|f|:X[0,){\displaystyle |f|:X\to [0,\infty )} is continuous, which happens if and only if{xX|f(x)|<1}{\displaystyle \{x\in X\mid |f(x)|<1\}} is an open subset ofX.{\displaystyle X.}[21][note 12] And very importantly for applying theHahn–Banach theorem, a linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} is continuous if and only if this is true of itsreal partRef{\displaystyle \operatorname {Re} f} and moreover,Ref=f{\displaystyle \|\operatorname {Re} f\|=\|f\|} andthe real partRef{\displaystyle \operatorname {Re} f} completely determinesf,{\displaystyle f,} which is why the Hahn–Banach theorem is often stated only for real linear functionals.Also, a linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} onX{\displaystyle X} is continuous if and only if theseminorm|f|{\displaystyle |f|} is continuous, which happens if and only if there exists a continuous seminormp:XR{\displaystyle p:X\to \mathbb {R} } such that|f|p{\displaystyle |f|\leq p}; this last statement involving the linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} and seminormp{\displaystyle p} is encountered in many versions of the Hahn–Banach theorem.

Basic notions

edit

The Cartesian productX×Y{\displaystyle X\times Y} of two normed spaces is not canonically equipped with a norm. However, several equivalent norms are commonly used,[22] such as(x,y)1=x+y,(x,y)=max(x,y){\displaystyle \|(x,y)\|_{1}=\|x\|+\|y\|,\qquad \|(x,y)\|_{\infty }=\max(\|x\|,\|y\|)}which correspond (respectively) to thecoproduct andproduct in the category of Banach spaces and short maps (discussed above).[20] For finite (co)products, these norms give rise to isomorphic normed spaces, and the productX×Y{\displaystyle X\times Y} (or the direct sumXY{\displaystyle X\oplus Y}) is complete if and only if the two factors are complete.

IfM{\displaystyle M} is aclosedlinear subspace of a normed spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} there is a natural norm on the quotient spaceX/M,{\displaystyle X/M,}x+M=infmMx+m.{\displaystyle \|x+M\|=\inf \limits _{m\in M}\|x+m\|.}

The quotientX/M{\displaystyle X/M} is a Banach space whenX{\displaystyle X} is complete.[23] The quotient map fromX{\displaystyle X} ontoX/M,{\displaystyle X/M,} sendingxX{\displaystyle x\in X} to its classx+M,{\displaystyle x+M,} is linear, onto, and of norm1,{\displaystyle 1,} except whenM=X,{\displaystyle M=X,} in which case the quotient is the null space.

The closed linear subspaceM{\displaystyle M} ofX{\displaystyle X} is said to be acomplemented subspace ofX{\displaystyle X} ifM{\displaystyle M} is therange of asurjective bounded linearprojectionP:XM.{\displaystyle P:X\to M.} In this case, the spaceX{\displaystyle X} is isomorphic to the direct sum ofM{\displaystyle M} andkerP,{\displaystyle \ker P,} the kernel of the projectionP.{\displaystyle P.}

Suppose thatX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} are Banach spaces and thatTB(X,Y).{\displaystyle T\in B(X,Y).} There exists a canonical factorization ofT{\displaystyle T} as[23]T=T1π,T:XπX/kerTT1Y{\displaystyle T=T_{1}\circ \pi ,\quad T:X{\overset {\pi }{{}\longrightarrow {}}}X/\ker T{\overset {T_{1}}{{}\longrightarrow {}}}Y}where the first mapπ{\displaystyle \pi } is the quotient map, and the second mapT1{\displaystyle T_{1}} sends every classx+kerT{\displaystyle x+\ker T} in the quotient to the imageT(x){\displaystyle T(x)} inY.{\displaystyle Y.} This is well defined because all elements in the same class have the same image. The mappingT1{\displaystyle T_{1}} is a linear bijection fromX/kerT{\displaystyle X/\ker T} onto the rangeT(X),{\displaystyle T(X),} whose inverse need not be bounded.

Classical spaces

edit

Basic examples[24] of Banach spaces include: theLp spacesLp{\displaystyle L^{p}} and their special cases, thesequence spacesp{\displaystyle \ell ^{p}} that consist of scalar sequences indexed bynatural numbersN{\displaystyle \mathbb {N} }; among them, the space1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} ofabsolutely summable sequences and the space2{\displaystyle \ell ^{2}} of square summable sequences; the spacec0{\displaystyle c_{0}} of sequences tending to zero and the space{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }} of bounded sequences; the spaceC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} of continuous scalar functions on a compact Hausdorff spaceK,{\displaystyle K,} equipped with the max norm,fC(K)=max{|f(x)|xK},fC(K).{\displaystyle \|f\|_{C(K)}=\max\{|f(x)|\mid x\in K\},\quad f\in C(K).}

According to theBanach–Mazur theorem, every Banach space is isometrically isomorphic to a subspace of someC(K).{\displaystyle C(K).}[25] For every separable Banach spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} there is a closed subspaceM{\displaystyle M} of1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} such thatX:=1/M.{\displaystyle X:=\ell ^{1}/M.}[26]

AnyHilbert space serves as an example of a Banach space. A Hilbert spaceH{\displaystyle H} onK=R,C{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} =\mathbb {R} ,\mathbb {C} } is complete for a norm of the formxH=x,x,{\displaystyle \|x\|_{H}={\sqrt {\langle x,x\rangle }},}where,:H×HK{\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle :H\times H\to \mathbb {K} }is theinner product, linear in its first argument that satisfies the following:y,x=x,y¯, for all x,yHx,x0, for all xHx,x=0 if and only if x=0.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\langle y,x\rangle &={\overline {\langle x,y\rangle }},\quad {\text{ for all }}x,y\in H\\\langle x,x\rangle &\geq 0,\quad {\text{ for all }}x\in H\\\langle x,x\rangle =0{\text{ if and only if }}x&=0.\end{aligned}}}

For example, the spaceL2{\displaystyle L^{2}} is a Hilbert space.

TheHardy spaces, theSobolev spaces are examples of Banach spaces that are related toLp{\displaystyle L^{p}} spaces and have additional structure. They are important in different branches of analysis,Harmonic analysis andPartial differential equations among others.

Banach algebras

edit

ABanach algebra is a Banach spaceA{\displaystyle A} overK=R{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} =\mathbb {R} } orC,{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ,} together with a structure ofalgebra overK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }, such that the product mapA×A(a,b)abA{\displaystyle A\times A\ni (a,b)\mapsto ab\in A} is continuous. An equivalent norm onA{\displaystyle A} can be found so thatabab{\displaystyle \|ab\|\leq \|a\|\|b\|} for alla,bA.{\displaystyle a,b\in A.}

Examples

edit

Dual space

edit
Main article:Dual space

IfX{\displaystyle X} is a normed space andK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} } the underlyingfield (either thereals or thecomplex numbers), thecontinuous dual space is the space of continuous linear maps fromX{\displaystyle X} intoK,{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} ,} orcontinuous linear functionals.The notation for the continuous dual isX=B(X,K){\displaystyle X'=B(X,\mathbb {K} )} in this article.[27] SinceK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} } is a Banach space (using theabsolute value as norm), the dualX{\displaystyle X'} is a Banach space, for every normed spaceX.{\displaystyle X.} TheDixmier–Ng theorem characterizes the dual spaces of Banach spaces.

The main tool for proving the existence of continuous linear functionals is theHahn–Banach theorem.

In particular, every continuous linear functional on a subspace of a normed space can be continuously extended to the whole space, without increasing the norm of the functional.[28] An important special case is the following: for every vectorx{\displaystyle x} in a normed spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} there exists a continuous linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} onX{\displaystyle X} such thatf(x)=xX,fX1.{\displaystyle f(x)=\|x\|_{X},\quad \|f\|_{X'}\leq 1.}

Whenx{\displaystyle x} is not equal to the0{\displaystyle \mathbf {0} } vector, the functionalf{\displaystyle f} must have norm one, and is called anorming functional forx.{\displaystyle x.}

TheHahn–Banach separation theorem states that two disjoint non-emptyconvex sets in a real Banach space, one of them open, can be separated by a closedaffinehyperplane. The open convex set lies strictly on one side of the hyperplane, the second convex set lies on the other side but may touch the hyperplane.[29]

A subsetS{\displaystyle S} in a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} istotal if thelinear span ofS{\displaystyle S} isdense inX.{\displaystyle X.} The subsetS{\displaystyle S} is total inX{\displaystyle X} if and only if the only continuous linear functional that vanishes onS{\displaystyle S} is the0{\displaystyle \mathbf {0} } functional: this equivalence follows from the Hahn–Banach theorem.

IfX{\displaystyle X} is the direct sum of two closed linear subspacesM{\displaystyle M} andN,{\displaystyle N,} then the dualX{\displaystyle X'} ofX{\displaystyle X} is isomorphic to the direct sum of the duals ofM{\displaystyle M} andN.{\displaystyle N.}[30] IfM{\displaystyle M} is a closed linear subspace inX,{\displaystyle X,} one can associate theorthogonal ofM{\displaystyle M} in the dual,M={xXx(m)=0 for all mM}.{\displaystyle M^{\bot }=\{x'\in X\mid x'(m)=0{\text{ for all }}m\in M\}.}

The orthogonalM{\displaystyle M^{\bot }} is a closed linear subspace of the dual. The dual ofM{\displaystyle M} is isometrically isomorphic toX/M.{\displaystyle X'/M^{\bot }.} The dual ofX/M{\displaystyle X/M} is isometrically isomorphic toM.{\displaystyle M^{\bot }.}[31]

The dual of a separable Banach space need not be separable, but:

Theorem[32]LetX{\displaystyle X} be a normed space. IfX{\displaystyle X'} isseparable, thenX{\displaystyle X} is separable.

WhenX{\displaystyle X'} is separable, the above criterion for totality can be used for proving the existence of a countable total subset inX.{\displaystyle X.}

Weak topologies

edit

Theweak topology on a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is thecoarsest topology onX{\displaystyle X} for which all elementsx{\displaystyle x'} in the continuous dual spaceX{\displaystyle X'} are continuous. The norm topology is thereforefiner than the weak topology. It follows from the Hahn–Banach separation theorem that the weak topology isHausdorff, and that a norm-closedconvex subset of a Banach space is also weakly closed.[33] A norm-continuous linear map between two Banach spacesX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} is alsoweakly continuous, that is, continuous from the weak topology ofX{\displaystyle X} to that ofY.{\displaystyle Y.}[34]

IfX{\displaystyle X} is infinite-dimensional, there exist linear maps which are not continuous. The spaceX{\displaystyle X^{*}} of all linear maps fromX{\displaystyle X} to the underlying fieldK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} } (this spaceX{\displaystyle X^{*}} is called thealgebraic dual space, to distinguish it fromX{\displaystyle X'} also induces a topology onX{\displaystyle X} which isfiner than the weak topology, and much less used in functional analysis.

On a dual spaceX,{\displaystyle X',} there is a topology weaker than the weak topology ofX,{\displaystyle X',} called theweak* topology. It is the coarsest topology onX{\displaystyle X'} for which all evaluation mapsxXx(x),{\displaystyle x'\in X'\mapsto x'(x),} wherex{\displaystyle x} ranges overX,{\displaystyle X,} are continuous. Its importance comes from theBanach–Alaoglu theorem.

Banach–Alaoglu theoremLetX{\displaystyle X} be anormed vector space. Then theclosedunit ballB={xXx1}{\displaystyle B=\{x\in X\mid \|x\|\leq 1\}} of the dual space iscompact in the weak* topology.

The Banach–Alaoglu theorem can be proved usingTychonoff's theorem about infinite products of compact Hausdorff spaces. WhenX{\displaystyle X} is separable, the unit ballB{\displaystyle B'} of the dual is ametrizable compact in the weak* topology.[35]

Examples of dual spaces

edit

The dual ofc0{\displaystyle c_{0}} is isometrically isomorphic to1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}}: for every bounded linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} onc0,{\displaystyle c_{0},} there is a unique elementy={yn}1{\displaystyle y=\{y_{n}\}\in \ell ^{1}} such thatf(x)=nNxnyn,x={xn}c0,  and  f(c0)=y1.{\displaystyle f(x)=\sum _{n\in \mathbb {N} }x_{n}y_{n},\qquad x=\{x_{n}\}\in c_{0},\ \ {\text{and}}\ \ \|f\|_{(c_{0})'}=\|y\|_{\ell _{1}}.}

The dual of1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} is isometrically isomorphic to{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}. The dual ofLebesgue spaceLp([0,1]){\displaystyle L^{p}([0,1])} is isometrically isomorphic toLq([0,1]){\displaystyle L^{q}([0,1])} when1p<{\displaystyle 1\leq p<\infty } and1p+1q=1.{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{p}}+{\frac {1}{q}}=1.}

For every vectory{\displaystyle y} in a Hilbert spaceH,{\displaystyle H,} the mappingxHfy(x)=x,y{\displaystyle x\in H\to f_{y}(x)=\langle x,y\rangle }

defines a continuous linear functionalfy{\displaystyle f_{y}} onH.{\displaystyle H.}TheRiesz representation theorem states that every continuous linear functional onH{\displaystyle H} is of the formfy{\displaystyle f_{y}} for a uniquely defined vectory{\displaystyle y} inH.{\displaystyle H.}The mappingyHfy{\displaystyle y\in H\to f_{y}} is anantilinear isometric bijection fromH{\displaystyle H} onto its dualH.{\displaystyle H'.} When the scalars are real, this map is an isometric isomorphism.

WhenK{\displaystyle K} is a compact Hausdorff topological space, the dualM(K){\displaystyle M(K)} ofC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} is the space ofRadon measures in the sense of Bourbaki.[36] The subsetP(K){\displaystyle P(K)} ofM(K){\displaystyle M(K)} consisting of non-negative measures of mass 1 (probability measures) is a convex w*-closed subset of the unit ball ofM(K).{\displaystyle M(K).} Theextreme points ofP(K){\displaystyle P(K)} are theDirac measures onK.{\displaystyle K.} The set of Dirac measures onK,{\displaystyle K,} equipped with the w*-topology, ishomeomorphic toK.{\displaystyle K.}

Banach–Stone TheoremIfK{\displaystyle K} andL{\displaystyle L} are compact Hausdorff spaces and ifC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} andC(L){\displaystyle C(L)} are isometrically isomorphic, then the topological spacesK{\displaystyle K} andL{\displaystyle L} arehomeomorphic.[37][38]

The result has been extended by Amir[39] and Cambern[40] to the case when the multiplicativeBanach–Mazur distance betweenC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} andC(L){\displaystyle C(L)} is<2.{\displaystyle <2.} The theorem is no longer true when the distance is=2.{\displaystyle =2.}[41]

In the commutativeBanach algebraC(K),{\displaystyle C(K),} themaximal ideals are precisely kernels of Dirac measures onK,{\displaystyle K,}Ix=kerδx={fC(K)f(x)=0},xK.{\displaystyle I_{x}=\ker \delta _{x}=\{f\in C(K)\mid f(x)=0\},\quad x\in K.}

More generally, by theGelfand–Mazur theorem, the maximal ideals of a unital commutative Banach algebra can be identified with itscharacters—not merely as sets but as topological spaces: the former with thehull-kernel topology and the latter with the w*-topology. In this identification, the maximal ideal space can be viewed as a w*-compact subset of the unit ball in the dualA.{\displaystyle A'.}

TheoremIfK{\displaystyle K} is a compact Hausdorff space, then the maximal ideal spaceΞ{\displaystyle \Xi } of the Banach algebraC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} ishomeomorphic toK.{\displaystyle K.}[37]

Not every unital commutative Banach algebra is of the formC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} for some compact Hausdorff spaceK.{\displaystyle K.} However, this statement holds if one placesC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} in the smaller category of commutativeC*-algebras.Gelfand'srepresentation theorem for commutative C*-algebras states that every commutative unitalC*-algebraA{\displaystyle A} is isometrically isomorphic to aC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} space.[42] The Hausdorff compact spaceK{\displaystyle K} here is again the maximal ideal space, also called thespectrum ofA{\displaystyle A} in the C*-algebra context.

Bidual

edit

IfX{\displaystyle X} is a normed space, the (continuous) dualX{\displaystyle X''} of the dualX{\displaystyle X'} is called thebidual orsecond dual ofX.{\displaystyle X.} For every normed spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} there is a natural map,{FX:XXFX(x)(f)=f(x) for all xX, and for all fX{\displaystyle {\begin{cases}F_{X}\colon X\to X''\\F_{X}(x)(f)=f(x)&{\text{ for all }}x\in X,{\text{ and for all }}f\in X'\end{cases}}}

This definesFX(x){\displaystyle F_{X}(x)} as a continuous linear functional onX,{\displaystyle X',} that is, an element ofX.{\displaystyle X''.} The mapFX:xFX(x){\displaystyle F_{X}\colon x\to F_{X}(x)} is a linear map fromX{\displaystyle X} toX.{\displaystyle X''.} As a consequence of the existence of anorming functionalf{\displaystyle f} for everyxX,{\displaystyle x\in X,} this mapFX{\displaystyle F_{X}} is isometric, thusinjective.

For example, the dual ofX=c0{\displaystyle X=c_{0}} is identified with1,{\displaystyle \ell ^{1},} and the dual of1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} is identified with,{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty },} the space of bounded scalar sequences. Under these identifications,FX{\displaystyle F_{X}} is the inclusion map fromc0{\displaystyle c_{0}} to.{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }.} It is indeed isometric, but not onto.

IfFX{\displaystyle F_{X}} issurjective, then the normed spaceX{\displaystyle X} is calledreflexive (seebelow). Being the dual of a normed space, the bidualX{\displaystyle X''} is complete, therefore, every reflexive normed space is a Banach space.

Using the isometric embeddingFX,{\displaystyle F_{X},} it is customary to consider a normed spaceX{\displaystyle X} as a subset of its bidual. WhenX{\displaystyle X} is a Banach space, it is viewed as a closed linear subspace ofX.{\displaystyle X''.} IfX{\displaystyle X} is not reflexive, the unit ball ofX{\displaystyle X} is a proper subset of the unit ball ofX.{\displaystyle X''.} TheGoldstine theorem states that the unit ball of a normed space is weakly*-dense in the unit ball of the bidual. In other words, for everyx{\displaystyle x''} in the bidual, there exists anet(xi)iI{\displaystyle (x_{i})_{i\in I}} inX{\displaystyle X} so thatsupiIxix,  x(f)=limif(xi),fX.{\displaystyle \sup _{i\in I}\|x_{i}\|\leq \|x''\|,\ \ x''(f)=\lim _{i}f(x_{i}),\quad f\in X'.}

The net may be replaced by a weakly*-convergent sequence when the dualX{\displaystyle X'} is separable. On the other hand, elements of the bidual of1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} that are not in1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} cannot be weak*-limit ofsequences in1,{\displaystyle \ell ^{1},} since1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} isweakly sequentially complete.

Banach's theorems

edit

Here are the main general results about Banach spaces that go back to the time of Banach's book (Banach (1932)) and are related to theBaire category theorem. According to this theorem, a complete metric space (such as a Banach space, aFréchet space or anF-space) cannot be equal to a union of countably many closed subsets with emptyinteriors. Therefore, a Banach space cannot be the union of countably many closed subspaces, unless it is already equal to one of them; a Banach space with a countableHamel basis is finite-dimensional.

Banach–Steinhaus TheoremLetX{\displaystyle X} be a Banach space andY{\displaystyle Y} be anormed vector space. Suppose thatF{\displaystyle F} is a collection of continuous linear operators fromX{\displaystyle X} toY.{\displaystyle Y.} The uniform boundedness principle states that if for allx{\displaystyle x} inX{\displaystyle X} we havesupTFT(x)Y<,{\displaystyle \sup _{T\in F}\|T(x)\|_{Y}<\infty ,} thensupTFTY<.{\displaystyle \sup _{T\in F}\|T\|_{Y}<\infty .}

The Banach–Steinhaus theorem is not limited to Banach spaces. It can be extended for example to the case whereX{\displaystyle X} is aFréchet space, provided the conclusion is modified as follows: under the same hypothesis, there exists a neighborhoodU{\displaystyle U} of0{\displaystyle \mathbf {0} } inX{\displaystyle X} such that allT{\displaystyle T} inF{\displaystyle F} are uniformly bounded onU,{\displaystyle U,}supTFsupxUT(x)Y<.{\displaystyle \sup _{T\in F}\sup _{x\in U}\;\|T(x)\|_{Y}<\infty .}

The Open Mapping TheoremLetX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} be Banach spaces andT:XY{\displaystyle T:X\to Y} be a surjective continuous linear operator, thenT{\displaystyle T} is an open map.

CorollaryEvery one-to-one bounded linear operator from a Banach space onto a Banach space is an isomorphism.

The First Isomorphism Theorem for Banach spacesSuppose thatX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} are Banach spaces and thatTB(X,Y).{\displaystyle T\in B(X,Y).} Suppose further that the range ofT{\displaystyle T} is closed inY.{\displaystyle Y.} ThenX/kerT{\displaystyle X/\ker T} is isomorphic toT(X).{\displaystyle T(X).}

This result is a direct consequence of the precedingBanach isomorphism theorem and of the canonical factorization of bounded linear maps.

CorollaryIf a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is the internal direct sum of closed subspacesM1,,Mn,{\displaystyle M_{1},\ldots ,M_{n},} thenX{\displaystyle X} is isomorphic toM1Mn.{\displaystyle M_{1}\oplus \cdots \oplus M_{n}.}

This is another consequence of Banach's isomorphism theorem, applied to the continuous bijection fromM1Mn{\displaystyle M_{1}\oplus \cdots \oplus M_{n}} ontoX{\displaystyle X} sendingm1,,mn{\displaystyle m_{1},\cdots ,m_{n}} to the summ1++mn.{\displaystyle m_{1}+\cdots +m_{n}.}

The Closed Graph TheoremLetT:XY{\displaystyle T:X\to Y} be a linear mapping between Banach spaces. The graph ofT{\displaystyle T} is closed inX×Y{\displaystyle X\times Y} if and only ifT{\displaystyle T} is continuous.

Reflexivity

edit
Main article:Reflexive space

The normed spaceX{\displaystyle X} is calledreflexive when the natural map{FX:XXFX(x)(f)=f(x) for all xX, and for all fX{\displaystyle {\begin{cases}F_{X}:X\to X''\\F_{X}(x)(f)=f(x)&{\text{ for all }}x\in X,{\text{ and for all }}f\in X'\end{cases}}}is surjective. Reflexive normed spaces are Banach spaces.

TheoremIfX{\displaystyle X} is a reflexive Banach space, every closed subspace ofX{\displaystyle X} and every quotient space ofX{\displaystyle X} are reflexive.

This is a consequence of the Hahn–Banach theorem. Further, by the open mapping theorem, if there is a bounded linear operator from the Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} onto the Banach spaceY,{\displaystyle Y,} thenY{\displaystyle Y} is reflexive.

TheoremIfX{\displaystyle X} is a Banach space, thenX{\displaystyle X} is reflexive if and only ifX{\displaystyle X'} is reflexive.

CorollaryLetX{\displaystyle X} be a reflexive Banach space. ThenX{\displaystyle X} isseparable if and only ifX{\displaystyle X'} is separable.

Indeed, if the dualY{\displaystyle Y'} of a Banach spaceY{\displaystyle Y} is separable, thenY{\displaystyle Y} is separable. IfX{\displaystyle X} is reflexive and separable, then the dual ofX{\displaystyle X'} is separable, soX{\displaystyle X'} is separable.

TheoremSuppose thatX1,,Xn{\displaystyle X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}} are normed spaces and thatX=X1Xn.{\displaystyle X=X_{1}\oplus \cdots \oplus X_{n}.} ThenX{\displaystyle X} is reflexive if and only if eachXj{\displaystyle X_{j}} is reflexive.

Hilbert spaces are reflexive. TheLp{\displaystyle L^{p}} spaces are reflexive when1<p<.{\displaystyle 1<p<\infty .} More generally,uniformly convex spaces are reflexive, by theMilman–Pettis theorem. The spacesc0,1,L1([0,1]),C([0,1]){\displaystyle c_{0},\ell ^{1},L^{1}([0,1]),C([0,1])} are not reflexive. In these examples of non-reflexive spacesX,{\displaystyle X,} the bidualX{\displaystyle X''} is "much larger" thanX.{\displaystyle X.} Namely, under the natural isometric embedding ofX{\displaystyle X} intoX{\displaystyle X''} given by the Hahn–Banach theorem, the quotientX/X{\displaystyle X''/X} is infinite-dimensional, and even nonseparable. However, Robert C. James has constructed an example[43] of a non-reflexive space, usually called "the James space" and denoted byJ,{\displaystyle J,}[44] such that the quotientJ/J{\displaystyle J''/J} is one-dimensional. Furthermore, this spaceJ{\displaystyle J} is isometrically isomorphic to its bidual.

TheoremA Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is reflexive if and only if its unit ball iscompact in theweak topology.

WhenX{\displaystyle X} is reflexive, it follows that all closed and boundedconvex subsets ofX{\displaystyle X} are weakly compact. In a Hilbert spaceH,{\displaystyle H,} the weak compactness of the unit ball is very often used in the following way: every bounded sequence inH{\displaystyle H} has weakly convergent subsequences.

Weak compactness of the unit ball provides a tool for finding solutions in reflexive spaces to certainoptimization problems. For example, everyconvex continuous function on the unit ballB{\displaystyle B} of a reflexive space attains its minimum at some point inB.{\displaystyle B.}

As a special case of the preceding result, whenX{\displaystyle X} is a reflexive space overR,{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ,} every continuous linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} inX{\displaystyle X'} attains its maximumf{\displaystyle \|f\|} on the unit ball ofX.{\displaystyle X.} The followingtheorem of Robert C. James provides a converse statement.

James' TheoremFor a Banach space the following two properties are equivalent:

The theorem can be extended to give a characterization of weakly compact convex sets.

On every non-reflexive Banach spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} there exist continuous linear functionals that are notnorm-attaining. However, theBishopPhelps theorem[45] states that norm-attaining functionals are norm dense in the dualX{\displaystyle X'} ofX.{\displaystyle X.}

Weak convergences of sequences

edit

A sequence{xn}{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}} in a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} isweakly convergent to a vectorxX{\displaystyle x\in X} if{f(xn)}{\displaystyle \{f(x_{n})\}} converges tof(x){\displaystyle f(x)} for every continuous linear functionalf{\displaystyle f} in the dualX.{\displaystyle X'.} The sequence{xn}{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}} is aweakly Cauchy sequence if{f(xn)}{\displaystyle \{f(x_{n})\}} converges to a scalar limitL(f){\displaystyle L(f)} for everyf{\displaystyle f} inX.{\displaystyle X'.} A sequence{fn}{\displaystyle \{f_{n}\}} in the dualX{\displaystyle X'} isweakly* convergent to a functionalfX{\displaystyle f\in X'} iffn(x){\displaystyle f_{n}(x)} converges tof(x){\displaystyle f(x)} for everyx{\displaystyle x} inX.{\displaystyle X.} Weakly Cauchy sequences, weakly convergent and weakly* convergent sequences are norm bounded, as a consequence of theBanach–Steinhaus theorem.

When the sequence{xn}{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}} inX{\displaystyle X} is a weakly Cauchy sequence, the limitL{\displaystyle L} above defines a bounded linear functional on the dualX,{\displaystyle X',} that is, an elementL{\displaystyle L} of the bidual ofX,{\displaystyle X,} andL{\displaystyle L} is the limit of{xn}{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}} in the weak*-topology of the bidual. The Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} isweakly sequentially complete if every weakly Cauchy sequence is weakly convergent inX.{\displaystyle X.} It follows from the preceding discussion that reflexive spaces are weakly sequentially complete.

Theorem[46]For every measureμ,{\displaystyle \mu ,} the spaceL1(μ){\displaystyle L^{1}(\mu )} is weakly sequentially complete.

An orthonormal sequence in a Hilbert space is a simple example of a weakly convergent sequence, with limit equal to the0{\displaystyle \mathbf {0} } vector. Theunit vector basis ofp{\displaystyle \ell ^{p}} for1<p<,{\displaystyle 1<p<\infty ,} or ofc0,{\displaystyle c_{0},} is another example of aweakly null sequence, that is, a sequence that converges weakly to0.{\displaystyle \mathbf {0} .} For every weakly null sequence in a Banach space, there exists a sequence of convex combinations of vectors from the given sequence that is norm-converging to0.{\displaystyle \mathbf {0} .}[47]

The unit vector basis of1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} is not weakly Cauchy. Weakly Cauchy sequences in1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} are weakly convergent, sinceL1{\displaystyle L^{1}}-spaces are weakly sequentially complete. Actually, weakly convergent sequences in1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} are norm convergent.[48] This means that1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} satisfiesSchur's property.

Results involving the𝓁1 basis

edit

Weakly Cauchy sequences and the1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} basis are the opposite cases of the dichotomy established in the following deep result of H. P. Rosenthal.[49]

Theorem[50]Let{xn}nN{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}_{n\in \mathbb {N} }} be a bounded sequence in a Banach space. Either{xn}nN{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}_{n\in \mathbb {N} }} has a weakly Cauchy subsequence, or it admits a subsequenceequivalent to the standard unit vector basis of1.{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}.}

A complement to this result is due to Odell and Rosenthal (1975).

Theorem[51]LetX{\displaystyle X} be a separable Banach space. The following are equivalent:

By the Goldstine theorem, every element of the unit ballB{\displaystyle B''} ofX{\displaystyle X''} is weak*-limit of a net in the unit ball ofX.{\displaystyle X.} WhenX{\displaystyle X} does not contain1,{\displaystyle \ell ^{1},} every element ofB{\displaystyle B''} is weak*-limit of asequence in the unit ball ofX.{\displaystyle X.}[52]

When the Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is separable, the unit ball of the dualX,{\displaystyle X',} equipped with the weak*-topology, is a metrizable compact spaceK,{\displaystyle K,}[35] and every elementx{\displaystyle x''} in the bidualX{\displaystyle X''} defines a bounded function onK{\displaystyle K}:xKx(x),|x(x)|x.{\displaystyle x'\in K\mapsto x''(x'),\quad |x''(x')|\leq \|x''\|.}

This function is continuous for the compact topology ofK{\displaystyle K} if and only ifx{\displaystyle x''} is actually inX,{\displaystyle X,} considered as subset ofX.{\displaystyle X''.} Assume in addition for the rest of the paragraph thatX{\displaystyle X} does not contain1.{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}.} By the preceding result of Odell and Rosenthal, the functionx{\displaystyle x''} is thepointwise limit onK{\displaystyle K} of a sequence{xn}X{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}\subseteq X} of continuous functions onK,{\displaystyle K,} it is therefore afirst Baire class function onK.{\displaystyle K.} The unit ball of the bidual is a pointwise compact subset of the first Baire class onK.{\displaystyle K.}[53]

Sequences, weak and weak* compactness

edit

WhenX{\displaystyle X} is separable, the unit ball of the dual is weak*-compact by theBanach–Alaoglu theorem and metrizable for the weak* topology,[35] hence every bounded sequence in the dual has weakly* convergent subsequences. This applies to separable reflexive spaces, but more is true in this case, as stated below.

The weak topology of a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is metrizable if and only ifX{\displaystyle X} is finite-dimensional.[54] If the dualX{\displaystyle X'} is separable, the weak topology of the unit ball ofX{\displaystyle X} is metrizable. This applies in particular to separable reflexive Banach spaces. Although the weak topology of the unit ball is not metrizable in general, one can characterize weak compactness using sequences.

Eberlein–Šmulian theorem[55]A setA{\displaystyle A} in a Banach space is relatively weakly compact if and only if every sequence{an}{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}} inA{\displaystyle A} has a weakly convergent subsequence.

A Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is reflexive if and only if each bounded sequence inX{\displaystyle X} has a weakly convergent subsequence.[56]

A weakly compact subsetA{\displaystyle A} in1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} is norm-compact. Indeed, every sequence inA{\displaystyle A} has weakly convergent subsequences by Eberlein–Šmulian, that are norm convergent by the Schur property of1.{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}.}

Type and cotype

edit

A way to classify Banach spaces is through the probabilistic notion oftype and cotype, these two measure how far a Banach space is from a Hilbert space.

Schauder bases

edit
Main article:Schauder basis

ASchauder basis in a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is a sequence{en}n0{\displaystyle \{e_{n}\}_{n\geq 0}} of vectors inX{\displaystyle X} with the property that for every vectorxX,{\displaystyle x\in X,} there existuniquely defined scalars{xn}n0{\displaystyle \{x_{n}\}_{n\geq 0}} depending onx,{\displaystyle x,} such thatx=n=0xnen,i.e.,x=limnPn(x), Pn(x):=k=0nxkek.{\displaystyle x=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }x_{n}e_{n},\quad {\textit {i.e.,}}\quad x=\lim _{n}P_{n}(x),\ P_{n}(x):=\sum _{k=0}^{n}x_{k}e_{k}.}

Banach spaces with a Schauder basis are necessarilyseparable, because the countable set of finite linear combinations with rational coefficients (say) is dense.

It follows from the Banach–Steinhaus theorem that the linear mappings{Pn}{\displaystyle \{P_{n}\}} are uniformly bounded by some constantC.{\displaystyle C.} Let{en}{\displaystyle \{e_{n}^{*}\}} denote the coordinate functionals which assign to everyx{\displaystyle x} inX{\displaystyle X} the coordinatexn{\displaystyle x_{n}} ofx{\displaystyle x} in the above expansion. They are calledbiorthogonal functionals. When the basis vectors have norm1,{\displaystyle 1,} the coordinate functionals{en}{\displaystyle \{e_{n}^{*}\}} have norm2C{\displaystyle {}\leq 2C} in the dual ofX.{\displaystyle X.}

Most classical separable spaces have explicit bases. TheHaar system{hn}{\displaystyle \{h_{n}\}} is a basis forLp([0,1]){\displaystyle L^{p}([0,1])} when1p<.{\displaystyle 1\leq p<\infty .} Thetrigonometric system is a basis inLp(T){\displaystyle L^{p}(\mathbf {T} )} when1<p<.{\displaystyle 1<p<\infty .} TheSchauder system is a basis in the spaceC([0,1]).{\displaystyle C([0,1]).}[57] The question of whether the disk algebraA(D){\displaystyle A(\mathbf {D} )} has a basis[58] remained open for more than forty years, until Bočkarev showed in 1974 thatA(D){\displaystyle A(\mathbf {D} )} admits a basis constructed from theFranklin system.[59]

Since every vectorx{\displaystyle x} in a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} with a basis is the limit ofPn(x),{\displaystyle P_{n}(x),} withPn{\displaystyle P_{n}} of finite rank and uniformly bounded, the spaceX{\displaystyle X} satisfies thebounded approximation property. The first example byEnflo of a space failing the approximation property was at the same time the first example of a separable Banach space without a Schauder basis.[60]

Robert C. James characterized reflexivity in Banach spaces with a basis: the spaceX{\displaystyle X} with a Schauder basis is reflexive if and only if the basis is bothshrinking and boundedly complete.[61] In this case, the biorthogonal functionals form a basis of the dual ofX.{\displaystyle X.}

Tensor product

edit

LetX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} be twoK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }-vector spaces. Thetensor productXY{\displaystyle X\otimes Y} ofX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} is aK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }-vector spaceZ{\displaystyle Z} with a bilinear mappingT:X×YZ{\displaystyle T:X\times Y\to Z} which has the followinguniversal property:

IfT1:X×YZ1{\displaystyle T_{1}:X\times Y\to Z_{1}} is any bilinear mapping into aK{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }-vector spaceZ1,{\displaystyle Z_{1},} then there exists a unique linear mappingf:ZZ1{\displaystyle f:Z\to Z_{1}} such thatT1=fT.{\displaystyle T_{1}=f\circ T.}

The image underT{\displaystyle T} of a couple(x,y){\displaystyle (x,y)} inX×Y{\displaystyle X\times Y} is denoted byxy,{\displaystyle x\otimes y,} and called asimple tensor. Every elementz{\displaystyle z} inXY{\displaystyle X\otimes Y} is a finite sum of such simple tensors.

There are various norms that can be placed on the tensor product of the underlying vector spaces, amongst others theprojective cross norm andinjective cross norm introduced byA. Grothendieck in 1955.[62]

In general, the tensor product of complete spaces is not complete again. When working with Banach spaces, it is customary to say that theprojective tensor product[63] of two Banach spacesX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} is thecompletionX^πY{\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} of the algebraic tensor productXY{\displaystyle X\otimes Y} equipped with the projective tensor norm, and similarly for theinjective tensor product[64]X^εY.{\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }Y.} Grothendieck proved in particular that[65]

C(K)^εYC(K,Y),L1([0,1])^πYL1([0,1],Y),{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}C(K){\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }Y&\simeq C(K,Y),\\L^{1}([0,1]){\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y&\simeq L^{1}([0,1],Y),\end{aligned}}}whereK{\displaystyle K} is a compact Hausdorff space,C(K,Y){\displaystyle C(K,Y)} the Banach space of continuous functions fromK{\displaystyle K} toY{\displaystyle Y} andL1([0,1],Y){\displaystyle L^{1}([0,1],Y)} the space of Bochner-measurable and integrable functions from[0,1]{\displaystyle [0,1]} toY,{\displaystyle Y,} and where the isomorphisms are isometric. The two isomorphisms above are the respective extensions of the map sending the tensorfy{\displaystyle f\otimes y} to the vector-valued functionsKf(s)yY.{\displaystyle s\in K\to f(s)y\in Y.}

Tensor products and the approximation property

edit

LetX{\displaystyle X} be a Banach space. The tensor productX^εX{\displaystyle X'{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }X} is identified isometrically with the closure inB(X){\displaystyle B(X)} of the set of finite rank operators. WhenX{\displaystyle X} has theapproximation property, this closure coincides with the space ofcompact operators onX.{\displaystyle X.}

For every Banach spaceY,{\displaystyle Y,} there is a natural norm1{\displaystyle 1} linear mapY^πXY^εX{\displaystyle Y{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }X\to Y{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }X}obtained by extending the identity map of the algebraic tensor product. Grothendieck related theapproximation problem to the question of whether this map is one-to-one whenY{\displaystyle Y} is the dual ofX.{\displaystyle X.}Precisely, for every Banach spaceX,{\displaystyle X,} the mapX^πX X^εX{\displaystyle X'{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }X\ \longrightarrow X'{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }X}is one-to-one if and only ifX{\displaystyle X} has the approximation property.[66]

Grothendieck conjectured thatX^πY{\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} andX^εY{\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }Y} must be different wheneverX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} are infinite-dimensional Banach spaces. This was disproved byGilles Pisier in 1983.[67] Pisier constructed an infinite-dimensional Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} such thatX^πX{\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }X} andX^εX{\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\varepsilon }X} are equal. Furthermore, just asEnflo's example, this spaceX{\displaystyle X} is a "hand-made" space that fails to have the approximation property. On the other hand, Szankowski proved that the classical spaceB(2){\displaystyle B(\ell ^{2})} does not have the approximation property.[68]

Some classification results

edit

Characterizations of Hilbert space among Banach spaces

edit

A necessary and sufficient condition for the norm of a Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} to be associated to an inner product is theparallelogram identity:

Parallelogram identityfor allx,yX:x+y2+xy2=2(x2+y2).{\displaystyle x,y\in X:\qquad \|x+y\|^{2}+\|x-y\|^{2}=2(\|x\|^{2}+\|y\|^{2}).}

It follows, for example, that theLebesgue spaceLp([0,1]){\displaystyle L^{p}([0,1])} is a Hilbert space only whenp=2.{\displaystyle p=2.} If this identity is satisfied, the associated inner product is given by thepolarization identity. In the case of real scalars, this gives:x,y=14(x+y2xy2).{\displaystyle \langle x,y\rangle ={\tfrac {1}{4}}(\|x+y\|^{2}-\|x-y\|^{2}).}

For complex scalars, defining theinner product so as to beC{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }-linear inx,{\displaystyle x,}antilinear iny,{\displaystyle y,} the polarization identity gives:x,y=14(x+y2xy2+i(x+iy2xiy2)).{\displaystyle \langle x,y\rangle ={\tfrac {1}{4}}\left(\|x+y\|^{2}-\|x-y\|^{2}+i(\|x+iy\|^{2}-\|x-iy\|^{2})\right).}

To see that the parallelogram law is sufficient, one observes in the real case thatx,y{\displaystyle \langle x,y\rangle } is symmetric, and in the complex case, that it satisfies theHermitian symmetry property andix,y=ix,y.{\displaystyle \langle ix,y\rangle =i\langle x,y\rangle .} The parallelogram law implies thatx,y{\displaystyle \langle x,y\rangle } is additive inx.{\displaystyle x.} It follows that it is linear over the rationals, thus linear by continuity.

Several characterizations of spaces isomorphic (rather than isometric) to Hilbert spaces are available. The parallelogram law can be extended to more than two vectors, and weakened by the introduction of a two-sided inequality with a constantc1{\displaystyle c\geq 1}: Kwapień proved that ifc2k=1nxk2Ave±k=1n±xk2c2k=1nxk2{\displaystyle c^{-2}\sum _{k=1}^{n}\|x_{k}\|^{2}\leq \operatorname {Ave} _{\pm }\left\|\sum _{k=1}^{n}\pm x_{k}\right\|^{2}\leq c^{2}\sum _{k=1}^{n}\|x_{k}\|^{2}}for every integern{\displaystyle n} and all families of vectors{x1,,xn}X,{\displaystyle \{x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n}\}\subseteq X,} then the Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is isomorphic to a Hilbert space.[69] Here,Ave±{\displaystyle \operatorname {Ave} _{\pm }} denotes the average over the2n{\displaystyle 2^{n}} possible choices of signs±1.{\displaystyle \pm 1.}In the same article, Kwapień proved that the validity of a Banach-valuedParseval's theorem for the Fourier transform characterizes Banach spaces isomorphic to Hilbert spaces.

Lindenstrauss and Tzafriri proved that a Banach space in which every closed linear subspace is complemented (that is, is the range of a bounded linear projection) is isomorphic to a Hilbert space.[70] The proof rests uponDvoretzky's theorem about Euclidean sections of high-dimensional centrally symmetric convex bodies. In other words, Dvoretzky's theorem states that for every integern,{\displaystyle n,} any finite-dimensional normed space, with dimension sufficiently large compared ton,{\displaystyle n,} contains subspaces nearly isometric to then{\displaystyle n}-dimensional Euclidean space.

The next result gives the solution of the so-calledhomogeneous space problem. An infinite-dimensional Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} is said to behomogeneous if it is isomorphic to all its infinite-dimensional closed subspaces. A Banach space isomorphic to2{\displaystyle \ell ^{2}} is homogeneous, and Banach asked for the converse.[71]

Theorem[72]A Banach space isomorphic to all its infinite-dimensional closed subspaces is isomorphic to a separable Hilbert space.

An infinite-dimensional Banach space ishereditarily indecomposable when no subspace of it can be isomorphic to the direct sum of two infinite-dimensional Banach spaces. TheGowers dichotomy theorem[72] asserts that every infinite-dimensional Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} contains, either a subspaceY{\displaystyle Y} withunconditional basis, or a hereditarily indecomposable subspaceZ,{\displaystyle Z,} and in particular,Z{\displaystyle Z} is not isomorphic to its closed hyperplanes.[73] IfX{\displaystyle X} is homogeneous, it must therefore have an unconditional basis. It follows then from the partial solution obtained by Komorowski andTomczak–Jaegermann, for spaces with an unconditional basis,[74] thatX{\displaystyle X} is isomorphic to2.{\displaystyle \ell ^{2}.}

Metric classification

edit

IfT:XY{\displaystyle T:X\to Y} is anisometry from the Banach spaceX{\displaystyle X} onto the Banach spaceY{\displaystyle Y} (where bothX{\displaystyle X} andY{\displaystyle Y} are vector spaces overR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }), then theMazur–Ulam theorem states thatT{\displaystyle T} must be an affine transformation. In particular, ifT(0X)=0Y,{\displaystyle T(0_{X})=0_{Y},} this isT{\displaystyle T} maps the zero ofX{\displaystyle X} to the zero ofY,{\displaystyle Y,} thenT{\displaystyle T} must be linear. This result implies that the metric in Banach spaces, and more generally in normed spaces, completely captures their linear structure.

Topological classification

edit

Finite dimensional Banach spaces are homeomorphic as topological spaces, if and only if they have the same dimension as real vector spaces.

Anderson–Kadec theorem (1965–66) proves[75] that any two infinite-dimensionalseparable Banach spaces are homeomorphic as topological spaces. Kadec's theorem was extended by Torunczyk, who proved[76] that any two Banach spaces are homeomorphic if and only if they have the samedensity character, the minimum cardinality of a dense subset.

Spaces of continuous functions

edit

When two compact Hausdorff spacesK1{\displaystyle K_{1}} andK2{\displaystyle K_{2}} arehomeomorphic, the Banach spacesC(K1){\displaystyle C(K_{1})} andC(K2){\displaystyle C(K_{2})} are isometric. Conversely, whenK1{\displaystyle K_{1}} is not homeomorphic toK2,{\displaystyle K_{2},} the (multiplicative) Banach–Mazur distance betweenC(K1){\displaystyle C(K_{1})} andC(K2){\displaystyle C(K_{2})} must be greater than or equal to2,{\displaystyle 2,} see above theresults by Amir and Cambern. Although uncountable compact metric spaces can have different homeomorphy types, one has the following result due to Milutin:[77]

Theorem[78]LetK{\displaystyle K} be an uncountable compact metric space. ThenC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} is isomorphic toC([0,1]).{\displaystyle C([0,1]).}

The situation is different forcountably infinite compact Hausdorff spaces. Every countably infinite compactK{\displaystyle K} is homeomorphic to some closed interval ofordinal numbers1,α={γ1γα}{\displaystyle \langle 1,\alpha \rangle =\{\gamma \mid 1\leq \gamma \leq \alpha \}}equipped with theorder topology, whereα{\displaystyle \alpha } is a countably infinite ordinal.[79] The Banach spaceC(K){\displaystyle C(K)} is then isometric toC(⟨1,α⟩). Whenα,β{\displaystyle \alpha ,\beta } are two countably infinite ordinals, and assumingαβ,{\displaystyle \alpha \leq \beta ,} the spacesC(⟨1,α⟩) andC(⟨1,β⟩) are isomorphic if and only ifβ <αω.[80]For example, the Banach spacesC(1,ω), C(1,ωω), C(1,ωω2), C(1,ωω3),,C(1,ωωω),{\displaystyle C(\langle 1,\omega \rangle ),\ C(\langle 1,\omega ^{\omega }\rangle ),\ C(\langle 1,\omega ^{\omega ^{2}}\rangle ),\ C(\langle 1,\omega ^{\omega ^{3}}\rangle ),\cdots ,C(\langle 1,\omega ^{\omega ^{\omega }}\rangle ),\cdots }are mutually non-isomorphic.

Examples

edit

Glossary of symbols for the table below:

ClassicalBanach spaces
Dual spaceReflexiveweakly sequentially completeNormNotes
Fn{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} ^{n}}Fn{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} ^{n}}YesYesx2{\displaystyle \|x\|_{2}}=(i=1n|xi|2)1/2{\displaystyle =\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}|x_{i}|^{2}\right)^{1/2}}Euclidean space
pn{\displaystyle \ell _{p}^{n}}qn{\displaystyle \ell _{q}^{n}}YesYesxp{\displaystyle \|x\|_{p}}=(i=1n|xi|p)1p{\displaystyle =\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}|x_{i}|^{p}\right)^{\frac {1}{p}}}
n{\displaystyle \ell _{\infty }^{n}}1n{\displaystyle \ell _{1}^{n}}YesYesx{\displaystyle \|x\|_{\infty }}=max1in|xi|{\displaystyle =\max \nolimits _{1\leq i\leq n}|x_{i}|}
p{\displaystyle \ell ^{p}}q{\displaystyle \ell ^{q}}YesYesxp{\displaystyle \|x\|_{p}}=(i=1|xi|p)1p{\displaystyle =\left(\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }|x_{i}|^{p}\right)^{\frac {1}{p}}}
1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}}{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}NoYesx1{\displaystyle \|x\|_{1}}=i=1|xi|{\displaystyle =\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }\left|x_{i}\right|}
{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}ba{\displaystyle \operatorname {ba} }NoNox{\displaystyle \|x\|_{\infty }}=supi|xi|{\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{i}\left|x_{i}\right|}
c{\displaystyle \operatorname {c} }1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}}NoNox{\displaystyle \|x\|_{\infty }}=supi|xi|{\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{i}\left|x_{i}\right|}
c0{\displaystyle c_{0}}1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}}NoNox{\displaystyle \|x\|_{\infty }}=supi|xi|{\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{i}\left|x_{i}\right|}Isomorphic but not isometric toc.{\displaystyle c.}
bv{\displaystyle \operatorname {bv} }{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}NoYesxbv{\displaystyle \|x\|_{bv}}=|x1|+i=1|xi+1xi|{\displaystyle =\left|x_{1}\right|+\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }\left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}\right|}Isometrically isomorphic to1.{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}.}
bv0{\displaystyle \operatorname {bv} _{0}}{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }}NoYesxbv0{\displaystyle \|x\|_{bv_{0}}}=i=1|xi+1xi|{\displaystyle =\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }\left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}\right|}Isometrically isomorphic to1.{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}.}
bs{\displaystyle \operatorname {bs} }ba{\displaystyle \operatorname {ba} }NoNoxbs{\displaystyle \|x\|_{bs}}=supn|i=1nxi|{\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{n}\left|\sum _{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\right|}Isometrically isomorphic to.{\displaystyle \ell ^{\infty }.}
cs{\displaystyle \operatorname {cs} }1{\displaystyle \ell ^{1}}NoNoxbs{\displaystyle \|x\|_{bs}}=supn|i=1nxi|{\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{n}\left|\sum _{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\right|}Isometrically isomorphic toc.{\displaystyle c.}
B(K,Ξ){\displaystyle B(K,\Xi )}ba(Ξ){\displaystyle \operatorname {ba} (\Xi )}NoNofB{\displaystyle \|f\|_{B}}=supkK|f(k)|{\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{k\in K}|f(k)|}
C(K){\displaystyle C(K)}rca(K){\displaystyle \operatorname {rca} (K)}NoNoxC(K){\displaystyle \|x\|_{C(K)}}=maxkK|f(k)|{\displaystyle =\max \nolimits _{k\in K}|f(k)|}
ba(Ξ){\displaystyle \operatorname {ba} (\Xi )}?NoYesμba{\displaystyle \|\mu \|_{ba}}=supSΞ|μ|(S){\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{S\in \Xi }|\mu |(S)}
ca(Σ){\displaystyle \operatorname {ca} (\Sigma )}?NoYesμba{\displaystyle \|\mu \|_{ba}}=supSΣ|μ|(S){\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{S\in \Sigma }|\mu |(S)}A closed subspace ofba(Σ).{\displaystyle \operatorname {ba} (\Sigma ).}
rca(Σ){\displaystyle \operatorname {rca} (\Sigma )}?NoYesμba{\displaystyle \|\mu \|_{ba}}=supSΣ|μ|(S){\displaystyle =\sup \nolimits _{S\in \Sigma }|\mu |(S)}A closed subspace ofca(Σ).{\displaystyle \operatorname {ca} (\Sigma ).}
Lp(μ){\displaystyle L^{p}(\mu )}Lq(μ){\displaystyle L^{q}(\mu )}YesYesfp{\displaystyle \|f\|_{p}}=(|f|pdμ)1p{\displaystyle =\left(\int |f|^{p}\,d\mu \right)^{\frac {1}{p}}}
L1(μ){\displaystyle L^{1}(\mu )}L(μ){\displaystyle L^{\infty }(\mu )}NoYesf1{\displaystyle \|f\|_{1}}=|f|dμ{\displaystyle =\int |f|\,d\mu }The dual isL(μ){\displaystyle L^{\infty }(\mu )} ifμ{\displaystyle \mu } isσ{\displaystyle \sigma }-finite.
BV([a,b]){\displaystyle \operatorname {BV} ([a,b])}?NoYesfBV{\displaystyle \|f\|_{BV}}=Vf([a,b])+limxa+f(x){\displaystyle =V_{f}([a,b])+\lim \nolimits _{x\to a^{+}}f(x)}Vf([a,b]){\displaystyle V_{f}([a,b])} is thetotal variation off{\displaystyle f}
NBV([a,b]){\displaystyle \operatorname {NBV} ([a,b])}?NoYesfBV{\displaystyle \|f\|_{BV}}=Vf([a,b]){\displaystyle =V_{f}([a,b])}NBV([a,b]){\displaystyle \operatorname {NBV} ([a,b])} consists ofBV([a,b]){\displaystyle \operatorname {BV} ([a,b])} functions such thatlimxa+f(x)=0{\displaystyle \lim \nolimits _{x\to a^{+}}f(x)=0}
AC([a,b]){\displaystyle \operatorname {AC} ([a,b])}F+L([a,b]){\displaystyle \mathbb {F} +L^{\infty }([a,b])}NoYesfBV{\displaystyle \|f\|_{BV}}=Vf([a,b])+limxa+f(x){\displaystyle =V_{f}([a,b])+\lim \nolimits _{x\to a^{+}}f(x)}Isomorphic to theSobolev spaceW1,1([a,b]).{\displaystyle W^{1,1}([a,b]).}
Cn([a,b]){\displaystyle C^{n}([a,b])}rca([a,b]){\displaystyle \operatorname {rca} ([a,b])}NoNof{\displaystyle \|f\|}=i=0nsupx[a,b]|f(i)(x)|{\displaystyle =\sum _{i=0}^{n}\sup \nolimits _{x\in [a,b]}\left|f^{(i)}(x)\right|}Isomorphic toRnC([a,b]),{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}\oplus C([a,b]),} essentially byTaylor's theorem.

Derivatives

edit

Several concepts of a derivative may be defined on a Banach space. See the articles on theFréchet derivative and theGateaux derivative for details. The Fréchet derivative allows for an extension of the concept of atotal derivative to Banach spaces. The Gateaux derivative allows for an extension of adirectional derivative tolocally convextopological vector spaces. Fréchet differentiability is a stronger condition than Gateaux differentiability. Thequasi-derivative is another generalization of directional derivative that implies a stronger condition than Gateaux differentiability, but a weaker condition than Fréchet differentiability.

Generalizations

edit

Several important spaces in functional analysis, for instance the space of all infinitely often differentiable functionsRR,{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} \to \mathbb {R} ,} or the space of alldistributions onR,{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ,} are complete but are not normed vector spaces and hence not Banach spaces. InFréchet spaces one still has a completemetric, whileLF-spaces are completeuniform vector spaces arising as limits of Fréchet spaces.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^It is common to read"X{\displaystyle X} is a normed space" instead of the more technically correct but (usually) pedantic"(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} is a normed space", especially if the norm is well known (for example, such as withLp{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}^{p}} spaces) or when there is no particular need to choose any one (equivalent) norm over any other (especially in the more abstract theory oftopological vector spaces), in which case this norm (if needed) is often automatically assumed to be denoted by.{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|.} However, in situations where emphasis is placed on the norm, it is common to see(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} written instead ofX.{\displaystyle X.} The technically correct definition of normed spaces as pairs(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} may also become important in the context ofcategory theory where the distinction between the categories of normed spaces,normable spaces,metric spaces,TVSs,topological spaces, etc. is usually important.
  2. ^This means that if the norm{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|} is replaced with a different norm{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|'} onX,{\displaystyle X,} then(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|)} isnot the same normed space as(X,),{\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|'),} not even if the norms are equivalent. However, equivalence of norms on a given vector space does form anequivalence relation.
  3. ^abcA metricD{\displaystyle D} on a vector spaceX{\displaystyle X} is said to betranslation invariant ifD(x,y)=D(x+z,y+z){\displaystyle D(x,y)=D(x+z,y+z)} for all vectorsx,y,zX.{\displaystyle x,y,z\in X.} This happens if and only ifD(x,y)=D(xy,0){\displaystyle D(x,y)=D(x-y,0)} for all vectorsx,yX.{\displaystyle x,y\in X.} A metric that is induced by a norm is always translation invariant.
  4. ^Becausez=z{\displaystyle \|{-z}\|=\|z\|} for allzX,{\displaystyle z\in X,} it is always true thatd(x,y):=yx=xy{\displaystyle d(x,y):=\|y-x\|=\|x-y\|} for allx,yX.{\displaystyle x,y\in X.} So the order ofx{\displaystyle x} andy{\displaystyle y} in this definition does not matter.
  5. ^abLetH{\displaystyle H} be the separableHilbert space2(N){\displaystyle \ell ^{2}(\mathbb {N} )} of square-summable sequences with the usual norm2,{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|_{2},} and leten=(0,,0,1,0,,0){\displaystyle e_{n}=(0,\ldots ,0,1,0,\ldots ,0)} be the standardorthonormal basis (that is, eachen{\displaystyle e_{n}} has zeros in every position except for a1{\displaystyle 1} in then{\displaystyle n}th-position). The closed setS={0}{1nenn=1,2,}{\displaystyle S=\{0\}\cup \{{\tfrac {1}{n}}e_{n}\mid n=1,2,\ldots \}} is compact (because it issequentially compact) but its convex hullcoS{\displaystyle \operatorname {co} S} isnot a closed set because the pointh:=n=112n1nen{\textstyle h:=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\tfrac {1}{2^{n}}}{\tfrac {1}{n}}e_{n}} belongs to the closure ofcoS{\displaystyle \operatorname {co} S} inH{\displaystyle H} buthcoS{\displaystyle h\not \in \operatorname {co} S} (since every pointz=(z1,z2,)coS{\displaystyle z=(z_{1},z_{2},\ldots )\in \operatorname {co} S} is a finiteconvex combination of elements ofS{\displaystyle S} and sozn=0{\displaystyle z_{n}=0} for all but finitely many coordinates, which is not true ofh{\displaystyle h}). However, like in allcomplete Hausdorff locally convex spaces, theclosed convex hullK:=co¯S{\displaystyle K:={\overline {\operatorname {co} }}S} of this compact subset is compact. The vector subspaceX:=spanS=span{e1,e2,}{\displaystyle X:=\operatorname {span} S=\operatorname {span} \{e_{1},e_{2},\ldots \}} is apre-Hilbert space when endowed with the substructure that the Hilbert spaceH{\displaystyle H} induces on it, butX{\displaystyle X} is not complete andhC:=KX{\displaystyle h\not \in C:=K\cap X} (sincehX{\displaystyle h\not \in X}). The closed convex hull ofS{\displaystyle S} inX{\displaystyle X} (here, "closed" means with respect toX,{\displaystyle X,} and not toH{\displaystyle H} as before) is equal toKX,{\displaystyle K\cap X,} which is not compact (because it is not a complete subset). This shows that in a Hausdorff locally convex space that is not complete, the closed convex hull of a compact subset mightfail to be compact (although it will beprecompact/totally bounded).
  6. ^Let(C([0,1]),|){\displaystyle (C([0,1]),|{\cdot }\|_{\infty })} denote theBanach space of continuous functions with the supremum norm and letτ{\displaystyle \tau _{\infty }} denote the topology onC([0,1]){\displaystyle C([0,1])} induced by.{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|_{\infty }.} The vector spaceC([0,1]){\displaystyle C([0,1])} can be identified (via theinclusion map) as a properdense vector subspaceX{\displaystyle X} of theL1{\displaystyle L^{1}} space(L1([0,1]),1),{\displaystyle (L^{1}([0,1]),\|{\cdot }\|_{1}),} which satisfiesf1f{\displaystyle \|f\|_{1}\leq \|f\|_{\infty }} for allfX.{\displaystyle f\in X.} Letp{\displaystyle p} denote the restriction of1{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|_{1}} toX,{\displaystyle X,} which makes this mapp:XR{\displaystyle p:X\to \mathbb {R} } a norm onX{\displaystyle X} (in general, the restriction of any norm to any vector subspace will necessarily again be a norm). The normed space(X,p){\displaystyle (X,p)} isnot a Banach space since its completion is the proper superset(L1([0,1]),1).{\displaystyle (L^{1}([0,1]),\|{\cdot }\|_{1}).} Becausep{\displaystyle p\leq \|{\cdot }\|_{\infty }} holds onX,{\displaystyle X,} the mapp:(X,τ)R{\displaystyle p:(X,\tau _{\infty })\to \mathbb {R} } is continuous. Despite this, the normp{\displaystyle p} isnot equivalent to the norm{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|_{\infty }} (because(X,){\displaystyle (X,\|{\cdot }\|_{\infty })} is complete but(X,p){\displaystyle (X,p)} is not).
  7. ^Thenormed space(R,||){\displaystyle (\mathbb {R} ,|\cdot |)} is a Banach space where the absolute value is anorm on the real lineR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } that induces the usualEuclidean topology onR.{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} .} Define a metricD:R×RR{\displaystyle D:\mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} \to \mathbb {R} } onR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } byD(x,y)=|arctan(x)arctan(y)|{\displaystyle D(x,y)=|\arctan(x)-\arctan(y)|} for allx,yR.{\displaystyle x,y\in \mathbb {R} .} Just like||{\displaystyle |\cdot |} 's induced metric, the metricD{\displaystyle D} also induces the usual Euclidean topology onR.{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} .} However,D{\displaystyle D} is not a complete metric because the sequencex=(xi)i=1{\displaystyle x_{\bullet }=(x_{i})_{i=1}^{\infty }} defined byxi:=i{\displaystyle x_{i}:=i} is aD{\displaystyle D}-Cauchy sequence but it does not converge to any point ofR.{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} .} As a consequence of not converging, thisD{\displaystyle D}-Cauchy sequence cannot be a Cauchy sequence in(R,||){\displaystyle (\mathbb {R} ,|\cdot |)} (that is, it is not a Cauchy sequence with respect to the norm||{\displaystyle |\cdot |}) because if it was||{\displaystyle |\cdot |}-Cauchy, then the fact that(R,||){\displaystyle (\mathbb {R} ,|\cdot |)} is a Banach space would imply that it converges (a contradiction).Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 47–51
  8. ^The statement of the theorem is: Letd{\displaystyle d} beany metric on a vector spaceX{\displaystyle X} such that the topologyτ{\displaystyle \tau } induced byd{\displaystyle d} onX{\displaystyle X} makes(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} into a topological vector space. If(X,d){\displaystyle (X,d)} is acomplete metric space then(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} is acomplete topological vector space.
  9. ^This metricD{\displaystyle D} isnot assumed to be translation-invariant. So in particular, this metricD{\displaystyle D} doesnot even have to be induced by a norm.
  10. ^A norm (orseminorm)p{\displaystyle p} on a topological vector space(X,τ){\displaystyle (X,\tau )} is continuous if and only if the topologyτp{\displaystyle \tau _{p}} thatp{\displaystyle p} induces onX{\displaystyle X} iscoarser thanτ{\displaystyle \tau } (meaning,τpτ{\displaystyle \tau _{p}\subseteq \tau }), which happens if and only if there exists some open ballB{\displaystyle B} in(X,p){\displaystyle (X,p)} (such as maybe{xXp(x)<1}{\displaystyle \{x\in X\mid p(x)<1\}} for example) that is open in(X,τ).{\displaystyle (X,\tau ).}
  11. ^X{\displaystyle X'} denotes thecontinuous dual space ofX.{\displaystyle X.} WhenX{\displaystyle X'} is endowed with thestrong dual space topology, also called thetopology of uniform convergence onbounded subsets ofX,{\displaystyle X,} then this is indicated by writingXb{\displaystyle X'_{b}} (sometimes, the subscriptβ{\displaystyle \beta } is used instead ofb{\displaystyle b}). WhenX{\displaystyle X} is a normed space with norm{\displaystyle \|{\cdot }\|} then this topology is equal to the topology onX{\displaystyle X'} induced by thedual norm. In this way, thestrong topology is a generalization of the usual dual norm-induced topology onX.{\displaystyle X'.}
  12. ^The fact that{xX|f(x)|<1}{\displaystyle \{x\in X\mid |f(x)|<1\}} being open implies thatf:XR{\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {R} } is continuous simplifies proving continuity because this means that it suffices to show that{xX|f(x)f(x0)|<r}{\displaystyle \{x\in X\mid |f(x)-f(x_{0})|<r\}} is open forr:=1{\displaystyle r:=1} and atx0:=0{\displaystyle x_{0}:=0} (wheref(0)=0{\displaystyle f(0)=0}) rather than showing this forall realr>0{\displaystyle r>0} andallx0X.{\displaystyle x_{0}\in X.}

References

edit
  1. ^Bourbaki 1987, V.87
  2. ^Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 93.
  3. ^see Theorem 1.3.9, p. 20 inMegginson (1998).
  4. ^Wilansky 2013, p. 29.
  5. ^Bessaga & Pełczyński 1975, p. 189
  6. ^abAnderson & Schori 1969, p. 315.
  7. ^Henderson 1969.
  8. ^Aliprantis & Border 2006, p. 185.
  9. ^Trèves 2006, p. 145.
  10. ^Trèves 2006, pp. 166–173.
  11. ^abConrad, Keith."Equivalence of norms"(PDF).kconrad.math.uconn.edu.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. RetrievedSeptember 7, 2020.
  12. ^see Corollary 1.4.18, p. 32 inMegginson (1998).
  13. ^Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 47–66.
  14. ^Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 47–51.
  15. ^Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 35.
  16. ^Klee, V. L. (1952)."Invariant metrics in groups (solution of a problem of Banach)"(PDF).Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.3 (3):484–487.doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1952-0047250-4.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  17. ^Trèves 2006, pp. 57–69.
  18. ^Trèves 2006, p. 201.
  19. ^Gabriyelyan, S.S."On topological spaces and topological groups with certain local countable networks (2014)
  20. ^abQiaochu Yuan (June 23, 2012)."Banach spaces (and Lawvere metrics, and closed categories)".Annoying Precision.
  21. ^abNarici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 192–193.
  22. ^Banach (1932, p. 182)
  23. ^absee pp. 17–19 inCarothers (2005).
  24. ^seeBanach (1932), pp. 11-12.
  25. ^seeBanach (1932), Th. 9 p. 185.
  26. ^see Theorem 6.1, p. 55 inCarothers (2005)
  27. ^Several books about functional analysis use the notationX{\displaystyle X^{*}} for the continuous dual, for exampleCarothers (2005),Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977),Megginson (1998),Ryan (2002),Wojtaszczyk (1991).
  28. ^Theorem 1.9.6, p. 75 inMegginson (1998)
  29. ^see also Theorem 2.2.26, p. 179 inMegginson (1998)
  30. ^see p. 19 inCarothers (2005).
  31. ^Theorems 1.10.16, 1.10.17 pp.94–95 inMegginson (1998)
  32. ^Theorem 1.12.11, p. 112 inMegginson (1998)
  33. ^Theorem 2.5.16, p. 216 inMegginson (1998).
  34. ^see II.A.8, p. 29 inWojtaszczyk (1991)
  35. ^abcsee Theorem 2.6.23, p. 231 inMegginson (1998).
  36. ^see N. Bourbaki, (2004), "Integration I", Springer Verlag,ISBN 3-540-41129-1.
  37. ^abEilenberg, Samuel (1942). "Banach Space Methods in Topology".Annals of Mathematics.43 (3):568–579.doi:10.2307/1968812.JSTOR 1968812.
  38. ^see alsoBanach (1932), p. 170 for metrizableK{\displaystyle K} andL.{\displaystyle L.}
  39. ^Amir, Dan (1965)."On isomorphisms of continuous function spaces".Israel Journal of Mathematics.3 (4):205–210.doi:10.1007/bf03008398.S2CID 122294213.
  40. ^Cambern, M. (1966)."A generalized Banach–Stone theorem".Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.17 (2):396–400.doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1966-0196471-9. AndCambern, M. (1967)."On isomorphisms with small bound".Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.18 (6):1062–1066.doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1967-0217580-2.
  41. ^Cohen, H. B. (1975)."A bound-two isomorphism betweenC(X){\displaystyle C(X)} Banach spaces".Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.50:215–217.doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1975-0380379-5.
  42. ^See for exampleArveson, W. (1976).An Invitation to C*-Algebra. Springer-Verlag.ISBN 0-387-90176-0.
  43. ^R. C. James (1951)."A non-reflexive Banach space isometric with its second conjugate space".Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.37 (3):174–177.Bibcode:1951PNAS...37..174J.doi:10.1073/pnas.37.3.174.PMC 1063327.PMID 16588998.
  44. ^seeLindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977), p. 25.
  45. ^bishop, See E.; Phelps, R. (1961)."A proof that every Banach space is subreflexive".Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.67:97–98.doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1961-10514-4.
  46. ^see III.C.14, p. 140 inWojtaszczyk (1991).
  47. ^see Corollary 2, p. 11 inDiestel (1984).
  48. ^see p. 85 inDiestel (1984).
  49. ^Rosenthal, Haskell P (1974)."A characterization of Banach spaces containing ℓ1".Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.71 (6):2411–2413.arXiv:math.FA/9210205.Bibcode:1974PNAS...71.2411R.doi:10.1073/pnas.71.6.2411.PMC 388466.PMID 16592162. Rosenthal's proof is for real scalars. The complex version of the result is due to L. Dor, inDor, Leonard E (1975)."On sequences spanning a complex ℓ1 space".Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.47:515–516.doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1975-0358308-x.
  50. ^see p. 201 inDiestel (1984).
  51. ^Odell, Edward W.; Rosenthal, Haskell P. (1975),"A double-dual characterization of separable Banach spaces containing ℓ1"(PDF),Israel Journal of Mathematics,20 (3–4):375–384,doi:10.1007/bf02760341,S2CID 122391702,archived(PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  52. ^Odell and Rosenthal, Sublemma p. 378 and Remark p. 379.
  53. ^for more on pointwise compact subsets of the Baire class, seeBourgain, Jean; Fremlin, D. H.; Talagrand, Michel (1978), "Pointwise Compact Sets of Baire-Measurable Functions",Am. J. Math.,100 (4):845–886,doi:10.2307/2373913,JSTOR 2373913.
  54. ^see Proposition 2.5.14, p. 215 inMegginson (1998).
  55. ^see for example p. 49, II.C.3 inWojtaszczyk (1991).
  56. ^see Corollary 2.8.9, p. 251 inMegginson (1998).
  57. ^seeLindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977) p. 3.
  58. ^the question appears p. 238, §3 in Banach's book,Banach (1932).
  59. ^see S. V. Bočkarev, "Existence of a basis in the space of functions analytic in the disc, and some properties of Franklin's system". (Russian) Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 95(137) (1974), 3–18, 159.
  60. ^seeEnflo, P. (1973)."A counterexample to the approximation property in Banach spaces".Acta Math.130:309–317.doi:10.1007/bf02392270.S2CID 120530273.
  61. ^see R.C. James, "Bases and reflexivity of Banach spaces". Ann. of Math. (2) 52, (1950). 518–527. See alsoLindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977) p. 9.
  62. ^see A. Grothendieck, "Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires". Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1955 (1955), no. 16, 140 pp., and A. Grothendieck, "Résumé de la théorie métrique des produits tensoriels topologiques". Bol. Soc. Mat. São Paulo 8 1953 1–79.
  63. ^see chap. 2, p. 15 inRyan (2002).
  64. ^see chap. 3, p. 45 inRyan (2002).
  65. ^see Example. 2.19, p. 29, and pp. 49–50 inRyan (2002).
  66. ^see Proposition 4.6, p. 74 inRyan (2002).
  67. ^see Pisier, Gilles (1983), "Counterexamples to a conjecture of Grothendieck", Acta Math.151:181–208.
  68. ^see Szankowski, Andrzej (1981), "B(H){\displaystyle B(H)} does not have the approximation property", Acta Math.147: 89–108. Ryan claims that this result is due toPer Enflo, p. 74 inRyan (2002).
  69. ^see Kwapień, S. (1970), "A linear topological characterization of inner-product spaces", Studia Math.38:277–278.
  70. ^Lindenstrauss, Joram; Tzafriri, Lior (1971)."On the complemented subspaces problem".Israel Journal of Mathematics.9 (2):263–269.doi:10.1007/BF02771592.
  71. ^see p. 245 inBanach (1932). The homogeneity property is called "propriété (15)" there. Banach writes: "on ne connaît aucun exemple d'espace à une infinité de dimensions qui, sans être isomorphe avec(L2).{\displaystyle (L^{2}).} possède la propriété (15)".
  72. ^abGowers, W. T. (1996), "A new dichotomy for Banach spaces", Geom. Funct. Anal.6:1083–1093.
  73. ^seeGowers, W. T. (1994). "A solution to Banach's hyperplane problem".Bull. London Math. Soc.26 (6):523–530.doi:10.1112/blms/26.6.523.
  74. ^seeKomorowski, Ryszard A.; Tomczak-Jaegermann, Nicole (1995)."Banach spaces without local unconditional structure".Israel Journal of Mathematics.89 (1–3):205–226.arXiv:math/9306211.doi:10.1007/bf02808201.S2CID 5220304. and alsoKomorowski, Ryszard A.; Tomczak-Jaegermann, Nicole (1998)."Erratum to: Banach spaces without local unconditional structure".Israel Journal of Mathematics.105:85–92.arXiv:math/9607205.doi:10.1007/bf02780323.S2CID 18565676.
  75. ^C. Bessaga, A. Pełczyński (1975).Selected Topics in Infinite-Dimensional Topology. Panstwowe wyd. naukowe. pp. 177–230.
  76. ^H. Torunczyk (1981).Characterizing Hilbert Space Topology. Fundamenta Mathematicae. pp. 247–262.
  77. ^Milyutin, Alekseĭ A. (1966), "Isomorphism of the spaces of continuous functions over compact sets of the cardinality of the continuum". (Russian) Teor. Funkciĭ Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. Vyp.2:150–156.
  78. ^Milutin. See also Rosenthal, Haskell P., "The Banach spaces C(K)" in Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, Vol. 2, 1547–1602, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003.
  79. ^One can takeα =ωβn, whereβ+1{\displaystyle \beta +1} is theCantor–Bendixson rank ofK,{\displaystyle K,} andn>0{\displaystyle n>0} is the finite number of points in theβ{\displaystyle \beta }-thderived setK(β){\displaystyle K(\beta )} ofK.{\displaystyle K.} SeeMazurkiewicz, Stefan;Sierpiński, Wacław (1920), "Contribution à la topologie des ensembles dénombrables", Fundamenta Mathematicae 1: 17–27.
  80. ^Bessaga, Czesław; Pełczyński, Aleksander (1960), "Spaces of continuous functions. IV. On isomorphical classification of spaces of continuous functions", Studia Math.19:53–62.

Bibliography

edit

External links

edit
Wikimedia Commons has media related toBanach spaces.
Types of Banach spaces
Banach spaces are:
Function space Topologies
Linear operators
Operator theory
Theorems
Analysis
Types of sets
Subsets / set operations
Examples
Applications
Spaces
Properties
Theorems
Operators
Algebras
Open problems
Applications
Advanced topics

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp