• Antilla L (2005) Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:338–352

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Armstrong D (2002) Focal and surrogate species: getting the language right. Conserv Biol 16(2):285–286

  Google Scholar 

• Ashlin A, Ladle R (2006) Environmental science adrift in the blogosphere. Science 312:201

  Article PubMed CAS  Google Scholar 

• Ashlin A, Ladle R (2007) “Natural disasters” and newspapers: post-tsunami environmental discourse. Environ Hazards 7:330–341

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barua M (2010) Whose issue? Representations of human-elephant conflict in Indian and international media. Sci Commun 32(1):55–75

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boykoff MT (2007) From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Trans Inst Br Geogr 32:477–489

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cachelin A, Norvell R, Darling A (2010) Language fouls in teaching ecology: why traditional metaphors undermine conservation literacy. Conserv Biol 24(3):669–674

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Carignan V, Villard M (2002) Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review. Environ Monit Assess 78:45–61

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Caro TM (2010) Conservation by proxy. Island Press, Washington

  Google Scholar 

• Caro TM, O’Doherty G (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation. Conserv Biol 13:805–814

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Caro T, Engilis A, Fitzherbert E et al (2004) Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale. Anim Conserv 7:63–70

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clucas B, McHugh K, Caro T (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodivers Conserv 17:1517–1528

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dumit J (2010) Inter-pill-ation and the instrumentalization of compliance. Anthropol Med 17(2):245–247

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gardezi T, da Silva J (1999) Diversity in relation to body size in mammals: a comparative study. Am Nat 153:110–123

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heywood VH (ed) (1995) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Kotliar NB, Baker BW, Whicker AD et al (1999) A critical review of assumptions about the prairie dog as a keystone species. Environ Manag 24(2):177–192

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ladle RJ, Gilson L (2009) The (im)balance of nature: a public perception of time-lag? Public Underst Sci 18:229–242

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ladle RJ, Jepson P, Whittaker RJ (2005) Scientists and the media: the struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science. Interdisc Sci Rev 30:231–240

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff G (1995) Metaphor, morality, and politics. Or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Res 62(2):1–22

  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff G, Johnson M (2003) Metaphors we live by, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  Google Scholar 

• Lamb BL, Cline K (2003) Public knowledge and perceptions of black-tailed prairie dogs. Hum Dimens Wildl 8:127–143

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leader–Williams N, Dublin HT (2000) Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In: Entwistle A, Dunstone N (eds) Priorities for conservation of mammalian diversity: has the panda had its day?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 53–84

  Google Scholar 

• Lybecker DL, Lamb BL, Ponds PD (2002) Public attitudes and knowledge of the black-tailed prairie dog: a common and controversial species. Bioscience 52(7):607–613

  Article  Google Scholar 

• MacDonald DW, Tattersall FH, Brown ED et al (1995) Reintroducing the European beaver to Britain: nostalgic meddling or restoring biodiversity? Mammal Rev 25(4):161–200

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meffe G, Carroll CR (1997) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

  Google Scholar 

• Nie M (2001) The sociopolitical dimensions of wolf management and restoration in the United States. Hum Ecol Rev 8(1):1–12

  Google Scholar 

• Nisbet MC, Brossard D, Kroepsch A (2003) Framing science: the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Int J Press/Politics 8(2):36–70

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peterson MN, Birckhead JL, Leong K et al (2010) Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict. Conserv Lett 3:74–82

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salafsky N, Salzer D (2005) The unglamorous essential foundation of conservation science. Oryx 39(3):235–236

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shoemaker PJ, Reese SD (1991) Mediating the message: theories of influences on mass media content. Longman, White Plains

  Google Scholar 

• Silva M, Downing JA (1995) CRC handbook of mammalian body masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  Google Scholar 

• Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas and keystones: is single species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83:247–257

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simpson J, Weiner E (eds) (1989) Oxford English dictionary. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  Google Scholar 

• Trimble MJ, Van Aarde RJ (2010) Species inequality in scientific study. Conserv Biol 24(3):886–890

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Trumbo B, Dunwoody S, Griffin RJ (1998) Journalists, cognition, and the presentation of an epidemiologic study. Sci Commun 19:238–265

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Webb TJ, Raffaelli D (2008) Conversations in conservation: revealing and dealing with language differences in environmental conflicts. J Appl Ecol 45:1198–1204

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiegold MF (2001) Communicating science: a review of the literature. Sci Commun 23:164–193

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references