1. Gürtin ZB, Faircloth C. Conceiving contemporary parenthood: imagining, achieving and accounting for parenthood in new family forms. Anthropol Med. 2018;25(3):243–8.

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Tasca C, Rapetti M, Carta MG, Fadda B. Women and hysteria in the history of mental health. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2012;8:110–9.

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Naragon MD. Communities in motion: Drapetomania, work and the development of African-American slave cultures. Slavery Abolition. 1994;15(3):63–87.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infertility FAQs 2019.https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility/index.htm.

5. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1520–4.

   Article CAS  Google Scholar 

6. Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Birger J, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, et al. Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):70.

   Article CAS  Google Scholar 

7. Mamo L. Queering reproduction: achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience, vol. xi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2007.

   Google Scholar 

8. Mazzola J. Lesbian couples sue N.J., say fertility laws discriminate against them. NJcom. 2016 August 8.

   Google Scholar 

9. Murphy J. Should lesbians count as infertile couples? Antilesbian discrimination in assisted reproduction. In: Purdy ADLM, editor. Embodying bioethics: recent feminist advances. Landam, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 1999.

   Google Scholar 

10. Centanni C. Using ART to make a baby: how Rhode Island's insurance coverage mandate is preventing same-sex couples from having biological children. Roger Williams University Law Review. 2019;24(2):331–58.

    Google Scholar 

11. Lo W, Campo-Engelstein L. Expanding the clinical definition of infertility to include socially infertile individuals and couples. In: Campo-Engelstein L, Burcher P, editors. Reproductive ethics II. Springer International Publishing AG; 2018. p. 71–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

12. Honkasalo J. Unfit for parenthood? Compulsory sterilization and transgender reproductive justice in Finland. J Int Women's Stud. 2018;20(1):40–52.

    Google Scholar 

13. Murphy TF. The ethics of helping transgender men and women have children. Perspect Biol Med. 2010;53(1):46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Marsh M, Ronner W. The empty cradle: infertility in America from colonial times to the present. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

15. Daniels C. Exposing men: the science and politics of male reproduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

16. Barnes LW. Conceiving masculinity: male infertility, medicine, and identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

17. Almeling R. GUYnecology: the missing science of men's reproductive health. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

18. Hoffkling A, Obedin-Maliver J, Sevelius J. From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(2).

    Google Scholar 

19. Ho V, Sherqueshaa S, Zheng D. The forced sterilization of transgender and gender non-conforming people in Singapore. LGBTQ POLICY. 2016;6:53.

    Google Scholar 

20. Bell AV. Misconception: social class and infertility in America. Rutgers University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

21. Epstein R. Space invaders: queer and trans bodies in fertility clinics. Sexualities. 2018;21(7):1039–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Sumerau JE, Mathers LAB. America through transgender eyes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

23. Armuand G, Dhejne C, Olofsson JI, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(2):383–90.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

24. Payne JG, Erbenius T. Conceptions of transgender parenthood in fertility care and family planning in Sweden: from reproductive rights to concrete practices. Anthropol Med. 2018;25(3):329–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Access to fertility services by transgender persons: an ethics committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(5):1111–5.

    Google Scholar 

26. James-Abra S, Tarasoff LA, Green D, Epstein R, Anderson S, Marvel S, et al. Trans people's experiences with assisted reproduction services: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1365–74.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

27. Charter R, Ussher JM, Perz J, Robinson K. The transgender parent: experiences and constructions of pregnancy and parenthood for transgender men in Australia. Int J Transgend. 2018;19(1):64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Moseson H, Zazanis N, Goldberg E, Fix L, Durden M, Stoeffler A, et al. The imperative for transgender and gender nonbinary inclusion: beyond women's health. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1059–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Adashi EY, Dean LA. Access to and use of infertility services in the United States: framing the challenges. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1113–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Management SfHR. 2014 employee benefits: an overview of employee benefit offerings in the US. VA: Author Alexandria; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

31. Dupree JM, Dickey RM, Lipshultz LI. Inequity between male and female coverage in state infertility laws. Fertil Steril. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

32. Liu JJ, Adashi E, editors. Selective justice : state mandates for assisted reproductive technology and reproductive justice 2013.

    Google Scholar 

33. Basco D, Campo-Engelstein L, Rodriguez S. Insuring against infertility: expanding state infertility mandates to include fertility preservation technology for cancer patients. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38(4):832–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Campo-Engelstein L. Consistency in insurance coverage for iatrogenic conditions resulting from cancer treatment including fertility preservation. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(8):1284–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Kyweluk MA, Reinecke J, Chen D. Fertility preservation legislation in the United States: potential implications for transgender individuals. LGBT Health. 2019;6(7):331–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Tishelman AC, Sutter ME, Chen D, Sampson A, Nahata L, Kolbuck VD, et al. Health care provider perceptions of fertility preservation barriers and challenges with transgender patients and families: qualitative responses to an international survey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(3):579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Galic I, Negris O, Warren C, Brown D, Bozen A, Jain T. Disparities in access to fertility care: who’s in and who’s out. F&S Rep. 2020;

    Google Scholar 

38. Crissman HP, Berger MB, Graham LF, Dalton VK. Transgender demographics: a household probability sample of US adults, 2014. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(2):213–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Committee opinion no. 512: health care for transgender individuals. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):1454–8.

    Google Scholar 

40. Goldman RH, Kaser DJ, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Scout ARK, et al. Fertility treatment for the transgender community: a public opinion study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(11):1457–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Review of the transgender literature: where do we go from here? Transgend Health. 2017;2(1):119–28.

    Google Scholar 

42. European society of human reproduction and embryology. Female Fertility Preservation. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

43. World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender nonconforming people. 7th ed 2011.

    Google Scholar 

44. Moravek MB, Kinnear HM, George J, Batchelor J, Shikanov A, Padmanabhan V, et al. Impact of exogenous testosterone on reproduction in transgender men. Endocrinology. 2020;161:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Jiang DD, Swenson E, Mason M, Turner KR, Dugi DD, Hedges JC, et al. Effects of estrogen on spermatogenesis in transgender women. Urology. 2019;132:117–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. Shuster SM. Uncertain expertise and the limitations of clinical guidelines in transgender healthcare. J Health Soc Behav. 2016;57(3):319–32.

    Google Scholar 

47. Politi MC, Han PKJ, Col NF. Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions. Med Decis Mak. 2007;27(5):681–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. Patient access to experimental treatments. Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

49. Rodriguez A, Agardh A, Asamoah BO. Self-reported discrimination in health-care settings based on recognizability as transgender: a cross-sectional study among transgender U.S. citizens. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(4):973–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. Lerner JE, Martin JI, Gorsky GS. More than an apple a day: factors associated with avoidance of doctor visits among transgender, gender nonconforming, and nonbinary people in the USA. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

51. Persky RW, Gruschow SM, Sinaii N, Carlson C, Ginsberg JP, Dowshen NL. Attitudes toward fertility preservation among transgender youth and their parents. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):583–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. Feinberg J. The child's right to an open future. In: Aiken W, LaFollette H, editors. Whose child? Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield; 1980. p. 124–53.

    Google Scholar 

53. McDougall R. The ethics of fertility preservation for paediatric cancer patients: from offer to rebuttable presumption. Bioethics. 2015;29(9):639–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. McDougall RJ, Gillam L, Delany C, Jayasinghe Y. Ethics of fertility preservation for prepubertal children: should clinicians offer procedures where efficacy is largely unproven? J Med Ethics. 2018;44(1):27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

55. Jayasuriya S, Peate M, Allingham C, Li N, Gillam L, Zacharin M, et al. Satisfaction, disappointment and regret surrounding fertility preservation decisions in the paediatric and adolescent cancer population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(9):1805–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. Harris RM, Kolaitis IN, Frader JE. Ethical issues involving fertility preservation for transgender youth. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(10):2453–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

57. Chiniara LN, Viner C, Palmert M, Bonifacio H. Perspectives on fertility preservation and parenthood among transgender youth and their parents. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(8):739–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Planning for adoption: knowing the costs and resources. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

59. Stack L. Texas bill would let adoption agencies reject families on religious grounds. New York Times. 2017; May 11

    Google Scholar 

60. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):314–7.

    Google Scholar 

61. Weithorn LA, Campbell SB. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Dev. 1982;53(6):1589–98.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

62. Blake V. Minors' refusal of life-saving therapies. Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(10):792–6.

    Google Scholar 

63. Weddle M, Kokotailo PK. Confidentiality and consent in adolescent substance abuse: an update. Virtual Mentor. 2005;7:3.

    Google Scholar 

64. Johnson EK, Finlayson C. Preservation of fertility potential for gender and sex diverse individuals. Transgend Health. 2016;1(1):41–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

65. McCabe MA. Involving children and adolescents in medical decision making: developmental and clinical considerations. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996;21(4):505–16.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

66. Schoendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914).

    Google Scholar 

67. Strang JF, Jarin J, Call D, Clark B, Wallace GL, Anthony LG, et al. Transgender youth fertility attitudes questionnaire: measure development in nonautistic and autistic transgender youth and their parents. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(2):128–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

68. Riggs DW. An examination of ‘just in case’arguments as they are applied to fertility preservation for transgender people. The Reproductive Industry: Intimate Experiences and Global Processes. 2019:69.

    Google Scholar 

69. Kyweluk MA, Sajwani A, Chen D. Freezing for the future: transgender youth respond to medical fertility preservation. Int J Transgend. 2018;19(4):401–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

70. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(6):1622–8.

    Google Scholar 

71. Shnorhavorian M, Johnson R, Shear SB, Wilfond BS. Responding to adolescents with cancer who refuse sperm banking: when "no" should not be the last word. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2011;1(3):114–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

72. Nahata L, Tishelman AC, Caltabellotta NM, Quinn GP. Low fertility preservation utilization among transgender youth. J Adolesc Health. 61(1):40–4.

    Google Scholar 

73. Chen D, Simons L. Ethical considerations in fertility preservation for transgender youth: a case illustration. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018;6(1):93.

    Google Scholar 

74. Giordano S. Lives in a chiaroscuro. Should we suspend the puberty of children with gender identity disorder? J Med Ethics. 2008;34(8):580–4.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

75. Cochran BN, Stewart AJ, Ginzler JA, Cauce AM. Challenges faced by homeless sexual minorities: comparison of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender homeless adolescents with their heterosexual counterparts. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):773–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references