Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Cover of In Search of Cell History
In Search of Cell History The Evolution of Life's Building Blocks
by Franklin M. Harold
University of Chicago Press, 2014
Cloth:978-0-226-17414-3 |Paper:978-0-226-17428-0 |Electronic:978-0-226-17431-0
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

The origin of cells remains one of the most fundamental problems in biology, one that over the past two decades has spawned a large body of research and debate. WithIn Search of Cell History, Franklin M. Harold offers a comprehensive, impartial take on that research and the controversies that keep the field in turmoil.

Written in accessible language and complemented by a glossary for easy reference, this book investigates the full scope of cellular history. Assuming only a basic knowledge of cell biology, Harold examines such pivotal subjects as the relationship between cells and genes; the central role of bioenergetics in the origin of life; the status of the universal tree of life with its three stems and viral outliers; and the controversies surrounding the last universal common ancestor. He also delves deeply into the evolution of cellular organization, the origin of complex cells, and the incorporation of symbiotic organelles, and considers the fossil evidence for the earliest life on earth.In Search of Cell History shows us just how far we have come in understanding cell evolution—and the evolution of life in general—and how far we still have to go.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Franklin M. Harold was born in Germany, grew up in the Middle East, and became a scientist at the City College of New York and the University of California, Berkeley. His professional career spans forty years of research and teaching, mostly in Colorado. He is professor emeritus of biochemistry at Colorado State University and affiliate professor of microbiology at the University of Washington. Harold’s interests include the physiology, energetics, and morphogenesis of microorganisms, with a continuing interest in evolution. He is a member of the American Academy of Microbiology. Harold is also the author ofThe Vital Force: A Study of Bioenergetics andThe Way of the Cell: Molecules, Organisms, and the Order of Life.

REVIEWS

“This book is a rare pleasure: a beautiful, rational, wise, and eloquent framing of life’s greatest mysteries, what remains to be known, and how we might get there. It should be read by anyone who wonders, seriously, how we came to be. If it does not provide all the answers, that is because we honestly do not know.”
— Nick Lane, University College London and author of "Life Ascending: The Ten Great Inventions of Evolution"

“The origin of life is one of the great enigmas yet to yield to modern science. While there are other books that attempt to place their own spin on how life came about,In Search of Cell History stands alone in that it is written not by one of those advocating a particular viewpoint but instead by one who tries to remain a detached, albeit extremely well informed, observer of events. An excellent piece of scholarly work by a suitably unbiased and appropriately skeptical researcher.”
— Mark A. Farmer, University of Georgia

“When dealing with difficult questions such as the origin of life, one yearns for writing that is both sagacious and readable, two qualities that don’t always go together. Fortunately, we can forego the need for making a choice. Harold’s book provides an account that is both masterful in the pursuit of the very question and in the clarity with which he unravels relevant phenomena. I daresay that few more helpful guides to a complex terrain have come forth since Dante’s Beatrice.”
— Moselio Schaechter, Distinguished Professor, emeritus, Tufts University

“Wonderful. . . . A loving distillation of connections within the incredible diversity of life in the biosphere, framing one of biology’s most important remaining questions: how did life begin? . . . Using [a] deceptively casual approach, Harold cleans up the vast untidy mess of biology and stacks the fundamental concepts in an orderly and creative way for readers to enjoy. . . . Harold’s book is like a balloon that will let [young scientists] rise above the trees for a while and look down to better understand the scope and shape of the forest—and perhaps then descend to pluck some low-hanging fruit. Senior scientists like myself will take pleasure in comparing perspectives with Harold’s. This is, after all, a story to conjure with—that of how life began and evolved into eukaryotic cells, a hundred trillion of which compose the human body. No one can yet tell this story in its entirety, but Harold’s book is a good place to start.”
— David Deamer, University of California, Santa Cruz, Nature

“The big questions in evolution are the ones that grab our imagination: How did life begin? Where do cells come from? How did eukaryotes come to be? How does life become organized? How does it become complex, and what is biological complexity in the first place? How does energy figure into cell evolution? Where did the genetic code come from? Those are the kinds of questions that Franklin Harold, a grand master of cellular workings and bioenergetics, has packed into his latest book. . . . Sound interesting? It is. The book is a must for those interested in microbial evolution, life’s origin, or both. . . . Coming into the final chapter, the reader gets a strong sense that judgment day and the unabated Wrath of God are lurking just around the corner, to be delivered ablaze with lightning bolts from above. There is chilling suspense that Harold is finally going to part the waters and thunder forth what he really thinks about all these ideas on early evolution, namely that individually and in sum they cut neither ice nor mustard, and that we are best advised to repentantly seek our drawing board, eraser firm in hand, with renewed resolve to do better in our next sixty years of attempt. I will not divulge here how much hellfire and damnation the final verdicts hold.”
— William F. Martin, University of Düsseldorf, Germany, BioEssays

“WithinIn Seach of Cell History Harold deftly discusses the definition of life, successes and problems of classification of cells, how cells get and use energy, the great divergence of cell types into three loose families, cell symbionts, and even tackles the ultimate riddle of where cells first came from. His approach is a classic scientific one, starting with what is known and provable then moving into theories of what is not known.  He is clear to separate fact from speculation, not hesitating to state his own opinions as such and contrasting them point by point with others in the field. It is very refreshing to read about the forward edge of cell research without polemics of any kind. The talent of his writing is twofold, first; I felt a part of a conversation among the leading lights of cell research, and second; Harold has no problem stating what is not known. . . . This is a book that illustrates what scientific writing should be; precise, exciting, and presenting the unknown in such a way as to inspire us to want to learn more.”
— San Francisco Book Review

“A fine addition to the many books on how cells originated and evolved. It is well written, accessible, thorough, and illustrated with helpful figures, focusing on cellular organization and how that organization diversified as various life-forms evolved. Harold comprehensively discusses the important process of fusion between cells (symbiosis) in cell evolution as well as information on cellular structure and organization that can be gleaned from the fossil record. . . . Highly recommended.”
— B. K. Hall, Dalhousie University, Choice

In Search of Cell History offers an ambitious, one-stop overview of early cell evolution that covers all major theories related to the origin of life, the early evolution and diversification of cells, and the emergence of eukaryotic cells with their structural novelties, such as nuclei, mitochondria, and plastids. . . . The bottom line: I really admire this book and expect to refer to it frequently in the future. . . . Harold does a marvelous job of reviewing and summarizing an unwieldy mass of literature on the origin and early diversification of life and providing some opinions about which theories and lines of research seem promising.”
— David Baum, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Reports of the National Center for Science Education

“A must-have. . . .In Search of Cell History is a wise and useful summary of the issues facing origins research. Importantly, it refocuses the origin problem onto the cell in toto, as a unit of living matter; it represents a solid foundation for origins research where chemists have begun only very recently to make significant advances in understand the crowding and structuring of biomacromolecules in living cells. There is no need to throw in the towel yet.”
— Jan Spitzer, Mallard Creek Polymers, Inc., Microbe

“Harold manages to cover a lot of ground, offers a piece of writing that is highly instructive and broad in its treatment of cellular evolution, and includes a helpful glossary at the end. He also provides a wonderful historical summary and perspective. . . . We can thank Harold for his fine work, so broad and sweeping, on leading us to nature’s ultimate mystery—the link of the LUCA to the cosmos.”
— Paul Schimmel, Scripps Research Institute, FASEB Journal

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface

Acknowledgments

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0001
[cell theory, microorganisms, spatial organization, molecular systems, complexity, genes rule, extragenic inheritance]
An introductory chapter. Where the cell doctrine came from, the place of microorganisms in cell theory, how the distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes came to be appreciated, and the traditional classification of living things into five kingdoms. Turning to contemporary matters, cells are presented as molecular systems of inordinate complexity. Is cell structure and function wholly specified by the genes? Much of it is, but not all. There is good evidence that spatial organization, including morphology, is not specified by genes but arises by self-organization, and is often transmitted independently of genes. (pages 1 - 17)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0002
[tree of life, ribosomal RNA, three domains, lateral gene transfer, molecular phylogeny, dating the divergences, Carl Woese]
The idea that all living things arose from their progenitors by descent with modification, and that this history can be depicted as a great tree, goes back to Darwin and beyond. Construction of a universal tree became possible after Carl Woese introduced ribosomal RNA sequences as a molecular chronometer. The tree consists of three great stems, or domains, designated Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, and this tripartite division is now generally accepted. But soon a serious complication arose: lateral transfer of genes between species, genera and even domains is common, particularly among prokaryotes. Lateral gene transfer erodes the phylogenetic trace, and has led some to question the very principle of a tree of life, but the division of all living things into three domains has held up. It is not easy to assign absolute dates to their emergence. The prokaryotes, Bacteria and Archaea, clearly go back more than 3 billion years. Modern Eukarya are much more recent, a billion years or so, but the eukaryotic lineage appears to be very ancient, possibly comparable to the prokaryotic ones. (pages 18 - 34)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0003
[bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya, planctomycetes, viruses]
The world seems to hold only three kinds of cells, three cellular designs: Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea. This chapter attempts to define their essential characteristics. A central theme is the discovery, utterly unexpected at the time, that “prokaryotes” conflates two distinct modes of organization that become apparent only at the molecular level. The evidence that supports the separation of Archaea from Bacteria, and the affinity of the Archaea with the Eukarya, is considered in some detail. Attention is given to organisms that seem to straddle the border between domains, notably the planctomycetes, Bacteria whose internal organization is reminiscent of eukaryotic cells. The chapter concludes with viruses, which have no home on the universal tree but are clearly related to it. Viruses may represent an ancient line of molecular evolution, distinct from but intertwined with, that of cells. (pages 35 - 50)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0004
[universal ancestry, Last Universal Common Ancestor, LUCA, alternative phylogenies, Thomas Cavalier-Smith, James Lake]
The hypothesis that all living things share a common ancestry was already part of Darwin's thinking. It crystallized in the 20th century and became solidly established with the recognition that basic molecular strategies are universal, including transcription, translation and especially the genetic code. LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, is represented on the universal tree by its deepest node, that which marks the divergence of Bacteria from Archaea/Eukarya. The nature of that entity has been much debated and remains controversial. It now appears that LUCA was a much more advanced organism than originally expected, endowed with genes, membranes, enzymes, metabolism and the basic mechanisms of gene expression, replication and energy transduction. LUCA was a cell of sorts, but probably represents a stage before discrete lineages, whose members swapped genes and evolved communally. The chapter concludes with a brief presentation of dissenting opinions, chiefly those of Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Radhey Gupta and James Lake. (pages 51 - 67)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0005
[chemiosmotic energy coupling, proton circulation, membranes, ATP synthase, hydrothermal vents, respiration, photosynthesis]
All biological operations require the input of energy. In contemporary organisms, energy is harvested by mechanisms that are essentially electrical. Energy transduction relies on the circulation of ions across membranes (usually protons), and on a sophisticated rotary ATP synthase to capture the energy and conserve it as ATP. This chapter begins with an overview of chemiosmotic energy transduction and then poses the question, How did LUCA make a living? Current thinking questions the traditional notion that that LUCA lived off prebiotic organic molecules, and favors geochemical processes, such as the reduction of CO2 by hydrogen gas. One possible habitat for such organisms would be mineral honeycombs laid down by hydrothermal vents. If there is any truth to this hypothesis, then chemiosmotic energy transduction will have been part of LUCA's endowment, and may have evolved under the special circumstances that prevail in those vents. Subsequent evolution will have led to the liberation of cells from their mineral cradle, and the progressive expansion of energy metabolism by the invention of both photosynthesis and respiration. (pages 68 - 85)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0006
[cell heredity, molecular machines, flagella, Intelligent Design, cytoskeleton vents, membrane continuity]
This chapter tackles the evolution of cellular organization. How did intricate subcellular machines, such as ribosomes, flagella and ion pumps come to exist? How do cells transmit their functional organization to their offspring, and how did that evolve? And where did cellular organization come from in the first place? Contrary to the claims of Intelligent Design, there is ample evidence that random variation of genes winnowed by natural selection played a large role. But conventional views on these matters are too restrictive. Cells transmit structural organization by a hierarchy of mechanisms that includes genes, self-organization, the continuity of membranes and other structures, and a role for the cytoskeleton in helping a growing cell to model new structures upon the existing ones. How cells as we know them originated remains to be discovered, a subject for speculation and wonder but not yet for explication. (pages 86 - 103)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0007
[origin of eukaryotic cells, cell mergers, symbiosis, shared genes, chimaeric cells vents, mitochondria]
The origin of eukaryotic cells is a mystery second only to the origin of life itself. The problem is that eukaryotes make up a distinctive clade, conspicuously different from prokaryotes, yet they share genes and traits with both Bacteria and Archaea. There is general agreement that eukaryotes are chimaeric, since mitochondria and plastids derive from Bacterial endosymbionts; but consensus ends here. Disputes swirl around the nature of the cells that hosted those symbionts, the nature and timing of their association, and the role of the symbionts in generating eukaryotic complexity. This long-running controversy may now be approaching a resolution that combines ideas from several camps. The emerging synthesis postulates an “urkaryote” of Archaeal affinities that diverged very early and came to make its living by scavenging and predation upon the primary producers of organic matter. Acquisition of the Bacterial precursors of mitochondria enhanced the consortium's energy economy, and underwrote the rise of complex eukaryotic cells. (pages 104 - 125)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0008
[endosymbiosis, mitochondria, plastids, Paulinella, hydrogenosomes]
Mitochondria and plastids are the workhorses of eukaryotic metabolism. It is outrageous but indisputably true that they evolved from endosymbiotic Bacteria during the genesis of eukaryotic organization: mitochondria from alpha-proteobacteria, plastids from cyanobacteria. This chapter considers what molecular alterations were required to transform free-living bacteria into organelles. All mitochondria appear to be products of a single episode of this kind. So is the great majority of plastids, which then dispersed widely across the eukaryotic universe. The exception is the plastid of the protist Paulinella, which represents an independent and much more recent instance of endosymbiosis. Hydrogenosomes and other specialized organelles found in anaerobic eukaryotes belong to the extended mitochondrial family, and appear to be products of reductive evolution. (pages 126 - 144)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0009
[fossil bacteria, cyanobacteria, fossil eukaryotes, biomarkers, oxygen, timeline]
The discovery of fossil bacteria sixty years ago quadrupled the length of life's known history, and initiated the search for geological traces of cell evolution. Earth has hosted life for as long as it has offered a habitable environment, more than three billion years. Microbial communities of the Proterozoic and late Archean eras included various Bacteria (cyanobacteria go back some 2.5 billion years), and indirect evidence points to the presence of Archaea also. Eukaryotic fossils that can be assigned to contemporary lineages are much more recent, a billion years or less. However, there is a growing trove of much older fossils that are generally interpreted as eukaryotic, and also evidence from biomarkers. Taken together, they indicate that the eukaryotic lineage is ancient, at least 2 billion years and probably deeper. The last common ancestor of contemporary eukaryotes was the product of a prolonged history. The findings mesh with geological traces of the rise of atmospheric oxygen, and can be placed on a general timeline of cellular evolution. (pages 145 - 163)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0010
[origin of life, prebiotic synthesis, energy coupling, hydrothermal vents, ribozymes, replication, translation, RNA world]
In all of biology, there is no more consequential problem than the origin of life; yet despite the expenditure of much effort and ink over the past seventy years a satisfactory answer continues to elude us. This chapter surveys the huge body of experimental and theoretical work on this problem. Topics include the primordial broth of abiotic chemicals, prebiotic synthesis of metabolites, the quest for a self-replicating ribozyme, the critical importance of energy coupling, self-organized metabolic cycles, why membranes are essential, and the importance of natural selection from the outset. The recent idea, that life arose in the interstices of mineral deposits at the margins of warm alkaline hydrothermal vents, receives special attention. Between the first proto-cells and the Last Universal Common Ancestor, all the machinery of life must have been invented. We consider the place of the RNA World, and the horrendous difficulty of envisaging the origin of translation. In the end, the origin of life remains a mystery that passes understanding. (pages 164 - 189)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0011
[modern synthesis, cell evolution is different, expanded evolutionary framework, evolvable eukaryotes, symbiosis, evolution before genes]
The common understanding of evolution, formalized in the Modern Synthesis, is flawed by the neglect of the microbial world, together with most of biological history and diversity. The torrent of genomic information, and the assimilation of microbes, have forced a drastic expansion of the evolutionary framework. Genes still hold center stage, but no longer rule alone; lateral gene transfer has eroded the conventional tree of life, whose lower reaches have melded into a web; not all evolutionary change is adaptive, much is neutral; the inheritance of acquired characteristics, by lateral gene transfer and by symbiosis, plays a major role in life's history; evolution is not always gradual, but may be punctuated by abrupt leaps. Those evolvable eukaryotes are a prime example, considered in some detail. It's definitely not the world Darwin knew; and yet, so long as the history of life can be construed as the interplay of heredity, variation and natural selection, it remains Darwin's world. That premise presupposes the existence of cells, or something like them. Of evolution before cells and genes, we know almost nothing. (pages 190 - 214)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Franklin M. Harold
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226174310.003.0012
[cell history, enigmatic origint, progress, autonomy, direction, life in the cosmos]
This final chapter tries to assess what we have learned and where we may be going. The discussion revolves around four topics: A tentative narrative of cell history; the enigma of life's origin; the causes of evolution's lumbering progress towards greater complexity, autonomy and agency; and whether evolution has direction or purpose. (pages 215 - 230)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Notes

Glossary

References

Index


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp