Computer Science > Information Retrieval
arXiv:2502.19178 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Feb 2025 (v1), last revised 1 Apr 2025 (this version, v2)]
Title:UQABench: Evaluating User Embedding for Prompting LLMs in Personalized Question Answering
Authors:Langming Liu,Shilei Liu,Yujin Yuan,Yizhen Zhang,Bencheng Yan,Zhiyuan Zeng,Zihao Wang,Jiaqi Liu,Di Wang,Wenbo Su,Pengjie Wang,Jian Xu,Bo Zheng
View a PDF of the paper titled UQABench: Evaluating User Embedding for Prompting LLMs in Personalized Question Answering, by Langming Liu and 12 other authors
View PDFHTML (experimental)Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP). In practical scenarios like recommendations, as users increasingly seek personalized experiences, it becomes crucial to incorporate user interaction history into the context of LLMs to enhance personalization. However, from a practical utility perspective, user interactions' extensive length and noise present challenges when used directly as text prompts. A promising solution is to compress and distill interactions into compact embeddings, serving as soft prompts to assist LLMs in generating personalized responses. Although this approach brings efficiency, a critical concern emerges: Can user embeddings adequately capture valuable information and prompt LLMs? To address this concern, we propose \name, a benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of user embeddings in prompting LLMs for personalization. We establish a fair and standardized evaluation process, encompassing pre-training, fine-tuning, and evaluation stages. To thoroughly evaluate user embeddings, we design three dimensions of tasks: sequence understanding, action prediction, and interest perception. These evaluation tasks cover the industry's demands in traditional recommendation tasks, such as improving prediction accuracy, and its aspirations for LLM-based methods, such as accurately understanding user interests and enhancing the user experience. We conduct extensive experiments on various state-of-the-art methods for modeling user embeddings. Additionally, we reveal the scaling laws of leveraging user embeddings to prompt LLMs. The benchmark is available online.
Comments: | 10 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables |
Subjects: | Information Retrieval (cs.IR) |
Cite as: | arXiv:2502.19178 [cs.IR] |
(orarXiv:2502.19178v2 [cs.IR] for this version) | |
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.19178 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Langming Liu [view email][v1] Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:34:00 UTC (638 KB)
[v2] Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:18:34 UTC (638 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
- Other Formats
View a PDF of the paper titled UQABench: Evaluating User Embedding for Prompting LLMs in Personalized Question Answering, by Langming Liu and 12 other authors
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer(What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers(What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps(What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations(What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv(What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers(What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub(What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub(What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face(What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code(What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast(What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower(What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender(What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.