Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
arXiv:2410.10783 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Oct 2024 (v1), last revised 15 Oct 2024 (this version, v2)]
Title:LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content
Authors:Nimrod Shabtay,Felipe Maia Polo,Sivan Doveh,Wei Lin,M. Jehanzeb Mirza,Leshem Chosen,Mikhail Yurochkin,Yuekai Sun,Assaf Arbelle,Leonid Karlinsky,Raja Giryes
View a PDF of the paper titled LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content, by Nimrod Shabtay and 10 other authors
View PDFHTML (experimental)Abstract:The large-scale training of multi-modal models on data scraped from the web has shown outstanding utility in infusing these models with the required world knowledge to perform effectively on multiple downstream tasks. However, one downside of scraping data from the web can be the potential sacrifice of the benchmarks on which the abilities of these models are often evaluated. To safeguard against test data contamination and to truly test the abilities of these foundation models we propose LiveXiv: A scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers. LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs (VQA). This is done without any human-in-the-loop, using the multi-modal content in the manuscripts, like graphs, charts, and tables. Moreover, we introduce an efficient evaluation approach that estimates the performance of all models on the evolving benchmark using evaluations of only a subset of models. This significantly reduces the overall evaluation cost. We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities, avoiding contamination. Lastly, in our commitment to high quality, we have collected and evaluated a manually verified subset. By comparing its overall results to our automatic annotations, we have found that the performance variance is indeed minimal (<2.5%). Our dataset is available online on HuggingFace, and our code will be available here.
Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) |
Cite as: | arXiv:2410.10783 [cs.CV] |
(orarXiv:2410.10783v2 [cs.CV] for this version) | |
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.10783 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Nimrod Shabtay [view email][v1] Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:51:23 UTC (1,151 KB)
[v2] Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:57:44 UTC (1,151 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
- Other Formats
View a PDF of the paper titled LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content, by Nimrod Shabtay and 10 other authors
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer(What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers(What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps(What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations(What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv(What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers(What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub(What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub(What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face(What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code(What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast(What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower(What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender(What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.