Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation,member institutions, and all contributors.Donate
arxiv logo>cs> arXiv:2410.05641
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2410.05641 (cs)
[Submitted on 8 Oct 2024]

Title:Synthesizing Efficient and Permissive Programmatic Runtime Shields for Neural Policies

View PDFHTML (experimental)
Abstract:With the increasing use of neural policies in control systems, ensuring their safety and reliability has become a critical software engineering task. One prevalent approach to ensuring the safety of neural policies is to deploy programmatic runtime shields alongside them to correct their unsafe commands. However, the programmatic runtime shields synthesized by existing methods are either computationally expensive or insufficiently permissive, resulting in high overhead and unnecessary interventions on the system. To address these challenges, we propose Aegis, a novel framework that synthesizes lightweight and permissive programmatic runtime shields for neural policies. Aegis achieves this by formulating the seeking of a runtime shield as a sketch-based program synthesis problem and proposing a novel method that leverages counterexample-guided inductive synthesis and Bayesian optimization to solve it. To evaluate Aegis and its synthesized shields, we use four representative control systems and compare Aegis with the current state-of-the-art. Our results show that the programmatic runtime shields synthesized by Aegis can correct all unsafe commands from neural policies, ensuring that the systems do not violate any desired safety properties at all times. Compared to the current state-of-the-art, Aegis's shields exhibit a 2.1$\times$ reduction in time overhead and a 4.4$\times$ reduction in memory usage, suggesting that they are much more lightweight. Moreover, Aegis's shields incur an average of 1.6$\times$ fewer interventions than other shields, showing better permissiveness.
Comments:Under Review by ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
Subjects:Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as:arXiv:2410.05641 [cs.SE]
 (orarXiv:2410.05641v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.05641
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jieke Shi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:44:55 UTC (1,158 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:
cs.SE
Change to browse by:
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logoReddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer(What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers(What is Connected Papers?)
scite Smart Citations(What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers(What is CatalyzeX?)
Hugging Face(What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code(What is Papers with Code?)

Demos

Hugging Face Spaces(What is Spaces?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower(What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender(What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp