Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation,member institutions, and all contributors.Donate
arxiv logo>cs> arXiv:2405.06404
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2405.06404 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 May 2024 (v1), last revised 19 Nov 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Inclusive content reduces racial and gender biases, yet non-inclusive content dominates popular culture

View PDFHTML (experimental)
Abstract:Images are often termed as representations of perceived reality. As such, racial and gender biases in popular culture and visual media could play a critical role in shaping people's perceptions of society. While previous research has made significant progress in exploring the frequency and discrepancies in racial and gender group appearances in visual media, it has largely overlooked important nuances in how these groups are portrayed, as it lacked the ability to systematically capture such complexities at scale over time. To address this gap, we examine two media forms of varying target audiences, namely fashion magazines and movie posters. Accordingly, we collect a large dataset comprising over 300,000 images spanning over five decades and utilize state-of-the-art machine learning models to classify not only race and gender but also the posture, expressed emotional state, and body composition of individuals featured in each image. We find that racial minorities appear far less frequently than their White counterparts, and when they do appear, they are portrayed less prominently. We also find that women are more likely to be portrayed with their full bodies, whereas men are more frequently presented with their faces. Finally, through a series of survey experiments, we find evidence that exposure to inclusive content can help reduce biases in perceptions of minorities, while racially and gender-homogenized content may reinforce and amplify such biases. Taken together, our findings highlight that racial and gender biases in visual media remain pervasive, potentially exacerbating existing stereotypes and inequalities.
Comments:86 pages, 17 figures
Subjects:Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as:arXiv:2405.06404 [cs.CY]
 (orarXiv:2405.06404v2 [cs.CY] for this version)
 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.06404
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yasir Zaki [view email]
[v1] Fri, 10 May 2024 11:34:47 UTC (35,055 KB)
[v2] Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:21:20 UTC (23,267 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:
cs.CY
Change to browse by:
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logoReddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer(What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers(What is Connected Papers?)
scite Smart Citations(What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers(What is CatalyzeX?)
Hugging Face(What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code(What is Papers with Code?)

Demos

Hugging Face Spaces(What is Spaces?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower(What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender(What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp