Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation,member institutions, and all contributors.Donate
arxiv logo>cs> arXiv:2205.15931
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Neural and Evolutionary Computing

arXiv:2205.15931 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 May 2022]

Title:The Environmental Discontinuity Hypothesis for Down-Sampled Lexicase Selection

View PDF
Abstract:Down-sampling training data has long been shown to improve the generalization performance of a wide range of machine learning systems. Recently, down-sampling has proved effective in genetic programming (GP) runs that utilize the lexicase parent selection technique. Although this down-sampling procedure has been shown to significantly improve performance across a variety of problems, it does not seem to do so due to encouraging adaptability through environmental change. We hypothesize that the random sampling that is performed every generation causes discontinuities that result in the population being unable to adapt to the shifting environment. We investigate modifications to down-sampled lexicase selection in hopes of promoting incremental environmental change to scaffold evolution by reducing the amount of jarring discontinuities between the environments of successive generations. In our empirical studies, we find that forcing incremental environmental change is not significantly better for evolving solutions to program synthesis problems than simple random down-sampling. In response to this, we attempt to exacerbate the hypothesized prevalence of discontinuities by using only disjoint down-samples to see if it hinders performance. We find that this also does not significantly differ from the performance of regular random down-sampling. These negative results raise new questions about the ways in which the composition of sub-samples, which may include synonymous cases, may be expected to influence the performance of machine learning systems that use down-sampling.
Comments:Accepted to The 2022 Conference on Artificial Life - Why it Didn't Work-Shop. 10 pages
Subjects:Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
Cite as:arXiv:2205.15931 [cs.NE]
 (orarXiv:2205.15931v1 [cs.NE] for this version)
 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.15931
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ryan Boldi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 31 May 2022 16:21:14 UTC (42 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
Current browse context:
cs.NE
Change to browse by:
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logoReddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer(What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers(What is Connected Papers?)
scite Smart Citations(What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers(What is CatalyzeX?)
Hugging Face(What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code(What is Papers with Code?)

Demos

Hugging Face Spaces(What is Spaces?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower(What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender(What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp