• Attneave, F. (1959).Application of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods, and results. New York: Holt.

  Google Scholar 

• Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M. M., Li, F., &Whitehead, S. D. (1992). Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasks.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,337, 331–339.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohn, T. E., &Wardlaw, J. C. (1985). Effect of large spatial uncertainty on foveal luminance increment detectability.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 820–825.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davis, E. T., &Graham, N. (1981). Spatial frequency uncertainty effects in the detection of sinusoidal gratings.Vision Research,21, 705–712.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Epstein, W., &Rock, I. (1960). Perceptual set as an artifact of recency.American Journal of Psychology,73, 214–228.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fischer, B. (1987). The preparation of visually guided saccades.Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, & Pharmacology,106, 2–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Geller, E. S., Whitman, C. P., Wrenn, R. F., &Shipley, W. (1971). Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 291–297.

  Google Scholar 

• Jarvik, M. E. (1951). Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 291–297.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Julesz, B. (1986). Texton gradients: The texton theory revisited.Biological Cybernetics,54, 245–251.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Karni, A., &Sagi, D. (1991). Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,88, 4966–4970.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kirby, N. H. (1972). Sequential effects in serial reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,96, 32–36.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koch, C., &Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology,4, 219–227.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kowler, E., Martins, A. J., &Pavel, M. (1984). The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control: IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions.Vision Research,24, 197–210.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kröse, B. J. A., &Julesz, B. (1989). The control and speed of shifts of attention.Vision Research,29, 1607–1619.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mackeben, M., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Express attentional shifts.Vision Research,33, 85–90.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Maljkovic, V., Bravo, M., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Characteristics of short-term visual memory which passively influence the guidance of focal attention.Perception,21(Suppl. 2), 68.

  Google Scholar 

• Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Priming of popout: An example of implicit short-term memory.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,19, 439.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitchell, D. B., &Brown, A. S. (1988). Persistent repetition priming in picture naming and its dissociation from recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 213–222.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moss, S. M., Engel, S., &Faberman, D. (1967). Alternation and repetition reaction times under three schedules of even sequencing.Psychonomic Science,9, 557–558.

  Google Scholar 

• Musen, G., &Treisman, A. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory for visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 127–137.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parkin, A. J., &Streete, S. (1988). Implicit and explicit memory in young children and adults.British Journal of Psychology,79, 361–369.

  Google Scholar 

• Poggio, T., Fahle, M., &Edelman, S. (1992). Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity.Science,256, 1018–1021.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Reid, P. J., &Shettleworth, S. J. (1992). Detection of cryptic prey: Search image or search rate?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 273–286.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Remington, R. J. (1969). Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times.Journal of Experimental Psychology,82, 250–257.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Rizzolati, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favour of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robertson, L. C., & Egly, R. (1993, November).Attention, spatial frequency, and parietal function in humans. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.

• Rovamo, J., &Virsu, V. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.Experimental Brain Research,37, 475–494.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985). “Where” and “what” in vision.Science,228, 1217–1219.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Schacter, D. L. (1990). Perceptual representation systems and implicit memory: Toward a resolution of the multiple memory debate.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,608, 543–571.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 5–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schacter, D. L., Delaney, S. M., &Merikle, E. P. (1990). Priming of nonverbal information and the nature of implicit memory.The Psychology of Learning & Motivation,26, 83–123.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Chase, W. G. (1969). Sequential effects in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 1–8.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sekuler, R., &Ball, K. (1977). Mental set alters visibility of moving targets.Science,198, 60–62.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Skavenski, A. A., McPeek, R. M., Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Two forms of shortened saccadic eye movement latency in a popout visual search task.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,19, 426.

  Google Scholar 

• Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.

  Google Scholar 

• Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C., &Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 681–692.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.

  Google Scholar 

• Treisman, A., &DeSchepper, B. (1993). Memory for novel visual shapes.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Suppl.),34, 1288.

  Google Scholar 

• Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Warren, C., &Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming on picture recognition.British Journal of Psychology,73, 117–129.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wickens, D. D., Born, D. G., &Allen, C. K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 382–385.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wurtz, R. H., Goldberg, M. E., &Robinson, D. L. (1980). Behavioral modulation of visual responses in the monkey: Stimulus selection for attention and movement.Progress in Psychobiology & Physiological Psychology,9, 43–83.

  Google Scholar 

Download references