• Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,11, 164–169.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. (1976). An analysis of recognition and recall and of problems in their comparison. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 1–35). London: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruce, D., &Fagan, R. L. (1970). More on the recognition and free recall of organized lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 153–154.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cofer, C. N., Bruce, D. R., &Reicher, G. M. (1966). Clustering in free recall as a function of certain methodological variations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 858–866.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, B. H. (1963). An investigation of recoding in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 368–376.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Connor, J. M. (1977). Effects of organization and expectancy on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,5, 315–318.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Criss, A. H., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001).Psychological Review,111, 800–807.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• D’Agostino, P. R. (1969). The blocked-random effect in recall and recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 815–820.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dewhurst, S. A. (2001). Category repetition and false recognition: Effects of instance frequency and category size.Journal of Memory & Language,44, 153–167.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 105–112.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jacoby, L. L. (1972). Effects of organization on recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 325–331.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kintsch, W. (1968). Recognition and free recall of organized lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 481–487.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koutstaal, W., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 555–583.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions.Memory & Cognition,6, 312–319.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Mandler, G. (1972). Organization and recognition. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory (pp. 139–166). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Neely, J. H., &Balota, D. A. (1981). Test-expectancy and semanticorganization effects in recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,9, 283–300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., &Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 267–287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tulving, E., &Kroll, N. (1995). Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 387–390.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 381–391.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., &Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms.Journal of Memory & Language,50, 289–335.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references