• Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421 -452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 948–961.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in the serial two-choice responding task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,13, 90–102.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bertelson, P. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction time to new versus repeated signals in a serial task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 478–484.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction time as a function of response versus signal repetition.Nature,206, 217–218.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Bertelson, P., &Renkin, A. (1966). Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval.Acta Psychologica,25, 132–136.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Martin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Egeth, H. E. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 277–320). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A. &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fletcher, B. C. (1981). Wholistic and analytic stimulus processing: The development of selective perceptual strategies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33 A, 167–183.

  Google Scholar 

• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gibson, B. S., &Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for display-wide visual features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 699–706.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hale, D. J. (1967). Sequential effects in a two-choice serial reaction task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,19, 133–141.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hillstrom, A. P. (1995, November).Singleton pop-out: Facilitation of uniqueness or inhibition of similarity? Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.

• Hillstrom, A. P., &Logan, G. D. (1998). Decomposing visual search: Evidence of multiple item-specific skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1385–1398.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes.Visual Cognition,5, 183–216.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,45, 188–196.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift.Archives of Psychology,14 (Whole No. 89).

• Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &Van Der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1053–1069.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Keele, S. W. (1969). Repetition effect: A memory-dependent process.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 243–248.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kornblum, S. (1969). Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time.Psychological Review,76, 113–131.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice reaction time: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 259–288). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lockhead, G. R., Gruenewald, P., &King, M. (1978). Holistic vs. attribute repetition effects in classifying stimuli.Memory & Cognition,6, 438–445.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Malley, G. B., &Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 657–667.

  Google Scholar 

• Marr, D. (1982).Vision. New York: Freeman.

  Google Scholar 

• Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., &Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.Psychological Review,105, 203–229.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone?Perception & Psychophysics,56, 133–147.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1291–1305.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., &Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 993–1000.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pashler, H., &Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 33–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Posner, M. I., &Konick, A. F. (1966). On the role of interference in short-term retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 221–231.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Repetition effects and signal classification strategies in serial choice-response tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 232–240.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Rabbitt, P. M. A., Cumming, G. D., &Vyas, S. M. (1977). An analysis of visual search: Entropy and sequential effects. In S. Domic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 363–368). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Rabbitt, P. [M. A.], Cumming, G. [D.], &Vyas, S. [M.] (1979). Modulation of selective attention by sequential effects in visual search tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 305–317.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Soetens, E., Boer, L. C, &Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 598–616.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Soetens, E., Deboeck, M., &Hueting, J. (1984). Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: A mathematical representation of some concepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 581–598.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spector, A., &Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited.American Journal of Psychology,89, 669–679.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Strayer, D. L. (1995, November).Negative priming and stimulus repetition. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.

• Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tipper.S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37, 571–590.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C, &Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time-course and disruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 681–692.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioral goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47 A, 809–840.

  Google Scholar 

• Treisman, A. (1992). Perceiving and re-perceiving objects.American Psychologist,47, 862–875.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Umiltà, C, Snyder, C, &Snyder, M. (1972). Repetition effect as a function of event uncertainty, response-stimulus interval, and rank order of the event.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 320–326.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wickelgren, W. (1965). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 53–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yantis, S., &Egeth. H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661 -676.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zohary, E., &Hochstein, S. (1989). How serial is serial processing in vision?Perception,18, 191–200.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references