Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account

  • Published:
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Search for odd-one-out feature targets takes longer when the target can be present in one of several dimensions as opposed to only one dimension (Müller, Heller, & Ziegler, 1995; Treisman, 1988). Müller et al. attributed this cost to the need to discern the target dimension. They proposed adimension-weighting account, in which master map units compute, in parallel, the weighted sum of dimension-specific saliency signals. If the target dimension is known in advance, signals from that dimension are amplified. But if the target dimension is unknown, it is determined in a process that shifts weight from the nontarget to the target dimension. The weight pattern thus generated persists across trials, producing intertrial facilitation for a target (trialn+1) dimensionally identical to the preceding target (trialn). In the present study, we employed a set of new tasks in order to reexamine and extend this account. Targets were defined along two possible dimensions (color or orientation) and could take on one of two feature values (e.g., red or blue). Experiments 1 and 2 required absent/present and color/orientation discrimination of a single target, respectively. They showed that (1) both tasks involveweight shifting, though (explicitly) discerning the dimension of a target requires some process additional to simply detecting its presence; and (2) the intertrial facilitation is indeed (largely) dimension specific rather than feature specific in nature. In Experiment 3, the task was to count the number of targets in a display (either three or four), which could be either dimensionally the same (all color or all orientation) or mixed (some color and some orientation). As predicted by the dimension-weighting account, enumerating four targets all defined within the same dimension was faster than counting three such targets or mixed targets defined in two dimensions.

Article PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Atkinson, J., &Braddick, O. (1989). “Where” and “what” in visual search.Perception,18, 181–189.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1990, June). Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and speed in humans.Science,248, 1556–1559.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.Journal of Neuroscience,11, 2383–2402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, R., &Ungerleider, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, C. L., Egeth, H., &Kwak, H.-W. (1988). Subitizing: Direct apprehension or serial processing?Perception & Psychophysics,44, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences,15, 20–25.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. C., &Pashler, H. (1990). Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. M., &Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.Cognitive Psychology,24, 175–219.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & van der Heijden, A. H. C. (in press). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

  • Koch, C., &Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology,4, 219–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. (1990). Thalamic and cortical mechanisms of attention suggested by recent positron emission tomography experiments.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2, 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, E. H. (1977, December). The retinex theory of color vision.Scientific American,237, 108–128.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malkjovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Spatial cueing and the relation between the accuracy of “where” and “what” decisions in visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 747–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, H.-C. (1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast.Vision Research,31, 1073–1078.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, H.-C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues.Vision Research,33, 1937–1958.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K.W., &Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingular cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,87, 256–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985a). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation.Perception,14, 619–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985b, June). “Where” and “what” in vision.Science,228, 1217–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects. The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trick, L. M., &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumerations studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Chun, M. M., &Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1995). Making use of texton gradients: Visual search and perceptual grouping exploit the same parallel processes in different ways. In T. Papathomas & A. Gorea (Eds.),Linking psychophysics, neuropsychology, and computational vision (pp. 189–197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S. (1993).A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, WC1E 7HX, London, England

    Andrew Found & Hermann J. Müller

Authors
  1. Andrew Found

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hermann J. Müller

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHermann J. Müller.

Additional information

This research was supported by Science and Engineering Research Council Grant GR/H/54966 and a Royal Society research grant to H. J. M.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Found, A., Müller, H.J. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account.Perception & Psychophysics58, 88–101 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205479

Download citation

Keywords

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp