1613Accesses
3Altmetric
Abstract
Search for odd-one-out feature targets takes longer when the target can be present in one of several dimensions as opposed to only one dimension (Müller, Heller, & Ziegler, 1995; Treisman, 1988). Müller et al. attributed this cost to the need to discern the target dimension. They proposed adimension-weighting account, in which master map units compute, in parallel, the weighted sum of dimension-specific saliency signals. If the target dimension is known in advance, signals from that dimension are amplified. But if the target dimension is unknown, it is determined in a process that shifts weight from the nontarget to the target dimension. The weight pattern thus generated persists across trials, producing intertrial facilitation for a target (trialn+1) dimensionally identical to the preceding target (trialn). In the present study, we employed a set of new tasks in order to reexamine and extend this account. Targets were defined along two possible dimensions (color or orientation) and could take on one of two feature values (e.g., red or blue). Experiments 1 and 2 required absent/present and color/orientation discrimination of a single target, respectively. They showed that (1) both tasks involveweight shifting, though (explicitly) discerning the dimension of a target requires some process additional to simply detecting its presence; and (2) the intertrial facilitation is indeed (largely) dimension specific rather than feature specific in nature. In Experiment 3, the task was to count the number of targets in a display (either three or four), which could be either dimensionally the same (all color or all orientation) or mixed (some color and some orientation). As predicted by the dimension-weighting account, enumerating four targets all defined within the same dimension was faster than counting three such targets or mixed targets defined in two dimensions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, J., &Braddick, O. (1989). “Where” and “what” in visual search.Perception,18, 181–189.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1990, June). Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and speed in humans.Science,248, 1556–1559.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.Journal of Neuroscience,11, 2383–2402.
Desimone, R., &Ungerleider, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Folk, C. L., Egeth, H., &Kwak, H.-W. (1988). Subitizing: Direct apprehension or serial processing?Perception & Psychophysics,44, 313–320.
Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences,15, 20–25.
Johnston, J. C., &Pashler, H. (1990). Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 843–856.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. M., &Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.Cognitive Psychology,24, 175–219.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & van der Heijden, A. H. C. (in press). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Koch, C., &Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology,4, 219–227.
LaBerge, D. (1990). Thalamic and cortical mechanisms of attention suggested by recent positron emission tomography experiments.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2, 358–372.
LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
Land, E. H. (1977, December). The retinex theory of color vision.Scientific American,237, 108–128.
Malkjovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Spatial cueing and the relation between the accuracy of “where” and “what” decisions in visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 747–773.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast.Vision Research,31, 1073–1078.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 355–375.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues.Vision Research,33, 1937–1958.
Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K.W., &Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingular cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,87, 256–259.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985a). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation.Perception,14, 619–628.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985b, June). “Where” and “what” in vision.Science,228, 1217–1219.
Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects. The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. M., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A. M., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Trick, L. M., &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumerations studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 331–351.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M., Chun, M. M., &Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1995). Making use of texton gradients: Visual search and perceptual grouping exploit the same parallel processes in different ways. In T. Papathomas & A. Gorea (Eds.),Linking psychophysics, neuropsychology, and computational vision (pp. 189–197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zeki, S. (1993).A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, WC1E 7HX, London, England
Andrew Found & Hermann J. Müller
- Andrew Found
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Hermann J. Müller
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toHermann J. Müller.
Additional information
This research was supported by Science and Engineering Research Council Grant GR/H/54966 and a Royal Society research grant to H. J. M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Found, A., Müller, H.J. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account.Perception & Psychophysics58, 88–101 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205479
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative