11kAccesses
584Citations
21 Altmetric
1Mention
Abstract
People’s metacognitions, both before and during problem solving, may be of importance in motivating and guiding problem-solving behavior. These metacognitions could also be diagnostic for distinguishing among different classes of problems, each perhaps controlled by different cognitive processes. In the present experiments, intuitions on classic insight problems were compared with those on noninsight and algebra problems. The findings were as follows: (1) subjective feeling of knowing predicted performance on algebra problems but not on insight problems; (2) subjects’ expectations of performance greatly exceeded their actual performance, especially on insight problems; (3) normative predictions provided a better estimate of individual performance than did subjects’ own predictions, especially on the insight problems; and, most importantly, (4) the patterns-of-warmth ratings, which reflect subjects’ feelings of approaching solution, differed for insight and noninsight problems. Algebra problems and noninsight problems showed a more incremental pattern over the course of solving than did insight problems. In general, then, the data indicated that noninsight problems were open to accurate predictions of performance, whereas insight problems were opaque to such predictions. Also, the phenomenology of insight-problem solution was characterized by a sudden, unforeseen flash of illumination. We propose that the difference in phenomenology accompanying insight and noninsight problem solving, as empirically demonstrated here, be used to define insight.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams, J. L. (1979).Conceptual blockbusting. New York: Norton.
Arieti, S. (1976).Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
Bergson, H. (1902).An introduction to metaphysics. New York: Putnam.
Bruner, J. (1966).On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Davidson, J. E., &Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness.Gifted Child Quarterly,28, 58–64.
DeBono, E. (1967).The use of lateral thinking. New York: Penguin
DeBono, E. (1969).The mechanism of mind. New York: Penguin.
Dominowski, R. L. (1981). Comment on an examination of the alleged role of ’fixation’ in the solution of ’insight’ problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 199–203.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving.Psychological Monographs,58(5, Whole No. 270).
Ellen, P. (1982). Direction, past experience, and hints in creative problem solving: Reply to Weisberg and Alba.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 316–325.
Fixx, J. F. (1972).More games for the superintelligent. New York: Popular Library.
Gardner, M. (1978).Aha! Insight. New York: Freeman.
Gruneberg, M. M., &Monks, J. (1974). Feeling of knowing In cued recall.Acta Psychologica,38, 257–265.
Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 685–691.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1980).Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Vintage Books.
Karat, J. (1982). A model of problem solving with incomplete constraint knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,14, 538–559.
Koestler, A. (1977).The act of creation. London: Picadoo.
Levine, M. (1986).Principles of effective problem solving. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stonybrook.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B., &Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state to the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristitcs and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 756–766.
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanizataon in problem solving.Psychological Monographs,54(6, Whole No. 248).
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness.Journal of Campara-tive Psychology,12, 181–194.
Mayer, R. E. (1983).Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: Freeman
Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition,12, 288–294.
Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Premonitions of insight predict impending error.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 623–634.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling of knowing prediction.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
Nelson, T. O. (1986). ROC curves and measures of discrimination accuracy: A reply to Swets.Psychologtcal Bulletin,100, 128–132.
Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Landwehr, R. S., &Narens, L. (1986). A comparison of three predictors of an individual’s memory performance: The individual’s feeling of knowing vs. the normative feeling of knowing vs. base-rate item difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 279–287.
Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Shimamura, A. P., Landwehr, R. F., &Narens, L. (1982). Overlearning and the feeling of knowing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 279–288.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 338–368
Polanyi, M. (1958).Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polya, G. (1957),How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Restle, F., &Davis, J. H. (1962). Success and speed of problem solwng by ~ndividuals and groups.Psychological Review,69, 520–536.
Schacter, D. L. (1983). Feeling of knowing in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 39–54.
Simon, H. (1977).Models of discovery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Reidel.
Simon, H. (1979).Models of thought. New Haven Yale University Press.
Simon, H., Newell, A., &Shaw, J. C. (1979). The process of creative thinking. In H. Simon (Ed),Models of thought (pp. 144–174). New Haven: Yale University Press
Sternberg, R. J. (1985).Beyond IQ. Cambridge, MA. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986).Intelligence applied. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Javonovich.
Sternberg, R. J., &Davidson, J. E. (1982, June). The nund of the puzzler.Psychology Today,16, 37–44.
Travers, K. J., Dalton, L. C., Bruner, V. F., &Taylor, A. R. (1976).Using advanced algebra. Toronto: Doubleday.
Wallas, G. (1926).The art of thought. New York. Harcourt.
Weisberg, R. W., &Alba, J. W. (1981a). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 169–192.
Weisberg, R. W., &Alba, J. W. (1981b). Gestalt theory, insight and past experience: Reply to Dominowski.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 193–198.
Weisberg, R. W., &Alba, J. W. (1982). Problem solwng is not like perception: More on gestalt theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 326–330.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Psychology, Indiana Umversgy, 47405, Bloomington, IN
Janet Metcalfe
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
David Wiebe
- Janet Metcalfe
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- David Wiebe
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Additional information
This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Grant A-0505 to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Metcalfe, J., Wiebe, D. Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving.Memory & Cognition15, 238–246 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197722
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative