Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a series of three experiments, increasing working memory (WM) load was demonstrated to reduce the executive control of attention, measured via task-switching and inhibitory control paradigms. Uniquely, our paradigms allowed comparison of the ability to exert executive control when the stimulus was either part of the currently rehearsed memory set or an unrelated distractor item. The results demonstrated a content-specific effect—insofar as switching attention away from, or exerting inhibitory control over, items currently held in WM was especially difficult—compounded by increasing WM load. This finding supports the attentional control theory that active maintenance of competing task goals is critical to executive function and WM capacity; however, it also suggests that the increased salience provided to the contents of WM through active rehearsal exerts a content-specific influence on attentional control. These findings are discussed in relation to cue-induced ruminations, where active rehearsal of evocative information (e.g., negative thoughts in depression or drug-related thoughts in addiction) in WM typically results from environmental cuing. The present study has demonstrated that when information currently maintained in WM is reencountered, it is harder to exert executive control over it. The difficulty with suppressing the processing of these stimuli presumably reinforces the maintenance of these items in WM, due to the greater level of attention they are afforded, and may help to explain how the cue-induced craving/rumination cycle is perpetuated.

Article PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Baddeley, A. [D.] (1996). Exploring the central executive.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working?American Psychologist,56, 851–864.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Fractionating the central executive. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.),Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 246–260). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. [D.], Chincotta, D., &Adlam, A. (2001). Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. [D.], &Della Sala, S. (1998). Working memory and executive control. In A. C. Roberts, T. W. Robbins, & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 9–21). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, A. R., Mozley, P. D., McElgin, W., Fitzgerald, J., Reivich, M., &O’Brien, C. P. (1999). Limbic activation during cueinduced cocaine craving.American Journal of Psychiatry,156, 11–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G., Scheffers, M. K., &Fournier, L. (1995). Where did you go wrong? Errors, partial errors, and the nature of human information processing.Acta Psychologica,90, 129–144.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention.Science,291, 1803–1806.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Zubicaray, G. I., Andrew, C., Zelaya, F. O., Williams, S. C., &Dumanoir, C. (2000). Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: A parametric fMRI study.Neuropsychologia,38, 1280–1291.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J. (1989). Semantic and perceptual priming: How similar are the underlying mechanisms?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franken, I. H., Kroon, L. Y., &Hendriks, V. M. (2000). Influence of individual differences in craving and obsessive cocaine thoughts on attentional processes in cocaine abuse patients.Addictive Behaviors,25, 99–102.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, H., Pankiewicz, J., Bloom, A., Cho, J. K., Sperry, L., Ross, T. J., Salmeron, B. J., Risinger, R., Kelley, D., &Stein, E. A. (2000). Cue-induced cocaine craving: Neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli.American Journal of Psychiatry,157, 1789–1798.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., Murphy, K., Roche, R. A., &Stein, E. A. (2002). Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction.NeuroImage,17, 1820–1829.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S., London, E. D., Newlin, D. B., Villemagne, V. L., Liu, X., Contoreggi, C., Phillips, R. L., Kimes, A. S., &Margolin, A. (1996). Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,93, 12040–12045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., Chung, C., May, C. P., &Foong, N. (2002). Age, time of testing, and proactive interference.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 200–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A. H., &Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A. H., &Heinz, S. P. (1979). Depth of nontarget processing in an attention task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., &Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contribution of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl, K. A., Liddle, P. F., &Hopfinger, J. B. (2000). Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: An event-related fMRI study.Psychophysiology,37, 216–223.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilts, C. D., Schweitzer, J. B., Quinn, C. K., Gross, R. E., Faber, T. L., Muhammad, F., Ely, T. D., Hoffman, J. M., &Drexler, K. P. (2001). Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction.Archives of General Psychiatry,58, 334–341.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulas, J. F., Conger, J. C., &Smolin, J. M. (2003). The effects of emotion on memory: An investigation of attentional bias.Journal of Anxiety Disorders,17, 103–113.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurens, K. R., Ngan, E. T., Bates, A. T., Kiehl, K. A., &Liddle, P. F. (2003). Rostral anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction during error processing in schizophrenia.Brain,126, 610–622.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N. T., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 32–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. (1999). Working memory.The Psychologist,12, 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, C., May, C. P., &Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, L. C., Lukas, S. E., Kaufman, M. J., Weiss, R. D., Daniels, S. L., Rogers, V. W., Kukes, T. J., &Renshaw, P. F. (1998). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activation during cue-induced cocaine craving.American Journal of Psychiatry,155, 124–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Galloway, M., &Hawkins, K. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response.Neuropsychologia,37, 661–670.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, V., Adleman, N. E., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., &Reiss, A. L. (2001). Error-related brain activation during a go/nogo response inhibition task.Human Brain Mapping,12, 131–143.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.Annual Review of Neuroscience,24, 167–202.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., &Gilchrist, I. D. (2002). Working memory and the suppression of reflexive saccades.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14, 95–103.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F., &Ahn, J.-C. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.Acta Psychologica,115, 123–142.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G., &Kok, A. (2001). Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: Evidence from an antisaccade task.Psychophysiology,38, 752–760.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., &Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity—facets of a cognitive ability construct.Personality & Individual Differences,29, 1017–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., &Wittmann, W.W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination.Intelligence,31, 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. J., Jr.,Hager, L. D., &Heron, C. (1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 374–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. J., Jr., &Pennington, B. F. (1996). An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes.Developmental Neuropsychology,12, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., &Yiend, J. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects.Neuropsychologia,35, 747–758.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rypma, B., Berger, J. S., &D’Esposito, M. (2002). The influence of working-memory demand and subject performance on prefrontal cortical activity.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14, 721–731.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., &Burgess, P. (1998). The domain of supervisory processes and the temporal organization of behaviour. In A. C. Roberts & T.W. Robbins (Eds.),The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 22–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, G. J., Steinhauer, S. R., Thase, M. E., Stenger, V. A., &Carter, C. S. (2002). Can’t shake that feeling: Event-related fMRI assessment of sustained amygdala activity in response to emotional information in depressed individuals.Biological Psychiatry,51, 693–707.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullsperger, M., &von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.NeuroImage,14, 1387–1401.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaeghen, P., &Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,26, 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, J., Sugiura, M., Sato, K., Sato, Y., Maeda, Y., Matsue, Y., Fukuda, H., &Kawashima, R. (2002). The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in no-go performances: An event-related fMRI study.NeuroImage,17, 1207–1216.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E., &Brown, R. G. (2002). Rumination and executive function in depression: An experimental study.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,72, 400–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E., Teasdale, J. D., &Williams, R. M. (2000). Decentering and distraction reduce overgeneral autobiographical memory in depression.Psychological Medicine,30, 911–920.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Robert Hester & Hugh Garavan

Authors
  1. Robert Hester

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hugh Garavan

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHugh Garavan.

Additional information

This research was supported by USPHS Grant DA14100 and GCRC Grant M01 RR00058.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hester, R., Garavan, H. Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention.Mem Cogn33, 221–233 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195311

Download citation

Keywords

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp