Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Next Article in Journal
Polyazulene Based Materials for Heavy Metal Ions Detection. 4. Search for Conditions for Thiophen-Vinyl-Pyridine-Azulene Based CMEs Preparation
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimal Control for a Class of Riemann-Liouville Fractional Evolution Inclusions
Previous Article in Journal
Axial Compression Behavior of Symmetrical Full-Scale Concrete Filled Double Skin Steel Tube Stub Columns
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Logical OperatorOperator
Search Text
Search Type
 
add_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
 
 
Journals
Symmetry
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/sym14020224
Font Type:
ArialGeorgiaVerdana
Font Size:
AaAaAa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cubic–Quartic Optical Soliton Perturbation with Differential Group Delay for the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel Model by Lie Symmetry

1
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151401, Punjab, India
2
Department of Applied Mathematics, National Research Nuclear University, 31 Kashirskoe Hwy, 115409 Moscow, Russia
3
Mathematical Modeling and Applied Computation (MMAC) Research Group, Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Applied Sciences, Cross-Border Faculty, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 111 Domneasca Street, 800201 Galati, Romania
5
Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa 0204, South Africa
6
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics, Alabama A&M University, Normal, AL 35762-4900, USA
7
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, Cyprus
8
Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
9
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry2022,14(2), 224;https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020224
Submission received: 30 December 2021 /Revised: 20 January 2022 /Accepted: 21 January 2022 /Published: 24 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special IssueSymmetries in Evolution Equations and Applications)

Abstract

:
This paper employs Lie symmetry analysis to recover cubic–quartic optical soliton solutions to the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model in birefringent fibers. The results are a sequel to the previously reported work on the same model in unpolarized fibers. Dark, singular, and straddled optical solitons that emerged from the scheme are presented.

    1. Introduction

    The concept of cubic–quartic (CQ) optical solitons emerged a couple of years ago out of extreme necessity when the chromatic dispersion (CD) effect ran low. This led to replenishing the low CD count with the CQ dispersive effect so that the necessary balance between CD and self-phase modulation (SPF) was sustained for the existence and propel of solitons for long distances through optical fibers. Later, this concept was applied to the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel (LPD) model [1,2,3,4], not including the well-known and most visible one: the nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation. The vector-coupled LPD equation in birefringent fibers was considered with the aid of the extended version of Jacobi’s elliptic function expansion scheme in [1], where Jacobi’s doubly periodic wave solutions are found. These solutions, in the limiting case, give rise to dark solitons, singular solitons or periodic solutions. The generalized LPD model with arbitrary refractive index is considered via the Jacobi and Weierstrass elliptic functions in [2], where solitary waves corresponding to optical solitons are recovered for an arbitrary refractive index. Periodic waves are also revealed for the classical case atn = 1 and for the new casen = 1/2. The LPD model is investigated, with the aid of the Ablowitz–Kaup–Newell–Segur (AKNS) hierarchy, to discover novel soliton breathers on the zero background in [3], where the specific conditions for the appearance of the standing and moving soliton breathers are also derived. Additionally, simple formulas for the soliton-breather periods are structured to understand the possibilities for controlling breather dynamics. The LPD equation in polarization-preserving fibers is discussed by virtue of the complete discrimination system for the polynomial method to obtain a complete list of all envelope patterns and to show a variety of dynamical properties of the patterns in [4], where solitons, singularity, periodicity, and double periodicity emerged from the exact parameter condition of existence for each pattern. Several results have been recovered using the CQ–LPD model with its scalar version [5,6,7]. The CQ–LPD equation is adopted using the Lie symmetry analysis in [5], where straddled singular–bright optical solitons are reported using the reduced ordinary differential equations that are handled using Kudryashov’s method. The perturbed CQ–LPD model is addressed by the method of undetermined coefficients in [6], where polarization-preserving fibers and birefringent fibers are studied. The conservation laws for polarization-preserving fibers are also retrieved and enumerated. The existence criteria for the displayed solitons are also presented. The perturbed CQ–LPD model is employed for both with and without polarization in [7], where a full spectrum of soliton solutions are retrieved using the sine-Gordon equation approach. Powerful Lie symmetry analysis has been successfully applied to several models that arise in mathematical physics [1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. In particular, a successful application of Lie symmetry analysis to the scalar version of the CQ–LPD model, yielded dark and singular solitons [5]. Lie symmetry is one of the most powerful methods for obtaining optical solitons with the governing models in nonlinear optics. In the last few decades, Lie’s method has been described in a number of excellent textbooks and has been applied to a number of physical and engineering models. The study of the group of infinitesimal transformations, in other words, Lie group point transformations, has an important place in this method. The Lie symmetry method, developed in the 19th century (1842–1899) by the Norwegian mathematician Sophus Lie, is exceptionally algorithmic. This method systematically combines and expands famous ad hoc methodologies for constructing optical solitons with model equations in optical fiber communications.
    Turning the page, and moving forward, it is about time to address the CQ–LPD model in birefringent fibers when polarization-mode dispersion kicks in. The perturbation terms are also taken into account in the vector CQ–LPD model. Lie symmetry analysis, when applied, leads to coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) [14,15]. These ODEs would be subsequently addressed using two powerful integration schemes: Kudryashov’s method and the improved F-expansion scheme. These lead to dark and singular soliton solutions to the model. The details of Lie symmetry analysis followed by the derivation of the soliton solutions from the derived ODEs are detailed and exhibited in the rest of the paper after a succinct introduction to the model.

    Governıng Model

    The perturbed LPD equation for propagation of CQ solitons through birefringent fibers is given in its dimensionless form [6,7]:
    iqt+ia1qxxx+b1qxxxx+(c1|q|2+d1|r|2)q=(α1(qx)2+β1(rx)2)q+(γ1|qx|2+λ1|rx|2)q+(δ1|q|2+ζ1|r|2)qxx+(μ1q2+ρ1r2)qxx+(f1|q|4+g1|q|2|r|2+h1|r|4)q+i[η1(|q|2q)x+ν1(|r|2r)x+{θ1(|q|2)x+ϵ1(|r|2)x}q+(τ1|q|2+σ1|r|2)qx],
    and
    irt+ia2rxxx+b2rxxxx+(c2|r|2+d2|q|2)r=(α2(rx)2+β2(qx)2)r+(γ2|rx|2+λ2|qx|2)r+(δ2|r|2+ζ2|q|2)rxx+(μ2r2+ρ2q2)rxx+(f2|r|4+g2|q|2|r|2+h2|q|4)r+i[η2(|r|2r)x+ν2(|q|2q)x+{θ2(|r|2)x+ϵ2(|q|2)x}r+(τ2|r|2+σ2|q|2)rx],
    where the complex-valued functionsq=q(x,t) andr=r(x,t) represent wave profiles in birefringent fibers with the complex parameteri representing1. The parametersal andbl forl=(1,2), are the coefficients of third-order and fourth-order dispersions, respectively. Next,cl andfl are the coefficients of self-phase modulation, whilehl,gl, anddl indicate the effects of cross-phase modulation. The parametersηl andνl denote self steepening. Then,τl,ϵl,θl,νl,ηl,ρl,μl, andσl stem from nonlinear dispersive effects along with the two components of birefringence. Finally,αl,βl,γl, andλl are additional nonlinear effects.

    2. Lie Symmetry Analysis

    The Lie symmetry method [5,14,15,16,17] is implemented in the coupled CQ–LPD model with perturbation terms for birefringent fibers (1) and (2) in this section. To solve model (1) and (2), the wave transformations are structured as follows:
    q(x,t)=u(x,t)eiv(x,t),r(x,t)=w(x,t)eiv(x,t),
    where the real-valued functionsu=u(x,t) andw=w(x,t) are the amplitude components of the soliton, while the real-valued functionv=v(x,t) is the phase component of the soliton. Inserting Equation (3) into Equation (1), we have the real and imaginary parts:
    (4ux4)b1+{ua14(vx)ub1}3vx33u(2vx2)2b1+{12(ux)b1vx3(ux)a1}2vx2+{6(vx)2b13(vx)a13(μ13+δ13)u2w2(ρ1+ζ1)}2ux2+(vx)4ub1+(vx)3ua1+{(μ1+α1+δ1γ1)u2+(ρ1+β1+ζ1λ1)w2}u(vx)2+{(η1+τ1)u3+w2uσ1+w3s1}vxu(α1+γ1)(ux)2u(β1+λ1)(wx)2uvtu5f1+{w2g1+c1}u3+{w4h1+d1w2}u=0,
    and
    3w(ws1+23uϵ1)wx+4(ux)b13vx3+(a1+4(vx)b1)3ux3+[6(2ux2)b16(vx)2ub13ua1vx+u{(μ1δ1)u2+w2(ρ1ζ1)}]2vx24(ux)b1(vx)33(ux)a1(vx)2+[2{(δ1+α1μ1)u223(ρ1ζ1)w2}ux2w(wx)uβ1]vx+{(3η1+τ1+2θ1)u2w2σ1}ux+(4vx4)ub1+ut=0.
    Similarly, inserting Equation (3) into Equation (2), we have the real and imaginary portions, which due to lengthy expressions, we have not written here. For the above system of equations, let us consider a one-parameter (ϵ) Lie group of transformations as follows:
    x=x+ϵξ(x,t,u,v,w)+O(ϵ2),t=t+ϵτ(x,t,u,v,w)+O(ϵ2),u=u+ϵη1(x,t,u,v,w)+O(ϵ2),v=v+ϵη2(x,t,u,v,w)+O(ϵ2),w=v+ϵη3(x,t,u,v,w)+O(ϵ2),
    whereξ, τ andηl forl=1, 2, 3 are infinitesimals andϵ<<1 is a very small parameter. The associated vector field for Equation (6) is indicated below:
    V=ξx+τt+η1u+η2v+η3w.
    Hence, the fourth prolongation formula [14,15] for Equation (7) is considered as
    pr(4)V=V+η1tut+η2tvt+η3twt+η1xux+η2xvx+η3xwx+η1xxxuxxx+η2xxxvxxx+η3xxxwxxx+η1xxxxuxxxx+η2xxxxvxxxx+η3xxxxwxxxx,
    whereη1t,η2t,η3t,η1x,η2x,η3x,η1xxx,η2xxx,η3xxx,η1xxxx,η2xxxx, andη3xxxx represent the extended infinitesimals. By usingpr(4)V(Δ)=0 wheneverΔ=0 in Equations (4) and (5), and other equations obtained from Equation (2), we obtain the invariance conditions. Plugging the extended infinitesimals into the invariance condition and equating the coefficients of different derivative terms that are equal to zero leads to the following:
    ξ=C2, τ=C1, η1=0, η2=C3, η3=0,
    whereCl,l=1,2,3 are arbitrary constants. Thus, we obtain only trivial symmetries.

    2.1. Symmetry Reduction and Closed-Form Solutions

    The transformations are employed to reduce the governing Equation (4) to the system of ODEs in this section. The corresponding characteristic equation is indicated below
    dxξ(x,t,u,v,w)=dtτ(x,t,u,v,w)=duη1(x,t,u,v,w)=dvη2(x,t,u,v,w)=dwη3(x,t,u,v,w),
    whereξ, τ, η1, η2, andη3 are given by Equation (9). Let us consider the following values of infinitesimals:
    ξ=k1, τ=1, η1=0, η2=k2, η3=0,
    wherek1 andk2 are arbitrary real numbers. Now, corresponding to Equation (11), on solving Equation (10), the similarity variables are structured as the following:
    σ=xk1t,u=F(σ),v=k2t+G(σ),w=H(σ),
    along with the dependent variablesF andG. For simplification, let us take the following:
    F(σ)=H(σ),
    and on substituting Equation (12) into Equations (4) and (5) and the remaining system of equations, we obtain the following system of equations:
    (βlαlγlλl)F(F)2(12blGG+3alG)F{(μl+ρl+ζl+δl)F2+6bl(G)2+3alG}F+(glhlfl)F5+{(μ1+ρl+βl+ζl+δl+αlγlλl)(G)2+(sl+ηl+σl+τl)G+dl+cl}F3+{al(G)3+bl(G)4+(4blG+k1)G3bl(G)2alGk2}F+blF=0,
    and
    (2ϵl3sl+(2αl2δl+2ρl+2μl2βl2ζl)Gτl3ηlσl2θl)F2F+6blFG+(4blG4blG33alG2k1)F+(μlδl+ρlζl)GF3+(al+4blG)F+{(6bl(G)23alG)G+blG}F=0,
    where() indicates the derivative with respect toσ andl=1,2. In Equation (15), setting
    4blG+al=0,
    we have
    G(σ)=al4blσ+C1,
    whereC1 is arbitrary constant. In addition, with Equation (17), by setting the coefficients ofF equal to zero in Equation (15), we have the following:
    k1=al38bl2.
    Equations (14) and (15) reduce to
    (gl+fl+hl)F5+3a128b1F+b1F+4(cl+dl)b12+2a1(ηl+θl+ϵl+sl)b1a12(ζl+δl)4b12F3=0,
    with the following parameter constraints:
    μl=ζlρlδl,λl=2δl+2ζlγl2b1(2ϵl+2θl+3sl+3ηl+σl+τl)a1,αl=3sl2ϵlσl3ηlτl2θl(2ρl2βl2ζl2δl2αl+2μl)a14b1.

    2.1.1. The Generalized Kudryashov’s Method

    We obtain CQ optical solitons with the governing system (1) and (2) by solving the ODE (19) forl=1,2. Equation (19) admits the solution form [2,12]:
    F(σ)=i=0Nmi Ri(σ)i=0Mni Rj(σ),
    wheremi (i=0,1,2,,N) andnj (j=0,1,2,,M) are real-valued constants. In addition, the new functionR=R(σ) satisfies the following ODE:
    R(σ)=R2(σ)R(σ),
    along with the solution
    R(σ)=11+Aeσ,
    whereA is arbitrary constant. By the usage of balance principle in Equation (19), we obtainN=M+1. By takingM=1, we haveN=2. So, Equation (21) becomes
    F(σ)=m0+m1R(σ)+m2R2(σ)n0+n1R(σ),
    wherem0,m1,m2,n0, andn1 are real-valued constants. Inserting Equation (24), along with Equation (22), into Equation (19), we arrive at the following results:
    Set–I:
    m0=0, m1=m2, n1=0, fl=glhl,al=±230i3bl, k2=19al36,cl=im22(ϵl+ηl+νl+θl)30+(3dl+10ζl+10δl)m22+360n02al3m22,
    wherem2 andn0 are arbitrary constants. Therefore, CQ straddled optical solitons with Equation (1) are structured as
    q(x,t)=m2A{cosh(tk1x)sinh(tk1x)}n0[1+A{cosh(tk1x)sinh(tk1x)}]2ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=m2A{cosh(tk1x)sinh(tk1x)}n0[1+A{cosh(tk1x)sinh(tk1x)}]2ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The CQ straddled optical solitons (26) and (27) are given with the conditions (18), (20), and (25) by takingl=1. CQ straddled optical solitons with Equation (2) are also yielded by takingl=2.
    Set–II:
    m0=m12, m2=0, n1=0, al=±43bl3,fl=24n04bl+m14gl+m14hlm14, k2=5 al4256 bl3,cl=(23m12ϵl+23m12ηl+23m12ν1+23m12θl+3m12dl4m12δl4m12ζl18n02bl)3m12,
    wherem1 andn0 are arbitrary constants. Thus, CQ straddled optical solitons with Equation (1) are indicated below:
    q(x,t)=m1[A{cosh(k1tx)sinh(k1tx)}1]2n0[1+A{cosh(k1tx)sinh(k1tx)}]ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=m1[A{cosh(k1tx)sinh(k1tx)}1]2n0[1+A{cosh(k1tx)sinh(k1tx)}]ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The CQ straddled optical solitons are retrieved by virtue of the parameter constraints (18), (20), and (28) by takingl=1. CQ straddled optical solitons to Equation (2) are also revealed by takingl=2. Equations (29) and (30) represent optical vector solitons that are constituted by the two polarization components of the optical field.

    2.1.2. Improved F-Expansion Approach

    New solitary wave solutions with Equation (1) are reported by solving the ODE (19) forl=1,2. Equation (19) presumes the formal solution [5]
    F(σ)=i=NNAi (b+H(σ))i,
    where the new functionH(σ) satisfies the ODE
    H(σ)=z0+z1H(σ)+z2H(σ)2+z3H(σ)3,
    wherez0,z1,z2,z3, andAi are arbitrary constants. By the use of balance principle in Equation (19), we obtainN=1. So, Equation (31) reduces to
    F(σ)=A1(b+H(σ))1+A0+A1(b+H(σ)).
    Plugging Equation (33), along with Equation (32), into Equation (19), we arrive at the following results:
    Family–1:(z2=z3=0)
    Set–I:
    z0=z1b, A0=0, A1=0, fl=glhl, al=2i6z1bl3,cl=±i6z13(ηl+ϵl+θl+νl)2z123(ζl+δl)dl.
    Hence, the analytical solutions of Equation (1) are formulated as
    q(x,t)=A1ez1(k1tx)ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=A1ez1(k1tx)ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The explicit solutions (35) and (36) are derived from the constraints (18), (20), and (34) by takingl=1. The exact solutions of Equation (2) are also obtained by takingl=2.
    Set–II:
    A1=0, A0=A1=arbitrary, fl=glhl, al=23i6blz1,cl=z1i3(ϵl+θl+νl+ηl)62z123 (δl+ζl)dl.
    Consequently, the explicit solutions of Equation (1) are considered as
    q(x,t)=(A1ez1(k1tx)C2+A1b+A0A1z0z1)ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=(A1ez1(k1tx)C2+A1b+A0A1z0z1)ei(k2ta24b2(xk1t)+C1).
    The analytical solutions (38) and (39) are provided by the conditions (18), (20), and (37) by takingl=1. The analytical solutions of Equation (2) are also reported by takingl=2.
    Family–2:(z3=0)
    Set–I:
    z0=b2z2, z1=2bz2, A1=0, fl=glhl,cl=4dlal2δlal2al2ζl+2ϵlalbl+2ηlalbl+2alblνl+2alblθl4bl2.
    As a result, the exact solutions of Equation (1) are retrieved as
    q(x,t)={A0A1z2(C1+k1tx)}ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)={A0A1z2(C1+k1tx)}ei(k2ta24b2(xk1t)+C1).
    The explicit solutions (41) and (42) emerged from the conditions (18), (20), and (40) by takingl=1. The solutions of Equation (2) are also given by takingl=2.
    Set–II:
    z0=z2(A1b+A0)2A12, z1=2z2(A1b+A0)A1,A1=0, fl=(glhl)A14+24blz24A14,cl={(ζl+δl)al22bl(θl+ϵl+ηl+νl)al4dlbl2}A123al2blz224A12bl2,
    Therefore, the analytical solutions of Equation (1) are revealed as
    q(x,t)=(A1z2(C2+(xk1t)))ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=(A1z2(C2+(xk1t)))ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The exact solutions (44) and (45) are considered with the parameters (18), (20), and (43) by takingl=1. The explicit solutions of Equation (2) are also recovered by takingl=2.
    Set–III:
    z0=z2b23 al264bl2z2, z1=2bz2, A0=A1=0,fl=glhl+243al82097152bl7z24A14,cl=(ζl+δl)al22bl(θl+ϵl+νl+ηl)al4dlbl24bl2+81al632768bl5z22A12.
    Thus, CQ singular optical solitons with Equation (1) are considered as
    q(x,t)=8A1b1z233a1coth(a1(C2+(xk1t))38b1)ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=8A1b1z233a1coth(a1(C2+(xk1t))38b1)ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The CQ singular optical solitons (47) and (48) are retrieved with the help of the parameter constraints (18), (20), and (46) by takingl=1. CQ singular optical solitons with Equation (2) are also yielded by takingl=2.
    Set–IV:
    z0=z2A02A123al264bl2z2, z1=2z2A0A1,fl=glhl+24blz24A14,A1=b=0,c1=((2δl+2ζl)al24bl(ϵl+θl+νl+ηl)al8dlal2)A12+9al2blz228A12bl2
    Hence, CQ dark optical solitons with Equation (1) are structured as
    q(x,t)=A18b1 z2[tanh(a1(C2+xk1t)38b1)3a18bb1z2]×ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=A18b1 z2[tanh(a1(C2+xk1t)38b1)3a18bb1z2]×ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The CQ dark optical solitons (50) and (51) are obtained by the aid of conditions (18), (20) and (49) by takingl=1. CQ dark optical solitons with Equation (2) are also given by takingl=2. Equations (50) and (51) stand for vector dark solitons that come from the reduction in the optical field intensity. These solitons are also less stable compared to scalar dark solitons.
    Family–3: (z1=z2=z3=0)
    Set–I:
    z1=0, z2=0, z3=0, A1=0, A0=A1=arbitrary,fl=glhl,cl=δlal2al2ζl+2ϵlalbl+2ηlalbl+2alblνl+2alblθl+4dlbl24bl2.
    Consequently, the analytical solutions of Equation (1) are indicated below:
    q(x,t)={A0+A1(z0(xk1t)+C2+b)}ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)={A0+A1(z0(xk1t)+C2+b)}ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The exact solutions (53) and (54) are considered with the parameters (18), (20), and (52) by takingl=1. The explicit solutions of Equation (2) are also recovered by takingl=2.
    Family–4: (z0=z3=0)
    Set–I:
    z1=2bz2, A1=A0=0, fl=(glhl)A14+24blz24A14,al=8z2bbl3,cl=4A12bz2(ηl+νl+θl+ϵl)3+(16b2(ζl+δl)z223dl)A12+72blb2z243A12.
    As a result, CQ straddled optical solitons with Equation (1) are retrieved:
    q(x,t)=A1[b+2b1+2C2b{cosh(2bz2(xk1t))sinh(2bz2(xk1t))}]×ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1},
    and
    r(x,t)=A1[b+2b1+2C2b{cosh(2bz2(xk1t))sinh(2bz2(xk1t))}]×ei{(k2+a14b1k1)ta14b1x+C1}.
    The CQ straddled optical solitons (56) and (57) are retrieved with the help of the parameter constraints (18), (20), and (55) by takingl=1. CQ straddled optical solitons with Equation (2) are also yielded by takingl=2.

    3. Conclusions

    The current work derived CQ optical solitons for the perturbed LPD model with differential group delay. The results are confined to dark, singular, and straddled solitons. Lie symmetry analysis yielded the ordinary differential equations that were integrated using Kudryashov’s scheme and the improved F-expansion procedure. These two approaches have visible shortcomings. They fail to recover the much–needed bright solitons, which are essential for handling soliton-propagation dynamics across intercontinental distances. Thus, in future additional integration, algorithms are to be implemented to obtain bright solitons for the governing model, which would enable one to paint a complete picture of the governing model. Moreover, the results of this work lead to additional studies, such as addressing the model with the aid of numerical schemes such as the variational iteration approach and Laplace–Adomian decomposition scheme. These results will soon be visible.

    Author Contributions

    Conceptualization, S.K. and D.H.A.-B.; methodology, H.M.A. and D.A.M.; software, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, L.M. and Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Funding

    This research received no external funding.

    Institutional Review Board Statement

    Not applicable.

    Informed Consent Statement

    Not applicable.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve the paper.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    References

    1. Ekici, M. Optical solitons in birefringent fibers for Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model by extended Jacobi’s elliptic function expansion scheme.Optik2018,172, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    2. Kudryashov, N.A. The Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model with arbitrary refractive index and its solution.Optik2021,241, 167043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    3. Serkin, V.N.; Belyaeva, T.L. Optimal control for soliton breathers of the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel, Hirota, and cmKdV models.Optik2018,175, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    4. Xin, H. Optical envelope patterns in nonlinear media modeled by the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel equation.Optik2021,227, 165839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    5. Kumar, S.; Biswas, A.; Zhou, Q.; Yildirim, Y.; Alshehri, H.M.; Belic, M.R. Straddled optical solitons for cubic–quartic Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model by Lie symmetry.Phys. Lett. A2021,417, 127706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    6. Vega–Guzman, J.; Biswas, A.; Kara, A.H.; Mahmood, M.F.; Ekici, M.; Alshehri, H.M.; Belic, M.R. Cubic–quartic optical soliton perturbation and conservation laws with Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model: Undetermined coefficients.J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater.2021,30, 2150007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    7. Yildirim, Y.; Topkara, E.; Biswas, A.; Triki, H.; Ekici, M.; Guggilla, P.; Khan, S.; Belic, M.R. Cubic–quartic optical soliton perturbation with Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model by sine–Gordon equation approach.J. Opt.2021,50, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    8. Bulut, H.; Pandir, Y.; Demiray, S.T. Exact solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation with dual power–law nonlinearity by extended trial equation method.Waves Random Complex Media2014,24, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
    9. Dan, J.; Sain, S.; Ghose-Choudhury, A.; Garai, S. Solitary wave solutions of nonlinear PDEs using Kudryashov’s R function method.J. Mod. Opt.2020,67, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    10. Guo, Q.; Liu, J. New exact solutions to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients.Results Phys.2020,16, 102857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    11. Islam, M.S.; Khan, K.; Arnous, A.H. Generalized Kudryashov method for solving some (3+1)–dimensional nonlinear evolution equations.New Trend Math. Sci.2015,3, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
    12. Kudryashov, N.A. First integrals and general solution of the traveling wave reduction for Schrödinger equation with anti–cubic nonlinearity.Optik2019,185, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    13. Wazwaz, A.M.; El–Tantawy, S.A. Optical Gaussons for nonlinear logarithmic Schrödinger equations via the variational iteration method.Optik2019,180, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    14. Bluman, G.; Stephen, A.Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
    15. Olver, P.J.Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
    16. Son, N.K.; Thieu, N.N.; Yen, N.D. On the solution existence for prox-regular perturbed sweeping processes.J. Nonlinear Var. Anal.2021,5, 851–863. [Google Scholar]
    17. Halik, A. Dynamics in a two species Lotka-Volterra cooperative system with the Crowley-Martin functional response.J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal.2021,2021, 36. [Google Scholar]
    Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

    Share and Cite

    MDPI and ACS Style

    Kumar, S.; Biswas, A.; Yıldırım, Y.; Moraru, L.; Moldovanu, S.; Alshehri, H.M.; Maturi, D.A.; Al-Bogami, D.H. Cubic–Quartic Optical Soliton Perturbation with Differential Group Delay for the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel Model by Lie Symmetry.Symmetry2022,14, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020224

    AMA Style

    Kumar S, Biswas A, Yıldırım Y, Moraru L, Moldovanu S, Alshehri HM, Maturi DA, Al-Bogami DH. Cubic–Quartic Optical Soliton Perturbation with Differential Group Delay for the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel Model by Lie Symmetry.Symmetry. 2022; 14(2):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020224

    Chicago/Turabian Style

    Kumar, Sachin, Anjan Biswas, Yakup Yıldırım, Luminita Moraru, Simona Moldovanu, Hashim M. Alshehri, Dalal Adnan Maturi, and Dalal H. Al-Bogami. 2022. "Cubic–Quartic Optical Soliton Perturbation with Differential Group Delay for the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel Model by Lie Symmetry"Symmetry 14, no. 2: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020224

    APA Style

    Kumar, S., Biswas, A., Yıldırım, Y., Moraru, L., Moldovanu, S., Alshehri, H. M., Maturi, D. A., & Al-Bogami, D. H. (2022). Cubic–Quartic Optical Soliton Perturbation with Differential Group Delay for the Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel Model by Lie Symmetry.Symmetry,14(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020224

    Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further detailshere.

    Article Metrics

    No
    No

    Article Access Statistics

    For more information on the journal statistics, clickhere.
    Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
    Symmetry, EISSN 2073-8994, Published by MDPI
    RSSContent Alert

    Further Information

    Article Processing Charges Pay an Invoice Open Access Policy Contact MDPI Jobs at MDPI

    Guidelines

    For Authors For Reviewers For Editors For Librarians For Publishers For Societies For Conference Organizers

    MDPI Initiatives

    Sciforum MDPI Books Preprints.org Scilit SciProfiles Encyclopedia JAMS Proceedings Series

    Follow MDPI

    LinkedIn Facebook X
    MDPI

    Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

    © 1996-2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated
    Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
    We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
    Read more about our cookieshere.
    Accept
    Back to TopTop
    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp