1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

Family Atypidae Thorell, 1870

GenusAtypus Latreille, 1804

Type species.Aranea subterranea Roemer, 1789; synonym ofAtypus piceus (Sulzer, 1776)

Diagnosis: It is worth noting that males of onlyAtypus in Atypidae possess marginal ridges of the sternum, a trait unique to this genus (Figure 3D) [5].

Atypus resemblesSphodros by having the labium fused to the sternum (Figure 1B) and possessing tubercles on the base of the fangs (Figure 3F andFigure 4E) but can be distinguished by the presence of a short, straight, spike-like embolus, and a short, straight and distally widened conductor in males (Figure 3E,G–K) (vs. the presence of a long, curved embolus and a long, curved conductor inSphodros) (see figures 25–26 in Gertsch and Platnick 1980 [5]); and by the presence of two lateral pore patches, and bulbous or pyriform receptacula with their bases separated in females (Figure 4F,G) (vs. without pore patches, but with four highly coiled receptacula and their bases fused in pairs) (see figures 29, 30 in Gertsch and Platnick 1980 [5]).

Atypus also resemblesCalommata by having a straight, spike-like embolus and a straight, broad, lobular conductor in males [5] but differs by the distally widened conductor, an almost rounded palpal bulb and an acuminate palpal cymbium in males (Figure 3E,G–K) (vs. a slender conductor, irregular palpal bulb and truncated palpal cymbium inCalommata) (see figure 6f in Li et al. 2022 [1]); and by receptacula without distinct granules in females (Figure 4) (vs. receptacula with granules, overall like cauliflowers inCalommata (see figure 7f–g in Li et al. 2022 [1]).

Atypus yaozu sp. nov. (瑶族地蛛)

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:38AD98C3-1F04-455E-B7CD-8F3C7F98B71C

Figure 2,Figure 3 andFigure 4

Type material. Holotype male (HNU1359): CHINA: Hunan Province, Chenzhou City, Yizhang County, Mangshan Town, Yaozu Village, 25.00° N, 112.83° E, 127 m a.s.l., 14 May 2024, YC Wu, Y. Liu, SX Zhu, W. Zhu, JM Fan leg.

Paratype: One female (HNU1360), same data as for holotype.

Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition and refers to the type locality, a village inhabited by the Yao ethnic minority.

Diagnosis: The male of this new species resembles that ofA. tibetensis Zhu et al. 2006 in the shape of the palpal bulb (cf.Figure 3E,G–K with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 108–110 [17]) but can be distinguished by the presence of a wide triangular space between the embolus and conductor in lateral views (Figure 3H–K), the first pair of sigilla being obviously larger than the second, and the fourth pair being oval and oriented vertically (Figure 3D) (vs. no apparent space between the embolus and conductor in lateral views, the first and second pairs of sigilla almost equal in size, and the fourth pair nearly top-shaped and inclined inA. tibetensis) (see figures 107–110 in Zhu et al. 2006 [17]). It also resemblesA. baotingensis Li et al. 2018 in the shape of the palpal bulb (cf.Figure 3E,G–K with Li et al. 2018: figure 2G–I [18]) but can be distinguished by a shorter embolus, whereas inA. baotingensis, the embolus longer and distinctly extends beyond the conductor.

Female of the new species resembles that ofA. jianfengensis Li et al. 2018 in the shape of the receptacula (cf.Figure 4F,G with Li et al. 2018: figure 4D–E [18]) but can be distinguished by the rectangular pore patches with rounded corners and the third pair of sigilla being oval (Figure 4D,F,G) (vs. large, rounded pore patches and teardrop-shaped third sigilla inA. jianfengensis) (see figure 4B, D–E in Li et al. 2018 [18]). It also resembles that ofA. largosaccatus Zhu et al. 2006 in the shape of the receptacula (cf.Figure 4F,G with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 42–43 [17]) but can be distinguished by the pore patches being rectangular with rounded corners, the median pair of receptacula larger than the lateral pair, and the first pair of sigilla positioned close to the anterior margin of the sternum (Figure 4D,F,G) (vs. small, rounded pore patches, receptacula equal in size, and the first pair of sigilla remote from the anterior sternal margin inA. largosaccatus) (see figures 41–43 in Zhu et al. 2006 [17]).

Figure 2. Microhabitat and general somatic morphology ofAtypus yaozu sp. nov. (A,B) microhabitat; (B) purse-web (red arrow indicates the position of the spider); (C) male holotype (HNU1359); (D) female (HNU1360). Scale bars: (C,D) 5 mm.

Figure 2. Microhabitat and general somatic morphology ofAtypus yaozu sp. nov. (A,B) microhabitat; (B) purse-web (red arrow indicates the position of the spider); (C) male holotype (HNU1359); (D) female (HNU1360). Scale bars: (C,D) 5 mm.

Description. Male (holotype). TL 10.70. CL 3.93, CW 3.57, AL 4.52, AW 2.96, FPC 1.50. Carapace brown (Figure 3C). Fovea transverse, occupying about 1/10 of carapace width at the same horizontal level, R1 0.38×. Radial grooves distinct (Figure 3C). Eye diameter and inter-distances: AME 0.25, ALE 0.21, PME 0.16, PLE 0.19; AME–AME 0.17, AME–ALE 0.11, PME–PME 0.62, PME–PLE 0.04. MOA 0.37, front width 0.64, back width 0.83. Labium wider than long (Figure 3D). Sternum reddish brown, 3.11 long, 2.26 wide, moderately rough, and clothed with fine black hairs. Sigilla deeply imprinted, DFS 0.82, WFS 0.18, with the second pair irregular and smallest, others oval, R2 4.5× (Figure 3D). Chelicerae brown, with 13 teeth on promargin arranged in a single row, the basal two fairly small and the fifth distal one noticeably smaller than the others (Figure 3F).

Abdomen dark brown, pyriform, with the dorsal scutum gloss black occupying about 7/10 of abdomen length (Figure 3A,B). Six spinnerets: ALS 0.32 long, PMS 0.56 long, four-segmented PLS with lengths as follows: basal 0.30, median 0.38, subapical 0.23, apical 0.40, total 1.31.

Legs slender, greenish brown, with coxae and trochanters reddish brown (Figure 2C). Spines present on all metatarsi; metatarsus IV with 16 ventral spines. Leg formula: 1423. Leg lengths are provided inTable 1.

Male palp (Figure 3E,G–K): upper corner small, lower distal corner triangular, distal margin of conductor strongly curved; embolus thin, with a wide triangular space between bases of itself and conductor in lateral views.

Figure 3. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus yaozu sp. nov. male holotype (HNU1359). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left palpal, prolateral view; (F) left chelicera, inner-lateral view (“t” means tubercles); (G) left palpal, retrolateral view; (H) left palpal bulb, prolateral view (“udc” means upper distal corner, “ldc” means lower distal corner); (I) same, ventral view; (J) same, retrolateral view (red arrow indicates the wide triangular space between bases of embolus and conductor in lateral views); (K) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–G) 1 mm; (H–K) 0.2 mm.

Figure 3. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus yaozu sp. nov. male holotype (HNU1359). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left palpal, prolateral view; (F) left chelicera, inner-lateral view (“t” means tubercles); (G) left palpal, retrolateral view; (H) left palpal bulb, prolateral view (“udc” means upper distal corner, “ldc” means lower distal corner); (I) same, ventral view; (J) same, retrolateral view (red arrow indicates the wide triangular space between bases of embolus and conductor in lateral views); (K) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–G) 1 mm; (H–K) 0.2 mm.

Female (paratype). TL 17.38. CL 4.96, CW 6.29, AL 8.75, AW 5.14, FPC 2.03. Carapace reddish brown (Figure 4C). Fovea transverse, occupying about 2/9 of the carapace width at the same horizontal level, R1 0.41×. Eye diameter and inter-distances: AME 0.35, ALE 0.27, PME 0.20, PLE 0.23; AME–AME 0.19, AME–ALE 0.21, PME–PME 0.97, PME–PLE 0.04. MOA 0.45 long, front width 0.88, back width 1.50. Labium wider than long (Figure 4D). Sternum reddish brown, 4.96 long, 3.95 wide, smooth, and clothed with fine black hairs. Sigilla slightly concave, DFS 1.28, WFS 0.49, with the first pair irregular in shape, the fourth pair oval and separated from each other by their longitudinal diameter; R2 2.6× (Figure 4D). Chelicerae reddish brown, with 13 teeth on promargin in a single row and the first and fourth ones extremely small (Figure 4E).

Figure 4. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus yaozu sp. nov. female (HNU1360). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left chelicera, inner-lateral view (“t” means tubercles); (F) vulva, ventral view; (G) same, dorsal view (“r” means receptaculum, “bs” means basal stalk, “lpp” means lateral pore patch). Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–E) 1 mm; (F,G) 0.5 mm.

Figure 4. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus yaozu sp. nov. female (HNU1360). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left chelicera, inner-lateral view (“t” means tubercles); (F) vulva, ventral view; (G) same, dorsal view (“r” means receptaculum, “bs” means basal stalk, “lpp” means lateral pore patch). Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–E) 1 mm; (F,G) 0.5 mm.

Abdomen pyriform and dark brown (Figure 4A,B). Six spinnerets: ALS 0.53 long, PMS 0.69 long, four-segmented PLS with lengths as follows: basal 0.62, median 0.53, subapical 0.50, apical 0.91, total 2.56.

Legs stronger than those of the male, reddish brown (Figure 2D). Spines present on all metatarsi; metatarsus IV with 13 ventral spines. Leg formula: 4123. Leg lengths are provided inTable 2.

Vulva (Figure 4F,G): Two lateral pore patches rectangular, with rounded corners; receptacula pyriform, with obvious basal stalks and the median pair larger than the lateral pair.

Habitat. Purse-webs were found attached to tea plants.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality, Yaozu Village (Yizhang County, Hunan Province, China).

Atypus siyiensis sp. nov. (泗义地蛛)

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1F093142-6AB5-42D6-A56C-4AFF284FD6F0

Figure 5,Figure 6 andFigure 7

Type material. Holotype female (HNU1352): CHINA: Sichuan Province, Chengdu City, Xindu District, Siyi Village, 30.80° N, 104.20° E, 53 m a.s.l., 18 October 2023, YC Wu leg.

Paratypes. Four females (HNU1354—HNU1357) and one male (HNU1353), same data as for holotype. One female (HNU1358), CHINA: Sichuan Province, Bazhong City, Nanjiang County, Guangwushan Town, Guangwushan Tourist Scenic Area, 32.68° N, 106.77° E, 1013 m a.s.l., 3 June 2022, AL He, JX Liu, ZG Huang, Y. Liang, Y. Hui, YL Wen, Y. Liu leg.

Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality.

Diagnosis: The female of the new species resembles that ofA. suiningensis Zhang 1985 in the shape of the receptacula (cf.Figure 6F–H with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 90–92 [17]) but can be distinguished by the spherical median pair of receptacula, the presence of prominent basal stalks, the anterior and posterior median eyes being almost equal in size, and the posterior edge of the sternum is not embedded between the bases of the fourth pair of legs (Figure 6C,D,F–H) (vs. all four receptacula pyriform and nearly equal in size, without prominent basal stalks, the anterior median eyes significantly larger than the posterior median eyes, and the posterior edge of the sternum slightly embedded between the bases of the fourth pair of legs inA. suiningensis) (see figures 87, 89–92 in Zhu et al. 2006 [17]).

Male of the new species resembles those ofA. suiningensis andA. sinensis Schenkel 1953 in the shape of their palpal bulb (cf.Figure 7D–I with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 95–98 [17] and Zhu et al. 2006: figures 83–86 [17]). It can be distinguished fromA. suiningensis by the conductor not wrapping around the embolus and the presence of an angle between conductor and embolus (cf.Figure 7D–I with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 95–98 [17]). It differs fromA. sinensis by the latter having a thicker embolus, the first pair of sigilla positioned significantly closer to the margin of the sternum and the third pair of sigilla relatively bigger (cf.Figure 7B,D–I with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 82–86 [17]).

Figure 5. Microhabitat and general somatic morphology ofAtypus siyiensis sp. nov. (A) purse-web (see red arrow point); (B,D) male (HNU1353); (C,E) female holotype (HNU1352). Scale bars: (B–E) 5 mm.

Figure 5. Microhabitat and general somatic morphology ofAtypus siyiensis sp. nov. (A) purse-web (see red arrow point); (B,D) male (HNU1353); (C,E) female holotype (HNU1352). Scale bars: (B–E) 5 mm.

Description. Female (holotype). TL 13.94. CL 5.05, CW 5.27, AL 5.51, AW 3.93, FPC 1.68. Carapace yellow brown (Figure 6C). Fovea transverse, occupying about 1/6 of carapace width at the same horizontal level, R1 0.33×, Radial grooves distinct (Figure 6C). Eye diameter and inter-distances: AME 0.23, ALE 0.27, PME 0.20, PLE 0.21; AME–AME 0.34, AME–ALE 0.26, PME–PME 1.01, PME–PLE 0.04. MOA 0.50 long, front width 0.82, back width 1.27. Labium wider than long (Figure 6D). Sternum reddish brown, 4.17 long, 3.75 wide, moderately rough, and clothed with fine black hairs. Sigilla deeply imprinted, DFS 1.18, WFS 0.59, with the second pair rounded, the third pair teardrop-shaped, and the posterior pair oval, larger than other pairs, separated by nearly their transverse diameter; R2 2× (Figure 6D). Chelicerae yellow brown, with 16 teeth on promargin in a single row, the basal three fairly small (Figure 6E).

Abdomen oval, brownish, with indistinct oval dorsal scutum on anterior half (Figure 6A,B). Six spinnerets: ALS 0.68 long, PMS 1.02 long, four-segmented PLS with lengths as follows: basal 0.71, median 0.61, subapical 0.65, apical 0.57, total 2.54.

Legs stronger than those of the male, yellow brown (Figure 5C–E). Spines present on all metatarsi; metatarsus IV with 12 ventral spines. Leg formula: 4123. Leg lengths are provided inTable 3.

Figure 6. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus siyiensis sp. nov. (A–E,G,H) female holotype (HNU1352); (F) (HNU1358). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (F,G) vulva, ventral view; (H) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–E) 1 mm; (F–H) 0.5 mm.

Figure 6. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus siyiensis sp. nov. (A–E,G,H) female holotype (HNU1352); (F) (HNU1358). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (F,G) vulva, ventral view; (H) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–E) 1 mm; (F–H) 0.5 mm.

Vulva (Figure 6F–H): pore patches oval; receptacula attached to anterior edge of atrium; the anterior margins of lateral and median receptacula on two different horizontal lines; median receptacula with obvious basal stalks, and more rounded than lateral ones.

Male (holotype). CL 5.42, CW 5.05, FPC 1.75. Carapace black brown (Figure 7A). Fovea transverse, occupying about 2/11 of carapace width at the same horizontal level, R1 0.32x. Radial grooves distinct (Figure 7A). Eye diameter and inter-distances: AME 0.32, ALE 0.27, PME 0.20, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.26, AME–ALE 0.21, PME–PME 0.85, PME–PLE 0.04. MOA 0.55 long, front width 0.83, back width 1.08. Labium wider than long (Figure 7B). Sternum reddish brown, 3.81 long, 3.56 wide, relatively smooth, with sparsely distributed fine hairs. Sigilla deeply imprinted, DFS 1.08, WFS 0.49; second pair small and rounded; third pair olive-shaped; posterior pair oval, much bigger than other pairs, R2 2.2× (Figure 7B). Chelicerae black brown, with 19 teeth on promargin in a single row, the basal three fairly small (Figure 7C).

Abdomen dark brown, oval, with dorsal scutum gloss black, occupying about 3/4 of abdomen length (Figure 5B).

Legs slender in red grey (Figure 5B,D).

Male palp (Figure 7D–I): long conductor with a triangular folded part of its upper corner in retrolateral view; embolus long, thin spike.

Figure 7. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus siyiensis sp. nov. male (HNU1353). (A) carapace, dorsal view; (B) labium and sternum, ventral view; (C) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (D) left palpal, prolateral view; (E) same, retrolateral view; (F) left palpal bulb, prolateral view; (G) same, ventral view; (H) same, retrolateral view; (I) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A–E) 1 mm; (F–I) 0.2 mm.

Figure 7. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus siyiensis sp. nov. male (HNU1353). (A) carapace, dorsal view; (B) labium and sternum, ventral view; (C) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (D) left palpal, prolateral view; (E) same, retrolateral view; (F) left palpal bulb, prolateral view; (G) same, ventral view; (H) same, retrolateral view; (I) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A–E) 1 mm; (F–I) 0.2 mm.

Variation. Size range of females: carapace length 3.39–5.05, carapace width 4.65–5.27, total length 12.27–14.64, n = 6.

Habitat. Purse-webs were found attached to shrubs.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality, Sichuan, China.

Remarks. Due to the fact that the sole male specimen ofA. siyiensis sp. nov. was consumed by a female during mating experiments, we are unable to provide as extensive morphological photos as we have for the male ofA. yaozu sp. nov. Despite the incomplete male specimen, this does not detract from our assessment that the male and female specimens belong to the same species. Based on the K2P model, the pairwise distance between the female holotype and male specimens is 1.35%, and based on thep-distance model, it is 1.34%, both of which support the conclusion that these specimens of different sexes belong to the same species. Additionally, specimens of both sexes were collected from the same location at the same time.

Atypus yanjingensis sp. nov. (盐井地蛛)

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:997E0C76-1812-4B8E-9EE3-14E11C748677

Figure 8,Figure 9 andFigure 10

Type material. Holotype female (HNU1361): CHINA: Hunan Province, Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Yongshun County, Yanjing Village, 28.94° N, 109.73° E, 289 m a.s.l., 23 June 2024, YC Wu, Y. Liu, SX Zhu leg.

Paratypes. Five females (HNU1363—HNU1367) and one male (HNU1362), same data as for holotype.

Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality.

Figure 8. Microhabitat and general somatic morphology ofAtypus yanjingensis sp. nov. (A,B) microhabitat; (B) purse-web (see red arrow point); (C) male (HNU1362); (D) female holotype (HNU1361). Scale bars: (C,D) 5 mm.

Figure 8. Microhabitat and general somatic morphology ofAtypus yanjingensis sp. nov. (A,B) microhabitat; (B) purse-web (see red arrow point); (C) male (HNU1362); (D) female holotype (HNU1361). Scale bars: (C,D) 5 mm.

Diagnosis: The female of the new species resembles those ofA. jianfengensis andA. pedicellatus Zhu et al. 2006 in the shape of the receptacula (cf.Figure 9F,G with Li et al. 2018: figure 4D–E [18] and Zhu et al. 2006: figures 59–62 [17]) but can be distinguished by the shorter basal stalks of the median pair of receptacula and the first pair of sigilla being especially close to the margin of the sternum (Figure 9D,F,G) (vs. the basal stalks of the median pair of receptacula being noticeably longer and the first pair of sigilla not as close to the margin of the sternum in bothA. jianfengensis andA. pedicellatus) (see figure 4B,D–E in Li et al. 2018 [18] and figures 58–62 in Zhu et al. 2006 [17]).

Male of the new species closely resembles that ofA. pedicellatus in the shape of their palpal organ (cf.Figure 10B–G with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 65–67 [17]) but can be distinguished by the particularly low upper distal corner of the conductor and the strongly curved distal margin of the conductor (cf.Figure 10B–G with Zhu et al. 2006: figures 65–67 [17]).

Figure 9. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus yanjingensis sp. nov. female holotype (HNU1361). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (F) vulva, ventral view; (G) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–E) 1 mm; (F,G) 0.5 mm.

Figure 9. General somatic morphology and genital anatomy ofAtypus yanjingensis sp. nov. female holotype (HNU1361). (A,B) habitus; (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; (C) carapace, dorsal view; (D) labium and sternum, ventral view; (E) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (F) vulva, ventral view; (G) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A,B) 5 mm; (C–E) 1 mm; (F,G) 0.5 mm.

Description. Female (holotype). TL 19.26. CL 5.02, CW 5.09, AL 9.60, AW 6.68, FPC 1.78. Carapace yellow brown (Figure 9C). Fovea transverse, occupying about 1/5 of carapace width at the same horizontal level, R1 0.35x. Radial grooves distinct (Figure 9C). Eye diameter and inter-distances: AME 0.31, ALE 0.22, PME 0.19, PLE 0.24; AME–AME 0.30, AME–ALE 0.18, PME–PME 1.06, PME–PLE 0.04. MOA 0.52 long, front width 0.92, back width 1.57. Labium wider than long (Figure 9D). Sternum orange brown, 4.65 long, 3.98 wide, relatively smooth, covered with fine black hairs. Sigilla deeply impressed, DFS 1.26, WFS 0.47; first pair positioned close to the margin of the sternum; second pair rounded; third pair elongated oval; posterior pair oval, larger than other pairs, separated by nearly their transverse diameter, R2 2.7× (Figure 9D). Chelicerae yellow brown, with 17 teeth on promargin in a single row, the basal one fairly small, with the first and seventh distal ones being relatively small (Figure 9E).

Abdomen oval, brownish, with distinct oval cardiac mark on anterior half (Figure 9A). Six spinnerets: ALS 0.56 long, PMS 1.20 long, four-segmented PLS with lengths as follows: basal 1.08, median 0.93, subapical 0.72, apical 0.79, total 3.52.

Legs stronger than those of the male, yellow brown (Figure 8D). Spines present on all metatarsi; metatarsus IV with 12 dorsal spines. Leg formula: 4123. Leg lengths are provided inTable 4.

Vulva (Figure 9F,G): pore patches large, rounded; lateral receptacula more rounded than median ones, both with distinct basal stalks; basal stalks of median receptacula longer than those of lateral ones, and all receptacula with their anterior margins almost on the same horizontal line.

Figure 10. Chelicera and genital anatomy ofAtypus yanjingensis sp. nov. male (HNU1362). (A) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (B) left palpal, prolateral view; (C) same, retrolateral view; (D) left palpal bulb, prolateral view (red arrow indicates the triangular space between bases of embolus and conductor in lateral views); (E) same, ventral view; (F) same, retrolateral view; (G) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A–C) 1 mm; (D–G) 0.2 mm.

Figure 10. Chelicera and genital anatomy ofAtypus yanjingensis sp. nov. male (HNU1362). (A) left chelicera, inner-lateral view; (B) left palpal, prolateral view; (C) same, retrolateral view; (D) left palpal bulb, prolateral view (red arrow indicates the triangular space between bases of embolus and conductor in lateral views); (E) same, ventral view; (F) same, retrolateral view; (G) same, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A–C) 1 mm; (D–G) 0.2 mm.

Male (paratype). Carapace and chelicerae black brown (Figure 8C). Abdomen dark brown, oval, with dorsal scutum gloss black, occupying nearly 4/5 of abdomen length (Figure 8C).

Male palp (Figure 10B–G): upper distal corner of the conductor particularly low, distal margin of the conductor strongly curved; embolus long, thin spike with a small triangular space between embolus and conductor in lateral views.

Variation. Size range of females: carapace length 3.98–5.45, carapace width 4.33–5.09, total length 13.47–19.26, n = 6.

Habitat. Purse-webs were found attached to shrubs.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality, Yanjing Village (Yongshun County, Hunan Province, China).

Remarks. Male of this new species had the same situation as that ofA. siyiensis sp. nov., consumed by a female. The pairwise distance between the female holotype ofA. yanjingensis sp. nov. and the male is 0.65% based on the K2P model and 0.64% based on thep-distance model, supporting the conclusion that the male and female specimens belong to the same species. The specimens of two sexes were collected from the same location at the same time.

3.3. Natural History

3.3.1. Web-Weaving

Atypus spiders live in underground burrows lined with silk and their silken tubes extend above ground (Figure 2B andFigure 11G). These tubes are typically anchored to nearby plant stems, walls or other available supports. The purse-web often begins at or just below the ground surface, where the spider excavates a small burrow, and weaves a longitudinally layer of silk around the surface of upright supports (Figure 11A,B). The spider reinforces the structure by repeatedly weaving silk vertically, section by section, extending upward along the tree (or other support) to form a distinct, tough silken tube (Figure 11B–E). This structure acts as a protective barrier, shielding the spider from harsh weather and predators while also serving as a trap for passing insects. According to our observation, an adult spider can complete a well-formed tube in just one day.

The above-ground section of the tube is typically camouflaged with small bits of moss, grass, or soil from the immediate surroundings (Figure 11E). We generally believed that these soil particles, mosses, etc. are caused by passing insects or other factors over time. However, in reality, they are attached by spiders during the process of weaving webs, at least according to our laboratory observations (excluding other factors). At the same time, we also believe that it is possible for the influence of insects or other factors to further enhance camouflage in the wild.

Figure 11. Web-weaving behavior ofAtypus spiders. (A–E) weaving process; (F) new web and discarded old web (red arrow indicates the old web); (G) a complete tube (red box indicates the above-ground section, white box indicates the underground section); (H,I) soil pushed next to the above-ground section of the tube as it extends downward (red circle in (I) indicates the soil pushed out).

Figure 11. Web-weaving behavior ofAtypus spiders. (A–E) weaving process; (F) new web and discarded old web (red arrow indicates the old web); (G) a complete tube (red box indicates the above-ground section, white box indicates the underground section); (H,I) soil pushed next to the above-ground section of the tube as it extends downward (red circle in (I) indicates the soil pushed out).

In our field collecting and laboratory rearing, we have observed that all purse-webs ofAtypus spiders are consistently vertical to the ground against support (Figure 2B andFigure 11G,H), without exception. However, a contrasting observation was also reported in the literature, where the purse-webs were found lying flat on the ground (see figure 4D–F in Řezáč et al. 2022 [24]), although this situation is rarely documented. Gertsch and Platnick [5] previously suggested that purse-web orientation could differentiateAtypus (horizontal webs) fromSphodros (found only in North America and constructing vertical webs). Nonetheless, Schwendinger [25] later demonstrated that both genera have the ability to construct webs in either orientation. More recently, Řezáč et al. [24] proposed that this orientation is influenced by various environmental factors, including the availability of supports, camouflage needs, and prey accessibility.

Small piles of soil are occasionally found next to the above-ground section of the tube, indicating that the tube is likely being extended or deepened (Figure 11H,I). The spider is usually positioned at the base of the tube, with its head pointing upwards. These burrows are commonly found on sunny slopes, where the above-ground section of the web is exposed to sunlight. The entrance is located at the end of the above-ground portion, with the side attached to support being higher and the opposite side (free side) lower, potentially aiding in preventing water from flooding the burrow during rain.

The length of the above-ground section is more variable compared to the underground part. Based on the limited data, we think that the length of the web is not correlated with spider body size, and we guess that it may be correlated to the duration of the spider’s residence within it. The longer the spider resides in the web, the more it reinforces and extends the structure, resulting in a progressively longer web. Additionally, the length of the web may also be influenced by the abundance of prey in the environment. When prey near the base of the tree is insufficient to meet the spider’s dietary needs, the web may continue to extend upward to increase hunting opportunities. Previously, Řezáč et al. [24] also reported that web length (both subterranean and above-ground) and the ratio of subterranean to above-ground segments were not correlated with spider body size. The longest recorded purse-web to date features an above-ground section measuring 64.5 cm and an underground section measuring 14 cm, giving it a total length of 78.5 cm and a diameter of 21 mm [26].

Although there is no evidence to support a correlation between web length and spider size, web diameter does indeed show to be related to body size. As a spider ages, its purse-web increases in both size and toughness, with the tube diameter expanding proportionally to the spider’s growth. Rather than expanding the diameter of the existing web to accommodate its growing bodies, the spider constructs a new web. This process begins with the spider making a longitudinal cut in the above-ground portion of the old web. Then, it emerges and starts building a new web either against or next to the old one. The spider continues to reside in the old web until the new one is completed. Once the new web is finished, the spider abandons the old one (Figure 11F).

3.3.2. Predatory Strategy

Atypus species weave numerous irregular silk lines around the aerial tube. When insects or other small animals approach and touch these lines, the vibrations they produce alert the spider inside the tube. The spider then positions itself beneath the prey and keeps a longitudinal distance from the prey outside, assessing whether to attack. If the approaching prey is small and moves slowly, the spider usually initiates a predatory response. However, if the prey is significantly larger or moves rapidly, the spider generally refrains from attacking. The spider’s decision to hunt or not is also influenced by its condition; for instance, well-fed spiders are less likely to attack, and female spiders that have recently mated may mistake approaching males as prey.

After carefully assessing the situation, if the spider decides to attack the insects or other small animals crawling over the aerial tube, it swiftly pierces through the silk web and impales the prey with its long, slender fangs (Figure 12D,E). Then, it enlarges the silk opening just enough to drag the prey inside. Once inside, it injects venom through its fangs to paralyze the prey, wraps it in silk, and repairs the torn section of the tube before consuming its meal. After feeding, the spider uses its cheliceral fangs to expel the remains (usually the exoskeleton) of the prey from the silk tube through a temporary opening in minority cases or the entrance at the top of the tube in majority cases (Figure 12F,G). Remnants of previous prey are usually found just outside the entrance in both field and laboratory settings (Figure 12A).

The remarkable and unique predatory technique ofAtypus spiders was first demonstrated by Enock [27]: “The spider lies in ambush within or near the aerial portion of its tubular web. Upon sensing prey, it swiftly pierces the web with its long fangs to capture it. The prey is then secured with silk threads. In most cases, the spider begins repairing the torn web shortly after immobilizing the prey, pulling the torn edges together and spinning silk across the rent. However, in some instances, the spider may prioritize feeding and delay repairing the web for up to a day. After consuming the prey, the spider discards the remnants outside the tube, and prey fragments can often be observed attached to the web surface.” This predatory behavior has been corroborated many times since [5,15,16,27,28,29,30]; our observations have not only confirmed these findings but also provided additional details.

3.3.3. Defecation Behavior

Atypids never defecate within their silk tube. Instead, they move cautiously toward the top entrance, progressing slowly and intermittently while frequently pausing to assess their surroundings for potential threats. Upon reaching the entrance, they deftly use their forefoot to gently open it. Then, with a swift motion, they turn their bodies and position the end of their abdomen towards the opening. Slowly extending the end of their abdomen outward, they swiftly eject white liquid from their anus (Figure 12H,I). The ejected droppings solidify within minutes after being expelled.

3.3.4. Defensive Behavior

Atypus spiders are typically sedentary, residing within their tube webs to await and ambush approaching prey (Figure 13A). Their unique silk tubes not only serve as dwellings but also facilitate an extraordinary defensive mechanism. In the event of an attack originating from above within the web, these spiders swiftly descend into the subterranean portion of their web and utilize their chelicerae to grasp and twist a section of the silk, effectively sealing off the lower region of the tube from the threat (Figure 13B). This strategy isolates them from danger and evades potential attacks.

Attempts to displaceAtypus spiders from their webs often are not easy. They strive to retreat deeper into their webs, even if the structure has been torn into fragmented sections, and they still diligently attempt to repair it (Figure 13G,H).

When forcibly removed from their webs and provoked with a stick or tweezers, the spiders adopt a defensive stance, raising their chelicerae high in a threatening posture (Figure 13I). Direct contact with tweezers elicits an immediate response: the spiders latch onto the tool with their fangs (Figure 13J), a behavior also observed during their prey-hunting activities. In multi-spider encounters, they utilize their fangs to intimidate or defend against one another (Figure 13E,F), typically in response to the proximity of other spiders rather than as an aggressive act.

3.3.5. Life-History

In mid-May in southern China, male specimens undergo their final molt, marking the onset of sexual maturity. During this period, mature males can be collected in the field, along with some freshly molted, incompletely developed males are also found. In natural settings, males reach maturity between mid-May and early June and subsequently leave their webs to seek females for mating. By mid- to late-June, a portion of the females (although no specific data can be provided) have already mated, and mature males can rarely or hardly be collected in the field. Additionally, during this period, some tubes were found empty, further indicating the males’ departure. In laboratory conditions, collected females, regardless of their maturity, burrow and weave new purse-webs. However, mature males exhibit different behavior: they no longer burrow or weave complete purse-webs, although they retain the ability to produce silk. Interestingly, if a pit is dug in advance under laboratory conditions, mature males will spin silk and weave very thin, tubular webs within the pit (Figure 14L). It is noteworthy that these webs do not extend upwards beyond the excavation plane. These behaviors of mature male spiders are believed to be energy-saving strategies for the upcoming mating season. Furthermore, our observations indicate that all male spiders cease feeding after reaching maturity.

After mating, the female may kill the male or allow him to coexist peacefully in her tube. Our observations indicate that this coexistence can last up to 22 days. However, longer durations have been reported, with Gertsch and Platnick [5] noting periods of several months and Hiebsch and Krause [29] recording coexistence of up to nine months inside the tubes of their mates inAtypus affinis. Following this period, the adult female lays her eggs. The number of eggs typically ranges between 150 and 200 in our observations, with a record of up to 441 eggs noted by Schwendinger [2]. These eggs are carefully placed in an olive-shaped sac, which is usually suspended just inside the underground section of the tube. The sac is securely attached to the nest wall at both ends by thin stalks, ensuring it remains firmly fixed to one side of the tube (seeFigure 14A,B). Additionally, we have observed thatAtypus spiders continue to molt even after laying their eggs.

From August, the young hatch but remain in the tube, guarded by their mother (Figure 14C). They overwinter in the maternal tube (Figure 14F,G) and disperse to start their own burrows in the following spring. Approximately 15–16 days after the eggs are laid, the spiderlings hatch as first instar juveniles. At this early stage of development, the spiderlings’ cephalothorax and legs emerge from the eggs, while the original eggs form the abdomens. Notably, the abdomen is significantly larger than the cephalothorax at this point (Figure 15B,C). These first instar juveniles are highly sensitive to light, have limited mobility, and are characterized by constricted chelicerae. Upon being removed from the egg sac, they tend to cluster together and retreat into the tube for shelter (Figure 14D). If exposed without shelter, they burrow into the soil and become less active, which could severely reduce their survival rate. Our observations also reveal that spiderlings are capable of hatching from the web even in the absence of their mother, indicating that her presence is not essential for hatching. Eggs taken from the sac can successfully hatch under artificial conditions, provided that the web’s cover is retained to maintain a dark environment and sufficient moisture. It is possible that other substitute coverings could yield similar results, although this was not tested in our study. Remarkably, even in the absence of their mother, the juveniles are capable of completing subsequent molts without feeding until they reach the third instar, presumably due to the nutrients stored in their disproportionately large abdomens.

Figure 14. Developmental stages and dispersal behavior ofAtypus spiders. (A) spider in the tube (red arrow indicates the egg sac); (B) female spider with her egg sac; (C) female spider with newly hatched first instar juveniles; (D) first instar juveniles hiding in the web; (E) the exuviae pushed out of the tube (red arrow indicates the exuviae); (F,G) juveniles living inside the maternal web; (H) early instar juveniles dispersing by “gossamer”; (I) relatively complete web woven by a third instarAtypus spider; (J,K) tubular webs woven by post-third instar juveniles: (J) photographed under laboratory conditions; (K) photographed under natural conditions; (L) thin tubular web woven by a maleAtypus spider.

Figure 14. Developmental stages and dispersal behavior ofAtypus spiders. (A) spider in the tube (red arrow indicates the egg sac); (B) female spider with her egg sac; (C) female spider with newly hatched first instar juveniles; (D) first instar juveniles hiding in the web; (E) the exuviae pushed out of the tube (red arrow indicates the exuviae); (F,G) juveniles living inside the maternal web; (H) early instar juveniles dispersing by “gossamer”; (I) relatively complete web woven by a third instarAtypus spider; (J,K) tubular webs woven by post-third instar juveniles: (J) photographed under laboratory conditions; (K) photographed under natural conditions; (L) thin tubular web woven by a maleAtypus spider.

About two weeks after hatching of eggs, the first true molt occurs, developing to the stage of second instar juveniles. At this stage, the mother spider pushes the shed skin (exuviae) and the empty egg sac out of the tube (Figure 14E). Second instar juveniles display slight pigmentation that gradually darkens over time (Figure 15D), and their mobility also improves. They started producing silk, though they had not yet formed extensive webs. Both first and second instar juveniles do not require food, likely due to their underdeveloped structures and limited predatory capabilities.

Figure 15. Changes in appearance from egg to third instar juvenile. (A) egg; (B) egg in the process of hatching (red arrow indicates legs extending from the egg); (C) first instar juvenile, dorsal view; (D) second instar juvenile, dorsal view; (E) third instar juvenile, dorsal view; (F) third instar juvenile after one month, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A–F) 0.5 mm.

Figure 15. Changes in appearance from egg to third instar juvenile. (A) egg; (B) egg in the process of hatching (red arrow indicates legs extending from the egg); (C) first instar juvenile, dorsal view; (D) second instar juvenile, dorsal view; (E) third instar juvenile, dorsal view; (F) third instar juvenile after one month, dorsal view. Scale bars: (A–F) 0.5 mm.

Approximately three weeks after the previous molt, the spider undergoes another molt within the maternal tube web. During this process, the spider remains stationary as its old exoskeleton gradually separates. The old carapace visibly lifts from the cephalothorax, while distinct wrinkles appear on the abdomen (Figure 16A,B). About 20 min into the process, the old exoskeleton suddenly splits open along the margins of both the carapace and abdomen, with the old dorsal exoskeleton of the carapace connected to that of the abdomen by the pedicel (Figure 16C). Following this, the spider’s body begins to bend towards its ventral side and then bends more strongly, aiding in the emergence of the body from the old exoskeleton. Subsequently, legs and chelicerae gradually emerge (Figure 16E–I). Simultaneously, the abdominal exoskeleton loosens and peels away. Once the tarsi, chelicera fangs, and spinnerets are freed from the old exoskeleton, the molting process concludes, lasting approximately 50 min in total molting. After molting, the spider typically lies on its back but regains a normal position (with its back up) within a few minutes, becoming mobile (Figure 16K,L). Just after molting, the cephalothorax, chelicerae and legs appear transparent, but they gradually darken over time due to pigmentation—a phenomenon consistently observed inAtypus spiders before they reach maturity (Figure 16M).

By the third instar (after undergoing two molts), the juveniles have developed noticeably darker pigmentation (Figure 15E) and can construct more robust webs (Figure 14I), although they are still thinner than those of adult spiders. At this stage, they begin to feed. Changes in appearance from egg to third instar juvenile are provided inFigure 15. Juveniles after the third instar, when removed from the maternal web and reared individually, are capable of weaving their own tubular webs (Figure 14J). However, under natural conditions, juveniles at this stage typically remain within the maternal web until the following spring. This behavior may be attributed to the cold winter season, which is not conducive to juvenile dispersal.

Early instar juveniles disperse by “gossamer” (Figure 14H), a phenomenon described by Enock [27] as the “ballooning of juveniles”. The juveniles leave the maternal tube in single file, leaving a silk dragline as they follow one another up into bushes or trees, where they begin constructing small purse-webs of their own (Figure 14K).

The number of molts that anAtypus spider undergoes before reaching maturity remains uncertain. However, it has been established that male spiders do not feed after maturity and have a relatively short lifespan, while mature female spiders continue to molt and have a longer lifespan. Under laboratory conditions, we have recorded instances where a male spider lived for approximately two months (from 19 January 2024 to 24 March 2024) after its last molt. In another case, a female spider was raised for about seven years (after being collected from the field). Based on this, the literature mentioned above that female spiders can live for up to 8–10 years [2] is reliable.

Remarks: The timing of mating, egg-laying, juvenile hatching, molting and maturation inAtypus spiders appears to vary with local climate and species differences, as evidenced by variations observed amongAtypus specimens collected from different regions. For instance, some males have been observed to mature as early as February.

4. Discussion

Abbreviations

References

1. Li, F.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F.; Yang, Z.; Li, D. Multilocus Species Delimitation and Phylogeny of the GenusCalommata (Araneae, Atypidae) in Southern China.Zool. Scr.2022,51, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Schwendinger, P.J. A Synopsis of the GenusAtypus (Araneae, Atypidae).Zool. Scr.1990,19, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Jocqué, R.; Dippenaar-Schoeman, A.S.Spider Families of the World; Royal Museum for Central Africa: Tervuren, Belgium, 2006. [Google Scholar]
4. Fourie, R.; Haddad, C.; Jocqué, R. A Revision of the Purse-Web Spider GenusCalommata Lucas, 1837 (Araneae, Atypidae) in the Afrotropical Region.Zookeys2011,95, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Gertsch, W.J.; Platnick, N.I. A Revision of the American Spiders of the Family Atypidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae).Am. Mus. Novit.1980,2704, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
6. Walckenaer, C.A. Mémoire sur une nouvelle espèce de Mygale, sur les théraphoses et les divers genres dont se compose cette tribu d’Aranéides.Ann. De La Société Entomol. De Fr.1835,4, 637–651. [Google Scholar]
7. World Spider Catalog. World Spider Catalog.Natural History Museum Bern. Version 25.5. 2025. Available online:http://wsc.nmbe.ch (accessed on 1 February 2025).
8. Simon, E. Etudes Arachnologiques. Note Sur Trois Espèces Françaises Du GenreAtypus Latr.Ann. De La Société Entomol. De Fr.1873,3, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
9. Thorell, T. On European Spiders. Review of the European Genera of Spiders, Preceded by Some Observations on Zoological Nomenclature [Second Part].Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Ups.1870,7, 109–242. [Google Scholar]
10. Bertkau, P. Versuch Einer Natürlichen Anordnung Der Spinnen, Nebst Bemerkungen Zu Einzelnen Gattungen.Arch. Für Naturgeschichte1878,44, 351–410. [Google Scholar]
11. Thorell, T. Studi sui ragni Malesi e Papuani.Ann. Del Mus. Civ. Di Stor. Nat. Di Genova1890,28, 5–421. [Google Scholar]
12. Simon, E.Histoire Naturelle Des Araignées. Deuxième Édition, Tome Premier; Roret: Paris, France, 1892. [Google Scholar]
13. Cambridge, O.P. The Classification of Spiders 1.Nature1887,36, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Simon, E.Histoire Naturelle Des Araignées. Deuxième Édition, Tome Second, 2nd ed.; Roret: Paris, France, 1903. [Google Scholar]
15. Kraus, O.; Baur, H. Die Atypidae Der West-Paläarktis: Systematik, Verbreitung Und Biologie (Arach.: Araneae).Abh. Und Verhandlungen Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Ver. Hambg. (NF)1974,17, 85–116. [Google Scholar]
16. McCook, H.C. Nesting Habits of the American Purseweb Spider (Atypus Abbotii).Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. USA1888,40, 203–220. [Google Scholar]
17. Zhu, M.; Zhang, F.; Song, D.; Qu, P. A Revision of the GenusAtypus in China (Araneae: Atypidae).Zootaxa2006,1118, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Li, F.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F.; Zhang, H.; Li, D. Two New Species of the Purse-Web Spider GenusAtypus Latreille, 1804 from Hainan Island, China (Araneae, Atypidae).Zookeys2018,762, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Kayashima, I.Spiders of Formosa; Tokyo Shoseki: Tokyo, Japan, 1943. [Google Scholar]
20. Yin, C.; Peng, X.; Yan, H.; Bao, Y.; Xu, X.; Tang, G.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, P.Fauna Hunan: Araneae in Hunan, China; Hunan Science and Technology Press: Changsha, China, 2012; ISBN 978-7-5357-6049-4. [Google Scholar]
21. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA Primers for Amplification of Mitochondrial Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I from Diverse Metazoan Invertebrates.Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol.1994,3, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
22. Wheeler, W.C.; Coddington, J.A.; Crowley, L.M.; Dimitrov, D.; Goloboff, P.A.; Griswold, C.E.; Hormiga, G.; Prendini, L.; Ramírez, M.J.; Sierwald, P.; et al. The Spider Tree of Life: Phylogeny of Araneae Based on Target-gene Analyses from an Extensive Taxon Sampling.Cladistics2017,33, 574–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11.Mol. Biol. Evol.2021,38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Řezáč, M.; Tessler, S.; Heneberg, P.; Herrera, I.M.Á.; Gloríková, N.; Forman, M.; Řezáčová, V.; Král, J.Atypus Karschi Dönitz, 1887 (Araneae: Atypidae): An Asian Purse-Web Spider Established in Pennsylvania, USA.PLoS ONE2022,17, e0261695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Schwendinger, P.J. On the GenusAtypus (Araneae: Atypidae) in Northern Thailand.Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc.1989,8, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
26. Li, F.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F.; Chen, J.; Li, D. Illustration of post–maturity molting in the purse-web spiders and a record for the longest purseweb.Acta Arachnol. Sin.2018,27, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
27. Enock, F., IX. The Life-History ofAtypus Piceus, Sulzer.Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond.1885,33, 389–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Enock, F., II. Additional Notes and Observations on the Life-history ofAtypus Piceus.Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond.1892,40, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Hiebsch, H.; Krause, R. Zur Verbreitung Und Lebensweise vonAtypus Affinis EICHWALD, 1830 in Der Sächsischen Schweiz (Araneae, Atypidae).Faun. Abh.1976,6, 69–88. [Google Scholar]
30. Coyle, F.A. The Role of Silk in Prey Capture by Nonaraneomorph Spiders. InSpiders: Webs, Behaviour, and Evolution; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1986; pp. 269–305. [Google Scholar]
31. Yin, C. Preliminary study on the different types of the intraspecific variants of order Araneae.Acta Arachnol. Sin.2001,10, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
32. Zhang, Y. Two new species of spiders of the genusAtypus from China (Araneae: Atypidae).Acta Zootaxonomica Sin.1985,10, 140–147. [Google Scholar]
33. Gerhardt, U. Zur Vergleichenden Sexualbiologie Primitiver Spinnen, Insbesondere Der Tetrapneumonen.Z. Für Morphol. Und Okol. Der Tiere1929,14, 699–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Xu, X.; Liu, F.; Cheng, R.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ono, H.; Pham, D.S.; Norma-Rashid, Y.; Arnedo, M.A.; et al. Extant Primitively Segmented Spiders Have Recently Diversified from an Ancient Lineage.Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.2015,282, 20142486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]